$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Effect of electroacupuncture on cognitive function in APP/PS1 mice
To assess spatial learning ability, mice underwent training trials from day 1 to day 5. In the hidden platform test (Figure 3A,B), the escape latency of mice in all groups showed a decreasing trend over the training period. Compared with the N group, the AD group exhibited a significantly prolonged escape latency (p < 0.05), indicating pronounced learning and memory deficits in 6-month-old APP/PS1 mice. The escape latency in the AD group was significantly longer than that in both the N and EA groups (p < 0.01). Notably, on day 5, the escape latency in the EA group was significantly shorter than that in the AD group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3C). Following the 5‑day training period, spatial memory was evaluated using the spatial probe test. The ratio of time spent swimming in the target (platform) quadrant to the total swimming time was calculated; a higher ratio indicates better memory retention. The results showed that the swimming‑time ratio in the AD group was significantly lower than that in the N group (p < 0.01). In contrast, the EA group exhibited a significantly higher ratio compared with the AD group (p < 0.01). However, the ratio in the EA group remained lower than that in the N group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3D).
The number of platform crossings, which reflects the precision of spatial memory, was also analyzed. A greater number of crossings suggests better memory retention. The AD group displayed significantly fewer platform crossings than the N group (p < 0.05), whereas the EA group showed a significant increase compared with the AD group (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the EA group still had fewer crossings than the N group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3E).
Effects of electroacupuncture on Aβ deposition in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice
Aβ deposition was evaluated using PET imaging, and the standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) of the radiolabeled Aβ tracer was calculated in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice (Figure 4A). Micro‑PET scans revealed that both the N group and the EA group exhibited significantly lower SUVR values compared to the AD group (Figure 4B). Further quantitative analysis confirmed that the hippocampal SUVR and Aβ in the EA group were significantly higher than those in the N group(p < 0.05), while it remained significantly lower than that in the AD group following electroacupuncture intervention (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C).
Effects of electroacupuncture on Aβ protein expression
Following the behavioral and imaging assessments, Aβ protein expression in the hippocampus was evaluated via Western blot analysis (Figure 5A). Quantitative analysis revealed that the relative expression of Aβ in the AD group was significantly elevated compared to the N group (p < 0.05). The EA group exhibited a significant reduction in hippocampal Aβ expression compared to the AD group (p < 0.05). However, the expression levels in the EA group remained higher than those of the N group, indicating that while the intervention effectively attenuated Aβ accumulation, it did not completely clear the existing plaques (Figure 5B).

Figure 1: Schematic diagram showing the locations of the acupoints GV20 (Baihui), GV26 (Shuigou), and GV29 (Yintang) in mice. This figure has been reused with permission from Sun et al.5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Micro-positron emission tomography (Micro-PET). The IRIS PET/CT (Inviscan) is a preclinical imaging system for mice and rats, featuring high sensitivity (>9%) and a spatial resolution of 1 mm with a 96 mm axial field of view. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Effect of electroacupuncture on cognitive function. (A) MWM apparatus. (B) Mice were tested using the Morris water maze (MWM) apparatus. (C) Trends in escape latency during the hidden platform test. Compared to the N group, ◆◆p < 0.05; compared to the Alzheimer's disease (AD) group, ▲▲p < 0.05. (D) Proportion of swimming time in the first quadrant. Compared to the N group, ◆◆p < 0.05; compared to the AD group, ▲▲p < 0.05. (E) Number of platform crossings in the platform quadrant. Compared to the N group, ◆◆p < 0.05; compared to the AD group, ▲▲p < 0.05. This figure has been reused with permission from Sun et al.5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Effects of electroacupuncture on Aβ deposition. (A) The region of interest in the mouse hippocampus is displayed in green. (B) Micro-positron emission tomography images of Aβ in mice from each group. (C) Comparison of [18F]AV-45 standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR; target region/cerebellum) in the hippocampus of each group, quantified by micro-PET. Compared to the N group, ◆◆p < 0.05; compared to the Alzheimer's disease (AD) group,▲▲p < 0.05. This figure has been reused with permission from Sun et al.5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Effects of electroacupuncture on Aβ protein expression. (A) Representative Western blot bands showing the expression levels of Aβ (4 kDa) and GAPDH (146 kDa) as a loading control. The bands illustrate low Aβ expression in the N group, high expression in the AD group, and reduced expression in the EA group compared to the AD model. (B) Quantitative analysis of the relative expression of Aβ to GAPDH across the experimental groups. Compared to the N group, ◆◆p < 0.05; compared to the Alzheimer's disease (AD) group, ▲▲p < 0.05. This figure has been reused with permission from Sun et al.5. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.