$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chongqing Medical University (IACUC-CQMU-2025-10073).
Preparation of sesquiterpene lactone–enriched fraction (SLEL)
Dried medicinal materials of Eupatorium lindleyanum DC. were pulverized and subjected to reflux extraction 2x with 70% (v/v) ethanol under reduced pressure. Each extraction was conducted with a solvent-to-material ratio of 10:1 (v/w) for 2 h. The combined extracts were filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure at ≤60 °C, and subsequently vacuum freeze-dried to obtain the crude ethanol extract powder.
The dried extract was fully dissolved in distilled water (final concentration: 100 mg/mL) and sequentially subjected to polyamide resin chromatography, followed by D101 macroporous adsorption resin chromatography to enrich sesquiterpene lactones. After the adsorption equilibrium was reached, the D101 resin was washed with distilled water to remove polar impurities and then eluted with anhydrous ethanol. Following ethanol elution, the collected fraction was concentrated under reduced pressure and subjected to freeze-drying to produce the SLEL fraction, which was stored at −20 ℃ until use.
Separation was achieved on a UPLC platform employing a binary mobile phase system of acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water. The gradient program comprised an initial 25 min isocratic hold at low organic content, a short linear ramp to 70% acetonitrile, a high-organic step phase at 90% acetonitrile, and a final equilibration step returning to starting conditions. The system was operated at 0.25 mL·min⁻1 with a column temperature of 35 °C and an injection volume of 0.1 µL (Supplemental Figure S1).
Animals
A total of 36 male Sprague–Dawley rats (200 ± 20 g) and 36 male BALB/c mice (20 ± 2 g) were used in this study. Animals were housed under standardized conditions (22 ± 2 ℃, 55 ± 5% humidity, 12 h light/dark cycle) with free access to food and water. Animals were acclimated for 7 days prior to experimentation and monitored daily for general health. All procedures were conducted to minimize animal suffering, and anesthesia was applied prior to blood collection and tissue harvesting.
Xylene-induced ear edema in mice
The mouse ear edema model was established as previously described9. After acclimatization, mice were randomly assigned into six groups (n = 6 per group): control (CG), model (MG), dexamethasone (DEX, 10 mg/kg), and SLEL low-dose (75 mg/kg), medium-dose (150 mg/kg), and high-dose (300 mg/kg) groups. All treatments were administered by oral gavage once daily for 7 consecutive days (final dosing volume: 10 mL/kg). At 1.5 h after the final administration, inflammation was induced by applying 30 µL of xylene evenly to both surfaces of the right ear, except in the control group. Thirty minutes later, mice were anesthetized, blood samples were collected, and 8 mm circular ear punches were obtained from identical anatomical positions of both ears.
Carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats
The rat paw edema model was established using carrageenan as previously described10. Rats were randomly assigned to six groups (n = 6 per group): CG, MG, DEX (5 mg/kg), and SLEL low-dose (50 mg/kg), medium-dose (100 mg/kg), and high-dose (200 mg/kg) groups. Treatments were administered orally once daily for 7 days (10 mL/kg). Baseline paw volumes were measured prior to the final dosing. Thirty minutes after the last administration, 0.1 mL of 1% (w/v) carrageenan solution was injected subcutaneously into the plantar surface of the right hind paw. Paw volumes were measured at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post injection using a plethysmometer. Paw edema was calculated as:
Paw edema (%) = (Vt − V0) / V0 × 100%
Histological examination
Ear and paw tissues were collected immediately after functional assessments. Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 72 h at room temperature, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (5 µm), and stained with H&E according to standard protocols11.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 10 min at 4 ℃. Levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were quantified using commercially available ELISA kits according to standard protocols.
Western blot analysis
Total protein extracts were prepared from ear and paw tissues using RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Protein concentrations were quantified using a BCA assay, and equal amounts of protein (30 µg per sample) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence and quantified with ImageJ software.
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from ear and paw tissues using the RNA extraction reagent listed in the Table of Materials. One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a commercial reverse transcription kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR Green chemistry with gene-specific primers (Table 1) in a 10 µL reaction volume under a two-step amplification protocol. Detailed reverse transcription conditions and PCR cycling parameters are provided in the Protocol section. Relative transcript levels were calculated using the 2⁻ΔΔCT method, with Gapdh used as the internal reference gene.
Data and statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons between two groups were performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test, whereas one-way ANOVA was applied for analyses involving more than two groups. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Significance is indicated as # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 versus the control group (CG), and * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 versus the model group (MG).