Continuous telemetric recording of BP and HR in C57BL/6 Mice
Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were randomized to undergo transmitter implantation by carotid artery cannulation (CAC) or abdominal aorta cannulation (AAC). After 10 days of recovery, baseline BP was recorded. Continuous 24 h monitoring confirmed stable and reliable signals with the expected circadian rhythm, showing slightly higher nocturnal than diurnal values. Compared with CAC, AAC resulted in higher SBP (Figure 8A), no differences in DBP (Figure 8B), a modest increase in MAP (Figure 8C), and no differences in HR (Figure 8D) during either light or dark phases. As shown in Supplementary Figure 4A-D, per min averages of SBP, DBP, MAP, and HR are also presented. Daily mean SBP (Figure 8E), DBP (Figure 8F), MAP (Figure 8G), and HR (Figure 8H), derived from continuous recordings, followed the same trends as the circadian profiles.
Comparison between telemetric and tail-cuff BP measurements in C57BL/6 mice
To evaluate the accuracy of non-invasive methods, the tail-cuff method was performed in parallel. Tail-cuff recordings showed higher SBP and greater intra-group variability than CAC or AAC. AAC also produced significantly higher SBP than CAC measurements (Figure 9A). In contrast, DBP (Figure 9B) and MAP (Figure 9C) did not differ significantly among these methods.
Comparative analysis of telemetric and tail-cuff BP data in hypertensive rats and mice
To validate implantable telemetry for hypertension research, we used SHRs29 and L-NAME-induced hypertensive mice30. Telemetry transmitters were implanted by AAC in rats and CAC in mice, with parallel tail-cuff measurements for comparison. Figure 10A-C and Supplementary Figure 5A-C showed SBP, DBP, and MAP in SHRs. Tail-cuff recordings overestimated DBP relative to telemetry, whereas SBP and MAP did not differ between these two methods (Figure 10D). In L-NAME (0.5 mg/mL in drinking water for 15 days) treated mice, SBP, DBP, and MAP were shown in Figure 10E-G and Supplementary Figure 5D-F. Tail-cuff measurements yielded higher SBP than telemetry, with no significant differences in DBP or MAP (Figure 10H).
These results validate the implantable telemetry method by demonstrating its capability to continuously record high-fidelity arterial pressure in conscious rodents under physiological conditions. Moreover, the clear detection of circadian BP rhythms in both normotensive and hypertensive models confirms the system's reliability and sensitivity to dynamic physiological changes.

Figure 1: Characteristics of the telemetry transmitters. (A) Specifications of the HD-X11 transmitter. (B) Specifications of the HD-S10 transmitter. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Surgical incisions and anatomical landmarks for transmitter implantation. (A) Midline cervical incision for carotid artery catheterization. (B) Midline abdominal incision for abdominal aorta catheterization. (C) Anatomical view of exposed structures after a midline cervical incision. 1. left common carotid artery; 2. air tube; 3. skin; 4. vagus nerve; 5. branches of the common carotid artery; 6. sympathetic trunk. (D) Anatomical view of exposed viscera and vasculature after a midline lower abdominal incision. 1. abdominal aorta; 2. inferior vena cava; 3. muscularis; 4. skin; 5. renal vein; 6. kidney. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Schematic of BP transmitter implantation through the left carotid artery. (A) Trachea exposure to locate the left carotid artery laterally. (B) Blunt dissection to isolate the artery from surrounding tissues and the vagus nerve; sutures are placed cranially and caudally as shown. (C) Cranial suture permanently ligated; middle suture tied with a slipknot for temporary occlusion; caudal suture tightened to temporarily block blood flow. (D) A catheter was inserted using a vessel dilator and advanced to the correct position, then secured by tying the suture. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Subcutaneous placement of ECG electrodes and transmitter body following carotid artery cannulation. (A) Formation of a subcutaneous pocket in the left inguinal region using blunt-ended scissors after catheter insertion. (B) Injection of 200 µL of sterile saline (37 °C) into the pocket for lubrication and irrigation. (C) Careful placement of the transmitter body into the subcutaneous pocket. (D) Fixation of the negative ECG lead (uncolored) onto the right pectoral muscle and the positive lead (red) onto the left intercostal muscle. (E) Skin closure after subcutaneous tunneling of ECG leads and catheter. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Schematic of the BP transmitter implantation procedure through the abdominal aorta. (A) Exposure of the abdominal aorta adjacent to the inferior vena cava; blunt dissection and placement of sutures at designated anatomical landmarks. (B) Sutures remain untied to preserve collateral blood flow; vessels are temporarily lifted and occluded to briefly interrupt blood flow. (C) Catheter insertion into the vessel using a vessel dilator. (D) After advancing the catheter to the correct position, a biological membrane is applied over the insertion site, followed by adhesive biological glue to achieve hemostasis. Sutures are then released and removed once bleeding is confirmed to be absent. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Subcutaneous placement of ECG electrodes and transmitter body following abdominal aorta cannulation. (A) Packing gauze is carefully removed to avoid catheter dislodgement, and the abdominal cavity is irrigated with 100 µL of sterile saline (37 °C). Gentle intestinal massage is applied to reposition organs. The transmitter is positioned above the intestines, parallel to the body axis, with leads directed caudally. (B) An 18 G needle is inserted through the right abdominal wall, and the negative (white) lead is passed through and externalized. (C) The positive (red) lead is externalized on the left side using the same approach. (D) The abdominal wall is sutured, with the positive lead secured subcutaneously 1 cm left of the xiphoid and the negative lead positioned subcutaneously over the right pectoral muscle. (E) Skin closure. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: BP data acquisition and analysis. (A) Representative telemetry recording. The raw arterial pressure trace is shown with automatically detected reference points: systolic (black), diastolic (dark blue), percent recovery (green), end-diastolic (light blue), and maximum slope (red). These markers define key parameters for quantitative BP assessment. Data are processed into minute-by-minute values for statistical analysis. (B) Representative tail-cuff recording. The cuff pressure decay curve (red) and pulsatile volume-pressure waveform (blue), reflecting distal blood flow, are displayed. Systolic (square) and diastolic (circle) values are automatically identified. Data from 5 cycles per animal are exported to Excel for further analysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Continuous BP and HR monitoring in C57BL/6 mice via CAC or AAC. (A-D) Continuous 24 h recordings of SBP (A), DBP (B), MAP (C), and HR (D) in mice with CAC or AAC, averaged in 30 min intervals. (E-H) Day- and night-period analysis of mean SBP (E), DBP (F), MAP (G), and HR (H). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p <0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: Comparison of BP measurements by telemetry and tail-cuff in the same animal. (A-C) Mean SBP (A), DBP (B), and MAP (C) recorded by tail-cuff, CAC, and AAC (n = 3-5). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 10: Telemetric versus tail-cuff BP measurements in hypertensive models. (A-C) Continuous 24 h recordings of SBP (A), DBP (B), and MAP (C) in 8-week-old SHR rats implanted by AAC, averaged in 30 min intervals. (D) Comparison of tail-cuff and AAC telemetry measurements in the same SHR rat (n = 3-5). (E-G) Continuous 24 h SBP (E), DBP (F), and MAP (G) recordings in 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice treated with L-NAME (0.5 mg/mL, 15 days) and implanted by CAC, averaged in 30 min intervals. (H) Comparison of tail-cuff and telemetry measurements in the same mice (n = 3-5). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1: Specialized surgical instruments for telemetry transmitter implantation. (A) Instruments used for implantation surgery (left to right): catheter-holding forceps (x 2), needle holder, fine-tip forceps, dissecting scissors, and hemostat. (B) Magnified view of the tip of the catheter-holding forceps. (C) Custom vessel dilator, designed for precise and controlled entry into blood vessels during catheterization to minimize vascular trauma. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 2: Schematic of sensing catheter implantation depth. (A) Telemetry catheter structure of HD-X11. (B) Catheter implantation depth through the carotid artery. (C) Telemetry catheter structure of HD-S10. (D) Catheter implantation depth through the abdominal aorta. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 3: Catheter fixation with adhesive and patch. (A) Tissue adhesive. (B) Fiber patch (Trim to pattern as shown). Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 4: Continuous BP and HR monitoring in C57BL/6 mice by CAC or AAC. (A-D) Continuous 24 h recordings of SBP (A), DBP (B), MAP (C), and HR (D), shown as per-minute averages. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Figure 5: Telemetric BP measurements in hypertensive models. (A-C) 24 h recordings of SBP (A), DBP (B), and MAP (C) in 8-week-old SHR rats implanted with AAC, shown as 1 min averages. (D-F) 24 h SBP (D), DBP (E), and MAP (F) in 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice treated with L-NAME (0.5 mg/mL, 15 days) and implanted with CAC, shown as per-minute averages. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Table 1: Postoperative monitoring sheet for mice. A standardized form used to systematically record postoperative recovery, pain assessment (Mouse Grimace Scale, MGS), vital signs, and analgesic administration in mice. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary File 1: Configuration steps for implantable transmitters. The file shows the main setup window for performing the configuration. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary File 2: Tail-cuff BP measurement method. This file outlines the key steps for performing non-invasive BP assessment using the tail-cuff system. Please click here to download this File.