$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Brain metastases represent the most common type of malignant brain tumor in adults, occurring approximately ten times more frequently than primary brain tumors1. It is estimated that 10%–20% of patients with systemic cancer will develop brain metastases during the advanced stages of their disease, which is a leading cause of mortality1,2. Despite significant advances in the treatment of primary cancers, the prognosis for patients with brain metastases remains poor. The one-year survival rate of patients with brain metastasis is less than 20%3. The mechanism of why and how some cancers metastasize to the brain remains unknown. The therapeutic challenge is compounded by the unique biology of brain metastases, including the presence of the BBB, the distinct brain immune microenvironment, and complex tumor cell interactions with neuroglial cells4,5.
Both pharmacodynamic and pathogenesis research on brain metastasis heavily rely on precise preclinical animal models that accurately recapitulate the human disease process. Current animal models of brain metastasis, though widely used, are mainly based on intracranial orthotopic implantation, intravenous or tail vein injection, intracardiac injection, or intracarotid artery injection6,7,8,9,10. However, these models imperfectly mirror human disease progression, often failing to capture key steps such as tumor cell extravasation across an intact BBB under physiological flow conditions11. Intravenous and intracardiac injections result in low brain-specific tumor formation efficiency and often lead to widespread extracranial metastases, causing premature animal death before substantial brain metastases development12. The traditional intracarotid artery injection method increases intracranial tumor formation rates but requires permanent ligation of the CCA. By altering cerebral hemodynamics, this ligation may induce ischemia in ipsilateral brain regions and impair physiological blood flow patterns necessary for tumor cell delivery, thus affecting their spatial distribution and colonization niche within the brain13,14.
High-quality animal models that can more faithfully mimic the pathophysiology of brain metastasis are crucial15. An ideal brain metastasis model should recapitulate the entire metastatic cascade, including tumor cell homing to the brain vasculature, extravasation across the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and dynamic interactions with the brain microenvironment16. High model fidelity is critical for both mechanistic studies and therapeutic evaluation6. However, existing intracarotid injection models do not fully reproduce key physiological conditions, particularly the preservation of normal cerebral blood flow and the natural distribution of circulating tumor cells.
To overcome the limitations of existing preclinical models of brain metastasis, a high-fidelity animal model that more accurately recapitulates the metastatic cascade was developed based on the IPI technique and microsurgical arterial repair. This method involves transient arterial occlusion after tumor cell injection, followed by meticulous repair of the arterial puncture site to restore physiological blood flow to the ipsilateral CCA. This approach not only enhances model consistency and success rates but also, crucially, preserves the BBB by maintaining native cerebral hemodynamics. By minimizing disruption of cerebral blood flow, the modified intracarotid injection model provides a high-fidelity platform that more accurately recapitulates the natural process of brain metastatic colonization, thereby offering an improved tool for investigating mechanisms of brain metastasis and evaluating potential therapeutics.