$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This protocol used a randomized controlled crossover design, recruiting 39 healthy subjects aged 20 to 35, including 14 males and 25 females. These participants were randomly assigned into Health Group 1 (n = 19) and Health Group 2 (n = 20). Baseline data for both groups were gathered (Table 1). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding gender, age, height, weight, length of left and right legs, and MoCA assessment scores (all P > 0.05).
Cognitive task outcomes revealed that the scalp acupuncture synchronizing motor-cognitive dual task outperformed the motor-cognitive dual task in terms of higher ACC (P = 0.022), more correct answers (P < 0.001), and a larger total calculation count (P < 0.001) (Table 2).
The analysis of gait parameters showed that compared to the motor-cognitive dual task, scalp acupuncture synchronizing motor-cognitive dual task showed an increase in Velocity, Cadence, Step Length, Step/Extremity, Stride Velocity_L, Stride Velocity_R, and Velocity normalized using leg length. The data showed a decrease in Ambulation Time, Step_Time_L, Step_Time_R, Angle of toe, Left: Right foot Step time ratio, Cycle_Time_L, Cycle_Time_R, Swing_Time_L, Stance_Time_L, Stance_Time_R, Single Support Time_R, Double Support percent of Cycle_L, Double Support percent of Cycle_R, Double Support Time_L, Double Support Time_R, Double Support Load Time_L, Double Support Load Time_R, Double Support Load Percent Gait Cycle_L, Double Support Load Percent Gait Cycle_R, Double Support Unload Time_L, Double Support Unload Time_R, Double Support Unload Percent Gait Cycle_L, and Double Support Unload Percent Gait Cycle_R (all P < 0.05) (Table 3). For a comprehensive overview of all gait parameters, refer to Supplementary Table 1.
The ΔHbO comparison results of each ROI under different interventions showed that in the scalp acupuncture synchronizing motor-cognitive dual task, the change in oxygenated hemoglobin (Δ HbO) levels in the left promoter cortex (L-PMC), the right primary motor cortex (R-M1), and the left primary motor cortex (L-M1) were lower compared to the motor-cognitive dual task (L-PMC: P = 0.041; R-M1: P = 0.001; L-M1: P = 0.008), as detailed in Table 4 and Figure 2.

Figure 1: Schematic showing the selected acupoints. (A,B) Select Baihui, Shenting, and Sishencong for stimulation. Locate the acupoints according to the positioning standards of the People's Republic of China: "The name and positioning of the acupoint." "Baihui Point" is the intersection point between the middle line of the head and the bilateral ear tips. "Shenting Point" is located on the middle line of the head, 1.7 cm above the midpoint of the front hairline. "Sishencong" is a group of four acupoints located 1 inch (3.3 cm) in front, behind, left, and right of Baihui Point on the top of the head, a total of four acupoints. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Comparison of ΔHbO for each ROI with different interventions. (A) Motor-cognitive dual Task. (B) Scalp acupuncture synchronizing motor-cognitive dual task. The ΔHbO levels of L-PMC, R-M1, and L-M1 were lower in the scalp acupuncture synchronizing motor-cognitive dual task compared to the motor-cognitive dual task. Abbreviations ΔHbO, change in oxygenated hemoglobin; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; PMC, promoter cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; S1, primary sensory cortex; R, right; L, left. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Comparison of clinical characteristics between two groups. Baseline data for Health Group-1 (n = 19) and Health Group-2 (n = 20) were gathered, and no significant differences were observed between the groups regarding gender, age, height, weight, length of left and right legs, and MoCA assessment scores. Abbreviations:Â cm, centimeter; kg, kilogram; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment. n (%) or mean and standard deviation are shown. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 2: Completion of cognitive tasks under different interventions. Subjects walk along the footpath at a natural and comfortable pace when hearing "random number -7", and dictate the result of continuously subtracting seven from the "random number". The researcher records the results of the cognitive task and calculates the total number of calculations, the correct number, and the ACC. Abbreviations:Â ACC, Accuracy Rate. Mean and standard deviation are shown. The significance level is set at P < 0.05. Significant correlations are marked with *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 3: Performance of gait parameters under different interventions. Subjects walk from one side of the footpath to the other, and the gait analysis system synchronizes gait data collection. Abbreviations:Â Amb_Time, Ambulation Time; Step_Time, Step Time (s); Step_Len, Step Length (cm); Step_Extrem, Step/Extremity (ratio); Cycle_Time, Cycle Time (s); ToeInOut, Angle of Toe; StrideVelocity, Stride Velocity; Step_Time_Dif, Left: Right foot Step time ratio; NormVelocity, Velocity normalized using leg length; Swing_Time, Swing Time (s); Stance_Time, stance Time (s); S_Supp_Time, Single Support Time (s); D_Supp_Perc, Double Support percent of Cycle; D_Supp_Time, Double Support Time (s); D_SuppLoadTm, Double Support Load Time; D_SuppLoadPerc, Double Support Load Percent Gait Cycle; D_SuppUnloadTm, Double Support Unload Time; D_SuppUnloadPerc, Double Support Unload Percent Gait Cycle; _R, right; _L, left. Mean and standard deviation are shown. The significance level is set at P < 0.05. Significant correlations are marked with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 4: Comparison of ΔHbO in various ROIs under different interventions. The ΔHbO levels of L-PMC, R-M1, and L-M1 were lower in the "scalp acupuncture synchronizing motor-cognitive dual task" compared to the "motor-cognitive dual task". Abbreviations: ΔHbO, change in oxygenated hemoglobin; ROIs, regions of interest; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; PMC, promoter cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; R, right; L, left. Mean and standard deviation are shown. The significance level is set at P < 0.05. Significant correlations are marked with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Please click here to download this Table.
Supplementary Table 1: Performance of gait parameters under different interventions. Subjects walk from one side of the footpath to the other, and the gait analysis system synchronizes gait data collection. Abbreviations Amb_Time, Ambulation Time; Step_Count, Step Count; Step_Time, Step Time (s); Step_Len,Step Length (cm); Step_Extrem, Step/Extremity (ratio); Cycle_Time, Cycle Time (s); Stride_Len, Stride Length (cm); Supp_Base, Heel-Heel Base Support; ToeInOut, Angle of toe; StrideVelocity, Stride Velocity; Step_Time_Dif, Left: Right foot Step time ratio; Step_Len_Dif, Left: Right foot Step Length ratio; Cycle_Time_Dif, Left: Right foot Cycle time ratio; FAP, Functional Amb. Profile; NormVelocity, Velocity normalized using leg length; Swing_Perc, Swing percent of Cycle; Swing_Time, Swing Time (s); Swing_Time, Swing Time (s); Stance_Perc, stance percent of Cycle; Stance_Time, stance Time (s); S_Supp_Perc, Single Support percent of Cycle; S_Supp_Time, Single Support Time (s); D_Supp_Perc, Double Support percent of Cycle; D_Supp_Time, Double Support Time (s); HeelOffOnTime, Heel Off On Time; HeelOffOnPerc, Heel Off On Percent; D_SuppLoadTm, Double Support Load Time; D_SuppLoadPerc, Double Support Load Percent Gait Cycle; D_SuppUnloadTm, Double Support Unload Time; D_SuppUnloadPerc, Double Support Unload Percent Gait Cycle; _R, right; _L, left. Mean and standard deviation are shown. The significance level is set at P < 0.05. Significant correlations are marked with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Please click here to download this File.