The described scaling models represent practical methods for researching long-term plasticity of astrocytic group I mGluRs. Imaging spontaneous and evoked Ca2+ events provides a sensitive assay for measuring changes in astrocytic Gq GPCR activity, as firm evidence has been established that astrocyte Ca2+ elevations occur following release from IP3R-sensitive stores downstream of Gq GPCR activation10,12,17,18. The percentage of astrocytes in the population responding to group I mGluR agonist and the pattern of such Ca2+ responses report changes in group I mGluRs by astrocytes.
The specific technique used to load astrocytes with Ca2+ indicator is an important consideration in the design of experiments to look for changes in astrocytic Gq GPCR activity. Bolus-loading or bulk-loading multiple astrocytes, or patch-clamp loading of individual astrocytes can be used to image Ca2+ transients in astrocytes. Each approach offers certain advantages and disadvantages. Directly filling astrocytes with Ca2+ indicator via patch clamp allows unequivocal identification of the cell as an astrocyte without need for a secondary marker such as SR-101. Patch-clamp delivery of indicator also enables recording of Ca2+ activity from small astrocytic compartments including the bushy fine processes, potentially deeper in the slice where cells are healthier and with more intact interactions with synapses (depending on the laser power available). However, patch-clamp loading suffers from low throughput as data are collected one cell at a time. Bulk-loading, by contrast, allows a large number of astrocytes to be loaded with Ca2+ indicator and imaged simultaneously. However, only astrocytes near the surface (<20 µm) of the slice are loaded, with associated concerns about cell health and intact synapses.
The backpressure bolus-loading protocol presented here offers a middle ground, with relatively high throughput and the ability to monitor Ca2+ activity deeper within the slice (40-75 µm). A significant increase in the percentage of spontaneously active astrocytes using the bolus-loading technique is observed compared to bulk-loading, suggesting that the connections among neuronal synapses and the astrocytic processes are more complete15. With good loading, one can often monitor Ca2+ activity in main processes of astrocytes (data not shown) or potentially even smaller compartments using 2-photon microscopy. However, care would need to be exercised in assigning the smaller processes to a particular astrocyte, as the boundaries blend into the nonspecific background staining. An additional concern with the use of bulk-loading or bolus-loading procedures is the need for a secondary marker for astrocyte identification. While it has been known for many years that astrocytes preferentially take up AM ester Ca2+ indicators, the secondary marker SR-101 is often used to verify the loaded cells as astrocytes. SR-101 may in itself alter the intrinsic excitability of neurons29. Use of SR-101 corroborates the need to perform all astrocyte Ca2+ measurements in TTX to limit possible SR-101 effects on neuronal excitability. Assuming that both control and experimental groups include SR-101, the marker in itself should not account for the effects observed in astrocyte Ca2+ signaling following long-term manipulation of neuronal action potentials. SR-101 may be more of a concern in high K+ experiments, however, as it may reduce the difference between 2.5 mM K+ vs. 5.0 mM K+ if the basal firing rate is not altered proportionally.
A very promising approach to deliver Ca2+ indicator to astrocytes has emerged recently which offers an attractive alternative to the more traditional approaches using Ca2+ dyes. Significant advances have been made over the past few years with genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) targeted to astrocytes30-32. GECIs can be delivered to astrocytes by in vivo microinjection of adeno-associated viral vectors into a brain region of interest such as the hippocampus. Expression of GECIs is achieved after approximately two weeks following viral infection32. There are numerous advantages presented by the use of GECIs in astrocytes. First, the vectors are targeted to astrocytes using an astrocyte-specific promoter, so the labeled cells are astrocytes32. Second, the signal-to-noise now seems comparable to what can be obtained using patch-clamp delivery of dye, but without the invasiveness of having had a patch pipette on the cell32. Third, the indicators can be delivered and expressed in adult tissue, which is problematic using bulk-loading delivery methods. Furthermore, the expression is mosaic, offering the ability to differentiate among multiple astrocytes. Thus, several astrocytes can potentially be imaged simultaneously, while also recording in the soma and fine branchlets at the same time. Therefore, potentially one single technique could be used in place of three separate techniques (bulk-loading, bolus-loading, and patch-clamp loading) to record scaling activity of astrocytic Gq GPCRs, greatly increasing efficiency.
One potential drawback of using viral-mediated delivery of Ca2+ indicators to astrocytes is the possible effect on slice health32. The adeno-associated viral vectors used to deliver the GECIs have been shown previously to cause reactive gliosis of astrocytes33. Preparation of brain slices in general likely initiates early stages of pathology including release of inflammatory molecules10. Therefore, combined with the long incubation times required to induce scaling of astrocytic receptors, use of GECIs delivered using viral vectors would need to receive additional consideration in the context of slice health in these types of experiments.
When employing this protocol, it is important to keep in mind that the application time for agonist to produce a response will vary as a function of receptor availability. For a given concentration of agonist, the application time will have to be longer if receptors have scaled down, and shorter if receptors have scaled up, for the drug to reach an adequate concentration in the tissue to activate receptors sufficiently to produce a Ca2+ response. Therefore, drug application times, and potentially their concentrations, may have to be adjusted depending upon the intended direction of the scaling. For example, the agonist concentration may need to be lowered in the case of TTX to avoid saturating responses, and increased after incubating slices in high K+ to even see a response. Specifically, the DHPG concentration was shifted from 5-15 µM after TTX treatment to 30-50 µM after 5.0 mM K+ treatment in order to study Ca2+ response patterns, as 5-15 µM was often too low to produce reliable responses in astrocytes after scaling down of group I mGluRs.
Recording of astrocyte Ca2+ activity provides no direct evidence of receptor insertion or internalization to or from the plasma membrane. However, based on the remarkable similarity of the data with data from previous studies in vitro which examined the direct relationship between Gq GPCR expression levels and spontaneous and evoked Ca2+ transients21-24, the most logical interpretation of the changes in Ca2+ signaling is that the astrocyte surface receptor expression levels have changed. A complementary approach may be an important consideration if one wants to provide additional evidence about the locus of the effect on Ca2+ activity. A strategy we used was to examine the effect of TTX incubation on hippocampal slices from astrocytic MrgA1R mice. These transgenic mice express a foreign Gq GPCR (the MrgA1R) only in astrocytes. Because this receptor is not native to the brain, there is no endogenous neurotransmitter present to change its activity levels. Previous work suggested that this receptor engages the same intracellular signaling molecules as endogenous group I mGluRs in the same astrocytes34. After long-term incubation of slices from MrgA1R mice in TTX, no differences in agonist-evoked MrgA1R responses compared to littermate control incubated slices would provide evidence that the effect on astrocyte Ca2+ activity is due to changes localized to the surface receptor, especially if group I mGluR responses are still significantly enhanced in the same astrocytes. An alternative, though perhaps more involved strategy would be to isolate astrocytes from the slices for Western blot analysis, as long as a membrane fraction could be analyzed for changes in surface receptor expression levels. Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) or flow cytometry may be helpful here.
The possible applications of this technique to the study of neurons, astrocytes and astrocyte-neuronal interactions are many. In our experiments, only DHPG-evoked group I mGluR astrocytic Ca2+ responses were studied, in isolated acute hippocampal slices from juvenile mice. This preparation not only has the intact afferents (Schaffer collaterals), but also the neurons that give rise to them (CA3 pyramidal cells), making it possible to manipulate the firing rates of these glutamatergic neurons onto the postsynaptic cells (CA1 pyramidal cells) and the astrocytes in stratum radiatum whose processes associate with these synapses. The acute hippocampal slice may not be the best preparation for manipulating firing rates of other types of neurons, however, as many afferents are severed from the neurons that give rise to them. Nevertheless, it may be possible in certain slice preparations to observe plasticity of other astrocytic Gq GPCR subtypes. For example, slices could be prepared with basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and their projections to hippocampus intact. Incubation of these slices in TTX or elevated K+ would affect basal firing rates of cholinergic neurons, leading to scaling of mAchRs in astrocytes of stratum oriens, which receive a significant portion of the cholinergic input1. An alternative yet untested approach to study astrocytic receptor scaling within a specific area of the brain, with all of the connections intact while scaling occurs, could be to use an in vivo model where a sustained release of TTX is achieved by implantation of a plastic polymer Elvax 40W above the region of interest35. This approach has been used previously in a study of neuronal scaling but should also be applicable to astrocytic scaling. Finally, with the proper readout, future studies could examine other GPCR families, including changes in Gs or Gi GPCRs. One might predict astrocytic GABAB Gi GPCRs to be affected following inhibition of firing in locally projecting GABA interneurons within any slice preparation. Development of new indicators targeting other signaling molecules, such as a real-time indicator of the second messenger cAMP, would open up a whole new area of research on neuron-to-astrocyte receptor communication.
Bidirectional scaling of astrocytic mGluRs by manipulation of basal neuron firing rates provides a measure of the sensitivity of astrocytes to AP-mediated release of neurotransmitter. Astrocytes can apparently sense spontaneous APs and glutamate release at Schaffer collateral-CA1 pyramidal cell synapses even when extracellular K+ is within a physiological range. While acute application of TTX does not reduce the frequency of spontaneous astrocyte Ca2+ activity18,36,37, the Ca2+ activity among the astrocytes in the population becomes decorrelated36, providing evidence that astrocytic receptors are AP detectors. This suggests that astrocytes sense spontaneous neuronal APs with no affect on their overall Ca2+ activity. It is widely accepted that intracellular concentrations of IP3 need to reach a threshold level to stimulate IP3Rs sufficiently to lead to a detectable Ca2+ elevation. Could spontaneous neuronal APs activate astrocytic GPCRs without producing measurable Ca2+ elevations? Future studies could utilize Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) or a similar technique (such as BRET) to examine the relationship between G protein coupling to the receptor (a measure of receptor activation) and Ca2+ release from internal stores. BRET has been used extensively in vitro to detect G protein-to-GPCR coupling38, although it may be some time before this technology becomes available for use in intact tissue preparations. It is possible that astrocytic Gq GPCRs are being activated much more frequently than can be recorded using the currently available Ca2+ imaging tools. In addition to sensing action potentials, astrocytic Gq GPCRs may also be able to detect miniature quantal release of neurotransmitter as reported in a recent study39. The bidirectional scaling method described here may be used in future studies to provide a measure of the extent to which astrocytic Gq GPCRs detect quantal vesicular release of neurotransmitter, by including bafilomycin A1 in the incubation protocol.
Thus far, the scaling protocols have only been used in hippocampal slices from juvenile mice (p12-p18). Therefore, it is currently unknown if astrocytic receptor scaling could also be induced in tissue obtained from adult mice. A compelling recent study suggests that group I mGluR expression in astrocytes diminishes considerably after the first week of age and continues to decline until adulthood, with very low levels of receptor expression in adult astrocytes40. It would therefore be interesting to determine if astrocytic mGluRs scale up following long-term inhibition of neuronal firing in adult mouse hippocampal slices to levels approaching those seen in astrocytes from juvenile mice. This finding would suggest that astrocytic receptor expression is not static at a given age but can change rapidly depending upon levels of neuronal activity. In contrast to reduced expression of group I mGluRs in adult mice, evidence is emerging that adrenergic receptors, including α1A, α2A, and β1 subtypes, are predominantly expressed by astrocytes in the adult brain3,4. The α1A adrenergic Gq GPCR may be an attractive target for future studies of neuron-to-astrocyte communication, including whether these receptors are sensitive to changes in adrenergic neuron firing rates.