The HET-CAM assay is a widely used alternative test system to animal testing in the industry12. The in-ovo system described here represents a modified version of the HET-CAM assay. While in its original form, HET-CAM experiments are performed to study the irritating properties of compounds and formulation or the analysis of angiogenesis14,15,16, we have adapted the approach to test compounds with putative insulin-mimetic characteristics12. According to the directive 2010/63/EU, experiments with non-hatched avian embryos during the first two-thirds of embryonic development do not need permission by an ethics committee since these experiments are not considered animal experiments. Recent studies have proven the suitability of the in-ovo system to characterize the efficacy of selected herbal extracts, which have been identified in a GLUT4-translocation-based primary screen10, to reduce blood glucose levels in the absence of insulin12,13. Critical points for a good performance of the in-ovo system include: First, a reliable breeder delivering the fertilized eggs. The Lohmann classic brown chicken is a good choice of breed. Second, the implementation of toxicity tests to exclude toxic effects of the investigated compound needs to be done. In addition, the preparation of a suitable blood vessel for blood collection is important. It is important to avoid the cutting of large vessels in the chorioallantoic membrane itself, as this can lead to a non-preferable loss of blood. Furthermore, before the vessel is cut onto the pH strip, it has to be patted dry using filter paper to prevent dilution of the collected blood. Finally, a sufficient number of experiments appears to be important. We recommend using at least 10 eggs for each time point, and a three-fold repetition of the respective experiment.
Naturally, there are some limitations of this in-ovo approach. Since it takes up to 30 minutes until the substances are absorbed through the eggshell membrane and come into close contact with the chorioallantoic membrane, it is not possible to quantify a rapid response of the embryo to the applied compound. Furthermore, some compounds may be toxic in the applied concentration, which frequently results in lesions of the blood vessels in the chorioallantoic membrane. Thus, cytotoxicity testing based on long-term incubation of the compounds for about 24 hours appears reasonable. Finally, we found that the buffer system used for application of the compounds has a significant effect on the performance of the assay.12 Currently, HBSS buffer is used because it results in the smallest effect on the blood glucose levels of the embryo.
For future applications, additional buffer systems as an alternative to HBSS might be tested. Furthermore, the influence of herbal extracts on additional blood parameters such as cholesterol, triglycerides or lipoproteins could be an attractive question.
Our new in-ovo system is a promising and important tool to test substances with insulin-mimetic characteristics in a living organism without the need of an animal experiment. Therefore, it fills the gap between in-vitro and in-vivo approaches. In comparison to existing in-ovo model systems17 there is no need to induce diabetes by streptozotocin (STZ) treatment, as we use embryos at day 10 or 11 of incubation. At this stage, insulin production has not started, but the embryos are already insulin sensitive. Additionally, permission by an ethics committee might be required if embryos aged 14 - 17 days are used17. Furthermore, compared to alternative strategies18, the compound application as described here is less harmful and laborious, increasing experimental through-put rates.
Taken together, this in-ovo approach is an attractive system if a blood-decreasing effect of an insulin-mimetic substance needs to be tested in a living organism.