$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
To ensure the even distribution of bacteria in the agar beads, it is important to uniformly suspend the molten agar-bacteria mixture before adding it to the oil phase. The oil-to-agar-bacteria volume ratio is critical in controlling bead size. A higher oil-to-agar ratio leads to the formation of smaller agar beads. When mixing the agar-bacteria suspension with the oil phase, temperature control is critical. The oil-agar mixture must be warm enough to allow emulsification and droplet formation but cool enough not to harm the bacteria. Continuous stirring while cooling the mixture to room temperature or below allows agar droplets to form and solidify.
Proper calibration of the stirring plate, size of the stir bar, and shape and size of the flask are important determinants of a uniform vortex. A stir bar positioned in the center of the flask creates a symmetric vortex, ensuring uniform mixing. An off-center stir bar can lead to an unstable vortex, resulting in irregularly shaped beads and the introduction of air bubbles into the beads. Real-time monitoring and adjustment of the position of the stir bar is recommended. The volume of the flask needs to be proportional to the volume of the oil-agar mixture. A 500 mL flask is ideal for spinning a 90 mL oil-agar mixture, producing a visible vortex. When using larger flasks, it is important to adjust the volume of the oil-agar mixture, the size of the stirrer, and the vortexing speed to achieve a balance between effective mixing and stable vortex. Maintaining consistent vortexing speed during the process and across bead preparations is critical for batch-to-batch reproducibility.
The agar bead preparation process, specifically the vortexing speed and oil-agar ratio, are adapted from16,22, with minor modifications. Shear forces within the spinning vortex inherently produce beads of different sizes. To minimize this size variability, the bead harvesting step was modified by introducing several washing steps, employing a gradient of decreasing centrifugation speed and time to ensure the removal of small-size beads (and free bacteria). A micro-mesh filter was employed to enrich beads of the desired size, effectively filtering out larger beads and those that may have formed through random coalescence. To avoid bead or bacterial losses as the bead slurry passes through the syringe and connected tube for intratracheal inoculation of the mouse, it is critical to use a glass syringe, 24 G metal feeding needles, and a metal-connected tube.
The major limitation of the method is the technical complexity of the bead preparation and intratracheal inoculation to achieve reproducible bead burden and lung implantation. Attention to detail and the ability to troubleshoot are required. In addition, the model has not been fully validated by testing the efficacy of standard-of-care antibiotics and most frequent antibiotic combinations administered to Mab patients.
Currently, no mouse model of chronic Mab infection has been validated to the extent that the efficacy of single agents and drug combinations in patients can be reasonably predicted by model9. The agar bead-embedded C57BL/6 mouse system has been exploited to test the efficacy of antimicrobial treatments15,19,23. The closest alternative to the agar bead-embedded C57BL/6 mouse system is the C3HeB/FeJ mouse model, which relies on dexamethasone immunosuppression to achieve a durable chronic infection24,25. The advantages of the protocol described here are that (i) fully immunocompetent and most affordable C57BL/6 mice can be used, (ii) a productive and chronic infection can be obtained with the well-characterized type strain ATCC 19977, and (iii) there is no chemically induced immunosuppression requirement, circumventing the need for daily dexamethasone injections, thereby avoiding potential drug-drug interactions and impact on the lung immunopathology.
Given the lack of validated mouse models of chronic Mab infection to evaluate new drug candidates and drug regimens8,9, the technique described here has the potential to move the field forward, improve the predictive value of preclinical efficacy data, help prioritize drug regimens with the highest potential to provide durable cure and overall accelerate drug discovery and development for Mab lung disease. The method can be applied to other lung pathogens and has an established track record for P. aeruginosa or Haemophilus influenza. The major objective of the protocol described here is to provide sufficient details and recommendations to ensure ease of implementation and excellent lab-to-lab reproducibility.