This review aims to explore the mechanistic role of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in the pathogenesis of CIPN and evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target for immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory intervention.
Review Article
This review aims to explore the mechanistic role of transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) in the pathogenesis of CIPN and evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target for immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory intervention.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and serious clinical condition that results when a chemotherapeutic agent damages the peripheral nervous system and is usually characterized by abnormal pain in the distal limbs and increased sensitivity to hot and cold stimuli. However, few clinical treatments for CIPN are available, so it is critical to identify effective treatment modalities. Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), an injury receptor, can be activated by oxidative stress, inflammatory mediators, and hypothermic conditions during the pathogenesis and progression of CIPN. TRPA1 modulates the downstream inflammatory pathway and promotes the release of inflammatory factors and neuropeptides, resulting in abnormal immune regulation, which in turn leads to a neurogenic inflammatory response and pain signaling. In this study, the role of TRPA1 in the pathogenesis of CIPN is examined, the possibility of targeting TRPA1 to treat CIPN by inhibiting neuroinflammation is verified, and the prospects of using TRPA1 antagonists and natural herbs for the clinical treatment of CIPN are explored.
Cancer remains one of the major global public health challenges1. Although chemotherapy plays a crucial role in improving cancer survival, it is often accompanied by severe adverse effects, among which CIPN is one of the most common and complex complications. CIPN is clinically characterized by symmetrical pain, paresthesia, and abnormal sensitivity to cold or heat in the distal extremities2, and some patients may also experience impaired fine motor coordination3. The reported incidence of CIPN varies widely, ranging from approximately 50% to 90%, and about 30%-40% of cases may progress to chronic neurological complications2, significantly reducing patients' quality of life and treatment compliance. The risk of developing CIPN is influenced by multiple factors, including the mode of administration (single dose, cumulative dose, or treatment duration), concomitant medications, age, anemia, higher body mass index (BMI), and pre-existing neuropathy2,4,5. Antineoplastic agents reported to induce varying degrees of neurotoxicity include platinum-based compounds, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors (such as bortezomib), epigenetic or immunomodulatory drugs (such as thalidomide and lenalidomide), and microtubule inhibitors (such as eribulin)6.
Currently, pharmacological options for the management of CIPN remain limited. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recommends duloxetine as the only pharmacological intervention with evidence-based support for CIPN treatment. Clinical studies have demonstrated that duloxetine is effective in alleviating CIPN-related pain, with its therapeutic benefit being most pronounced in neuropathy induced by platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents, particularly oxaliplatin (OXA), whereas its efficacy in CIPN caused by other agents, such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids, appears to be more variable across studies7. Despite its demonstrated analgesic efficacy, the overall clinical benefit of duloxetine is moderate, as it primarily provides symptomatic relief rather than preventing CIPN or reversing underlying pathological changes. Moreover, although duloxetine is generally well tolerated, treatment may be accompanied by mild to moderate adverse effects, including fatigue, insomnia, and nausea, which may limit long-term adherence in some patients. Other commonly used agents, such as gabapentin and pregabalin, are employed for symptomatic management but have shown inconsistent or unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes in CIPN8,9. Therefore, there remains an urgent need to develop more effective preventive strategies and to identify novel therapeutic targets for CIPN.
In recent years, with the deepening understanding of the pathogenesis of CIPN, multiple mechanisms such as inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and alterations in neural plasticity have gradually attracted increasing attention10,11,12. Among these, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation are considered central contributors to the initiation and progression of neuronal injury in CIPN. Importantly, the TRPA1 channel, a redox-sensitive ion channel abundantly expressed in sensory neurons, has emerged as a key molecular mediator linking oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling to neuronal hyperexcitability and pain hypersensitivity13,14. Distinct from TRPV1, which primarily senses noxious heat, and TRPM8, which detects cold stimuli, TRPA1 is characterized by its high sensitivity to various oxidative and electrophilic metabolites such as 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE)15. The activation of TRPA1 typically involves covalent modification of critical cysteine residues16, a unique mechanism that positions TRPA1 as a crucial molecular bridge linking chemotherapy-induced oxidative and lipid peroxidation stress to the development of pain hypersensitivity. Moreover, several animal studies have demonstrated a functional involvement of TRPA1 in chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. In particular, in OXA-induced neuropathy models, genetic ablation or pharmacological blockade of TRPA1 markedly alleviates cold and mechanical allodynia, indicating a crucial contribution of TRPA1 to the pathogenesis of CIPN17,18.
Specifically, TRPA1 is a redox-sensitive ion channel highly expressed in peripheral nociceptive neurons. Chemotherapeutic agents frequently induce mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation in neurons, leading to excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid peroxidation products such as 4-HNE. These reactive molecules can covalently modify key cysteine residues of TRPA1 or alter its activation threshold, resulting in channel opening, Ca²⁺ influx, and neuronal depolarization, thereby amplifying pain transmission and inflammatory signaling19,20,21. Previous studies have further demonstrated that TRPA1 is sensitive to cold and can be activated by endogenous inflammatory mediators, contributing to the development of cold-induced pain hypersensitivity22. In addition, TRPA1 has been shown to act as a mechanosensitive ion channel whose activity is modulated by the cellular redox state, participating in abnormal mechanical pain and hypersensitivity22,23. Beyond neurons, TRPA1 is also expressed in multiple immune cell types, where its activation modulates cytokine release and inflammatory cascades, further amplifying peripheral neuro-inflammation24. Collectively, the cold sensitivity, mechanosensitivity, and redox responsiveness of TRPA1 establish a clear mechanistic link between chemotherapy-induced oxidative stress and the ensuing pathological pain processes, thereby contributing to the initiation and maintenance of CIPN. Accordingly, targeting TRPA1 to disrupt the vicious cycle of oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory toxicity may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathic pain. In existing studies, intervention strategies targeting TRPA1 have been validated across multiple model systems. In vitro, DRG neuron cultures combined with calcium imaging are commonly used to verify the impact of TRPA1 activation on chemotherapy-induced neuronal excitability25. In vivo, CIPN is typically induced in rodents using OXA, paclitaxel, or bortezomib, followed by pharmacological or genetic inhibition of TRPA1 and subsequent behavioral assessments such as cold and mechanical hypersensitivity17,26,27. At the therapeutic level, TRPA1 antagonists have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating neuropathic pain in preclinical models28,29. Collectively, these findings provide a solid experimental basis for translational research targeting TRPA1 as a therapeutic strategy for CIPN.
Current research has already revealed a possible connection between TRPA1 and CIPN. However, these studies have mainly focused on the direct impact of TRPA1 on pain signal transmission and its local role in the inflammatory response. Yet, there is still a lack of systematic research and in-depth exploration of the mechanisms by which TRPA1 modulates immune responses to affect the overall pathological process of CIPN. Therefore, this article discusses the potential mechanisms of CIPN, with a focus on exploring the role of TRPA1 in CIPN pathogenesis. The current status of research on TRPA1 antagonists and natural herbs is also summarized to validate the feasibility of inhibiting TRPA1 to produce anti-inflammatory immune effects for the treatment of CIPN. The innovation of this article lies in systematically studying the role of TRPA1 in the pathogenesis of CIPN from an immune-regulatory perspective, overcoming previous research limitations that focused solely on its effects in nerve cells or local inflammation. In addition, it provides new targets and theoretical support for the development of drugs to treat CIPN, with great scientific significance and clinical application value.
1. Potential mechanisms for CIPN
The pathomechanism of CIPN is complex and associated with chemotherapeutic drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, immune system abnormalities, ion channel dysregulation, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuron damage, and disruption of the neuronal cytoskeleton2,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42. Table 1 provides an overview of the specific pathogenic mechanisms involved in CIPN.
2. Mechanisms of CIPN associated with TRPA1
TRPA1 is a non-selective cation channel typically existing as a homotetramer in the cell membrane. It contains six transmembrane segments (S1-S6) characteristic of TRP channels. Among these, S1-S4 form the voltage sensor-like domain (VSLD), while S5 and S6 shape the pore through which ions pass. These regions are essential for the channel's activation and its role in sensing painful, thermal, and chemical stimuli65. The long N-terminal region of TRPA1 contains multiple ankyrin repeat domains (ARDs), which mediate interactions with other proteins and contribute to channel regulation. This region also serves as a key site for modulation by kinases involved in pain signaling66,67. At the C-terminus, the TRP-like domain connects to the transmembrane region and plays a central role in channel gating. Movement of this domain, together with rearrangements of S5 and S6, underlies channel opening and Ca2+ influx, which activates downstream signaling pathways involved in inflammation and pain68,69. Overall, the ARDs, transmembrane helices (S1-S6), and TRP-like domain are the major structural features that determine TRPA1 activation and its role in pain and inflammatory signaling. Figure 4 illustrates the key structural domains of TRPA1 relevant to its activation by chemotherapeutic agents, while Table 2 summarizes the mechanisms of CIPN associated with TRPA161,62,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83.
3. Potential of targeting TRPA1 for CIPN treatment
In the previous section, we elucidated how TRPA1 is a key target for alleviating CIPN by triggering a neuroinflammatory cascade response. The mechanism of action of TRPA1 is twofold: on the one hand, TRPA1 is directly modulated by the neuroinflammatory cascade and participates in the pathological process of CIPN; on the other hand, TRPA1 interacts with inflammatory signals, which in turn mediate neurotoxic responses and exacerbate neuronal damage. Therefore, targeted inhibition of TRPA1 can reduce oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory responses, attenuate pain signaling, and ultimately improve CIPN-related symptoms. Figure 7 depicts the proposed mechanisms through which inhibition of TRPA1, either by specific antagonists or natural herbal agents, mitigates neuropathic pain associated with CIPN.
4. Discussion
According to the latest statistics from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), there will be nearly 20 million new cases of cancer in 2022, and approximately 50% of those cancer patients will eventually die from cancer or its complications. IARC projections also indicate that the number of new cancer cases per year will exceed 35 million in 2050. Cancer is therefore a major public health concern worldwide and one of the major contributors to the global burden of disease1. Although novel therapies for cancer (e.g., targeted therapies and immunotherapy) continue to be researched and developed, chemotherapy still plays a central role in the treatment of cancer. CIPN is a common side effect of chemotherapy and affects the course of treatment and its efficacy. However, the pathogenesis of CIPN is unclear but may be related to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, abnormalities in the immune system, ion channel dysregulation, and DRG neuron damage2. Currently, only duloxetine has been recommended by the ASCO for pain management in CIPN patients, Despite its demonstrated analgesic efficacy, the overall clinical benefit of duloxetine is moderate, as it primarily provides symptomatic relief rather than preventing CIPN or reversing underlying pathological changes8. Therefore, exploring the potential targets of CIPN is important for drug development and precision therapy.
TRP channels, which are key mediators of nociceptive signaling, have been receiving increasing attention in the context of the development of CIPN therapies. Among the TRP channels, TRPA1 has been suggested to be a key factor in the induction of pain hypersensitivity by a variety of chemotherapeutic agents131. Therefore, this study focuses on the role of TRPA1 in the pathogenesis of CIPN and further elucidates the mechanisms by which it mediates neuropathic pain, as illustrated in Figure 8. This channel is activated by oxidative stress to elicit abnormal mechanical pain and cold hypersensitivity61,70,71 and is involved in inflammatory nociception by modulating immune cells to mediate neuroinflammation62,72,73,74,75. In addition, TRPA1 channels interact with TRPV1, TRPM8, and voltage-gated channels such as Ca2+, Nav1.7, Zn2+, and Kv7. These interactions amplify neuropathic and inflammatory pain responses76,77,78,79,80,81. Such synergistic modulation has significant clinical implications. Because TRPA1, TRPV1, and TRPM8 are co-expressed in sensory neurons and can mutually regulate each other's activity, dual or multi-target inhibitors are capable of producing more pronounced analgesic effects than those targeting TRPA1 alone. Moreover, this synergistic interaction allows each compound to achieve comparable analgesic efficacy at lower doses, thereby reducing potential adverse effects. Similarly, the DRG, a target of CIPN neurotoxicity, is affected by TRPA1. The activation of TRPA1 enhances the excitability of DRG neurons, which in turn promotes the release of neurotransmitters from the DRG, leading to increased hypersensitivity to nociceptive symptoms82,83. In conclusion, TRPA1 can exacerbate neuropathic pain in CIPN patients by inducing a neuroinflammatory cascade response. Thus, antagonizing TRPA1 can effectively alleviate the inflammatory and painful symptoms of CIPN, which also suggests that the application of TRPA1 antagonists and natural herbs is crucial.
The efficacy of TRPA1 antagonists has been effectively demonstrated in animal models. For example, in TRPA1 KO mice and upon the application of TRPA1 antagonists (e.g., HC-030031), chemotherapeutic drug-induced neuropathic pain symptoms are significantly attenuated86,89. However, there are still limitations to the application of TRPA1 antagonists, as clinical trials for patients with CIPN have not yet been conducted, suggesting that the safety and efficacy of TRPA1 antagonists in humans need to be further evaluated and confirmed. For instance, differences in TRPA1 expression patterns and sensitivity to antagonists between rodents and humans may lead to discrepancies between preclinical and clinical outcomes. In addition, the conversion of experimental doses from animals to humans remains uncertain, further increasing the complexity of drug development.
In addition, the precise mechanisms by which TRPA1 functions as a therapeutic target in CIPN have not yet been fully elucidated, and its tissue-specific roles require further investigation. Given the broad expression of TRPA1 in sensory neurons, Schwann cells, and immune cells, delineating its specific functions across different cellular contexts remains challenging. Most existing studies rely on systemic TRPA1 antagonists, making it difficult to precisely attribute observed effects to specific cellular compartments. It should be emphasized that TRPA1 expressed in sensory neurons directly mediates nociceptive signaling, whereas TRPA1 in Schwann cells and immune cells primarily regulates inflammatory and microenvironmental processes that secondarily modulate pain sensitivity. Therefore, tissue-specific deletion of TRPA1 would provide important mechanistic insights. Neuronal-specific loss of TRPA1 could clarify its direct role in nociceptor excitability and pain transmission, whereas Schwann cell-specific deletion may elucidate how TRPA1-driven oxidative stress and glial-neuronal interactions promote sustained neuroinflammation. Importantly, immune cell-specific TRPA1 knockout models (e.g., in macrophages or T cells) would help define the contribution of immune TRPA1 signaling to neuroimmune crosstalk and inflammatory regulation in CIPN. Such approaches would substantially deepen our understanding of tissue- and cell-specific TRPA1 functions and facilitate the development of more precise therapeutic strategies. Meanwhile, multiple aspects of TRPA1 antagonism in the treatment of CIPN remain to be further explored. For example, whether TRPA1 exhibits differential functional roles in CIPN induced by distinct chemotherapeutic agents, and how its activity can be more precisely modulated to achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy, remain important unresolved questions.
In this context, the combined use of TRPA1 antagonists with natural herbal compounds or traditional Chinese medicine formulations represents a promising therapeutic approach. Such combination therapy may not only reduce drug-related toxicity but also enhance efficacy through multi-target synergistic effects. Overall, antagonizing TRPA1 can modulate immune responses and interrupt neuroinflammatory cascades, thereby effectively mitigating neurotoxicity and neuronal damage, offering new insights and potential strategies for the clinical management of CIPN.
This review comprehensively explores the intricate relationship between TRPA1 and CIPN, as well as the potential anti-inflammatory effects of TRPA1 antagonism in its treatment. Preclinical studies have shown that pharmacological inhibition or genetic deletion of TRPA1 can suppress neuroinflammation, reduce neuronal excitability, and mitigate neurotoxicity, thereby producing anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects that may help alleviate the symptoms of CIPN. However, there are still some limitations in the current research. Future studies should further explore the specific molecular mechanisms underlying TRPA1's involvement in CIPN, optimize targeting strategies, and conduct large-scale clinical trials to verify the safety and efficacy of TRPA1 antagonists. This will provide more precise and effective treatment options for patients with CIPN.

Figure 1: Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress-induced CIPN mechanisms. Platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents form platinum-DNA adducts that accumulate in the DRG, where they bind to nDNA and mtDNA. This induces DNA/mitochondrial damage, enhances the production of ROS, and induces neuronal apoptosis. There is also evidence that OXA induces neuropathic pain by activating astrocytes and upregulating proinflammatory cytokines in the MAPK pathway. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Mechanisms of CIPN induction by abnormalities in the immune system. (A) Chemotherapeutic agents lead to macrophage activation, increases in the numbers of T lymphocytes (CD4+), cytotoxic T cells (CD8+), and B cells in the DRG, and a decrease in the number of anti-inflammatory T cells and neutrophils. MCs contribute to the progression of CIPN by recruiting immune cells and releasing a variety of inflammatory cytokines in CIPN, thereby decreasing the activity of NK cells, which in turn exacerbates neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. (B) Chemotherapeutic agents modulate the activation of and immune mediator secretion from via SGCs in the DRG, microglia and astrocytes in the spinal cord, and Schwann cells in the axons, resulting in increased excitability of sensory neurons and intensified pain hypersensitivity in CIPN. (C) Activation of immuno-inflammatory signaling pathways, such as MAPK and NF-κB, also plays an important role in exacerbating neuroinflammatory responses. (D) Chemotherapeutic agents can also activate immune cells and enhance neuroinflammatory responses by increasing TLR4 and triggering associated gene dysregulation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: DRG is a major target for chemotherapeutic agents to trigger CIPN. (A) PTX can lead to macrophage infiltration into the DRG, which in turn triggers a decrease in the number of IENFs. (B) Platinum drugs accumulate in the DRG, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased ROS levels, which, in turn, promote neuronal apoptosis. (C) Thalidomide can directly damage the DRG. (D) Chemotherapeutic agents can also damage DRG neurons by altering sodium, potassium, and calcium ion channels, disrupting microtubule structure, and activating PRRs. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: The key structural domains of TRPA1 relevant to its activation by chemotherapeutic agents. The TRPA1 channel contains six transmembrane α-helical fragments (S1-S6). Among them, S1-S4 constitute the VSLD, and S5 and S6 form a concave pore loop structure. Both the NH2 and COOH ends of the TRPA1 channel are located in the cytoplasm. One of the longer NH2 termini contains ARDs and the Cdk5 site, whereas the C-terminus of TRPA1 contains a TRP-like domain and is linked to the transmembrane structural domain. Channel activation can cause Ca2+ influx, which in turn triggers a series of cell signaling pathways, such as those that regulate gene expression, promote cell proliferation, and induce inflammatory responses.The structure of TRPA1 dictates its function in sensing pain and heat/cold sensitivity. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: TRPA1 regulates immune cell-mediated neuroinflammatory nociception. Immune cells (macrophages, Schwann cells, and MCs), proinflammatory factors (IL-1 family, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8), chemokines (CXCL5/CXCR2), inflammatory mediators (NGF, PKA/PKC), and TLR4 can activate TRPA1 channels. Activation of TRPA1 channels can increase intracellular Ca2+ concentration, which promotes the release of SP, NK-A, and CGRP, affects immune cells (T cells, NK cells), and modulates inflammation-related pathways (PANX1 pathway), thereby enhancing the excitability of DRG neurons and maintaining neuroinflammation and persistent pain. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: TRPA1 modulates ion channels to accelerate pain signaling. TRPA1 and TRPM8 are involved in cold hypersensitivity, and TRPA1 and TRPV1 are involved in mechanical allodynia. In addition, TRPA1 channels with voltage-gated Ca2+, Nav1.7, Zn2+, Kv 7, and Kir4.1 channels promote the release of inflammatory mediators (e.g., CGRP, GFAP) and proinflammatory factors (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6), triggering the hyperexcitability of DRG neurons, which in turn exerts a synergistic effect in exacerbating neuropathic and inflammatory pain. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Potential of targeting TRPA1 for CIPN treatment. The use of TRPA1 antagonists and natural herbs can inhibit TRPA1 channel activity, thereby reducing Ca2+ flux and oxidative stress, which, in turn, suppresses neuroinflammatory responses and reduces neuropathic pain, ultimately reducing nerve damage and improving CIPN-related symptoms. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Inhibiting TRPA1. A Therapeutic Strategy for CIPN. TRPA1 activation drives inflammation and hypersensitivity in CIPN; its inhibition by antagonists or herbs may reduce neurogenic inflammation, nociceptive sensitization, and CIPN symptoms. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: Potential mechanisms underlying CIPN. Chemotherapeutic agents contribute to CIPN through multiple pathological pathways, including mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, immune system abnormalities, ion channel dysregulation, DRG neuronal injury, and disruption of the neuronal cytoskeleton. These mechanisms collectively lead to neuroinflammation, neurotoxicity, and neuropathic pain. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 2: Mechanisms of CIPN associated with TRPA1. TRPA1 contributes to CIPN through multiple pathological processes, including oxidative stress-induced activation, immune modulation and inflammation, ion channel interactions, and DRG neuronal injury. These mechanisms collectively enhance neuronal excitability and promote neuropathic pain and hypersensitivity. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 3: Current development status and clinical indications of representative TRPA1 antagonists. This table summarizes the major TRPA1 antagonists investigated in preclinical and clinical studies, including their mechanisms of action, therapeutic indications, and drug development stages. These agents inhibit TRPA1 channel activity, thereby reducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and neuropathic pain associated with CIPN and other pathological conditions. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 4: Natural herbal sources of TRPA1 ligands and their potential mechanisms in alleviating CIPN. This table summarizes representative natural compounds and herbal extracts that modulate TRPA1 activity, including their sources, chemical types, experimental conditions, and molecular targets. These natural agents exert neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects by regulating TRPA1 and related signaling pathways, thereby alleviating oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neuronal hyperexcitability associated with CIPN. Please click here to download this Table.
There are no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
The authors would like to express their gratitude to all members of Mingzhu Li's group for their support and assistance. This manuscript was supported by the China National Natural Science Foundation (82104838), China Promotion Foundation Spark Program (XH-D001), and Liaoning Provincial Key Research and Development Programme(2024JH2/102500062), which is gratefully acknowledged. Figure 1 and Figure 2 were drawn using FigDraw.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission