15.5
Archival Research
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to an…
Researchers do not need to interact with participants to carry out psychological research. Instead, they may find it more appropriate to answer certain research questions using material that was already collected and archived.
This method is known as archival research—the use of existing records and data sets for experimental purposes. This may include public records, databases of survey results, and even social media information.
For example, a researcher may be interested in exploring how students’ driving behavior changes when there’s a big college home game. Rather than watching students on the road—which would be dangerous—she can access police records and compare the number of speeding tickets given out on game days versus other days.
She may find that students are more likely to speed on game days because they are excited to get to the stadium. Using this method, she can be confident that the results were not affected by observational bias, because she didn’t interact with the participants herself.
In addition, because she doesn’t need to spend time and money collecting her own data, she can focus her attention on data analysis.
However, archival research also has a few drawbacks. Specifically, researchers cannot control the data collection process or what data were collected. For instance, the police records may not be able to confirm whether the speeding drivers were on their way to the game or not.
While researchers are therefore limited in the questions they can answer, the approach does allow them to carryout studies they might not otherwise be able to perform.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: What is archival research and how does it differ from other research methods?
Archival research uses existing records and datasets to answer research questions without directly interacting with participants. Unlike methods requiring new data collection, archival research accesses public records, survey databases, and social media information. Researchers analyze patterns in pre-existing data, making it cost-effective and reducing time investment compared to traditional data collection approaches.
Q2: What are the main advantages of using archival research?
Archival research eliminates observational bias since researchers don't interact with participants, ensuring results reflect actual behavior rather than researcher influence. Additionally, researchers save significant time and money by analyzing existing data instead of collecting new information. This efficiency allows researchers to focus resources on thorough data analysis and explore questions that would be impractical or dangerous to study directly.
Q3: What limitations does archival research present for researchers?
Researchers cannot control what data were originally collected or how the collection process occurred. This means research questions must fit within existing dataset structures rather than being designed first. Additionally, consistency issues may arise when comparing records from different sources, making it difficult to combine datasets reliably for comprehensive analysis.
Q4: What types of existing records can researchers access for archival studies?
Archival research can utilize public records such as police reports, academic records from educational institutions, databases of survey results, and social media information. For example, researchers might access college enrollment records to analyze degree completion rates, course loads, grades, and extracurricular involvement across multiple cohorts to identify patterns and risk factors.
Q5: How can archival research help identify at-risk students?
By analyzing academic records of students enrolled over multiple years, researchers can calculate degree completion timelines and examine relationships between course loads, grades, and extracurricular involvement. This data reveals patterns about who successfully completes education and identifies important risk factors for struggling students, enabling institutions to develop targeted support interventions.
Q6: Can archival research establish cause and effect relationships?
Archival research primarily identifies correlations and patterns in existing data rather than establishing definitive cause and effect relationships. For instance, police records might show increased speeding tickets on game days, suggesting excitement influences driving behavior, but cannot confirm whether drivers were actually heading to the game. Researchers must tailor questions to match what archived data can reliably demonstrate.
Q7: Why is consistency between archival sources important for research?
When combining records from multiple archival sources, inconsistencies in how data were originally recorded or categorized can create problems. Different institutions or agencies may use varying definitions, collection methods, or data formats. These inconsistencies can make comparing and contrasting datasets problematic, potentially compromising the reliability of findings drawn from combined archival sources.