$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The strict maintenance of euglycemia is imperative to prevent morbidities such as neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy, which are all hallmarks of the pathology of uncontrolled type 1 and 2 diabetes1. Reduced β-cell function and mass in both type 1 and 2 diabetes perturb blood glucose concentrations2. Whereas immune-mediated type 1 diabetes results from a devastating loss of insulin-producing β-cells, impaired β-cell insulin secretion and peripheral insulin signaling in type 2 diabetes together promote hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and increased hepatic glucose production, which eventually results in both loss of β-cell mass and insulin secretory capacity from individual β-cells3. Understanding the underlying β-cell mechanisms in the progression of type 1 and 2 diabetes will hopefully give rise to novel therapies to prevent and treat these diseases.
In vitro tissue culture models, such as the INS-1 and MIN6 immortalized β-cell lines, can be useful tools for understanding specific β-cell functions. However, the interactions among the different cell types within the islet may themselves regulate β-cell function. For example, the paracrine influence of glucagon (released from α-cells) and somatostatin (released from δ-cells) in increasing and decreasing insulin secretion, respectively, demonstrates the importance of cell cell proximity in the endocrine response4. Moreover, gap junctions between β-cells potentiate the release of insulin5. Furthermore, although strides have been made in generating insulinoma lines that better replicated the physiological response of isolated islets to glucose (e.g., the INS-1- derived 832/13 and 832/3 cell lines), their glucose responsiveness still differs from normal rat islets6,7. Moreover, the response of these clonal insulinoma cell lines to glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists can differ dramatically from one another, as well as from normal islets6. Therefore, immortalized cell lines may not represent the best model for assaying agents that impact on cAMP production.
In contrast to the insulinoma-derived cell lines, studying β-cell function solely in whole animal models offers its own set of complications. One of the biggest challenges in working with endocrine tissue is measuring the precise concentration of hormone released. Specifically, the liver plays a major role metabolizing insulin, and the pancreas blood flow goes directly to the liver. Thus, a plasma insulin measurement may not accurately portray the amounts of insulin being secreted from the pancreas itself or the impact of different treatments on the rate of insulin secretion8. Furthermore, renal metabolism of glucagon may limit the reliability of glucagon output from islet α-cells9. Therefore, isolating primary mouse islets for in vitro experimentation provides a more precise understanding of how the islet is responding to specific stimuli to complement measurements made in vivo.
The present protocol for the isolation of mouse islets is a well-established protocol used by a number of groups (with slight modifications that may help to increase success)10,11. In addition, the determination of cAMP production allows for a direct read-out of the incretin responsiveness of the β-cells. In conjunction with cAMP measurement, protein content and insulin secretion can also be quantified from the same cAMP sample prep, helping to determine whether a defect in β-cell function lies proximal or distal to cAMP10. The final cAMP content and insulin secretion application in this protocol can be a very powerful tool for understanding the influence of pharmaceutical and dietary constituents, among others, on cAMP and insulin secretion. In addition to stimulation from glucose alone, other compounds can be used to measure changes in cAMP and insulin secretion10,11.
Finally, although insulin is the primary hormone we assay from isolated islets, other hormones, such as glucagon and somatostatin, as well as cytokines, eicosanoids, and cyclic adenosine monophosphate, can also be measured, either by a transient stimulation assay or by quantification of their levels in culture medium12. Finally, although outside of the scope of this manuscript, islet isolation with the described collagenase isolation method allows for islet preservation so that many other downstream applications may be pursued, such as islet transplantation, RNA isolation for quantitative real time PCR or microarray analyses, protein isolation for Western blotting, islet embedding and immunofluorescent imaging, and [3H]-thymidine incorporation as a measure of islet cell replication, some of which have been described in previous JoVE articles13-16. Overall, following the islet isolation procedure described in the protocol may provide a researcher with important and useful information for developing therapies and promoting drug discovery aimed at enhancing β-cell function.