Research Article

Long Noncoding RNA IRAIN Drives Immunometabolic Reprogramming in Glioma via the IGF1R-JAK-STAT-BIRC5 Axis

DOI:

10.3791/69711

December 12th, 2025

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Using integrated machine learning across multiple cohorts, we built a robust IMRG prognostic signature for glioma. IRAIN is markedly downregulated, inversely linked to grade and survival, and suppresses IGF1R-JAK2-STAT3-BIRC5 signaling, restraining proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. Findings nominate IRAIN and IMRGs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Glioma is an aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic options and a poor prognosis. Its progression is closely linked to metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion, underscoring the need to identify molecular regulators that integrate these processes. Here, we established a robust immunometabolic-related gene (IMRG) prognostic signature and elucidated the role of the long noncoding RNA IRAIN in regulating glioma immunometabolism through the IGF1R-JAK-STAT-BIRC5 axis. Transcriptomic and clinical data from TCGA, CGGA (693/325), and GEO (GSE43378) cohorts were analyzed. Differential expression and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (β = 8) ensured scale-free topology, and a leave-one-out cross-validation framework combining ten machine-learning algorithms produced 101 prognostic models. The optimal 17-gene IMRG signature was validated across all cohorts and independently predicted overall survival. Functional assays demonstrated that IRAIN overexpression inhibited IGF1R, suppressed JAK2/STAT3 phosphorylation, and downregulated BIRC5, thereby promoting apoptosis and reducing angiogenesis. Low IRAIN expression correlated with immunosuppressive Tregs and M2 macrophages and with elevated tumor-microenvironment scores, suggesting an immune-evasive phenotype. These findings establish IRAIN as a key regulator of glioma immunometabolic reprogramming and validate the IMRG signature as a reliable prognostic tool, highlighting the IRAIN-IGF1R-JAK-STAT-BIRC5 pathway as a mechanistic bridge linking immune and metabolic dysregulation in glioma and offering potential targets for precision therapy.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Glioma represents the most common primary malignancy of the central nervous system and remains among the deadliest human cancers despite progress in neurosurgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. High-grade gliomas, particularly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are characterized by rapid proliferation, diffuse infiltration, and inevitable recurrence1,2. Recently, a range of effective therapeutic approaches has arisen, such as surgical interventions, immunotherapy, and chemotherpy3. Median survival remains approximately 14-18 months, even with maximal therapy, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies and prognostic biomarkers4.

The interplay between the tumor microenvironment (TME) and cancer cells critically drives the aggressive growth and molecular heterogeneity of gliomas. Numerous immune constituents, including microglia, neuronal precursor cells, vascular cells, and adaptive immune cells, are intricately involved in shaping the TME5,6,7. Recent years have witnessed remarkable advances in immunotherapy, ushering in a transformative era in oncology. Nevertheless, immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and other immunotherapeutic approaches have shown only limited success in glioma8. The failure of immunotherapy in this context stems from several intrinsic features of the glioma microenvironment-namely, low tumor mutational burden, pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity, poor blood-brain barrier permeability, downregulation of major histocompatibility complex molecules, and sparse T-cell infiltration9,10,11,12.

Increasing evidence suggests that the tumor microenvironment (TME), which exhibits metabolic dysfunction, is marked by acidic conditions, nutrient deprivation, and the accumulation of metabolites that suppress immune responses. This condition subsequently leads to the dysfunction of immune cells that infiltrate tumors and diminishes the effectiveness of immunotherapy13. Simultaneously, immune cells within the TME undergo context-dependent metabolic shifts that dictate their differentiation and effector functions. For instance, activated T cells rely on glycolysis for rapid proliferation, whereas regulatory T cells (Tregs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), particularly the M2 subtype, depend on oxidative phosphorylation and fatty-acid metabolism to maintain their immunosuppressive activity14,15.

Therefore, integrating immune and metabolic signatures offers a rational framework to better classify gliomas and predict patient prognosis. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have recently emerged as versatile regulators of chromatin architecture, gene transcription, and post-transcriptional modification. Several lncRNAs have been implicated in glioma pathogenesis, influencing proliferation, invasion, and immune modulation16. Among them, the imprinted antisense transcript IRAIN (IGF1R antisense imprinted non-protein coding RNA) has garnered attention for its role in regulating the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) gene through cis-acting chromatin interactions, which has been proven to be downregulated and decreased cis competition control, especially in cancer cells such as breast cancer, leukemia cell lines, laryngeal cancer, and acute myeloid leukemia, which directly leads to upregulation of IGF1R17,18,19. Because IGF1R signaling activates downstream JAK-STAT and PI3K-AKT pathways -- both central to tumor growth and immune regulation20,21 -- alterations in IRAIN expression may critically affect tumor immunometabolism. However, the role of IRAIN in glioma and its potential impact on the immunometabolic landscape have not yet been elucidated. Addressing this knowledge gap could provide mechanistic insight into how noncoding RNAs coordinate metabolic adaptation and immune evasion in glioma.

In this study, we combined multi-cohort transcriptomic data with experimental validation to explore immunometabolic regulation in glioma. Using integrated machine-learning frameworks across the TCGA, CGGA (693/325), and GEO (GSE43378) cohorts, we identified a robust 17-gene immunometabolic-related gene (IMRG) prognostic signature capable of stratifying patient survival across datasets. We subsequently focused on IRAIN as a potential upstream regulator of this network, given its predicted interaction with the IGF1R-JAK-STAT signaling axis. Functional assays revealed that IRAIN overexpression suppresses glioma proliferation and angiogenesis by inhibiting IGF1R expression and downstream STAT3 phosphorylation, resulting in reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic protein BIRC5 (also known as Survivin). Taken together, these findings support a working model in which IRAIN functions as a mechanistic bridge linking immune regulation and metabolic reprogramming in glioma. We hypothesize that dysregulated IRAIN expression promotes tumor progression by disturbing this balance, thereby fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment and conferring resistance to therapy.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All procedures involving human tissues complied with institutional guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fujian Medical University (Approval No. 2021KYB089). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to tissue procurement.

Gene expression and survival analysis
RNA sequencing data and corresponding clinical information were obtained from multiple public databases. 1) TCGA cohort: RNA-seq (FPKM) data for 175 glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and 534 low-grade glioma (LGG) samples were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/); 2) Normal controls: Expression profiles of 211 normal brain tissues and 662 glioma tissues were downloaded from the UCSC Xena database (https://xenabrowser.net/datapages/); 3) External validation: Data from CGGA693 and CGGA325 cohorts were obtained from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (http://www.cgga.org.cn); 4) GEO dataset: The GSE43378 dataset, containing expression and clinical data for 50 glioma samples, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). All raw count data were converted to transcripts per million (TPM) and log2-transformed. For datasets already normalized, expression matrices were examined to ensure comparable distributions. Genes with TPM values < 1 in more than 80% of samples were excluded. Missing clinical information (age, IDH status, 1p/19q codeletion, MGMT methylation) was removed using complete-case filtering. Batch effects among datasets were adjusted using the ComBat algorithm implemented in the R package sva. Expression values were standardized by z-score transformation within each dataset. Survival analyses were performed using the R packages survival and survminer. Patients were dichotomized into high- and low-expression groups according to the median expression level of IRAIN. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated, and statistical significance was evaluated by the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Definition of immune and metabolic gene sets
Immune-related genes (IRGs, n = 2,483) were obtained from the ImmPort database (https://www.immport.org/shared/), and metabolic-related genes (MRGs, n = 948) were obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB, https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/). The combined set of these genes was defined as immunometabolic-related genes (IMRGs). These gene lists served as references for subsequent differential expression and network analyses.

Differential expression and weighted gene co-expression network analysis
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal brain and glioma tissues were identified using the R package limma. Expression data were fitted with a linear model followed by empirical Bayes moderation. Genes with |log₂ fold change| > 1.5 and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 were considered significantly differentially expressed. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted using the R package WGCNA. Outlier samples were excluded through hierarchical clustering. The soft-thresholding power was set to β = 8 to achieve a scale-free topology fit index (R2 ≥ 0.85) while maintaining adequate mean connectivity. Topological overlap matrices (TOM) were constructed, and genes were grouped into modules with a minimum size of 50 using the dynamic tree-cut algorithm. Module eigengenes were correlated with clinical traits, and the module most strongly associated with glioma (Pearson's r > 0.7, P < 1×10-10) was selected for hub gene identification.

Machine learning-based prognostic model construction
A comprehensive leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) framework integrating ten machine-learning algorithms was applied to construct and evaluate prognostic models. In total, 101 combinatorial workflows were implemented using the TCGA cohort as the training dataset. Prognosis-associated immunometabolic-related genes (IMRGs) were first identified by univariate Cox regression (P < 0.05). The optimal model was determined by maximizing the mean Harrell's concordance index (C-index) across three validation datasets (CGGA693, CGGA325, and GSE43378). The resulting RSF-Enet model (α = 0.3) demonstrated the highest predictive performance and maintained robust generalizability across independent cohorts22.

TME and immune infiltration
To comprehensively characterize the immunogenomic landscape, we employed a multi-tiered analytical approach. First, immune and stromal infiltration levels were quantified using the ESTIMATE algorithm23. Differential expression of key immune checkpoint molecules, including PDCD1, CTLA4, and LAG3, was then assessed through limma-based analysis, and the correlations among checkpoint genes were visualized using correlation matrices. Somatic mutation profiles from 903 glioma samples in the TCGA cohort were used to calculate tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) scores to predict potential responses to immunotherapy. Patients were subsequently stratified into four prognostic groups according to combined TMB status (high/low) and risk scores (high/low), and survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Functional enrichment analysis
Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were conducted using the R package clusterProfiler. Enrichment results with adjusted P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Overrepresented biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions were visualized using dot plots and bar plots. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed using the STRING database (≥ 0.4) and visualized in Cytoscape. Functional modules within the PPI network were identified using the MCODE algorithm. Gene-gene interaction and co-expression networks were further analyzed using GeneMANIA (https://string-db.org; confidence score ≥ 0.4) and visualized in Cytoscape. Functional modules within the PPI network were identified using the MCODE algorithm. Gene–gene interaction and co-expression networks were further analyzed using GeneMANIA (https://genemania.org), which integrates information on physical and genetic interactions, shared pathways, and co-expression patterns to infer potential functional associations.

Clinical specimens
Fresh glioma tissues (n = 6) and paired adjacent non-tumorous brain tissues (n = 6; located at least 3 cm from the tumor margin and histologically confirmed as tumor-free) were collected from patients undergoing primary glioma resection at the Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. None of the patients had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. All pathological diagnoses were independently verified by two neuropathologists according to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. Immediately after surgical excision, tissue specimens were rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove residual blood, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen (-196 °C), and stored at -80 °C until RNA extraction.

Cell lines and cell culture
Human glioblastoma cell lines SHG44, U251, A172, and T98G, as well as normal human glial cells (HEB), were obtained from authenticated repositories and confirmed to be free of mycoplasma contamination prior to use. Cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, high glucose) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO₂. Cells were passaged every 4-5 days upon reaching 80-90% confluence. To establish IRAIN-overexpressing and control cell lines, cells were transduced with lentiviral vectors carrying the full-length IRAIN transcript or an empty vector as control. Stable clones were selected using puromycin (2 µg/mL) for 14 days. Overexpression efficiency was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) prior to downstream assays.

3- (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell proliferation assay
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells per well in 100 µL of complete culture medium. At 24, 48, and 72 h after seeding, 20 µL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to each well and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The supernatant was then removed, and 150 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to dissolve the formazan crystals. The plate was gently agitated for 10 min to ensure complete solubilization. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer. Background readings from blank wells were subtracted. Cell viability was calculated relative to the 24-h or control group (set as 1.0). All experiments were performed with six technical replicates and three independent biological replicates. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed t-test.

Flow cytometry for apoptosis (Annexin V - FITC/PI staining)
Cells were seeded at 60-70% confluence and treated for 24 h under the indicated conditions. Floating and adherent cells were collected using EDTA-free trypsin, combined, and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. Cell pellets were resuspended in Annexin V binding buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2) at 1 × 106 cells/mL. For each sample, 100 µL of suspension was incubated with 5 µL of Annexin V-FITC and 5 µL of propidium iodide (PI; 50 µg/mL stock) in the dark for 15 min at room temperature. Following the addition of 400 µL of binding buffer, samples were kept on ice and analyzed within 1 h on a flow cytometer (488 nm excitation; 530/30 nm for FITC and >585 nm for PI). Appropriate single-stain and fluorescence-minus-one controls were included for compensation. At least 10,000 events were recorded per sample. Data were analyzed by quadrant gating: live (Annexin V⁻/PI⁻), early apoptotic (Annexin V⁺/PI⁻), late apoptotic (Annexin V⁺/PI⁺), and necrotic (Annexin V⁻/PI⁺) populations. Percentages of early + late apoptotic cells were reported (mean ± SD, n = 3).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated using an acid phenol-guanidinium reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA purity was verified by spectrophotometry (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ = 1.8-2.1), and integrity was confirmed by gel electrophoresis (RNA integrity number ≥ 7). One microgram of total RNA was treated with DNase I and reverse-transcribed in a 20 µL reaction using random hexamers and oligo(dT) primers. The reaction was carried out at 25 °C for 10 min, 50 °C for 30 min, and 85 °C for 5 min. Quantitative PCR was performed in a 10 µL system containing 5 µL of 2× SYBR Green Master Mix, 0.3 µM each primer, and 1 µL of cDNA (≈ 20 ng RNA equivalent). Thermal cycling conditions were 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 30 s, then a melt-curve analysis from 65 °C to 95 °C in 0.3 °C increments. All reactions were performed in triplicate, together with no-template and minus-RT controls. Ct values > 35 or technical replicate SD > 0.5 were excluded. Relative expression was calculated using the 2⁻ΔΔCt method, with GAPDH as the internal control. Mean ± SD values from three independent biological replicates were reported, and group differences were analyzed using a two-tailed t-test.

Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed on ice in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Lysates were incubated for 30 min on ice with intermittent vortexing and cleared by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were measured by BCA assay, adjusted to 1-2 µg/µL, and mixed 1:3 with 4× Laemmli buffer (final 1× buffer containing 100 mM DTT). Samples were denatured at 95 °C for 5 min. Equal amounts of protein (50 µg) were resolved by 12 % SDS-PAGE at 100 V for 90 min and electro-transferred to PVDF membranes at 250 mA for 90 min. Membranes were blocked with 5 % non-fat milk in TBST (0.1 % Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature (or 5 % BSA for phosphoproteins) and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against IGF1, IGF1R, JAK2, p-JAK2 (Y1007/1008), STAT3, p-STAT3 (Y705), BIRC5, and β-actin (typical dilution 1:1000, β-actin 1:5000). After three 10-min washes in TBST, membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000) for 1 h at room temperature, washed again, and developed using chemiluminescent substrate. Band intensities were quantified with ImageJ, normalized to β-actin or total protein, and expressed as mean ± SD from three independent experiments.

Immunocytochemistry
Cells grown on sterile glass coverslips were rinsed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. After three PBS washes, cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min, blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h, and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary anti-CD31 antibody (1:200 dilution in 1% BSA). Following three PBS washes, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibody (1:500 dilution) for 1 h in the dark, counterstained with DAPI (1 µg/mL, 5 min), and mounted in antifade medium. Images were captured using a fluorescence microscope under identical exposure and gain settings. The percentage of CD31-positive area was quantified in five randomly selected non-overlapping fields per sample using ImageJ software. This assay was performed in cell models rather than tissue sections.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed utilizing R version 4.3.0 along with its associated packages. To compare categorical variables, the chi-squared test was employed, while continuous variables were assessed using either the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the T test. The evaluation of continuous variables was accomplished through Pearson's correlation coefficient. Survival analyses were carried out using the survival package, which included Cox proportional hazards modeling and the generation of Kaplan-Meier curves, with optimal stratification thresholds established by the survminer package and the formula Riskscore = Mathematical summation equation Σ(Expression × Coefficient) with indices, formula presentation.. The CompareC package was used to assess the C-indices of various variables. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), aimed at predicting binary categorical variables, was generated using the pROC package. Additionally, the time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUC) for survival metrics was analyzed using the timeROC package. All statistical tests were conducted with a two-sided approach. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

IRAIN is downregulated in glioma and associated with adverse clinicopathologic features
The analysis process is illustrated in Figure 1. IRAIN expression was first assessed by qRT-PCR in primary astrocytes, glioma tissues and glioma cell lines. IRAIN levels were markedly reduced in both low-grade and high-grade glioma tissues and in all four glioma cell lines (SHG44, A172, U251 and T98G) compared with normal astrocytes (Figure 2A). Consisten...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Glioma remains one of the most lethal malignancies of the central nervous system, characterized by profound intratumoral heterogeneity and resistance to conventional therapy. Despite surgical resection combined with chemoradiotherapy, recurrence and mortality remain high, and the median survival of patients, particularly those with glioblastoma, has shown limited improvement over recent decades4,24. Increasing evidence indicates that metabolic reprogramming and i...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We thank all participants and investigators involved in the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and the TCGA, CGGA databases for sharing available data. This work was supported by Fujian Provincial Health Technology Project (2024GG01010154) and Doctoral Workstation Climbing Project of Zhangzhou Hospital (PDA202306). The funder provided funds for our research.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Annexin V-PI Apoptosis Kit Southern Biotechnology, Birmingham, AL, USANAUsed for evaluating apoptosis
AnnexinV-PI Apoptosis KitSouthern Biotechnology10010-02Used for apoptosis assessment by flow cytometry.
Anti-IGF1, Anti-IGF1R, Anti-JAK2, Anti-STAT3, Anti-Survivin, Anti-β-actinAbcamab182408, ab108596, ab109085, ab76424, ab8227Antibodies used for Western Blot analysis of signaling pathways.
BiocManagerCRAN1.30.25Install and manage Bioconductor packages in R ≥ 3.6.
Bio-Rad Cfx96 SystemBioconductor1.5.1Programmatic access to STRING protein–protein interactions.
CaretCRAN0.4Time dependent ROC/AUC for survival models.
Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas ( CGGA)NACGGA693 and CGGA325 Used for model consruction and validation
ClusterprofilerBioconductor2.18.0Parse MAF files; compute tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutation landscape.
CorrplotCRAN3.5.0General plotting (boxplots, violin plots, scatter, trend lines).
CoxboostCRAN7.3-60stepAIC for stepwise Cox model selection.
Data.TableCRANreadr2.1.5Fast reading of delimited files; robust UTF-8 handling.
DoseBioconductor3.17.0Human gene annotation (Entrez, Ensembl, SYMBOL mappings).
DynamictreecutCRAN1.73Weighted gene co expression network analysis; pickSoftThreshold, TOM, module detection.
EdgerBioconductor3.56.2Differential expression (voom/linear models); Wilcoxon/empirical Bayes; volcano/heatmap inputs.
EnrichplotBioconductor3.26.2Disease Ontology enrichment and GSEA helpers (used with clusterProfiler).
FlashclustCRAN1.63-1Adaptive branch cutting for WGCNA module detection.
GbmCRAN1.12Supervised principal components for survival analysis.
Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)NAGSE43378Used for model consruction and validation
GEOqueryBioconductorNADownload and parse GEO datasets.
Ggplot2CRAN1.0.12Publication ready heatmaps of expression signatures.
GlmnetCRAN3.3.1Random survival forest for right censored outcomes.
Horseradish Peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit secondary antibodiesAbcamab6721Secondary antibodies for detection in Western Blot.
Human glioblastoma cell lines (SHG44, U251, A172, T98G)American Tissue Culture CollectionNAHuman glioblastoma cell lines for glioma research. Cells were cultured in DMEM + 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine.
IgraphCRAN10.0.1Access MSigDB gene sets (e.g., metabolic MRGs); convenient tidy frames.
Image J software Media Cybernetics, USA152Used for visualization
Lentiviral vector encoding lncRNA-IRAINGeneChem, Shanghai, China NALentiviral vectors used for transfection of glioma and HEB cells to establish stable clones.
LimmaBioconductor3.48.0Batch correction (ComBat) and surrogate variable analysis.
MaftoolsBioconductor1.52.0Harrell’s concordance index (C index) and survival comparison utilities.
MassCRAN4.1-8Penalized Cox models: Lasso, Ridge, and Elastic Net.
MsigdbrCRAN0.0.5Support vector machine methods for survival data.
MTTSigma-AldrichM2128Used for cell proliferation assays.
Normal glial cells (HEB)American Tissue Culture CollectionNANormal human glial cell line for comparison studies. Cultured in DMEM + 10% FBS.
Org.Hs.Eg.DbBioconductor4.8.3GO/KEGG enrichment and GSEA; supports multiple ID types.
PheatmapCRAN2.0.0Grammar of data science; includes dplyr, tidyr, purrr, ggplot2 for wrangling and plotting.
PlsrcoxCRAN1.5Likelihood based boosting for Cox models.
PVDF MembranesMilliporeIPVH00010Membranes used for protein transfer after SDS-PAGE.
RandomforestsrcCRAN6.0-94Unified resampling (including LOOCV), tuning grids, and model pipelines.
ReadrCRANNARetrieve matrices/phenotypes from UCSC Xena (e.g., TCGA/GTEx hubs).
SDS-Page Gel (12%)Bio-Rad185-5096System used for quantitative PCR.
StringdbBioconductor1.20.3Visualization for enrichment results (dotplot, cnetplot, ridgeplot).
SuperpcCRAN1.7.7Partial least squares regression adapted to Cox models.
SurvcompBioconductor3.42.4Counts normalization and dispersion estimation when needed (optional, complements limma voom).
SurvivalCRAN1.01-2Fast hierarchical clustering used by WGCNA (optional).
SurvivalsvmCRAN2.2.2Generalized boosted regression modeling (gradient boosting).
SurvminerCRAN3.8-3Cox proportional hazards models; Kaplan–Meier curves.
TCGAbiolinksBioconductorT9039Programmatic access to TCGA data; download/prepare expression and clinical data.
The Cancer Genome Atlas Program ( TCGA)NAhttps://www.cancer.gov/tcga; 175 GBM and 534 LGGUsed for model consruction and validation
TidyverseCRAN1.17.6High performance data manipulation for large matrices/tables.
TimerocCRAN0.5.0KM visualization and risk table rendering.
TRIzolInvitrogen15596026Reagent for RNA extraction from cells.
UCSC XenaNAhttps://xenabrowser.net/datapages/Used for model consruction and validation
UcscxenatoolsBio-Rad4561044Used for protein separation in Western Blot analysis.
WgcnaCRAN0.95Correlation matrices for checkpoint genes and feature relationships.

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Goodenberger, M. L., Jenkins, R. B. Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet. 205 (12), 613-621 (2012).
  2. Cordier, D., Krolicki, L., Morgenstern, A., Merlo, A. Targeted radiolabeled compounds in glioma therapy. Semin Nucl Med. 46 (3), 243-249 (2016).
  3. Jiang, T., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult diffuse gliomas. Cancer Lett. 499, 60-72 (2021).
  4. Huang, X., et al. Immune-Related Gene SERPINE1 Is a Novel Biomarker for Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas via Large-Scale Analysis. Front Oncol. 11, 646060(2021).
  5. Cole, A. P., et al. Microglia in the Brain Tumor Microenvironment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1273, 197-208 (2020).
  6. Vitale, I., Manic, G., Coussens, L. M., Kroemer, G., Galluzzi, L. Macrophages and metabolism in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Metab. 30 (1), 36-50 (2019).
  7. Cheng, W., et al. Bioinformatic profiling identifies an immune-related risk signature for glioblastoma. Neurology. 86 (24), 2226-2234 (2016).
  8. Rodriguez, S. M. B., et al. Glioblastoma and immune checkpoint inhibitors: a glance at available treatment options and future directions. Int J Mol Sci. 25 (19), (2024).
  9. Arrieta, V. A., et al. Immune checkpoint blockade in glioblastoma: from tumor heterogeneity to personalized treatment. J Clin Invest. 133 (2), (2023).
  10. Kadry, H., Noorani, B., Cucullo, L. A blood-brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity. Fluids Barriers CNS. 17 (1), 69(2020).
  11. Wang, Q., et al. Tumor evolution of glioma-intrinsic gene expression subtypes associates with immunological changes in the microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 32 (1), 42-56.e6 (2017).
  12. Jansen, J. A., Omuro, A., Lucca, L. E. T-cell dysfunction in glioblastoma: a barrier and an opportunity for the development of successful immunotherapies. Curr Opin Neurol. 34 (6), 827-833 (2021).
  13. Vander Heiden, M. G., Cantley, L. C., Thompson, C. B. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 324 (5930), 1029-1033 (2009).
  14. Dong, X., et al. Tumor metabolism-rewriting nanomedicines for cancer immunotherapy. ACS Cent Sci. 9 (10), 1864-1893 (2023).
  15. Kesarwani, P., Prabhu, A., Kant, S., Chinnaiyan, P. Metabolic remodeling contributes towards an immune-suppressive phenotype in glioblastoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 68 (7), 1107-1120 (2019).
  16. Xu, X., et al. LncRNA as potential biomarker and therapeutic target in glioma. Mol Biol Rep. 50 (1), 841-851 (2023).
  17. Sun, J., et al. A novel antisense long noncoding RNA within the IGF1R gene locus is imprinted in hematopoietic malignancies. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (15), 9588-9601 (2014).
  18. Wang, J. Y., Liu, D., Meng, Y. D., Guo, Y. Y., Zhao, M. Aberrant allelic switch of antisense lncRNA IRAIN may be an early diagnostic marker in laryngeal cancer. Oncol Lett. 20 (4), 65(2020).
  19. Pian, L., et al. Targeting the IGF1R pathway in breast cancer using antisense lncRNA-mediated promoter cis-competition. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 12, 105-117 (2018).
  20. Salminen, A., Kaarniranta, K., Kauppinen, A. Insulin/IGF-1 signaling promotes immunosuppression via the STAT3 pathway: impact on the aging process and age-related diseases. Inflamm Res. 70 (10-12), 1043-1061 (2021).
  21. Cortés-Ballinas, L., López-Pérez, T. V., Rocha-Zavaleta, L. STAT3 and the STAT3-regulated inhibitor of apoptosis protein survivin as potential therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer (Review). Biomed Rep. 21 (6), 175(2024).
  22. Liu, Z., et al. Machine learning-based integration develops an immune-derived lncRNA signature for improving outcomes in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 13 (1), 816(2022).
  23. Yoshihara, K., et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun. 4, 2612(2013).
  24. Ostrom, Q. T., et al. The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a "state of the science" review. Neuro Oncol. 16 (7), 896-913 (2014).
  25. Weidner, N., Semple, J. P., Welch, W. R., Folkman, J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 324 (1), 1-8 (1991).
  26. Perrin, S. L., et al. Glioblastoma heterogeneity and the tumour microenvironment: implications for preclinical research and development of new treatments. Biochem Soc Trans. 47 (2), 625-638 (2019).
  27. Justus, C. R., Sanderlin, E. J., Yang, L. V. Molecular connections between cancer cell metabolism and the tumor microenvironment. Int J Mol Sci. 16 (5), 11055-11086 (2015).
  28. Boedtkjer, E., Pedersen, S. F. The acidic tumor microenvironment as a driver of cancer. Annu Rev Physiol. 82, 103-126 (2020).
  29. Bernhard, C., Reita, D., Martin, S., Entz-Werle, N., Dontenwill, M. Glioblastoma metabolism: insights and therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 24 (11), 9137(2023).
  30. Kesarwani, P., Kant, S., Prabhu, A., Chinnaiyan, P. The interplay between metabolic remodeling and immune regulation in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 19 (10), 1308-1315 (2017).
  31. Pellegrino, M., et al. Manipulating the tumor immune microenvironment to improve cancer immunotherapy: IGF1R, a promising target. Front Immunol. 15, 1356321(2024).
  32. Zhang, W., et al. Polarization of macrophages in the tumor microenvironment is influenced by EGFR signaling within colon cancer cells. Oncotarget. 7 (46), 75366-75378 (2016).
  33. DiToro, D., et al. Insulin-like growth factors are key regulators of T helper 17/regulatory T cell balance in autoimmunity. Immunity. 52 (4), 650-667.e10 (2020).
  34. Pennati, M., Folini, M., Zaffaroni, N. Targeting survivin in cancer therapy: fulfilled promises and open questions. Carcinogenesis. 28 (6), 1133-1139 (2007).
  35. Sah, N. K., Khan, Z., Khan, G. J., Bisen, P. S. Structural, functional and therapeutic biology of survivin. Cancer Lett. 244 (2), 164-171 (2006).
  36. Altieri, D. C. Survivin apoptosis: an interloper between cell death and cell proliferation in cancer. Lab Invest. 79, 1327-1333 (1999).
  37. Feng, J., et al. A novel long noncoding RNA IRAIN regulates cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 8 (10), 12268-12275 (2015).
  38. Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Luan, X., Xie, G., Pan, X. Inhibition of the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3 signalling pathway by AG490 in laryngeal carcinoma cells. J Int Med Res. 38 (5), 1673-1681 (2010).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Glioma ImmunometabolismPrognostic SignatureWeighted Gene Co ExpressionMachine Learning ModelsTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Evasion

Related Articles