Over the past few decades, three variations of the SA reinstatement procedure have been developed to study reinstatement of drug seeking in laboratory rats and monkeys. The differences that define the procedural variations relate primarily to whether drug SA, extinction, and testing sessions occur within the same day or on different days 1. The procedure we have described in this paper is commonly referred to as the "within-between" session variation, because drug SA occurs during daily sessions (i.e., in a between-session manner) that are separate from extinction and test sessions, but extinction and testing occur on the same day (i.e., in a within-session manner) [e.g., 7, 9]. Alternatively, in so-called "between sessions" procedures, all phases of the experiment occur sequentially, such that SA, extinction, and testing sessions are given on different days (i.e., all phases are between sessions) [e.g., 8, 10, 11]. In contrast, in complete "within sessions" procedures, SA training, extinction, and test sessions all occur within the same day [e.g., 12].
Although there are published reports of footshock-induced reinstatement of drug seeking using different variations of the reinstatement procedure, we have found this stressor (at least in animals with a history of cocaine SA) to be most effective when extinction and testing occur on the same day (i.e., in a "within-between" sessions manner). Alternatively, we have had success with obtaining reliable footshock-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking using a completely "between sessions" procedure, but only under conditions in which animals are housed in the SA chambers throughout the experiment 8, or at least during extinction and testing 13. The disadvantage of this between-session approach, over that described in the present protocol, is that it limits the number of subjects that can be trained and tested at one time and, thereby, decreases the efficiency of data collection. Although under the conditions of the present protocol only one group of animals can be extinguished and tested at a given time, a greater throughput can be achieved by staggering by one week the start time of the SA training phase for two groups of rats. In this scenario, a first group of rats can enter the drug-free phase as the second group enters Week 2 of SA training, and, subsequently, extinction and testing can be carried out in the first group while the second group is in its drug-free phase. This approach permits a more efficient use of resources and accelerates the rate of data acquisition, while leading to very effective and reliable footshock-induced reinstatement.
Importantly, in our procedure, extinction of the previously drug-reinforced behavior and testing for reinstatement occurs in the presence of drug-associated cues. Although we have never carried out extinction training or testing in the absence of drug-associated cues, it is our understanding, based on personal communications, that the stressor may in fact be ineffective in inducing reinstatement when testing occurs in the absence of extinguished cues (at least in the case of animals with a history of cocaine SA). A systematic examination of this variable, and the theoretical implications it poses, is an important question for future research.
A final procedural factor that warrants comment is that the effect of footshock stress on reinstatement appears to be highly sensitive to manipulations of context. For example, footshock stress is only effective in inducing the reinstatement of drug seeking if it is administered in the environment in which drug SA and extinction occur; that is, footshock does not reinstate drug seeking if exposure to the stressor occurs in a novel context, suggesting an important interaction between the stressor and drug environment in its effects on reinstatement 14.
In conclusion, footshock reinstatement procedures, like those described in this paper, have been used with considerable success to elucidate the basic behavioral and neurobiological mechanisms governing the relationship between stress and drug relapse. Indeed, these procedures, when modified to accommodate pharmacological pretreatments or neurochemical manipulations targeting specific neuronal substrates, can serve as powerful tools for characterizing the neurobiology of reinstatement to drug seeking by stress.