The main advantage of using an ameroid constrictor is the simplicity of the device; however, this presents limitations in the inability to control closure rates or the degree of stenosis around the coronary artery. This can lead to variability in the induction of myocardial ischemia. Alternatives to the use of ameroid constrictors include the use of silk ties, hydraulic occluders, or serial placement of flow probes12,13,14,15,16. The use of silk ties and occluders is often employed to create a fixed stenosis model providing a precise percentage of occlusion of a given coronary artery but is often offset by higher mortality rates12,15. Occluders additionally have increased rates of arterial dissection due to the introduction of such devices14. The use of serial flow probes again offers standard reductions in coronary flow but requires sophisticated equipment, multiple procedures, and more technical expertise to reliably model17. In contrast, ameroid constrictor placement is technically simple, cost-effective, and produces a relatively low mortality rate of about 20%18. Additionally, we ensure that the placement of the ameroid is around the most proximal portion of the LCx at its takeoff from the left main coronary artery. This strategy plays a vital role in achieving a consistent ischemic burden across all subjects.
The main cause of mortality has been demonstrated to be ventricular arrhythmia around the time of complete closure of the ameroid constrictor: 2 weeks postoperatively. In a previously published protocol of ameroid placement, the group utilized prophylactic oral amiodarone postoperatively through the end of the study6. Two concerns are raised with this use: 1) there was no decrease in mortality rate compared to this protocol, and 2) the use of amiodarone negatively affects the inotropic capability of the heart with administration, so it may confound the results when investigating new therapies19. Additionally, the use of amiodarone has effects on the reduction of afterload and changes in coronary artery resistance, adding further evidence against postoperative use of this drug19. Alternative agents that may be used prophylactically could be class I antiarrhythmic medications, such as lidocaine; however, these medications additionally have dose-dependent negative effects on inotropy and chronotropy20. In regard to other causes of mortality, it has been reported that decompensated heart failure may occur with ameroid placement6. We rarely have observed heart failure leading to mortality within the cohorts of swine. This may be due to the effective and consistent placement of the ameroid on the proximal LCx, leading to ischemia persistently to about 20% of the myocardium. The ischemic area reflects a large enough territory to thoroughly investigate therapeutic agents and limits affecting a large enough area to induce left ventricular heart failure.
In the above-described protocol, control animals have had ameroid constrictors placed that subsequently do not receive experimental therapies. We typically do not include sham animals within the protocol as we have consistently shown the control animals have reduced overall cardiac function. For example, controls typically have a mean ejection fraction (EF) of around 30-35%, about half of normal swine21. Furthermore, histological analysis of the left ventricular myocardium within the ischemic territory reliably demonstrates fibrosis, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. With such long-standing evidence of reliable induction of myocardial ischemia, we feel the inclusion of sham swine would not add benefit to the investigations. Groups starting the following protocol may wish to include sham swine as well as control-operated swine to ensure reliable induction of meaningful myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, based on our prior standard deviation of myocardial perfusion studies (0.150 mL/mg/min) and using a β of 0.1, we have determined an ideal sample size is 8 swine per group. Given the mortality rate, researchers should plan on starting with about 10 swine per group to maintain power.
As described, a critical step in this protocol is the use of gold microspheres for the mapping of myocardial perfusion. Prior groups, including our laboratory, have utilized multiple strategies for measuring myocardial perfusion, such as cardiac MRI, coronary angiography, cardiac positron emission tomography (PET), or contrast echocardiography22,23. Cardiac PET scanning using radioactive tracers has been extensively validated and remains a gold standard for noninvasive measurement of myocardial perfusion; however, this technique has several limitations, including the high cost and technical expertise of imaging protocols, the need for specific tracers and possible motion artifacts of the images24. Coronary angiography is advantageous for its ability to rapidly acquire data on coronary anatomy, ventricular function, and perfusion within one study; however, it requires investigators to be exposed to radiation and has multiple limitations in regards to image quality which is inversely proportional to heart rate making characterization under stress extremely limited23. Finally, cardiac MRI has become more widespread, using gadolinium contrast agents, resulting in high-resolution imaging, especially under stress conditions. However, this modality can be challenging in its application to animals requiring sedation and costly equipment6,25. Furthermore, the use of an ameroid constrictor adds further susceptibility artifacts due to a metallic foreign body, which led to the development of plastic ameroid constrictors to limit this interference26.
Nonetheless, microspheres represent the gold standard for invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion and have several advantages over the noninvasive imaging modalities, including low cost, simplified and reproducible protocol, and the ability to simultaneously measure regional metabolism by measuring other stably labeled compounds. In this first step of using gold microspheres, the left ventricular regions are accurately mapped. This allows a reliable illustration of the LCx ischemic territory and the LAD non-ischemic territory, especially after sectioning of the left ventricular. Now that the myocardium is mapped, perfusion to these territories can be measured during the terminal harvest with different isotopes of microspheres. We have found using both an ameroid constrictor and gold microspheres to be reliable, affordable, and reproducible.