15.1
The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or…
To conduct empirical studies, researchers use the scientific method—a stepwise process for evaluating ideas and answering questions.
During the first step, she could make an observation: when students are triggered by something annoying, they behave differently. Some are calm, breathing slowly, and interacting with generosity, whereas others react with anger—their hearts are beating rapidly as they redirect their rage.
Such observations prompt her to ask questions, like could the distressed individuals alter their responses and replace negative emotions with more composed reactions?
After formulating questions, she can then form hypotheses—potential explanations for the observations that lead to specific testable predictions.
In this case, one hypothesis is that meditation training promotes compassion, which prompts the prediction that students who meditate will show fewer aggressive outbursts after being triggered by a stressor relative to those who do not meditate.
Often, hypotheses fit within the context of a theory—a set of principles that attempts to explain how several observations are related. In this example, the current assumption could be grounded in Polyvagal theory, which suggests an evolutionary framework for how the autonomic nervous system supports emotional experiences that relate to prosocial behaviors.
In the next phase, experimentation, she can test the ideas through a series of experiments that are designed to eliminate hypotheses.
As part of an experimental design, the researcher must operationalize—define—variables. One, the independent variable, is the variable being intentionally manipulated or changed in an experiment, for instance, meditation training. The other, the dependent variable, describes the measurement used to determine the outcome, such as the number of aggressive outbursts.
In addition, the subjects must be divided into groups—experimental and control. The control group is exposed to the same features as the experimental group, except for the hypothesized manipulation of meditation guidance; that is, they are instructed to quietly sit still with their eyes closed.
Following data collection and analysis, the researcher can form conclusions and communicate their results to others. With scientific curiosity, new questions are continuously asked, and the cycle repeats.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: What are the main steps of the scientific method?
The scientific method is a stepwise process beginning with observation of phenomena, followed by formulating questions and hypotheses—testable predictions about how the world will behave. Researchers then design experiments to test these ideas, collect and analyze data, and form conclusions. This cycle repeats as new questions emerge, creating a continuous process of empirical investigation and refinement.
Q2: How do independent and dependent variables differ in an experiment?
The independent variable is the factor intentionally manipulated or changed by the researcher, such as meditation training. The dependent variable is the measurement used to determine the outcome, like the number of aggressive outbursts. Properly defining these variables through operationalization ensures researchers can systematically test cause and effect relationships in their experiments.
Q3: What is the purpose of a control group in experimental design?
A control group is exposed to the same conditions as the experimental group, except for the hypothesized manipulation being tested. For example, in a meditation study, the control group might sit quietly with eyes closed instead of receiving meditation training. This comparison allows researchers to isolate the effect of the independent variable and draw valid conclusions about causation.
Q4: Why is falsifiability important in scientific research?
Falsifiability means a hypothesis must be capable of being shown incorrect through empirical observation. This criterion ensures scientific claims can be tested against reality and either supported or disproven. Theories grounded in falsifiable hypotheses, like the James-Lange theory of emotion, allow the scientific community to build confidence in findings through repeated testing and refinement.
Q5: How do theories and hypotheses relate in the scientific process?
A theory is a well-developed set of principles explaining observed phenomena, while a hypothesis is a specific, testable prediction derived from that theory. Theories are too complex to test all at once, so researchers create hypotheses to test particular aspects. As hypotheses are tested through empirical research, theories are modified and refined based on the results.
Q6: What distinguishes scientific facts from opinions?
Facts are observable realities established through empirical evidence collected via systematic research. Opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, only facts supported by evidence from rigorous empirical investigation are accepted as reliable knowledge.
Q7: How does the scientific method create a circular process?
Ideas in the form of theories and hypotheses are tested against the real world through empirical observations. These observations then generate new questions and ideas, which are tested again, creating a continuous cycle. This circular process ensures scientific knowledge is constantly refined and improved through repeated testing and evidence gathering.