Squaring each species proportion gives greater weight to abundant species than to rare species. Consequently, communities dominated by one or a few species produce larger values of Σpᵢ², indicating a greater probability that two randomly selected individuals belong to the same species. This weighting makes the measure particularly responsive to changes in dominance within a biological community.
The calculation uses the proportion contributed by every species, so adding species can alter the result while changing the balance among existing species can also shift it. A community with similar abundances across species generally has less concentration in any single species than one dominated by a few species. Interpretation therefore requires considering composition and relative abundance together.
The quantity Σpᵢ² expresses concentration, specifically the probability that two individuals selected at random belong to the same species. Its complement, 1 − Σpᵢ², reverses that emphasis by expressing diversity rather than concentration. Researchers should identify which form they report because the numerical meaning changes, even though both describe the same community structure.
Dominant species have a strong effect because their proportions are squared in the calculation. A shift involving a highly abundant species can therefore change the index more than a comparable shift involving a rare species. This sensitivity helps biologists examine community patterns in which dominance matters, including changes associated with disturbance, pollution, or habitat loss.
First, determine the proportion of individuals belonging to each species in the sampled community. Square each proportion and sum the squared values to obtain Σpᵢ². If a diversity form is required, subtract that sum from one. The resulting value can then be compared with values from other habitats or sampling periods, provided the same form is used.
Biologists can apply it when they need to compare community structure across habitats or evaluate changes over time. The measure is useful for monitoring effects linked to disturbance, pollution, and habitat loss because it incorporates relative abundance rather than merely listing species. Comparing the selected index form across comparable samples can reveal shifts in dominance and overall diversity.