Here, we present a method for delivering viral expression vectors into the brain using silk fibroin films. This method allows targeted delivery of expression vectors using silk/AAV coated optical fibers, tapered optical fibers, and cranial windows.
The quest to understand how neural circuits process information in order to drive behavioral output has been greatly aided by recently-developed optical methods for manipulating and monitoring the activity of neurons in vivo. These types of experiments rely on two main components: 1) implantable devices that provide optical access to the brain, and 2) light-sensitive proteins that change neuronal excitability or provide a readout of neuronal activity. There are a number of ways to express light-sensitive proteins, but stereotaxic injection of viral vectors is currently the most flexible approach because expression can be controlled with genetic, anatomical, and temporal precision. Despite the great utility of viral vectors, delivering the virus to the site of optical implants poses numerous challenges. Stereotaxic virus injections are demanding surgeries that increase surgical time, increase the cost of studies, and pose a risk to the animal’s health. The surrounding tissue can be physically damaged by the injection syringe, and by immunogenic inflammation caused by the abrupt delivery of a bolus of high-titer virus. Aligning injections with optical implants is especially difficult when targeting small regions deep in the brain. To overcome these challenges, we describe a method for coating multiple types of optical implants with films composed of silk fibroin and Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors. Fibroin, a polymer derived from the cocoon of Bombyx mori, can encapsulate and protect biomolecules and can be processed into forms ranging from soluble films to ceramics. When implanted into the brain, silk/AAV coatings release virus at the interface between optical elements and the surrounding brain, driving expression precisely where it is needed. This method is easily implemented and promises to greatly facilitate in vivo studies of neural circuit function.
The past decade has produced an explosion of engineered light-sensitive proteins for monitoring and manipulating neural activity1. Viruses offer unparalleled flexibility for expressing these optogenetic tools in the brain. Compared to transgenic animals, viruses are far easier to produce, transport, and store, allowing fast implementation of the newest optogenetic tools. Expression can be targeted genetically to distinct neuronal populations, and viruses designed for the retrograde transport can even be used to target expression based on neuronal connectivity2.
Viruses are usually introduced with stereotaxic injections, which can be time-consuming and challenging. Precisely targeting small regions can be difficult, while driving expression over broad areas often requires many injections. Moreover, when an optical device is subsequently implanted into the brain to deliver light in vivo, the implant must be properly aligned with the viral injection. Here, we describe an easily-implemented method for delivering viral vectors to the tissue around an implanted device using silk fibroin films3. Silk fibroin is commercially available, well-tolerated by neural tissues, and can be used to produce materials with varied properties. Silk films can be applied to implants using common laboratory equipment like microinjection pipettes or hand pipettes. Silk/AAV films eliminate the requirement for two surgical procedures and ensure that virus-mediated expression is properly aligned to the optical implant. The resulting expression is constrained to the tip of fibers, and results in less unwanted expression along the fiber track than stereotaxic injections.
In addition to producing targeted expression at the tip of small fibers, silk/AAV films can be used to drive widespread (>3 mm diameter) cortical expression beneath cranial windows. In vivo 2-photon imaging of fluorescent activity sensors has become an indispensable tool for evaluating the role of neuronal activity in driving sensory and cognitive processing. However, to drive uniform expression over the broad cortical areas, experimenters often perform multiple injections. These injections can be extremely time-consuming and can lead to inconsistent expression across the field of view. In contrast, silk/AAV-coated cranial windows are extremely easy to manufacture, greatly reduce the time required for surgeries, and most remarkably drive expression hundreds of microns below the cortical surface.
All experiments involving animals were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Harvard Standing Committee on Animal Care following guidelines described in the US NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Adult C57BL/6 mice of either sex (6-15 weeks of age) were used for all experiments.
1. Obtain Aqueous Silk Fibroin
2. Mix Aqueous Silk with AAV Expression Vectors
3. Prepare Equipment for Fabrication and Storage of Silk/AAV-Coated Devices
4. Apply Silk/AAV Film to Devices
5. Storing silk/AAV-coated implants
6. Implanting the Devices
7. Evaluating the Expression and Troubleshooting
To assess the success of silk/AAV films in driving expression, we perfused animals 2-3 weeks after implantation and prepared brain slices from the region of interest. Fluorescence images of fluorophore-tagged optogenetic proteins (ChR2-YFP) provided a measure of the extent of expression (Figure 1D). Typical optical fibers (230 µm diameter) can readily accommodate 200 nL of silk/AAV. With practice, experimenters can achieve highly reliable expression around the tip of implanted fibers (Figure 5).
To assess expression driven by silk/AAV-coated cranial windows, begin imaging beginning 7-10 days after implantation. We have used two-photon imaging for visualization, but other methods such as fluorescence imaging with a CCD could also be used. Two possible issues with coated cranial windows are insufficient expression, and silk films that fail to dissolve and obscure the field of view. To increase expression, we suggest performing a durectomy prior to implanting the window, and/or increasing the amount of virus in the film. We achieved the best expression using a 1:4 mixture of silk and stock-titer AAV, respectively. While this represents a substantially larger number of viral particles than are usually used in stereotaxic injections, the decreased surgical time counters the marginal additional cost of virus. Meanwhile, if silk films fail to dissolve beneath the window, further reduce the amount of silk used to coat the window. The total amount of silk in coated windows is 10-100 times more than on fiber implants, and the film is less embedded in tissue and thus may not be exposed to the same levels of proteolytic activity than can dissolve silk films13. However, the presence of some silk is essential to achieving expression beneath windows3, likely because a film made of virus alone is washed away by interstitial fluid during surgery.
Figure 1: Applying silk/AAV films to optical fibers. (A) Chronic fiber implants are placed fiber side-down into a holder (inset) mounted on a XYZ translator. A fixed microinjector below the fibers dispenses silk/AAV onto the fiber tips. A stereoscope allows visualization of the process. (B) Apply silk/AAV to fiber tips in small volumes (10-20 nL). After ejecting a bolus, retract the pipette and allow ~60 s for the droplet to dry to a flat film. Repeat the process until the required volume has been applied to the fiber tip. (C) Inspect silk coatings. Optimal coatings should be centered on the fiber tip (left), while improper coatings extend outward from the fiber face making them more prone to dislodge from the fiber (right). (D) Representative fibers coated with 200 nL of silk/AAV, and the resulting AAV-driven ChR2-YFP expression 2 weeks after implantation. The compact silk/AAV coating on the left resulted in robust expression, while the coating on the right protruded past the face of the fiber and resulted almost no expression, likely because the silk/AAV did not adhere to the optical fiber during implantation. Scale bars 0.2 mm (fibers) and 1.0 mm (brain slices). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Setup for coating tapered fiber implants. (A) The microinjector is mounted above the tapered fiber holder, and tapered fibers are positioned orthogonally to the ejection syringe. (B) Begin at the widest point (inset) and eject small volumes while moving the ejection syringe towards the point of the taper. This results in a continuous coating along the length of the taper. (C) Representative tapered fiber coated with silk mixed with Fast Green to aid in visualization. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Coating cranial windows. Silk/AAV can be applied cranial windows using a hand pipette. A standard 3 mm diameter window can be coated with a 5 µL droplet, which will slowly dry to a flat film. Inset: GCaMP6f expression resulting from silk/AAV-coated cranial windows implanted with and without durectomies. This figure has been adapted from Jackman et al. (2018)3. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Storing silk/AAV coated implants. (A) To remove residual moisture and preserve viral efficacy, implants should be stored under vacuum at 4 °C until used. Implants stored this way remain viable for at least 7 days. (B) Expression resulting from 4 silk/AAV coated fibers implanted after 7 days of storage. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Silk/AAV-GFP coated optical fibers reliably drive expression. Fluorescent images of slices from 24 consecutive striatal implants. Each implant was coated with 100-400 nL of 1:1 silk/AAV-GFP. This cohort of implants indicates the ability of silk to restrict expression to the implant site (in this case the dorsal striatum). GFP fluorescence is indicated in green; DAPI staining is shown in blue. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The use of silk/AAV to target the expression of optogentic proteins overcomes limitations of approaches that are currently in use. Although many studies successfully use AAV injections to express optogenetic proteins, it is challenging to align expression to the tip of optical fibers, to regions around the length of tapered fibers, and to the viewing region of a GRIN lens. Because of misalignment between optical components and optogenetic expression, stereotaxic injections can be unreliable, and many experiments fail. The silk/AAV labelling method we describe here solves this problem. It also simplifies the procedure by eliminating a second surgical step and in some cases eliminating the need for a second surgery. It can also be difficult to use viruses to obtain widespread expression beneath cranial windows, and experimenter typically perform long surgeries to inject virus in multiple locations. The ability to obtain widespread expression over large cortical regions by simply coating cranial windows with silk/AAV is a simplification that eliminates the need for the many invasive injections.
Another potential advantage of the silk/AAV method is that it might induce less inflammation in the neural tissues compared to viral injections. Injecting high-titer AAV into the brain can cause inflammatory responses such as reactive astrocytosis that have the potential to alter cellular and circuit properties14,15 (although such potential complications are usually ignored). Silk films induce little immunogenic response on their own13 and silk/AAV films are expected to release virus over the course of many hours or days16, which may lower the viral load in the surrounding tissue and reduce immunogenic responses. With conventional approaches in which implantation of a device is preceded by an AAV injection, inflammatory responses can arise from both the implantation and the injection. In the future it will be desirable to systematically compare conventional approaches and the silk/AAV method to determine whether silk/AAV films reduces overall inflammatory responses.
Several steps are critical to the successful use of silk/AAV films. Most importantly, the coating of optical fibers must be done carefully as described in the Methods and the location of the dried films should be assessed carefully by visual inspection under a microscope to ensure that the films are compact, in the correct location, and adhere to the face of the optical fiber. Any silk/AAV on the sides of the optical fiber will lead to expression outside the region of interest, and misshaped films that protrude beyond the face of the fiber may break off during implantation and lead to unreliable or no expression. The techniques we describe for applying silk/AAV to implantable devices can be adapted to use of any materials are that are readily available and allow the precise deposition of small volumes of silk/AAV.
A bit of practice is required to achieve accurate, reproducible results. If expression is observed along the track of the fiber, it is likely that the silk film dried on the side of the fiber rather than the fiber face. Repeat the manufacturing process and closely inspect dried implants for signs that films are drying on the side of the fiber. Because silk/AAV films are optically transparent, it may help to practice applying silk mixed with dye (Fast Green or a similar dye) to better visualize the shape of resulting films (Figure 2C). If there is no expression, it is probable that the silk film dislodged from the fiber tip during implantation. We suggest the use of stock-titer virus when making implants. For optical fibers, this reduces the total volume that must be applied to small diameter fibers. If the size of the coating is a concern consider waiting longer between each 10 nL application to allow complete drying of the deposited droplet. Silk/AAV droplets dry faster under a warm lamp. For cranial windows, high-titer virus may be necessary to supply adequate viral load across the pia or dura. Certain types of implants may dissolve silk and release AAV more readily than others. We have found that cranial windows implanted over the surface of the brain require a lower ratio of silk/virus to achieve reliable expression, perhaps owing to different cerebral spinal fluid dynamics or protease activity. If expression cannot be increased by increasing effective AAV concentrations, decreasing the volume of aqueous silk is a plausible alternative.
Finally, it is important to store the optical components properly and implant them quite soon after they are prepared. We have shown that coated fibers that are refrigerated under vacuum can be stored for many days prior to use. Vacuum storage removes residual moisture17 which may reduce the solubility of silk films, and also help maintain viral efficacy. Ideally, optical fibers should be implanted within 24 hours of fabrication. However, we find that silk/AAV-coated fibers stored under vacuum drive similar levels of expression when implanted 7 days after fabrication (Figure 4B). In contrast, coated cranial windows and GRIN lenses drove the most reliable expression when they were dried at room temperature and used within hours of preparation. The reason for this disparity remains unclear. Further studies may be needed to refine preparation and storage conditions to further extend the storage time.
Silk/AAV-coated cranial windows have considerable potential because they drastically shorten surgical times and are extremely simple to manufacture, but at present this method has limitations. Coated cranial windows uniformly label large areas of cortex and drive sufficient expression in layer 2/3 for GCaMP imaging, with somewhat less expression in deeper layers. However, stereotaxic injections drive more robust expression and provide more control over the layers targeted for expression. Reliable expression was only achieved when the dura was removed. Although the dura is often removed for many 2-photon imaging experiments to improve image quality8, for many experiments it is desirable to obtain labelling in a less invasive manner. We have therefore explored our ability to use silk/AAV to label cortical regions without removing the dura. We obtained some labelling, but it is possible that this was a consequence of damaging the dura in the process of preparing the craniotomy. Further study is needed for coated cranial windows to be used to reliably label the cortex without removing the dura.
The preparation of aqueous silk fibroin from cocoons of Bombyx Mori is described in detail in Rockwood et al. (2011)18. Aqueous silk fibroin is now commercially available (5% w/v). Although most of our experiments were performed using aqueous silk fibroin stocks prepared in our lab (5-7.5% w/v), we have obtained similar results using commercial aqueous fibroin. Aqueous fibroin is stable at 4 °C for up to 3 months, after which it spontaneously transitions from liquid to hydrogel18. We recommend that fibroin stocks be divided into ~1 mL aliquot and stored at -80 °C. A 1 mL working aliquot (sufficient for coating hundreds of implants) can be stored at 4 °C and used until it begins to gel. Be careful not shake, vortex, agitate or aggressively pipette aqueous fibroin, as shear forces can lead to gelation19,20.
Silk/AAV films permit a wide range of expression patterns, from widespread cortical expression under cranial windows, to precise subcortical expression at the tip of a small-diameter optical fibers. These techniques were developed to take advantage of common AAV expression vectors but could likely be used to disperse other expression vectors like Lentiviruses or rabies viruses into the brain. Silk films could also be manufactured into three-dimensional shapes to improve viral release into tissue. For example, in order to drive strong expression beneath cortical windows without the use of a durotomy, cranial windows could be coated with arrays of silk microneedles that would pierce the dura and release virus in deeper cortical layers21. Further refinement will likely lead to improved properties of virus release, and new applications for silk/AAV films.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors wish to thank J. Vazquez for illustrations, D. Kaplan and C. Preda for reagents and helpful guidance, and the labs of B. Sabatini and C. Harvey for in vivo imaging. Microscopy was made possible by M. Ocana and the Neurobiology Imaging Center, supported in part by the Neural Imaging Center as part of a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) P30 Core Center grant (NS072030). This work was supported by the GVR Khodadad Family foundation, the Nancy Lurie Marks foundation, and by NIH grants, NINDS R21NS093498, U01NS108177 and NINDS R35NS097284 to W.G.R, and by an NIH postdoctoral fellowship F32NS101889 to C.H.C.
Aqueous silk fibroin | Sigma | 5154-20ML | Aqueous Silk Fibroin (5% w/v) for making films |
Microinjector to deposit silk/AAV | Drummond | 3-000-207 | Nanoject III nanoliter injector |
Manipulator to hold implants | Narashige | MM-33 | Micromanipulator |
Stereoscope to visualize silk deposits | AmScope | SM-6TX-FRL | 3.5X-45X Trinocular articulating zoom microscope with ring light |
Vacuum chamber to store implants | Ablaze | N/A | 3.5 Quart Vacuum Vac Degassing Chamber |
Optional, implant holder for storage | N/A | N/A | To store premade optical fibers, drill a grid of ~4 mm-deep holes with a diameter just larger than the ferrule diameter into a plastic block. |
Optical fiber | Thorlabs | FT200EMT | Ø200 µm Core Multimode Optical Fiber for fiber implants |
Ferrules | Kientec | FZI-LC-230 | LC Zirconia Ferrule for fiber implants |
Various materials for manufacturing chronic fiber implants | Various | N/A | For detailed procedure, see Ung K, Arenkiel BR. Fiber-optic implantation for chronic optogenetic stimulation of brain tissue. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE. 2012(68). |
Tapered fiber implants | Optogenix | Lambda-B | Tapered fiber implants |
GRIN lenses | GoFoton | CLH-100-WD002-002-SSI-GF3 | GRIN lenses |
Small glass cranial windows | Warner | 64-0726 (CS-3R-0) | Small round cover glass, #0 thickness |
Large glass cranial windows | Warner | 64-0731 (CS-5R-0) | Small round cover glass, #0 thickness |
Various materials for manufacturing cranial windows | Various | N/A | For detailed procedure, see Goldey GJ et al. Removable cranial windows for long-term imaging in awake mice. Nature protocols. 2014 Nov;9(11):2515. |