The central dogma of neurobiology, laid down by the fundamental observations of the brain cytoarchitecture made by Ramón Y. Cajal over a century ago, held that neurogenesis was unlikely after adolescence given the complexity of the neural networks found in the CNS1. Despite the work of Altman in the 1960s, and later Kaplan, demonstrating that 3H-thymidine could be found in mature neurons indicating that in fact neurons were being generated in distinct areas of the adult brain, the dogma continued to hold2,3. Evidence continued to mount with Nottebohm’s research describing the seasonal changes in the number of neurons present in songbird brains4. It wasn’t until 1999, when Gould et al. published work on the generation of neurons in the hippocampus increases with the performance of associative learning tasks in rat, as well as the observations of Kornack and Rakic demonstrating continued neurogenesis in the adult macaque that the concept of a less rigid, more plastic brain, was recognized5,6.
The search for the cellular source for these de novo generated neurons lead to the discovery of a discrete population of stem cells (SCs) that reside in areas of the brain referred to as niches7. The subventricular zone and sub granular zone of the hippocampus are considered to be the two principal neurogenic regions8,9. Cells isolated from these locations display the classic characteristic of embryonic or fetal derived SCs, self-renewal and differentiation potential. In the case of neural stem cells (NSCs), they can be differentiated into neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. In addition, these SCs stain positive for fetal NSC markers such as the intermediate filament protein nestin10. More recent work highlights that SCs might not be limited to these two areas, and are in fact localized throughout the brain as a largely quiescent population of cells tightly associated with the vasculature11.
The observations that SCs are mobilized in response to injury suggests the possibility of being able to utilize these cells for regenerative purposes to aid in the recovery from neurodegenerative disorder and stroke12,13. This is not unlike the role that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) play in the healing of connective tissues, which are found as perivascular cells that have the potential to become osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipose cells14. However, NSCs cannot be harvested in the same manner as MSCs from bone marrow by routine aspiration and density gradient centrifugation techniques and subsequently utilized in autologous cell based therapies. As a consequence, other sources of cells, such as the use of fetal NSCs or neuronal precursors derived from embryonic stem cells have been extensively explored in animal disease and injury models with varying degrees of success15. Induced pluripotent stem cell technologies utilizing somatic cell sources offer another potential avenue for producing therapeutically useful cell-based therapies for a wide range of applications, overcoming the limited availability and ethical concerns regarding the use of embryonic cells and fetal tissues16. However, clinical translation of these findings has proven to be a difficult task, as demonstrated in the struggles of treating various neurological conditions with SC-based therapeutic approaches17,18, as well as a tortuous path to regulatory clearance. As an alternative approach, introduction of specific pharmacological treatments can modulate NSC numbers and facilitate recovery in models of Parkinson’s disease and stroke19. Whatever the strategy might be, understanding how to effectively manipulate these cells requires an accessible in vitro system.
Cultures of NSCs can be performed either as aggregate cultures, also known as neurospheres, or as a monolayer8,20. Both techniques have been widely used, allowing for the establishment of defined culture conditions, i.e. use of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) or basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) as a mitogen source, that provide for the expansion of multipotent precursors. While neurosphere cultures may be better suited for studying clonal propagation capability of an isolated cell type, the system has been shown to produce a mixed population of cells during expansion21. In addition, the closed structure of neurospheres makes pharmacological manipulation of the cells impractical, and the interpretation of the influence these factors may have could be confounded due to the microenvironment established within the neurosphere itself. Monolayer cultures, on the other hand, can be employed in high throughput screens of small molecule libraries, providing a powerful tool to explore the signal transduction mechanisms that regulate SC growth and differentiation and opens the opportunity to discover novel compounds that specifically target this cell population.
As a consequence, the ability to reproducibly generate cultures of adult NSCs from different regions of interest in the brain can be used in a broad spectrum of research applications, ranging from developmental studies of the central nervous system (CNS) to exploring novel regenerative medicine approaches. The protocol presented here demonstrates how to dissect and assess the differentiation potential of CNS SCs isolated from the adult rodent brain.