Name: Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2025-07-25T14:25:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 58 s
Description: Learn automatic laser-based geometry capture for weld bead monitoring using a laser scanner. This protocol enables near-real-time metrology without delays and creates digital records for finite element analysis.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

The work was also supported by the UK Atomic Energy Authority through the Fusion Industry Programme. The Fusion Industry Programme is stimulating the growth of the UK fusion ecosystem and preparing it for future global fusion powerplant market. More information about the Fusion Industry Programme can be found online:&#160;https://ccfe.ukaea.uk/programmes/fusion-industry-programme/. Further, all authors gratefully acknowledge access to facilities hosted by the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials, funded through EPSRC grants EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P025021/1 and EP/P025498/1. MJR would like to thank Mr. Stephen Pryce for efforts in confirming functionality of the software elements contained herein.&#160;

It is assumed that both robots have been activated and undergone any setup diagnostics to confirm positional compliance, such as brake tests, and have been homed.
1. Perform calibration
NOTE: Before the laser scanner can be used, it must be calibrated to ensure that the distances it perceives are representative of true distances. This may not be the case by default, as if the scanner is at&#160;an angle to the plate, this will create a trigonometric change in&#160;distance (Figure 2).
<ol>
	<li>To calibrate, scan a component of known dimensions, which is rigid and preferably metallic, with fiducial points added to it in the form of spheres. 
	NOTE: These spheres provide an easy-to-identify shape that can be fitted to reliably find the center of the fiducial sphere with a low number of data points and high precision. An example component is shown in the weld cell in Figure 3A. The summary workflow used for the calibration steps 1.1-1.13 is shown in Figure 4.</li>
	<li>Place a minimum of three fiducial spheres randomly across different locations, for example, standard ball bearings larger than 10 mm from low- to medium-grade ABEC ratings (e.g., 15.875 mm diameter ball bearings [0.625 &#177; 0.0001 inches]). Attach them to the component with a suitable medium such as a conductive epoxy resin to ensure good conductivity between the sphere and the calibration part. Use washers of suitable radius (e.g., 10 mm) to support the spheres to improve the surface area contact between the sphere and the component.</li>
	<li>Locate the coordinates of a number of points on the surface of the fiducial spheres with a Coordinate Measurement Machine (CMM) as in Figure 3C. These coordinates will be used to generate a virtual datum corresponding to the center of each of the fiducial spheres (Figure 3B).
	<ol>
		<li>Before measuring the fiducial spheres, first calibrate the CCM by affixing a calibration benchmark with known dimensions into the CMM bay. This calibration benchmark takes the form of a ceramic sphere of radius 29.993 mm embedded onto a rod with a threaded bottom so it can be screwed into the CMM bay and held rigidly.</li>
		<li>Screw the calibration benchmark into the CMM bay.</li>
		<li>With the tip of the CMM in the same orientation as will be used to measure the fiducial spheres for the welding cell calibration component, run the calibrate automatically function within the appropriate software. To begin running the calibration of the CMM tip, with the CMM set to measure mode, move the tip into contact with the top surface of the calibration benchmark. The program will then take control, automatically mapping the benchmark sphere and calibrating the CMM tip for the current orientation.</li>
		<li>Once the calibration of the tip has been completed, save the calibration to a chosen tip number, for example, tip number 1.</li>
		<li>Remove the calibration benchmark from the CMM.</li>
		<li>Place the calibration component with the attached fiducial spheres into the CMM bay. Choose an orientation and note the orientation for future reference, such as by using an annotated photograph with each fiducial sphere numbered.</li>
		<li>Create a program to identify points on each of the fiducial spheres.
		<ol>
			<li>Select the tip using probe | change probe.</li>
			<li>Select the contour | measure CNC point and bring the tip into contact with the first fiducial sphere. Repeat for many points across the top hemisphere of the first fiducial sphere.</li>
			<li>Do the same for each fiducial sphere, creating a point cloud for each of the surface of the sphere. 
			NOTE: In principle, a minimum of three points per sphere is required to locate the center; however, many more are preferred. Here, a minimum of 12 points located over the entirety of one half was employed, as illustrated by the fitted sphere from the CMM points in Figure 3D. Aspects involving CMM operation to obtain surface points on the fiducial sphere will vary based on the equipment used.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Calculate the coordinates of the center of the fiducial spheres by fitting the surface points to a sphere by a least-squares fitting approach. For example, this could be achieved using the Numpy least squares solver16.</li>
	<li>Choose one of the fiducial spheres to act as the origin of the calibration coordinate system. Subtract this coordinate from each of the fiducial spheres to create a part coordinate system. 
	NOTE: Assuming the calibration component is rigid, once the CMM procedure is complete and the centers of the fiducial spheres are known, future implementations of this protocol can skip steps 1.2-1.5 as the calibration component dimensions and associated coordinate system are already known.</li>
	<li>Place the calibration component in the welding cell in the same orientation relative to the origin when measured in the CMM. 
	NOTE: Orientation is not theoretically important but replicating the original orientation allows any errors to be more easily identified.</li>
	<li>Set up the scan of the calibration component with the laser scanner as shown in Figure 5A. The output is in the form of an x,y,z coordinate file. 
	CAUTION: The laser scanner is the source of laser radiation and can therefore be hazardous if laser safety protocols are not followed. The use of class 2M and below lasers is necessary as these can fulfil the required role and an open beam is often required.</li>
	<li>For the illustrative laser system employed, measure each 15.875 mm diameter fiducial sphere, and scan across each fiducial sphere with the laser scanner to measure the component (Figure 5A). Truncate the output of these line scans to remove any information originating from the substrate, using a combination of circles in x and y around the known ball positions and z value thresholds. Use the remaining points to fit a sphere (Figure 5B) using the same least-squares fitting procedure as in step 1.4 to obtain a central coordinate. 
	NOTE: The surface finish of the fiducial spheres may interact poorly with the laser scanner employed. An aerosolized dye-penetrant developer can be used to coat and matte the surface as in Figure 5A.</li>
	<li>Return the scanning robot to its home position.</li>
	<li>Locate the calibration component with the welding robot using electronic point finding. Use a metallic tip that is integrated into the welding torch with known dimensions. Bring this tip into contact with the fiducial sphere at a number of points around the surface (Figure 6), similar to the CMM approach. When the tip contacts the fiducial sphere, a low-voltage circuit is completed, and the current robot location is recorded directly by the robot system. 
	NOTE: A similar effect can be achieved using other types of electronic edge finders fitted to the welding robot, which rely on physical contact.</li>
	<li>Use these points to fit a sphere and locate the central position of each fiducial sphere in the deposition robot coordinates system.</li>
	<li>Return the welding robot to its home position and remove the calibration component from the welding cell.</li>
	<li>Use the CMM coordinate system to calibrate the weld cell coordinates through single value decomposition. An outline of the process to create the required affine transformation matrices is given in Figure 7. 
	NOTE: The resulting affine transformation matrix transforms the position of each of the fiducial sphere centers from the measured coordinates to true distances. This will correct for any misalignment of the laser scanner to the direction of scanning.</li>
</ol>
2. Locate the build plate position
<ol>
	<li>Place the substrate or parent material to receive a deposition into the welding cell.
	<ol>
		<li>Run the laser scanner over the corners of the build area such that it overhangs the edge of the plate, starting completely off the plate and ending partially on the plate as in Figure 8A. Ensure that this is done as a continuous motion at a constant speed, with the frequency of the data recording being known. Use the time of acquisition of a particular scan along with the start and end points of the path to assign a position in space to each scan recorded at a particular time. Record the locations of the corners of the build plate, which will be used to acquire geometry suitable for FE analysis. 
		NOTE: Performing step 2.1.1 allows the corners of the plate to be located in the laser scanner coordinate system as there will be a step function with the height significantly changing as the laser arrives over the plate (Figure 8B).</li>
		<li>Identify the substrate in the scanning robot coordinate system by transforming the corners found in Step 2.1.1 into the welding robot&#39;s coordinate system via the transformation matrix calculated in Step 1.13.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>As a check, with the welding robot, bring the tip of the welding head to each corner of the plate and record the locations as shown in Figure 8C and confirm these locations are as expected.</li>
</ol>
3. Conduct the deposition
<ol>
	<li>With the plate located, program the welding robot to produce the desired path in the correct position relative to the position of the plate in the welding&#160;robot&#39;s coordinates.</li>
	<li>Initiate a weld pass resulting in a deposition of a bead of material as shown in Figure 9.</li>
	<li>After the pass is completed, retract the welding robot head to a safe distance to prevent collisions with the scanning robot.</li>
</ol>
4. Scan the bead and generate FE geometry
NOTE: See Figure 10 for a summary of the workflow for scanning the bead geometry and using the scan data to create a 3D point cloud, which can be solidified and meshed for FEA. The following steps describe how each part of the workflow is conducted.
<ol>
	<li>Program the scanning robot to follow a path that will allow the bead to be scanned. For simple lines, use similar start and end points as the welding robot or for a more robust method, conduct a scan of the full plate. 
	NOTE: This will use the same scanning requirements used to locate the plate position initially.</li>
	<li>Take measurements as the scanner is moved over the workpiece as per Figure 11. Note the start and end points of the path, the robot movement speed, and acquisition frequency. Ensure that the frequency of acquisition corresponds to distance intervals no less than the minimum element size intended for use in the subsequent FEA.</li>
	<li>If the bead profile cannot be captured in one pass, do multiple parallel passes with an overlap corresponding to at least 10% of the laser scanner&#39;s field of view.</li>
	<li>Once the scans are completed, retract the laser scanner robot to prevent collisions with the welding robot in any subsequent weld pass.</li>
	<li>Fit the bead output with an appropriate analytical function, facilitated through a series of commands coded in Python. For the example deposition of a single bead, a parabolic function is used for the fitting. 
	NOTE: The Python code used to undertake steps 4.5.1-4.5.10 is available in the supplementary repository17. Step 4.5.10 requires an additional software package FreeCAD18, as well as a Python installation, to function. 
	Figure 10 shows the workflow outlined in this section. An example output at each of the following stages is provided in Figure 12A-J. An example script used for the bead scanned in Figure 11 along with the scanned geometry used to produce Figure 12 is also available in the supplementary repository17.
	<ol>
		<li>Before attempting to manipulate or use the point cloud data from the laser scanner in any way, apply the same affine transformation matrix to the laser output as was found the calibration step 1.13.</li>
		<li>Crop the scanned data to the rough area of a single bead to be fitted. Be sure to include some of the plate around the bead, effected by some percentage of the bead width for windowing. At this stage, remove any scanning artifacts stemming from reflections by using height filters.</li>
		<li>Flatten the local plate within the cropped section of the scan by solving for the normal for the plate and applying a rotation matrix such that the data are now in a coordinate system where the plate normal is parallel to the vertical axis.</li>
		<li>Locate the orientation of the bead on the plate by applying a height filter threshold just above the height of the base plate, then fit the remaining data points with a 1st order polynomial. This will give a vector for the direction of the bead. If the bead is known not to be straight, split the bead up into smaller sections that can be approximated by straight sections</li>
		<li>Rotate the bead so that it is parallel with the y-axis for ease of manipulation.</li>
		<li>Crop the rotated section to remove the extremities of the plate but leave a small amount (~5 mm) on either side of the bead to allow for fitting.</li>
		<li>Select the center of the bead section to be fitted and perform a parabolic fit to the cross section of the data at this y position. The program workflow for this step is given in Figure 13.</li>
		<li>Using the fit, extract the extents of the bead by evaluating the fit at the x coordinates corresponding to the maximum height of the plate-where the bead begins.
		<ol>
			<li>Evaluate the maximum y position of the bead using the same thresholding.</li>
			<li>Create bead termination profiles using the same parabolic shape but transposed into the x-y plane at each end of the bead.</li>
			<li>Record the points that would make up the outline by evaluating all the parabola at a series of x and y coordinates that span the full extents of the bead.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Translate the domain of the points back into the original coordinates by first starting the bead at the origin of a new co-ordinates system, then transforming it to the original welding robot co-ordinate system.</li>
		<li>Using meshing tools, fill in the surface of the points and make a solid surface that can be imported into an FE analysis. To do this, use the FreeCAD18 program to combine the series of parabolas to create a full 3D solid that is suitable for importing into the FEA preprocessor.
		<ol>
			<li>Add a substrate at this point by defining either the true base plate extents or other dimensions as needed.</li>
			<li>Use macros to generate STL (Standard Tessellation Language) and STEP (Standard for the Exchange of Product Data) files using the points calculated in Step 4.5.9.</li>
			<li>Once the solid geometry is produced, it is exported in a file format suitable for FE analysis, in this case, an &#34;.inp&#34; (input) format. If desired, the finite element mesh can be created directly, facilitated by another FreeCAD macro. For this example, the Netgen mesh FEM tool plugin to FreeCAD is used. The example bead mesh was generated using moderate fineness within Netgen mesh, a defined maximum element size of 0.5 mm, and a minimum element size of 0.1 mm. 
			NOTE: At this stage the real geometry can now be successfully imported into an FE analysis processor.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Shravan, C., Radhika, N., Deepak Kumar, N. H., Sivasailam, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+review+on+welding+techniques%3A+properties%2C+characterisations+and+engineering+applications%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Advances+Mater+Process+Technol%22%5BJournal%5D)">A review on welding techniques: properties, characterisations and engineering applications.</a> Advances Mater Process Technol. 10 (2), 1126-1181 (2024).</li>
<li>Smith, M. C., Smith, A. C., Ohms, C., Wimpory, R. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+NeT+Task+Group+4+residual+stress+measurement+and+analysis+round+robin+on+a+three-pass+slot-welded+plate+specimen%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Press+Vessels+Pip%22%5BJournal%5D)">The NeT Task Group 4 residual stress measurement and analysis round robin on a three-pass slot-welded plate specimen.</a> Int J Press Vessels Pip. 164, 3-21 (2018).</li>
<li>Ding, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Thermo-mechanical+analysis+of+wire+and+arc+additive+layer+manufacturing+process+on+large+multi-layer+parts%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Comput+Mater+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Thermo-mechanical analysis of wire and arc additive layer manufacturing process on large multi-layer parts.</a> Comput Mater Sci. 50 (12), 3315-3322 (2011).</li>
<li>Lindgren, L. -E., Runnemalm, H., Näsström, M. O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Simulation+of+multipass+welding+of+a+thick+plate%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Numer+Meth+Eng%22%5BJournal%5D)">Simulation of multipass welding of a thick plate.</a> Int J Numer Meth Eng. 44 (9), 1301-1316 (1999).</li>
<li>Kazanas, P., Deherkar, P., Almeida, P., Lockett, H., Williams, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Fabrication+of+geometrical+features+using+wire+and+arc+additive+manufacture%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc+Inst+Mech+Eng+B+J+Eng+Manuf%22%5BJournal%5D)">Fabrication of geometrical features using wire and arc additive manufacture.</a> Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf. 226 (6), 1042-1051 (2012).</li>
<li>Nguyen, L., Buhl, J., Israr, R., Bambach, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Analysis+and+compensation+of+shrinkage+and+distortion+in+wire-arc+additive+manufacturing+of+thin-walled+curved+hollow+sections%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Addit+Manuf%22%5BJournal%5D)">Analysis and compensation of shrinkage and distortion in wire-arc additive manufacturing of thin-walled curved hollow sections.</a> Addit Manuf. 47, 102365(2021).</li>
<li>Dugar, J., Ikram, A., Klobčar, D., Pušavec, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sustainable+hybrid+manufacturing+of+AlSi5+alloy+turbine+blade+prototype+by+robotic+direct+energy+layered+deposition+and+subsequent+milling%3A+an+alternative+to+selective+laser+melting%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Materials%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sustainable hybrid manufacturing of AlSi5 alloy turbine blade prototype by robotic direct energy layered deposition and subsequent milling: an alternative to selective laser melting.</a> Materials. 15 (23), 8631(2022).</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22BS+EN+ISO+17637%3A2016%3A+Non-destructive+testing+of+welds%3A+visual+testing+of+fusion-welded+joints%22">BS EN ISO 17637:2016: Non-destructive testing of welds: visual testing of fusion-welded joints</a>. , British Standards Institute. (2016).</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22BS+EN+ISO+17639%3A2022%3A+Destructive+tests+on+welds+in+metallic+materials%3A+macroscopic+and+microscopic+examination+of+welds%22">BS EN ISO 17639:2022: Destructive tests on welds in metallic materials: macroscopic and microscopic examination of welds</a>. , British Standards Institute. (2022).</li>
<li>Aviles-Viñas, J. F., Rios-Cabrera, R., Lopez-Juarez, I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((On-line+learning+of+welding+bead+geometry+in+industrial+robots%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Adv+Manuf+Tech%22%5BJournal%5D)">On-line learning of welding bead geometry in industrial robots.</a> Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 83 (1), 217-231 (2016).</li>
<li>Ye, G., Guo, J., Sun, Z., Li, C., Zhong, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Weld+bead+recognition+using+laser+vision+with+model-based+classification%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Robot+Comput-Integr+Manuf%22%5BJournal%5D)">Weld bead recognition using laser vision with model-based classification.</a> Robot Comput-Integr Manuf. 52, 9-16 (2018).</li>
<li>Sensors & system solutions metallic flat & long products. , Micro-Epsilon. 
 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.micro-epsilon.com/fileadmin/download/industries/industry-brochure--metallic-flat-long-products--en.pdf">https://www.micro-epsilon.com/fileadmin/download/industries/industry-brochure--metallic-flat-long-products--en.pdf</a> (2024).</li>
<li>Hu, Z., Qin, X., Li, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, Q. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Multi-bead+overlapping+model+with+varying+cross-section+profile+for+robotic+GMAW-based+additive+manufacturing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Intell+Manuf%22%5BJournal%5D)">Multi-bead overlapping model with varying cross-section profile for robotic GMAW-based additive manufacturing.</a> J Intell Manuf. 31 (5), 1133-1147 (2020).</li>
<li>KUKA Robot Language (KRL). , 
 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.kuka.com/">https://www.kuka.com/</a> (2014).</li>
<li>Francis, J. A., Bednarz, B., Bee, J. V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Prediction+of+steady+state+dilution+in+multipass+hardfacing+overlays+deposited+by+self-shielded+flux+cored+arc+welding%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Technol+Weld+Join%22%5BJournal%5D)">Prediction of steady state dilution in multipass hardfacing overlays deposited by self-shielded flux cored arc welding.</a> Sci Technol Weld Join. 7 (2), 95-101 (2002).</li>
<li>Harris, C. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Array+programming+with+NumPy%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Array programming with NumPy.</a> Nature. 585 (7825), 357-362 (2020).</li>
<li>Laurence, R., Li, J., Roy, M. LAZ3RUS v0.1. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aLaurence%2C+R+%22Zenodo%22">Zenodo</a>. , (2025).</li>
<li>FreeCAD 1.0. , 
 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.freecad.org/">https://www.freecad.org/</a> (2025).</li>
<li>Huang, W., Wang, Q., Ma, N., Kitano, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Distribution+characteristics+of+residual+stresses+in+typical+wall+and+pipe+components+built+by+wire+arc+additive+manufacturing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Manuf+Process%22%5BJournal%5D)">Distribution characteristics of residual stresses in typical wall and pipe components built by wire arc additive manufacturing.</a> J Manuf Process. 82, 434-447 (2022).</li>
<li>Cambon, C., Bendaoud, I., Rouquette, S., Soulié, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+WAAM+benchmark%3A+from+process+parameters+to+thermal+effects+on+weld+pool+shape%2C+microstructure+and+residual+stresses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mater+Today+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">A WAAM benchmark: from process parameters to thermal effects on weld pool shape, microstructure and residual stresses.</a> Mater Today Commun. 33, 104235(2022).</li>
<li>Schajer, G. S., Prime, M. B., Withers, P. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Why+is+it+so+challenging+to+measure+residual+stresses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Exp+Mech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Why is it so challenging to measure residual stresses.</a> Exp Mech. 62 (9), 1521-1530 (2022).</li>
</ol>

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Capture quality 
The dimensional accuracy and precision of the laser scanning system were investigated by the positions and radii of the fiducial spheres in Table 2. The accuracy of each system is determined by the positional difference of the fiducial spheres as measured by the robot systems (laser scanner and electric edge finding) as compared to the CMM data when transformed into the welding robot&#39;s coordinate system. The CMM is known to have both high accuracy and precision,...

Fusion welding is used for the permanent bonding of metallic components through localized melting of parent and filler materials. These filler materials are in the form of a wire or rod. The heat source to effect this melting can vary1, but in all cases, both the parent and filler are exposed to high temperatures and gradients. These thermal excursions can result in significant distortion, changes to the material properties, and induce residual stresses within the component during both the welding process and during cooling. As these side effects can be extremely detrimental to the lifespan or viability of high-value components, welding processes are often modeled by the finite element (FE) method to determine thermal history, distortion, and residual stress2. Such models generally use simplified or idealized geometry of the weld and parent material, which is determined before any welding takes place, rather than using a geometry based on the full 3D deposition, including welding start and stop locations. Reproducible multi pass welding can be achieved using automated systems where the welding torch is manipulated by a robotic arm. It should be noted that some apparatus used for automated arc welding can also be used for direct energy deposition additive manufacturing, which is known as directed energy deposition-arc (DED-Arc) or wire arc additive manufacturing3 (WAAM). The same predictive modelling approaches are typically also employed for WAAM as for joining4.
WAAM can produce 3D components in a near-net shape by selectively combining many layers of deposited material. WAAM has been used in the past to create walls and other geometric shapes5, pipes6, as well as components with more complicated topologies, such as turbine blades7. Due to the increased number of thermal cycles as compared to joining and the increase in deposited material, the distortion of such WAAM components can become significant. As such, any FE model implemented reflecting this process may have its accuracy undermined by the idealized or presumed print geometry. Distortion of the substrate can be limited during deposition by increased mechanical restraint. However, this will also increase the level of residual stress in the final component, which is also undesirable.
Traditionally, post weld geometry inspection can be manually achieved with inspection tools8 or by cross sectioning the deposition and substrate to reveal the profile of the weld, including the deposited material, the melted region of the parent material, and the heat-affected zones9. Manual geometric inspection tools, though good for providing information on the extents of the deposition, require the operator to interrupt the automated routine to conduct any measurements and transcribe any data obtained. Similarly, cross sectioning provides a very accurate representation of the weld but is destructive and requires multiple preparation steps, which must be carried out externally to manufacturing locations. Both approaches only provide information about the bead profile in specific locations measured, which, for cross sectioning, may be a single profile. In contrast, laser scanners have the advantage of rapidly assessing the weld profile without the need to remove the sample from the weld cell and have the potential for high-resolution capture of the entire deposition. Monitoring of the real bead geometry during welding with laser systems has been employed10,11 much in the same way that it is commonly employed in metal forming12. Laser systems have also been used to capture WAAM geometry10. However, the specific steps taken to process this data to be included or compared to FE analysis have not been well described. The present work presents a new protocol for using an automated laser scanner to monitor the evolution of weld geometry between deposition passes and integrate the recorded geometry to update a finite element&#160;analysis (FEA),&#160;as realized with the commercial package ABAQUS. The ability to automatically capture the weld bead in situ and convert the weld bead into an FE input geometry with limited user input is a step towards intelligent manufacturing.
The geometry capture employed in the present work is a full scan of a weld, facilitated by the scanner being integrated with a robotic arm with six degrees of freedom that is distinct and separate from the robotic arm controlling the deposition. This is a departure from previous implementation of laser scanning systems, which were designed to probe the geometry at specific locations, either by handheld means13, fixed but limited by the extent of a sample stage10,11, or where the laser scanner is attached to the same robotic arm as the welding torch8. The present approach allows the full geometry of the bead to be captured regardless of the deposition location within the cell, in the coordinate system of the welding cell, without the need for customized fixtures or complicated algorithms.
The captured geometry can then be used to predict important factors such as the temperature history during deposition. When combined with suitable thermocouple data, distortion and residual stress can also be simulated, which is adjacent to the present work. This has the potential to improve manufacturing by allowing rapid process modelling of real-world welding. The automated nature of the geometry capture provides an avenue to link welding parameters to the resultant geometry. This, in turn, can be used for the development of improved process control and path planning. Current manual welding relies on the operator&#39;s skill to control the output. The robotic welding adds consistency but limits the opportunity for on-the-fly decision making. Capturing the bead profile between passes will allow for the programming of the next bead pass to be altered if desired, and combined with process modeling, has the potential to improve production rates, material properties, and part lifetimes. The present protocol is exemplified by a single bead-on-plate example case to demonstrate the workflow developed.
Setup of the welding cell and equipment used 
The subject welding cell consists of robotic arms with the necessary attachments to conduct welding (referred to as the welding robot) and laser scanning (referred to as the scanning robot). The subject cell is shown in Figure 1. These robots can be controlled through a programming interface that understands KUKA Robot Language (KRL)14, a functional programming language that gives the robot the necessary instructions, which are interpreted by the robots as joint and motor movements. The welding system operates in cold metal transfer (CMT) mode and is equipped with TouchSense, a form of electronic point finding. The consumable used was a G3Si-120n 1.2 mm diameter steel wire in the presence of argon/carbon dioxide gas mixture (80/20%). The substrate employed was a G43 mild steel plate that was fixed by clamps. The deposition imposed was a bead-on-plate with parameters given in Table 1. This combination of welding parameters was selected as it was known to create an industrially representative deposition. The laser scanner employed is capable of scanning a line of 2048 points simultaneously, which was used to acquire data at a frequency of 100 Hz. Additionally, a coordinate measurement machine (CMM) was used to provide the dimensions of a calibration component.
Metrology data obtained from laser scanners require calibration. This need for calibration is even more important when the scanner must be moved to capture a large region with overlapping scans. Were the laser scanner skewed relative to the substrate or the motion not to be smooth, there would be distortion in the resultant geometry, as illustrated in Figure 2. Additionally, the scanner only records information for light, which returns to the sensor; it is common, therefore, in welding, which produces a highly reflective, non-uniform, curved surface as the melt pool solidifies, that much of the spatial information can be lost. To improve the likelihood that the shape being recorded represents the true bead shape, some level of curve fitting is therefore required. In the simplest case, a single weld bead shape can be well approximated by a parabola15. This approach has been used by Hu et al. with laser scanning type systems to calculate bead overlaps13. The following protocol will employ this fitting technique to the single bead example case to create a digital representation within the selected FE package.

<table><tbody><tr><td>3 mm diameter ruby CMM stylus</td><td>Renishaw</td><td></td><td>Stylus used on the CMM machine (A-5004-0422)</td></tr><tr><td>80% Argon 20% CO2 gas</td><td>BOC</td><td></td><td>Gas mix for shielding gas (Argosheild)</td></tr><tr><td>Crysta-Apex 776</td><td>Mitutoyo</td><td></td><td>Co-ordinate measurement machine, quoted precition 10 &amp;micro;m</td></tr><tr><td>FK 1000 MIG 1.2 mm welding wire</td><td>Iabco</td><td></td><td>Welding wire consumable&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>FreeCAD 1.0</td><td>FreeCAD</td><td></td><td>Software for veiwing geometrties and creating stl, step and FE files from the point cloud. Used version 1.0</td></tr><tr><td>Fronius CMT 4000 GMAW welder</td><td>Fronius</td><td></td><td>Welding torch&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>G43 mild steel plate 50 cm x 50 cm x2.5 cm</td><td>Smiths Metal</td><td></td><td>Substrate metal used as the build plate</td></tr><tr><td>GEOPAK/MCOSMOS</td><td>Mitutoyo&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td><td>Software for controlling the CMM. Used version 4.0</td></tr><tr><td>KUKA KR20</td><td>KUKA</td><td></td><td>Robotic arm used as scanning robot</td></tr><tr><td>KUKA KR70</td><td>KUKA</td><td></td><td>Robotic arm used as welding robot</td></tr><tr><td>LAZ3RUS</td><td>University of Manchester</td><td></td><td>LAZer-based 3d Rendering in Universal Scene: for creating the FE geometry for the laser scan. Used version 1.0</td></tr><tr><td>Micro Epsilon LLT3010-100&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Micro Epsilon&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td><td>Laser scanner, quoted precition 9 &amp;micro;m</td></tr><tr><td>Mitutoyo 30 mm dimater calibration sphere</td><td>Mitutoyo&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td><td>Fused silica CMM calibration sphere</td></tr><tr><td>ScanCONTROL3000_100&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Micro Epsilon&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td><td>Software for capturing and processing the information from the laser scanner</td></tr><tr><td>TouchSense</td><td>Fronius</td><td></td><td>System for electronic edge/feature finding in a roboticized welding implementation</td></tr></tbody></table>

automatic laser-based geometry capture for finite element analysis of weld beads

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Fusion welding for high-value manufacturing requires strict process controls on component distortion and ascertaining levels of residual stress imparted to the completed component. The process is dependent on controlling a myriad of parameters, focusing predominantly on ensuring adequate fusion of parent material and consumables. High thermal gradients that are imparted during the process can result in significant distortion if left unchecked, and high levels of residual stress if the component is completely restrained. Finite element analysis is commonly applied in fusion welding processes to predict distortion. These models, however, almost exclusively use an idealized or simplified geometry defined before the start of the process, which can be unrepresentative of the final component. A protocol is described for capturing the true shape of a single weld bead deposition within a unique coordinate system using a laser scanning system and converting this captured geometry into a form that can immediately be incorporated into finite element analyses. This allows the finite element model to be rapidly populated with a geometry representative of the true deposition with&#160;limited user input.

The calculated radii and distances between fiducial spheres for the calibration component in each of the coordinate systems are shown in Table 2. The error between the CMM and the electronic point finding for each fiducial sphere position is small, under 0.1 mm. Both of these techniques rely on physical contact between the fiducial sphere and the stylus. The error induced by the laser scanner when locating the spheres is somewhat large in comparison and dominates at 1-2 mm. The application of the transfo...

A process is described for acquiring near-real-time metrology of weld beads and prepare the resulting geometry automatically for finite element analysis.

Fusion welding for high-value manufacturing requires strict process controls on component distortion and ascertaining levels of residual stress imparted ...

Automated welding is widely used and capable of creating uniform and reproducible welds. It, however, currently lacks the ability for adaptation during multipass welding processes, something that a skilled technician would do naturally during manual welding. By using a laser scanner, our protocol allows the progress to be monitored without causing delays unlike manual capture of the weld geometry using physical gauges.It also produces a digital record of the deposition, which can be used for future analysis. This protocol is enabled by Meta one, which is the digital train of the welding cell. They are developed at the University of Manchester.The digital train allows the recording and playback in a digital space of not just the build geometry, but also robot instructions, actual robot movement, and camera footage of the welding cell and the local melt pool. The laser scanner need to be calibrated to correct for any skew or tilt between it and the build plate. As part of this calibration process, the laser scanner data is brought into the coordinate system of the welding robot.Rapid capture of weld geometry can facilitate decision-making between passes, possibly enhance through machine learning, and allow finite element models to be populated with true deposition geometry. To begin, place the calibration component inside the welding cell in the same orientation relative to the origin in the coordinate measuring machine. Set up the scan of the calibration component using the laser scanner system and record the scan output in the coordinate file containing X, Y, and Z values.Measure each fiducial sphere using the laser scanner. Scan across each sphere to measure the calibration component. Truncate the line scan data by excluding points originating from the substrate, using circular masks in X and Y around the known positions, and applying thresholds in Z.Use the filtered point set to perform a least square sphere fitting and determine the central coordinates.Now locate the calibration component using the welding robot equipped with a metallic tip of known dimensions. Using the touch sense routine, bring the tip into contact with the surface of each fiducial sphere at several locations. Allow the low voltage circuit to complete upon contact and record the robot's position through the system software.Then place the substrate or parent material that will receive the deposition into the welding cell. Next, initiate a weld pass using the welding robot to deposit a bead of material along the substrate surface. Program the scanning robot to follow a path aligned with the bead location.For simple linear beads, use the same start and end points as the welding robot and scan the entire plate area with the scanning robot for enhanced coverage. Take measurements while moving the scanner over the work piece. Record the start and end points of the scanning path, the movement speed of the robot, and the acquisition frequency.Confirm that the frequency corresponds to a spatial interval, no smaller than the minimum element size planned for the finite element analysis. Fit the scanned bead profile with an appropriate analytical function using Python code. For single bead depositions, use a parabolic function for curve fitting.Apply the same affine transformation matrix to the laser scan data as used during calibration. Crop the scan data to a region that covers the bead and includes a margin around it. Remove any scanning artifacts caused by reflections using height-based filters.Then flatten the local region of the plate in the cropped scan by solving for the plate normal and apply a rotation matrix to align the plate normal with the vertical axis. Rotate the bead so that it aligns with the Y-axis to simplify further processing. Detect the bead orientation by applying a height filter just above the base plate level and fit the resulting data with a first order polynomial to generate a vector representing the bead direction.If the bead is not straight, divide it into smaller segments that approximate straight lines. Now crop the rotated section to remove excess plate area while retaining approximately five millimeters of material on either side of the bead. Choose the central region of the bead forfeiting and execute a parabolic curve fit to the cross section of the data at this location.Then using the fitted parabolic curve, determine the bead's lateral extents by evaluating the curve at the X coordinates where the bead meets the base plate at its maximum height. Next, evaluate the Y coordinates, which indicate the extents of the bead by using similar height thresholding techniques. Create termination profiles at both ends of the bead using the same parabolic shape transposed into the XY plane.Now calculate the full outline of the bead by evaluating all parabolas at multiple X and Y coordinates covering the bead's entire span. Then add the base substrate geometry by specifying its actual extents or using predefined dimensions. Then use meshing tools in FreeCAD to convert the set of parabolic cross-sections into a single 3D solid geometry.This surface should be suitable for import into a finite element analysis environment. Translate the outline points into the original welding robot coordinate system. First, reset the bead to the origin of a new coordinate system.Then apply the transformation to restore its position in the original frame. Use macros to export the bead and substrate as STL and step files using the previously calculated geometry points. Finally, export the complete geometry into a file format appropriate for finite element analysis, such as the INP format.Optionally, use the NETGEN mesh FEM tool in FreeCAD to create the mesh using moderate fineness with a maximum element size of 0.5 millimeters and minimum of 0.1 millimeters. The transformation matrix applied to the fiducial sphere locations resulted in overlapping, visibly distinct point sets between the coordinate systems. The measured radii of the fiducial spheres using the laser scanner showed consistent slight underestimation compared to edge finding and coordinate measuring machine techniques.The positional error of the laser scanner in determining distances between fiducial spheres ranged from 1.30 millimeters to 2.05 millimeters, while both CMM and electronic edge finding errors remained below 0.1 millimeters. The final meshed full weld bead geometry was successfully imported into the finite element analysis software.

automatic-laser-based-geometry-capture-for-finite-element-analysis

Research

JoVE Journal

Engineering

The scalability and resolution of conventional optical manipulation techniques are limited by diffraction. We circumvent the diffraction limit and describe a method of optically transporting nanoparticles across a chip using a gold surface patterned with a path of closely spaced C-shaped plasmonic resonators.

Fabrication and Operation of a Nano-Optical Conveyor Belt

This manuscript introduces a robust method of fabricating concave microwells without the need for complex high-cost facilities. Using magnetic force, steel beads, and a through-hole array, several hundred microwells were formed in a 3 cm x 3 cm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate.

A Paired Bead and Magnet Array for Molding Microwells with Variable Concave Geometries

This method aims at locating vertical subsurface defects. Here, we couple a laser with a spatial light modulator and trigger its video input to heat a sample surface deterministically with two anti-phased modulated lines while acquiring highly resolved thermal images. The defect position is retrieved from evaluating thermal wave interference minima.

Subsurface Defect Localization by Structured Heating Using Laser Projected Photothermal Thermography

During vacuum induction melting, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy is used to perform real-time quantitative analysis of the main-ingredient elements of a molten alloy.

Quantitative Analysis of Vacuum Induction Melting by Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Key procedures to optimize the sealing process and achieve real-time monitoring of the metal-to-glass seal (MTGS) structure are described in detail. The embedded fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor is designed to achieve online monitoring of temperature and high-level residual stress in the MTGS with simultaneous environmental pressure monitoring.

Optimized Sealing Process and Real-Time Monitoring of Glass-to-Metal Seal Structures

Digital image correlation is used in fatigue tests on a resonance testing machine to detect macroscopic cracks and monitor crack propagation in welded specimens. Cracks on the specimen surface become visible as increased strains.

Crack Monitoring in Resonance Fatigue Testing of Welded Specimens Using Digital Image Correlation

This study outlines the necessary tools for utilizing low-dose three-dimensional cone beam-based patient images of the maxilla and maxillary teeth to obtain finite element models. These patient models are then used to accurately locate the CRES of all the maxillary teeth.

A Finite Element Approach for Locating the Center of Resistance of Maxillary Teeth

The present protocol involves the measurement and characterization of 3D shape deformation in underwater flapping fins built with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) materials. Accurate reconstruction of these deformations is essential for understanding the propulsive performance of compliant flapping fins.

Flapping Soft Fin Deformation Modeling using Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence Imaging

This protocol outlines a general workflow for constructing an artificial neural network for welding simulation using datasets generated automatically through Python scripts with macro functions. The workflow is validated against a benchmark case involving single-pass, straight-line welding. The surrogate model's predictive accuracy shows a strong agreement with finite element simulations.

Surrogate Model Development for Digital Experiments in Welding

A method for imposing surface topography of light-absorbing composite polymer materials, particularly magnetoactive elastomers (MAEs), by using laser micromachining is presented. This method enables large flexibility in topographical designs and rapid prototyping. An example of structuring MAE surfaces, characterization, and their response to the external magnetic field is demonstrated.

Laser Micromachining for Polymer Surface Topography Design

Learn automatic laser-based geometry capture for weld bead monitoring using a laser scanner. This protocol enables near-real-time metrology without delays and creates digital records for finite element analysis.

Automatic Laser-based Geometry Capture for Finite Element Analysis of Weld Beads

Explore More Videos