$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In the United States, nearly half of individuals have at least one component of CVD, comprising a large group of disease states of the heart and blood vessels1. By the year 2060, it is projected that the prevalence of multiple diagnoses comprising CVD will substantially increase compared to 2025. For instance, myocardial infarction is projected to increase by 30%, ischemic heart disease (IHD) by 31.3%, and heart failure by 33%2. These staggering statistics are further worrisome when taken with similar predictions of cardiovascular risk factors, in which the number of individuals with diabetes mellitus is estimated to rise by 39.3%, dyslipidemia by 27.5%, and hypertension by 27.2%2. Altogether, this highlights the imminent need for reliable and reproducible research models to effectively investigate innovative therapies for CVD and its risk factors. We have demonstrated our physiologically analogous model of CAD in swine3. The use of swine helps fulfill the validity of our research model in accurately representing the human condition of CAD, in which pre-clinical studies have previously been criticized for translatability. Swine have similar coronary anatomy, cardiac physiology, and myocardial proteome and metabolism to humans4. Furthermore, a crucial component of our model is to then accurately account for subsequent physiological, myocardial, and molecular outcomes due to the investigational therapies.
Typically, clinical trials are used to implement novel medical or surgical therapies to investigate any beneficial cardiovascular outcomes, which is discovered solely via observation. This is evident in the landmark trials of several novel anti-diabetic drugs investigating their cardiovascular impact. For example, in the SUSTAIN-6 randomized control trial, patients with type 2 diabetes treated with semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist, were found to have lower rates of major cardiovascular adverse events compared to placebo5. Similar observations were seen in another RCT studying sotagliflozin, a dual sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 and 2 (SGLT-1 and SGLT-2) inhibitor, showing a reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and additional cardiovascular risk factors6. These findings have been crucial in expanding the FDA approval of such therapies to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease. However, a major limitation to these observational findings is a lack of understanding of the mechanisms by which these new therapies perpetuate such effects. This exemplifies the importance of our model in the scientific discovery of the underlying mechanistic determinants for new therapies for CVD.
By using a large animal model, we are able to invasively characterize the macroscopic changes in cardiac function and myocardial perfusion, as well as comprehensively understand the microscopic molecular shifts in response to experimental therapies. We employ the use of PV loop catheterization to determine variations in cardiac function. The use of PV loops is the gold standard for invasively determining ventricular function during systole and diastole and serves as a benchmark for comparing non-invasive imaging techniques, such as echocardiogram or cardiac MRI7. This technique allows us to take several measurements to determine each hemodynamic variable and re-position the catheter in real time to ensure reproducible data acquisition. That is to say, the utilization of this technique is limited in the inability to collect longitudinal data, such as baseline cardiac functional, cardiac function at ischemic onset, and during treatment. We feel this is offset by the ability to measure load-independent measures, gaining the intrinsic functional status of the heart. Furthermore, the use of isotope-labelled microsphere injections after mapping the most ischemic territory aids in identifying any ischemic benefit of a therapeutic agent. Microsphere injections have long since been proven to be an accurate representation of changes in regional myocardial blood flow8.
Our lab consistently uses microspheres with a diameter of 15 μm and at a concentration of 2.5 million microspheres/mL. This diameter ensures the most precise measurement of myocardial blood flow, as confirmed by a previous study showing that microspheres were properly distributed according to blood flow, and the smaller diameter exhibited the least variation in distribution among left ventricular layers9. Additionally, a minimum amount of uptake of microspheres is necessary to ensure reliable results, which is easily produced at such high concentrations used in our lab. Taken together, the techniques employed during the terminal harvest consistently and meticulously analyze key cardiac physiological changes after any number of experimental therapies. This characterization is further bolstered by the ability to collect myocardial tissue and thoroughly analyze regional changes with advanced technologies, such as multiomic studies, providing robust, quantitative characterization at each layer of the central dogma within the myocardium.