$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In early-stage breast cancer, only a minority of cases present with axillary lymph node metastasis. For these patients, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) does not provide additional survival benefits and may lead to severe complications such as upper limb lymphedema1,2. The sentinel lymph node (SLN) is defined as the "first-station" lymph node receiving lymphatic drainage from the breast tumor3. If the SLN shows no metastasis, the probability of metastasis in downstream lymph nodes is extremely low4. According to the 2021 guidelines titled Management of the Axilla in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) and ASCO Guideline1, patients with negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) results can be spared ALND, while those with 1-2 metastatic SLNs may avoid ALND under specific conditions. Studies have demonstrated that SLNB spares approximately 70% of early-stage breast cancer patients from unnecessary ALND5,6,7. Therefore, SLN detection plays a crucial role in determining the necessity of ALND, significantly improving postoperative quality of life1.
Different studies have explored ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy to determine nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients, but this method yields a high false-negative rate (FNR) of 6.4%-40.8%4. Moreover, requiring the presence of an experienced sonographer during the operation poses significant challenges for widespread clinical implementation. A variety of tracers are available for SLN mapping in breast cancer8,9,10, radiocolloid and/or blue dyes, fluorescein, indocyanine green (ICG), and mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection. Tausch et al. reported an identification rate (IR) of 82% with blue dye alone, 85% with radiocolloid alone, and 94% when dual tracers (radiocolloid plus blue dye) were used11. A meta-analysis of 13 studies revealed comparable IR for radiocolloid (96%) and blue dye (96%), while the combination achieved 97%12. Combined tracer administration significantly reduces false-negative rates (FNR), with radiocolloid-only approaches exhibiting FNRs of 16%-20.3% versus 5.2%-10.8% for dual-tracer13,14,15,16,17. Fluorescein is non-inferior to 99mTc-SC and is more cost-effective. However, its poor tissue penetration limits its application in detecting deeper SLNs18. ICG demonstrates diagnostic efficacy comparable to 99mTc- SC, making it particularly suitable for institutions lacking nuclear medicine resources19,20. Nevertheless, its efficacy is low in patients with BMI > 30 or centrally located tumors21. Some studies have confirmed that the diagnostic performance of mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection is similar to 99mTc- SC for SLN mapping8,10. However, the limited number of studies necessitates further clinical validation.
Although there are many imaging agents available for detecting SLNs in recent decades, the guidelines still recommend the combination of radiocolloid and blue dye for SLN localization in breast cancer, owing to its high diagnostic efficacy, substantial evidence-based medical support, and minimal severe adverse reactions1,20,22. Alternative agents are fluorescein or ICG without support from a nuclear medicine department. 99mTc-SC is the most commonly used radiocolloid. Compared with other blue dyes, methylene blue is more commonly used in most centers in Asia23, because it demonstrates similar SLN localization efficacy to isosulfan blue or patent blue, but is morecost-effective.
Reported IR of SLN with either radiocolloid or blue dye alone differ significantly (from 69.8% to 90.8%) across studies and are highly dependent on procedural protocols and operator experience9,12,13,24. Therefore, standardized operational procedures are crucial for ensuring consistent IR. Several different protocols are currently available, which complicates standardization efforts. First is the heating time during the preparation of 99mTc-SC. Studies have shown that reduced 3 min heating can improve the synthesis efficiency of 99mTc-SC25. 99mTc-SC prepared by a reduced 3 min heating had comparable radiochemical purity (RCP) to the standard 5 min-heating (both >92%) at 0 h and 6 h26. Furthermore, 99mTc-SC of 3 min heating had greater lymph node retention at 24 h27 . Therefore, we consider the 3 min heating protocol is superior. Second, periareolar and peritumoral injections are recommended for 99mTc-SC administration. Studies demonstrate that the periareolar injection had a higher IR for axillary SLN compared to the peritumoral injection (99.3% vs. 91.1%, P < .001)28. The periareolar technique is technically simpler and shows particular advantages for non-palpable tumors or lesions in the upper outer quadrant, mainly by preventing the "shine-through" phenomenon29. Additionally, periareolar injection naturally covers lymphatic drainage from all breast quadrants, potentially reducing the missed detection rate of SLNs and proving particularly beneficial in multifocal tumors30,31. Hence, we consider the periareolar injection to be more advantageous.
In this article, we adopted a dual-tracer protocol of preoperative 99mTc-SC (periareolar injection) combined with intraoperative methylene blue (periareolar injection). 99mTc-SC was prepared using a reduced 3 min heating protocol.