$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The CLEM methodology presented here to study the impact of a viral protein expression on cell membranes has been successfully used before to elucidate the HCV replication-associated structures, mainly double membrane vesicles (DMVs)21, as well as to determine the critical building blocks required to form these HCV-induced structures23. Note that in our first work using CLEM to study HCV replication21, a slightly modified version of the protocol described here was applied. In that study, conventional 0.05 mm thick sapphire discs, without alphanumeric pattern, were used in which a reference pattern was created by carbon coating them with a finder grid on top (see Table of Materials). This version of the current protocol can be eventually applied, with the advantage that the "A" carrier for HPF can be used directly, without the need of cutting it down as in Figure 3A. Alternatively, as mentioned in the protocol, a thicker "A" carrier can be utilized (see Table of Materials) with patterned sapphire discs, without the need of a "B" carrier.
Interestingly, this protocol can be applied not only to study BSL-1 samples, such as cells transfected with viral proteins as described here and elsewhere19,23, but also to study virus-infected cells. Although working with human pathogens is usually restricted to BSL-2 and BSL-3 laboratories, in some countries it is still possible to perform cryo-immobilization under these biosafety conditions. In those BSL-2 and BSL-3 laboratories where vitrification is not possible, due to the local regulations or the absence of an HPF machine, virus-infected cells can be still prepared using this method if chemical fixation with aldehydes is carried out in advance, namely before leaving the BSL-2 or BSL-3 facilities. Furthermore, aldehydes need to be quenched immediately after fixation to keep the fluorescence, while the rest of the protocol is identical to the one described here. This technique can be considered redundant because the cells are fixed twice, chemically and via vitrification. However, this double fixation protocol leads indeed to a much better preservation of the HCV-induced DMVs in comparison to the DMVs found in cells subjected to chemical fixation alone21.
For further modifications and troubleshooting the reader is referred to the notes throughout the protocol part of this manuscript. These notes describe pitfalls to avoid, as well as alternatives to overcome putative difficulties that might arise when performing this method.
The main requisite for applying this technique is an HPF machine. When cryo-immobilizing the cells via HPF is not feasible (due to the absence of an HPF machine) or not required (when the membrane preservation does not need to be optimal), cells can be chemically fixed and subsequently prepared and analyzed by EM8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. This option does not require the use of sapphire discs, but cell culture dishes with gridded patterns for relocating cells or cell clusters. The main advantage of the use of these dishes is their larger diameter in comparison to sapphire discs, allowing the screening of larger surface areas. Thus, the application of this CLEM protocol has been successfully applied to study the effect of an antiviral compound against HCV15 or to visualize the membrane rearrangements induced by the nonstructural proteins of noroviruses19. Another issue that can limit the performance of this method is the absence of a commercial FS device. In this case, basic homemade FS systems can be utilized instead. Although automatic FS devices might reduce handling mishaps, homemade devices are used successfully for instance at Kent McDonald's30 and Paul Walther's labs.
With respect to chemical fixation, the protocol described here ensures an optimal preservation of the intracellular structures20. Therefore, in case the above-mentioned HPF and FS devices are available, vitrifying the cells of interest would be preferred.
Future alternatives to this CLEM approach include the possibility of using this method not only to acquire 2D information at the ultrastructural level, but also to gain 3D information about the architecture of membrane and organelle alterations caused by viruses. The 3D-EM methods, including electron tomography (ET) and focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) (extensively described in29), could be also applied to cells that have been prepared following this current protocol21,31. In addition, 3D information could be also obtained at the LM level, when using a confocal microscope, which allows the acquisition of z-stacks. In fact, this option is highly recommended when a precise correlation between LM and EM datasets is desired (see for example17). The information included in 3D z-stacks aids to improve the correlation with the 2D TEM images. Thus, in such a scenario, the best fitting LM and EM images can be selected and then subjected to one of the correlation software available, such as the ec-CLEM plugin of ICY (http://icy.bioimageanalysis.org/)32 or the Landmark Correspondences plugin of Image J (http://imagej.net/Landmark_Correspondences), resulting in the generation of overlapping LM-EM images.
When temporal information is needed to understand the kinetics of a certain event, time-lapse imaging can be used to monitor dynamics of living cells in combination with EM. During the event of interest, cells are fixed immediately, generating a "frozen snapshot" that can be subsequently analyzed via EM, providing detailed ultrastructural information about that particular moment at the time of immobilization. In order to obtain that "frozen snapshot", after the observation in real time, cells can be either chemically fixed33 or cryo-immobilized6. Since many cellular processes occur faster than the diffusion processes of chemical fixation, if possible, ultra-rapid freezing should be performed. However, it is important to take into account that the HPF machines differ in their effective time resolution34.
Furthermore, although this protocol has been designed for the embedding of cells in an epoxy resin, cells can be also embedded in low viscosity resins, such as Lowicryls, LR White or LR Gold. The use of these embedding media enables to preserve the antigenicity35,36, as well as fluorescence37,38 and, therefore, are mostly used for post-embedding on-section immunolabeling39,40 and on-section CLEM41,42,43,44, where the LM is done after the embedding. Both approaches (immuno-EM and on-section CLEM) must be crucial for those experiments in which non-characteristic structures can be easily found via TEM and/or as a control against miscorrelation between LM and EM signals. Likewise, labeling with antibodies that can be visualized by both imaging modalities (LM and EM) can be carried out45 in order to, for example, identify transfected cells in LM (pre-embedding stage) and achieve a much more accurate localization of the GFP signal via its specific labeling by immuno-EM (post-embedding stage). It must be taken into account, however, that permeabilization is conducted before LM to permit the access of the antibodies to the intracellular space, which might result in a sub-optimal preservation of the cell architecture at the EM level. Interestingly, this protocol is also well suited for multi-color experiments that can be achieved with the use of other fluorescent tags, other than GFP (as shown here). In conclusion, there are many putative possibilities of adapting this protocol, both on the LM and/or on the EM sides, depending on the questions that are being addressed. For a comprehensive description of other alternative protocols the reader is referred to5,46. Regardless of how the microscopy modalities are combined, together the result is a gain of information, allowing us to better understand how viruses and their proteins interact with their hosts in real life.
The most critical step within this method is the collection of serial sections from the cells of interest. As highlighted in the representative results section, this requires expert staff, as well as a lot of patience. Importantly, this step is essential to find the cells back at the EM level for two reasons. First, in this sort of CLEM protocol using pre-embedding LM, the coordinates are only visible at the LM level and on the resin block face after the embedding. However, they will not be visible on the sections by TEM. Therefore, targeted trimming on the block face down to the regions of interest (ROIs) must be accomplished carefully with a razor blade to ensure that the sections that are subsequently obtained contain the cells expressing a given FP. Second, "scanning" several sections is necessary to find the best overlay between the LM and the EM acquisitions. In contrast to methods where LM is performed at the post-embedding stage, in this case the LM-EM overlay is not so precise. The low overlay accuracy is due to differences in axial resolution between LM and EM, shrinkage during sample processing of EM, and compression during sectioning42. Nevertheless, efficient tracking methods, such as the use of landmarks, help to find the cells back. This includes the position of one cell to another, as well as the shape of the cells and their nucleus. In this regard, as explained in the protocol, DIC images provide "anatomical" information of the cells that are critical to improve the correlation. Alternatively, the nuclei or other well-recognizable cell organelles (such as mitochondria or lipid droplets) can be stained before LM and used as landmarks.
Finally, it is noteworthy to mention that although this manuscript is focused on the use of this technique for virology studies, the scope of this experimental design can be expanded to address more general biological questions.