Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma originates from intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells and is a cholangiocarcinoma occurring above the secondary bile duct of the liver. The incidence of ICC is second only to that of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), accounting for 10% to 15% of primary liver cancer and about 20% of bile duct cancer1. The incidence of ICC has been increasing year by year in the world, increasing by 140% in the past 40 years2. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of potentially curative treatment for ICC. However, only 20% to 30% of patients have the possibility of surgical resection. After surgical resection, the 5-year overall survival rate of ICC patients is only 20% to 35%3. This is because even if radical resection is performed, only a few patients can obtain negative margins4. It is particularly important for early ICC patients to obtain curative surgery. The curative surgery for ICC patients is closely related to surgical margins. Two recent meta-analyses5,6 indicated that a surgical margin width of >1 cm is associated with better overall survival. A study7 involving 126 patients showed that a margin ≥1.0 cm was associated with better overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
In ICC surgery, anatomical liver resection, which is important for the prognosis of ICC patients8, not only can obtain a safe surgical margin but also can excise the violated liver pedicle. A study9 reported that the most common infiltrating pathway for caudate lobe cholangiocarcinoma is through fibrous connective tissue along the Glisson system, not the bile duct. In a prior study, Si et al.10 reviewed data from 702 ICC patients and found that the incidence of complications was similar between anatomical resection and non-anatomical resection, and anatomical resection was associated with better disease-free survival and overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years. Another propensity matching study11 about ICC identified nonanatomical resection as an independent risk factor for OS (p < 0.05).
However, surgical resection of the caudate ICC can be challenging for the surgeon. It is very difficult for surgeons to explore the caudate lobe because of its unique anatomical location, such as its deep penetration into the liver parenchyma and its proximity to major vessels12 (the inferior vena cava, middle or right hepatic veins, portal vein, and ligamentum venosum). These can make it difficult to obtain a broad field of view during surgery and get an invisible cutting edge. In recent years, with the detailed study of liver anatomy, the rapid development of laparoscopic technology, and the continuous promotion of the concept of precise liver resection, ICC surgical management has grown from isolated caudate lobectomy13,14 to laparoscopic hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobectomy15, which is rarely reported in the literature. There is a great need for videos of successful operations to guide the widespread use of such operations in the future. Here, we present a laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobe resection to treat an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the caudate lobe.
A 65-year-old Chinese man was admitted to the hospital with an incidentally detected hepatic mass by abdominal ultrasonography. Physical examination showed no significant abnormalities. Laboratory examinations, including routine blood testing, liver function tests, coagulation, and tumor indicators (AFP, CEA, CA199), were normal. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the upper abdomen showed a 3.2 1.9 cm2 abnormal enhancement shadow at the S1/4/8 junction and showed that the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and left hepatic vein (LHV) shared a common trunk (Figure 1A). Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper abdomen also revealed a 2.5 2.0 cm2 nodule in the same area, but suggesting ICC (Figure 1B). After completing the preoperative evaluation, we decided to perform a laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy combined with caudate lobe resection to ensure a negative surgical margin.