A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Design and Implementation of a Bespoke Robotic Manipulator for Extra-corporeal Ultrasound

8.5K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/58811

⸱

January 7th, 2019

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This paper introduces the design and implementation of a bespoke robotic manipulator for extra-corporeal ultrasound examination. The system has five degrees of freedom with lightweight joints made by 3D printing and a mechanical clutch for safety management.

Abstract

With the potential for high precision, dexterity, and repeatability, a self-tracked robotic system can be employed to assist the acquisition of real-time ultrasound. However, limited numbers of robots designed for extra-corporeal ultrasound have been successfully translated into clinical use. In this study, we aim to build a bespoke robotic manipulator for extra-corporeal ultrasound examination, which is lightweight and has a small footprint. The robot is formed by five specially shaped links and custom-made joint mechanisms for probe manipulation, to cover the necessary range of motion with redundant degrees of freedom to ensure the patient's safety. The mechanical safety is emphasized with a clutch mechanism, to limit the force applied to patients. As a result of the design, the total weight of the manipulator is less than 2 kg and the length of the manipulator is about 25 cm. The design has been implemented, and simulation, phantom, and volunteer studies have been performed, to validate the range of motion, the ability to make fine adjustments, mechanical reliability, and the safe operation of the clutch. This paper details the design and implementation of the bespoke robotic ultrasound manipulator, with the design and assembly methods illustrated. Testing results to demonstrate the design features and clinical experience of using the system are presented. It is concluded that the current proposed robotic manipulator meets the requirements as a bespoke system for extra-corporeal ultrasound examination and has great potential to be translated into clinical use.

Introduction

An extra-corporeal robotic ultrasound (US) system refers to the configuration in which a robotic system is utilized to hold and manipulate a US probe for external examinations, including its use in cardiac, vascular, obstetric, and general abdominal imaging1. The use of such a robotic system is motivated by the challenges of manually holding and manipulating a US probe, for instance, the challenge of finding standard US views required by clinical imaging protocols and the risk of repetitive strain injury2,3,4, and also by the needs of US screening prog....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparation of Each Link, End-effector, and Additional Components

  1. Print all the links (L0, L1, L2, L3, and L4) and the end-effector as shown in Figure 1, with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic, polylactic acid (PLA) plastic, or nylon, using a 3D-printing service. Use the .STL files provided in the Supplementary Materials when printing.
    NOTE: Changes in shape and scale of each part can be made based on the provided files. The inner profile of the end-effector can be changed to fit different US probes.
  2. Print all the required a....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Following the protocol, the resulting system is a robotic manipulator with five specially shaped links (L0 to L4) and five revolute joints (J1 to J5) for moving, holding, and locally tilting a US probe (Figure 8). The top rotation joint (J1), with gear mechanisms actuated by four motors, can rotate the following structures 360°, to allow the US probe to point toward different sides of the scanning area, s.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Unlike many other industrial robots that have been translated into medical applications, the proposed robotic manipulator described in the protocol was specifically designed for US examinations according to clinical requirements for the range of motion, application of force, and safety management. The lightweight robotic manipulator itself has a wide range of movements sufficient for most extra-corporeal US scanning, without the need for large movements of the global positioning mechanism. As the closest mechanical struc.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust IEH Award [102431] and by the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering [WT203148/Z/16/Z]. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London and King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3D-printed link L03D printing service1As shown in Figure 1, with the STL file provided
3D-printed link L13D printing service1As shown in Figure 1, with the STL file provided
3D-printed link L23D printing service1As shown in Figure 1, with the STL file provided
3D-printed link L33D printing service1As shown in Figure 1, with the STL file provided
3D-printed link L43D printing service1As shown in Figure 1, with the STL file provided
3D-printed end-effector3D printing service1As shown in Figure 1, with the STL file provided
20-teeth spur gear3D printing service120.5 module, 5 mm face width, with mounting keyway, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
18-teeth bevel gear3D printing service20.5 module, 5 mm face width, with mounting keyway, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
120-teeth spur gear (Type A)3D printing service10.5 module, 6 mm face width, with mounting keyway, bearing housing, and bore, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
120-teeth spur gear (Type B)3D printing service20.5 module, 6 mm face width, with detent holes, bearing housing, and bore, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
120-teeth spur gear (Type C)3D printing service10.5 module, 6 mm face width, with mounting key, bearing housing, and bore, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
20-teeth long spur gear3D printing service10.5 module, 21.5 mm face width, with mounting keyways, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
144-teeth bevel gear3D printing service10.5 module, 7 mm face width, with mounting keyways, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
Bearing (37 mm O.D and 30 mm I.D)Bearing Station Ltd., UK5Bearing size and supplier can be varied
Bearing (12 mm O.D and 6 mm I.D)Bearing Station Ltd., UK2Bearing size and supplier can be varied
Bearing (32 mm O.D and 25 mm I.D)Bearing Station Ltd., UK1Bearing size and supplier can be varied
Bearing (8 mm O.D and 5 mm I.D)Bearing Station Ltd., UK2Bearing size and supplier can be varied
Plastic/metal shaft (6 mm O.D, 70 mm long)TR Fastenings Ltd., UK1e.g. Could be an M6 bolt and a nut
Plastic/metal shaft (5 mm O.D, 70 mm long)TR Fastenings Ltd., UK1e.g. Could be an M5 bolt and a nut
Ball-spring pairsWDS Ltd., UK4Numbers of ball-spring pairs could varied to adjust the triggering force of the clutch
Clutch covers3D printing service2104 mm O.D, 5mm face width, 6 mm bore, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
3D-printed shaft collar3D printing service135 mm O.D and 30 mm I.D, 8mm face width, as shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
3D-printed end-effector collar3D printing service1As shown in Figure 2, with the STL file provided
Small geared stepper motorsAOLONG TECHNOLOGY Ltd., China14Part number: GM15BYS; Internal gear ratio 232:1 or 150:1, all acceptable

References

  1. Priester, A. M., Natarajan, S., Culjat, M. O. Robotic ultrasound systems in medicine. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. 60 (3), 507-523 (2013).
  2. Magnavita, N., Bevilacqua, L., Mirk, P., Fileni, A., Castellino, N.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Ultrasound ProbeMechanical Clutch3D PrintingSpur GearsStepper MotorsBearing HousingLink AssemblyRange Of MotionClinical Translation