Paced Auditory Serial Subtraction
Paced Auditory Serial Subtraction - Related Videos
06:14
Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
0 Views •
2023
We present a minimally invasive leporine model of long-term cardiac pacing that can be utilized for artificial pacing and heart failure development in preclinical studies.
10:14
In Ovo Electroporation in the Chicken Auditory Brainstem
0 Views •
Cited by 6 •
2017
Auditory brainstem neurons of avians and mammals are specialized for fast neural encoding, a fundamental process for normal hearing functions. These neurons arise from distinct precursors of embryonic hindbrain. We present techniques utilizing electroporation to express genes in the hindbrain of chicken embryos to study gene function during auditory development.
02:22
Measuring the Auditory Brainstem Response in Mice
0 Views •
2025
Source: Lee, D., et. al. Modified Experimental Conditions for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Mice and Assessment of Hearing Function and Outer Hair Cell Damage. J. Vis. Exp. (2023)This video demonstrates the measurement of auditory brainstem response (ABR) in a mouse. Electrodes are placed on the head, behind the ear, and near the tail of an anesthetized mouse. Acoustic stimuli at various intensities are delivered, and electric signals generated are recorded as waveforms.
09:38
Quantitative Assessment of Cortical Auditory-tactile Processing in Children with Disabilities
0 Views •
Cited by 8 •
2014
Objective and easy measurement of sensory processing is extremely difficult in nonverbal or vulnerable pediatric patients. We developed a new methodology to quantitatively assess infants and children's cortical processing of light touch, speech sounds, and the multisensory processing of the 2 stimuli, without requiring active subject participation or causing discomfort in vulnerable patients.
09:43
Measuring Reaction Time and Donders' Method of Subtraction
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University The ambition of experimental psychology is to characterize the mental events that support the human ability to solve problems, perceive the world, and turn thoughts into words and sentences. But people cannot see or feel those mental events; they cannot be weighed, combined in test tubes, or grown in a dish. Wanting to study mental life, nonetheless, Franciscus Donders, a Dutch ophthalmologist in the early 1800s, came up with a...
FAQs
Continuous updating is central to the task. The participant must hold the preceding value in working memory, replace it when a new digit arrives, perform the subtraction, and regulate a spoken response. Because these operations occur together, performance reflects the coordination of attention, short-term retention, calculation, and response control rather than arithmetic ability alone.
The fixed presentation rate removes the option to pause between calculations. Each new number creates a deadline for retaining the prior value, computing the difference, and responding before the next item. This time pressure increases the demand on processing speed and sustained attention, making changes in performance sensitive to altered cognitive load.
Accuracy indicates whether participants produce correct differences, whereas response speed reflects how rapidly they process and respond to each item. Considering both measures helps distinguish slower but accurate performance from rapid responding with more errors. Their combination therefore provides a fuller picture of executive functioning and response control under demanding conditions.
The procedure presents a sequence of numbers aloud at a consistent pace. After hearing each new digit, the participant retains the preceding value, subtracts the new information as required by the task, and answers before the next item arrives. Researchers can then record response accuracy and speed as performance outcomes.
Neuroscientists may apply the task when they need to examine cognitive effects associated with stress, fatigue, brain injury, neurological disease, or an experimental intervention. Repeating the assessment under relevant conditions can reveal whether attention, processing speed, or response control changes as the participant’s cognitive state or treatment exposure changes.
Changes in correct responses and response timing can indicate altered executive functioning during ongoing information processing. The task is especially useful for tracking dynamic shifts in attention and cognitive performance rather than relying only on a single static measure. Such outcomes help researchers evaluate how demanding conditions or interventions affect processing over time.