Neurologically Intact Impaired
Neurologically Intact Impaired - Related Videos
08:11
Measuring Progressive Neurological Disability in a Mouse Model of Multiple Sclerosis
0 Views •
Cited by 21 •
2016
An optimized testing protocol is presented in this paper for the Rotarod performance test, used for measuring progressive neurological disability in TMEV-infected mice.
08:34
Thinking Too Much Impairs Decision-Making
0 Views •
2023
Source: Peter Mende-Siedlecki & Jay Van Bavel—New York University When we are considering a tough choice between two or more attractive options, we often end up actively weighing the pros and cons of each alternative. By reflecting on their advantages and disadvantages, we attempt to fit a complex, subjective decision into an orderly set of criteria. However, research in psychology suggests that this sort of introspective approach might not always yield the most optimal outcomes.1 In other...
07:52
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
0 Views •
2026
This protocol introduces an automated sound localization testing system with precise loudspeaker placement and integrated response analysis, validated in normal-hearing participants and participants with single-sided deafness. It provides a reproducible method to assess spatial hearing and supports functional classification using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework.
09:42
Electrophysiological Recording in the Brain of Intact Adult Zebrafish
0 Views •
Cited by 14 •
2013
This paper describes how an adult zebrafish can be immobilized, intubated, and used for in vivo electrophysiological experiments to allow recordings and manipulation of neural activity in an intact animal.
09:58
Lipidomics and Transcriptomics in Neurological Diseases
0 Views •
Cited by 13 •
2022
This article presents a modular protocol for tissue lipidomics and transcriptomics, and plasma lipidomics in neurological disease mouse models targeting lipids underlying inflammation and neuronal activity, membrane lipids, downstream messengers, and mRNA-encoding enzymes/receptors underlying lipid function. Sampling, sample processing, extraction, and quantification procedures are outlined.
FAQs
Routine examinations may confirm preserved basic neurological function without challenging the neural processes required for complex cognition, sensation, movement, or behavior. Subtle abnormalities in network connectivity, synaptic signaling, or information processing may therefore remain undetected. More demanding assessments can expose performance differences that appear only under specific cognitive, behavioral, or task-related conditions.
Altered connectivity can disrupt communication among neural regions even when basic functions remain preserved. Changes in synaptic signaling may also affect how information is transmitted or integrated, producing inefficient processing rather than an obvious examination abnormality. These mechanisms help explain why a person can appear neurologically normal while showing measurable difficulties during higher-order tasks.
Detection improves when assessment places specific demands on information processing, cognition, sensation, movement, or behavior. Controlled behavioral tasks and sensitive neuropsychological measures can reveal deficits that broad screening overlooks. Functional imaging and electrophysiology add complementary evidence by examining brain activity or processing-related responses, helping identify abnormalities linked to particular task conditions.
Assessment typically begins by recognizing preserved performance on a routine neurological examination, followed by targeted measurement of suspected difficulties. Sensitive neuropsychological tests, functional imaging, electrophysiology, and controlled behavioral tasks can then examine cognition, sensation, movement, or behavior more precisely. Comparing results across these approaches helps distinguish broadly preserved function from task-specific impairment.
The distinction is useful when symptoms or performance changes may be too subtle for routine examination findings, including after mild brain injury or during early neurological disease. It allows researchers and clinicians to measure abnormalities before widespread basic dysfunction becomes evident. Such evidence can improve outcome measurement and clarify how impairment changes over time.
Sensitive measurements provide more specific targets for rehabilitation planning than a routine examination alone. They can show which cognitive, sensory, motor, or behavioral functions remain affected and establish outcomes that reflect task performance. The same measures help evaluate treatment effects by detecting meaningful changes that might not appear through standard neurological assessment.