$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The discovery of antibiotics in the twentieth century and the parallel development of new antimicrobial compounds against pathogenic microorganisms enabled targeted treatments of bacterial infections. However, due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), MDR (multidrug-resistant) Salmonella typhimurium phage type 10 (DT10), and Klebsiella pneumoniae, it is urgently necessary to generate new antimicrobial agents1. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are versatile, often highly specific compounds that are promising candidates for the development of new drugs thanks to their physicochemical properties, flexibility, size, hydrophobicity, and mode of action2. AMPs are small peptides usually consisting of 7 - 100 amino acids. Often, they have a cationic structure rich in positively charged arginine and lysine residues, which interact with the targeted microbial cell membrane, which is oppositely charged3. A particular subgroup of AMPs are ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs)4. These are produced by many organisms from the kingdom of fungi and the domain of bacteria. One of the best known and widely used RiPPs is nisin, naturally produced by the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis (L. lactis). Active against a panel of Gram-positive bacteria, nisin has been used as a biopreservative in the food industry for more than 50 years due to its antimicrobial properties and the absence of evolved resistance in the targeted microbial strains5. Studies have shown that nisin destabilizes and generates pores in bacterial cell membranes, leading to antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens6. By binding to lipid II, bacterial cell wall synthesis is inhibited7. Nisin is encoded by nisA as a linear precursor peptide, which is composed of a leader and a core peptide region (Figure 1). After ribosomal synthesis, prenisin is first modified by the dehydratase NisB. Here, serine and threonine residues in the prepeptide core region are dehydrated to dehydroalanine (Dha) and dehydrobutyrine (Dhb)8. Subsequently, the dehydrated residues are coupled with cysteine to form lanthionine rings (hence the name "lantibiotic" for lanthionine ring-containing antibiotics) by an enzyme-catalyzed Michael addition. This posttranslational modification (PTM) is catalyzed by the cyclase NisC. In L. lactis, the modified prenisin is then transported out of the cell by transporter NisT, and the leader peptide is cleaved by the proteinase NisP to release the mature and active nisin form9. The responsible leader peptidase NisP has a high substrate specificity, since it only processes modified nisin efficiently10.
In general, active RiPPs result from the action of PTM enzymes (for instance NisBC), which drastically increase the chemical space of short peptides, e.g., via acetylation, glycosylation, methylation or phosphorylation. This level of complexity can further be expanded by the direct incorporation of ncAAs. While often feasible, chemical synthesis of AMPs is a challenge for large-scale production due to their structural complexity. For example, the total chemical synthesis of the lantibiotic lactosin S in 71 reaction steps was achieved with a final yield of 10% and that of nisin with a crude yield of only 0.003%11,12. Therefore, biological production offers a viable alternative, due to the generation of correct stereocenters and high product concentration.
Up to today, more than 150 ncAAs, e.g., having functional groups containing fluorine or azides, have been incorporated into recombinant proteins, and several examples of ncAA-modified AMPs have been reported13,14,15,16. With the introduction of ncAAs, novel physicochemical properties can be generated compared to conventional mutagenesis. The diversity of existing peptides can be increased, possibly leading to novel antibiotics.
One method for the incorporation of ncAAs into recombinant peptides is selective pressure incorporation (SPI) based on the use of auxotrophic bacterial strains17. These strains are not capable of synthesizing the corresponding cAA analog of the ncAA. The methodology uses the frequently observed relaxed substrate specificity, a feature of many natural aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs)18. Apart from their natural cAA substrates, these enzymes are often capable to recognize and activate the desired ncAA and to charge it onto their cognate tRNA(s). This leads to ribosomal incorporation of the ncAA into the target gene product in a residue-specific manner (i.e., cAA → ncAA substitution). This is of course only possible when the desired ncAA is structurally and chemically similar to the canonical amino acid and tolerated by the cell physiology, the translation machinery and the target peptide or protein sequence. In a particular experimental setup, the auxotrophic host cells are cultured in defined medium supplied with a limiting concentration of the native amino acid to be substituted. The cellular growth or exchange by cAA-free medium leads to intracellular depletion of the cAA. In the next step, the ncAA is added and the target gene expression is induced. Inevitably, ncAAs are now also incorporated in many other proteins in the host cell during this phase of target gene expression. Nonetheless, the toxicity of the SPI setup is kept at a low level since the Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain is transformed with a plasmid carrying the target gene under control of a strong promoter (commonly the highly competitive T7 promoter/ RNA polymerase system)19. Immediately after induction (usually when the cAA is exhausted), the host cells cease to grow and their cytoplasmic enzymatic machineries are used mainly for expression of the plasmid-based target gene. Site-directed mutagenesis can be used to define the site(s) of residue-specific ncAA installation in the target gene20.
As a model peptide for the incorporation of ncAAs, the pentacyclic AMP nisin A was chosen. It is 34 amino acids long and has only a single proline residue in the core peptide sequence (Figure 1). As in subtilisin, ericin A and S, and epidermin as well as in nisin Z and nisin Q, the conserved proline seems to be essential for activity9,21. The cAA proline plays a particularly important role in peptidyl-prolyl amide rotation and secondary structure stabilization. Its side chain ring conformations (exo / endo puckers) are responsible for a thermodynamic stabilization of the amide bond. Targeted chemical modifications (such as hydroxylations, fluorinations, methylations) of prolyl puckers often critically influence the folding stability, scaffold rigidity and functions of many biological structures22. Thus, it is plausible to expect that the Pro→ proline analog substitutions will endow ring B, the second ring of nisin, with novel and unusual properties.
Here, a proline-auxotrophic E. coli strain was used for recombinant nisin production. This requires the expression of the prepeptide gene nisA as well as the modification enzyme genes nisBC. The genetically encoded peptide product carries an N-terminally His-tagged leader for purification via affinity chromatography. For activity determination, L. lactis expressing and secreting NisPT is used to activate the recombinant nisin variants from E. coli cell lysates or purified peptide samples (Figure 1). The mature AMP is released after cleavage of the leader by NisP. In this agar diffusion method, the AMP sample diffuses into the solid growth medium and can inhibit the growth of the Gram-positive microorganism. After incubation, this can be observed visually by growth inhibition halos. In addition to L. lactis as an indicator, modified nisin variants showed antimicrobial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactobacillus johnsonii21,23.
An alternative and experimentally different method to incorporate ncAAs in RiPPs is stop codon suppression (SCS)24. For this, an orthogonal tRNA / aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (aaRS) pair is required for the corresponding ncAA. Ideally, all these three components are bioorthogonal, i.e., they do not interact with the endogenous tRNAs and aaRSs. An ncAA-specific aaRS can be generated by modification of the enzyme active site and screening of genetic libraries of mutant synthetases25. Furthermore, the introduction of an ncAA requires a codon which is reassigned and which does not encode for the cAA. Commonly, the amber stop codon is used24,26.
Recently, SPI was established for the incorporation of α-chloroacetamide-containing and click-chemistry-compatible ncAAs into NisA27. For example, Nε-alloc-lysine was incorporated into the lasso peptide captistruin with site-specific (SCS) and residue-specific (SPI) incorporation methods and subsequently modified in vitro by ruthenium-catalyzed metathesis28. In comparison to SPI, the SCS method is more complicated since an orthogonal tRNA / aaRS pair has to be co-expressed. To date, o-pairs for proline incorporation have been developed29, but to the best of our knowledge, no example of proline analog incorporation has been reported.
It should be noted that not all ncAAs can be incorporated using the SPI methodology. First, the uptake of ncAAs into the cytoplasm is regulated by a multitude of transport proteins that are embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane, which is the inner membrane for Gram-negative bacteria like E. coli. Normally, E. coli is capable of transporting a wide range of amino acid analogs into the cell with side chains structurally and chemically similar to canonical amino acids. Second, many chemically reactive or unstable ncAAs might act as an inhibitor towards cellular growth, as they are toxic for the metabolism and physiology of the host cell30. Thus, the uptake and toxicity of the ncAA for the production host should be tested beforehand. To avoid inactivation of the PTM machinery as a side effect, a strictly controlled expression setup of the responsible genes can be used to incorporate the natural amino acid into the modification enzymes (e.g., nisBC) and the ncAA into the target gene (e.g., nisA). This can be accomplished using two different promoters and induction of target gene expression, as demonstrated in specially designed SPI protocols31. As outlined above, the SPI method relies on the relaxed substrate specificity of the aaRS, which allows for ncAA activation and cognate tRNA charging. Subsequently, the tRNA is delivered to the ribosome followed by amide bond formation and folding of the target (poly)peptide. In this processes, proofreading and editing mechanisms may become relevant32. For these reasons, it is of great importance to have a target ncAA that is structurally and chemically similar to the cAA. Other crucial points are sufficient stability (both in the growth media and exposed to the cellular metabolism) and solubility of the ncAA. Additionally, it should be either commercially available or easy to be synthesized chemically.
Here, we describe a protocol for SPI, allowing residue-specific incorporation of ncAAs into recombinant RiPPs. Particularly, different proline analogs are incorporated into the antimicrobial peptide nisin A using E. coli as host organism. Mass spectrometry is used to verify amino acid replacement and peptide products are analyzed for bioactivity using growth inhibition assays and fluorescence microscopy using microbial indicator strains.
The basic requirement for successful recombinant nisin expression with defined ncAAs requires a suitable proline auxotrophic E. coli strain. For this auxotrophy, proA has to be dysfunctional, for instance achieved by genomic knockout. Cells fully deprived of intracellular Pro biosynthesis (i.e., deletion of proABC) without possibility for reversion are stable auxotrophs. Widely used gene knockout methods are phage transduction or single-gene knockout according to Datsenko & Wanner33. Furthermore, proA knockout strains can be obtained from public repositories such as Addgene, CGSC or the Keio collection. Since the recombinant nisABC expression shown here relies on the use of T7 promoters, the expression host strain has to carry an inducible gene for T7 RNA polymerase. This can be accomplished by introduction of the λDE3 prophage into the host genome, for example using the commercial kit. Alternatively, strains such as BL21(DE3) can be made auxotrophic as described above.