Here, we present a detailed protocol for region-specific lens insertion and stabilization to enable reliable In vivo calcium imaging in mice, to improve reproducibility and reduce trial-and-error in calcium imaging.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
Here, we present a detailed protocol for region-specific lens insertion and stabilization to enable reliable In vivo calcium imaging in mice, to improve reproducibility and reduce trial-and-error in calcium imaging.
In vivo calcium imaging of neuronal populations using surgically implanted optical lenses is widely used to monitor neuronal population activity during behavior. However, surgical success and imaging quality depend critically on anatomical constraints that vary across brain regions. This protocol provides region-specific surgical guidance for the selection and implantation of imaging lenses in commonly targeted cortical and hippocampal areas. Specifically, it describes a surgical workflow encompassing target localization and skull leveling, region-specific craniotomy, and, when required, dura removal or aspiration of overlying tissue, as well as the selection, insertion, and fixation of appropriate lenses and holders. In particular, we describe three implantation strategies: conventional lens implantation for the ventral hippocampus, lens implantation with tissue aspiration for the dorsal hippocampus, and prism lens implantation for cortical imaging. We further provide practical guidance on how differences in tissue depth, vascular architecture, and circuit organization inform key surgical parameters, including lens diameter, craniotomy size, the extent of tissue removal, insertion speed, hemostatic procedures, and fixation methods. By explicitly documenting surgical considerations that are often underreported in written methods, this protocol aims to reduce trial-and-error during lens implantation, and improve experimental reproducibility. Overall, this protocol provides a practical guide for selecting and reliably implementing region-appropriate lens implantation strategies across cortical and hippocampal circuits.
In vivo calcium imaging using implanted optical lenses has become a central technique for monitoring population-level neuronal activity in behaving animals1,2,3,4,5,6. By enabling longitudinal recordings from genetically defined neuronal ensembles, this approach has provided critical insights into the circuit dynamics underlying perception, learning, and decision making2,6,7,8. However, the success of lens-based imaging depends not only on optical access but also on careful consideration of region-specific anatomical constraints. Cortical regions such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC), mid-depth structures such as the dorsal hippocampus, and deep targets such as the ventral hippocampus differ substantially in circuit orientation and tolerance to tissue displacement, among other factors. These anatomical differences necessitate region-specific surgical strategies for lens selection and implantation. Previous studies have established reliable methods for imaging dorsal CA1 neurons in head-fixed mice using vertically implanted lenses6,9,10,11, and prism-based lenses are widely used for cortical imaging7,8, where lateral optical access enables whole- or laminar-specific recordings depending on the target circuit orientation. While these approaches share the common principle of optical access via implanted lenses, they impose distinct surgical constraints that must be addressed in a region-specific manner.
Despite the growing adoption of this technique, a common source of experimental failure lies not in conceptual misunderstanding, but in the lack of sufficiently detailed, region-specific surgical guidance. In practice, failed recordings frequently result from imprecise craniotomy, suboptimal tissue removal, or insufficient consideration of region-specific vascular and structural constraints. While general lens implantation procedures have been described in previous protocols9,10,11,12, the practical surgical nuances that determine imaging success, particularly those that differ across target regions, remain incompletely documented.
This video protocol addresses this gap by providing explicit, region-specific guidance for lens selection and implantation across cortical and hippocampal targets, using the PFC and the dorsal and ventral CA1 regions of the hippocampus as representative examples. Specifically, we describe three implantation strategies, each tailored to the anatomical and surgical constraints of the target region and highlight key decision points and technical pitfalls associated with each approach.
In dorsal hippocampal CA1 imaging, the relatively large diameter of conventional lenses often necessitates tissue aspiration to create sufficient space for implantation. If tissue removal is incomplete or improperly performed, the surrounding tissue may be compressed rather than displaced, leading to an accumulation of neurons near the lens surface and the formation of densely packed cell layers that obscure the intended imaging plane. For the ventral hippocampus, which is located deep within the brain, accurate targeting requires precise control of the insertion angle, trajectory, and penetration speed to minimize tissue damage and ensure correct positioning. By contrast, prism lens implantation for PFC imaging places greater emphasis on minimizing bleeding and preserving cortical integrity through a precise craniotomy and careful lens insertion to avoid vascular damage.
This protocol is intended for researchers planning to implement GRIN lens-based calcium imaging in cortical or hippocampal targets in rodents, particularly those who have encountered challenges in surgical reproducibility or imaging quality. It is most applicable when targeting the dorsal CA1, ventral CA1, or prefrontal cortex, and when using standard GRIN or prism lenses in combination with a miniscope or equivalent head-mounted imaging system. Researchers targeting other brain regions or using different hardware configurations should treat the region-specific principles described here as adaptable guidelines rather than fixed procedures. By explicitly documenting these practical considerations, this video aims to reduce trial-and-error, improve reproducibility across laboratories, and provide a principled framework for selecting appropriate implantation strategies.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All animal care and experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) under the approval number KA2025-060-V3. All experiments complied with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering and to reduce the number of animals used.
1. Preparatory steps for surgery
NOTE: This protocol was developed using 8-week-old adult C57BL/6J and VIP-Cre knock-in mice (RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664, IMSR_JAX:031628). The same general approach can be applied to other strains; however, some adjustments to specific details, such as target coordinates, may be required.
2. Craniotomy

Figure 1. Representative examples of skull drilling for each target region Representative photographs of mouse skulls following craniotomy. (A) Craniotomy targeting the prefrontal cortex. (B) Craniotomy targeting the ventral hippocampus. (C) Craniotomy targeting the dorsal hippocampus. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Skull drilling and edge finishing Schematic illustration of skull drilling and edge finishing. (A) Cross-sectional schematic of a properly finished craniotomy with a smoothly polished lower boundary. (B) Example showing sharp bone remnants caused by insufficient polishing of the lower edge. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Pre-implantation tissue preparation
Before inserting the lens, prepare the tissue to allow stable lens insertion. Depending on the target, use either method 3.1 or 3.2.

Figure 3. Aspiration device setup Photograph of the completed aspiration device assembly. The distal end of the tubing is connected to an aspiration pump, and all junctions are securely sealed to ensure stable suction. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Tissue aspiration during craniotomy preparation A schematic illustration depicting the approximate depth and extent of tissue aspiration required for lens implantation targeting dCA1. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Lens implantation
Two lens implantation methods will be described here. Both involve inserting the lens by advancing it into the tissue, but they differ in how the lens is applied. Select the appropriate method from Sections 4.1 and 4.2.

Figure 5. Tip assembly (A) Segments of P1000 and P200 pipette tips used for construction of the tip assembly. (B) Schematic of the assembled configuration. Insert the smaller P200 tip segment into the larger P200 tip segment and then fit the P1000 tip segment over the outside. (C) Fully assembled tip assembly. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
5. Cementing

Figure 6. Cementing and sealing schematics for lens fixation Schematic illustrations of lens fixation following implantation. Superbond is applied to the lateral surface of the lens and the surrounding skull (gray). After complete curing of the superbond, dental cement is built up in a dome shape to match the height of the lens (pink). Once the cement has hardened, a silicone sealant is applied to cover the lens surface (green). Finally, silicone adhesive is applied to cover and surround the cement dome (light blue). (A) Lens fixation targeting the dorsal hippocampus. (B) Lens fixation targeting the PFC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Histological analysis following lens implantation using the above protocol confirmed accurate placement of both the GRIN lens and prism-coupled GRIN lens. In both cases, the lenses were correctly positioned to record neural activity from the medial prefrontal cortex (Figure 7A), and the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus (Figure 7B), respectively.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The success of lens-based In vivo calcium imaging depends on several surgical steps that vary across brain regions and lens geometries, each of which directly determines the quality and reliability of recorded signals. Figure 10 summarizes the overall surgical workflow for each implantation strategy. Accurate craniotomy sizing is a foundational step: an opening that is too large relative to the lens diameter reduces structural support and increases the risk of post-fixation displace...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding: This work was supported by the Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R002-A1).
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 mm (outer diameter) hose | Tygon | e-3603 | |
| Aspiration pump | Cliq | VC-701 | |
| Black cement (Contemporary Ortho-Jet Liquid) | Lang Dental Mfg. Co. | 1506, black | |
| Black cement (Contemporary Ortho-Jet Powder) | Lang Dental Mfg. Co. | 1530, black | |
| Bupivacaine HCl heavy injection | Myungmoon | 649801341 | |
| Chlorhexidine gluconate solution 5 % | Sungkwang | 657400190 | |
| Cutanplast (dental) | Mascia Brunelli | 5610101 | |
| Dental cement | Vertex | Type 2, Class 2 | |
| Drill bit (tip diameter: 0.5 mm) | Fine Science Tools | 19007-05 | |
| Eye lubricant (Optixcare Pet Eye Lube Plus) | Aventix Animal Health | OPX-4242 | |
| Forceps | Fine Science Tools | 11254-20, 11051-10 | |
| GRIN lens (0.6 × 7.3 mm) | Inscopix | 1050-004597 | |
| GRIN lens (1.0 × 4.0 mm) | Inscopix | 1050-004595 | |
| Homeothermic system for controlling body temperature in small animals | Harvard Apparatus | Model: HB101 | |
| Isoflurane (Terrell) | Piramal | NDC 66794-011-25 | |
| Ketoprofen Injection 100 mg/2 mL | Bukwang | 642201001 | |
| Kwik-Cast | World Precision Instruments | KWIK-CAST | |
| Kwik-Sil | World Precision Instruments | KWIK-SIL | |
| Lidocaine HCl hydrate injection 2 % | Daihan | 645104361 | |
| Nail polish (Black) | Wakemake | 11 | |
| Prism GRIN lens (1.0 x 4.3 mm) | Inscopix | 1050-004601 | |
| Saline solution | JW Pharmaceutical Corporation | 201703175 | |
| Stereo micruscope | Olympus | SZ61 | |
| Stereotaxic holder (standard electrode holder) | KOPF | Model 1770 | |
| Super bond C&B (Catalyst) | Sun Medical | 0334-0010 | |
| Super bond C&B (L-type radiopaque) | Sun Medical | 0334-0020 | |
| Super bond C&B (Monomer) | Sun Medical | 0334-0013 | |
| Surgical scissors | Fine Science Tools | 14060-10 | |
| UV glue (Norland Optical Adhesive) | Norland Products | NOA 63 |