A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Solar-Driven Electrochemical Green Fuel Production from CO2 and Water Using Ti3C2Tx MXene-Supported CuZn and NiCo Catalysts

2.1K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/68870

⸱

November 7th, 2025

In This Article

Summary

This protocol guides the fabrication and electrochemical analysis of MXene-supported CuZn and NiCo bi-metallic electrocatalysts for green fuel production from carbon dioxide and water using solar energy.

Abstract

This protocol describes the synthesis and activity mapping of bi-metallic, MXene-supported cathodes for carbon dioxide reduction (CO2R) and anodes for water splitting utilizing solar energy in alkaline media. A reverse current pulse electrodeposition technique was used to control the nanostructure, grain refinement, and alloy composition of the fabricated electrodes. Both anodes and cathodes are noble metal-free and supported on two-dimensional (2D) titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene, which reduces contact resistance and facilitates the charge transfer from substrate to reactants via catalysts. Copper zinc (CuZn) supported on Ti3C2Tx MXene are used as cathodes for methanol production in thermocatalytic CO2 conversion, and here we have demonstrated their performance in electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2R) for the first time. Nickel cobalt (NiCo) supported on Ti3C2Tx MXene are similarly fabricated via pulse electrodeposition and tested as anodes for water electrolysis driven by a solar cell under simplified laboratory conditions. The activity also describes the structural characterization of metallic thin films. Detailed setup for the integration of the state-of-the-art perovskite silicon tandem solar cell with electrochemical cell, which in turn feeds in-line gas chromatography, is demonstrated for both CO2R and water electrolysis (WE). A setup detailing the water electrolysis at commercial conditions of highly caustic alkaline solutions (30% KOH), high temperatures (60 °C), and in a zero-gap cell is demonstrated on the fabricated anode paired with a Pt/C spray-coated cathode.

Introduction

Replacing fossil fuels with zero-emission alternatives is critical to decarbonizing the energy sector and increasing the use of renewable energy1,2,3. Conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) into carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), and other carbonaceous fuels is becoming an important route to prevent further CO2 emissions and create a circular carbon economy4. Similarly, replacing fossil fuels with high energy density hydrogen is projected to accelerate the energy transition from fossil-based to zero-emission fuels5,6,7,8. The energy generation system can be further made cost-effective, and eco-friendly by using direct sunlight9,10,11,12. The green energy transition can generate positive socio-economic outcomes, particularly by enhancing social impacts and thereby increasing the social capital associated with zero-emission fuel generation13.

An extensive body of research has been dedicated to solar-driven electrochemical reduction of CO2 and hydrogen generation14,15. Copper-based materials have shown excellent activity (>70% faradaic efficiency towards C2 product) towards CO2 reduction16,17,18,19. Bimetallic systems consisting of copper lead to an increase in Faradaic Efficiencies (FE) and overall carbon dioxide conversion rate. The main challenges are high overpotentials, lower faradaic efficiencies, and selectivity of a single product20. Integrating photovoltaic (PV) systems with electrochemical reactions requires an overlap between the electrocatalyst's faradaic activity and the solar cell's maximum power point to achieve sustainable fuel production rates21,22. Ni and Co bimetallic systems have been extensively reported as high functional anodes for alkaline water electrolysis due to their <600 mV overpotential at currents >100 mA/cm2 23,24. Rapid degradation of the catalyst at industrially relevant currents limits their viability as commercial anodes. The electrolyte-induced short circuiting by corrosion of the interface between the metal layer and substrate further makes water electrolysis sluggish25,26.

MXenes, a growing family of two-dimensional (2D) transition metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, have emerged as promising materials for electrochemical CO2R reaction due to their unique structural and electronic properties27,28. First discovered in 2011, MXenes are mostly derived from bulk-layered Mn+1AXn phases (where n = 1- 4) which consists of n+1 layers of one or more transition metals (M, typically from groups 4-6), interleaved with X layers, carbon (C), nitrogen (N) or both (CN), and an A group element (usually from groups 13-16). Their compositions can be tuned using different transition metals of groups 4 to 6, X sublattice (C/N), and Tx represents surface terminations (e.g., -O, -OH, -F, -Cl)27,29,30. In CO2R, MXenes are being actively investigated as co-catalysts or supports due to their tunable surface chemistry, catalytically active sites, high specific surface area, and metal-like electrical conductivity.

Recent theoretical studies predict that decorating MXenes with bimetallic or single atoms can substantially enhance CO2R performance by modulating their electronic structure. These design strategies shift the d-band center, modulate the intermediate adsorption energies, and lower the Gibbs free energy barriers of rate-determining steps31,32,33. For instance, Mo2ZC2 MXenes (Z = Ti, V, etc.) have been shown to strengthen -HOCH2O adsorption and weaken -OCH2O binding in electrochemical CO2RR, thereby reducing the limiting potential for CH4 production due to an upshift in the d-band center of Mo atoms. In another study, Cu-doped Ti3C2Tx MXene achieved a Faradaic efficiency of 58.1% toward HCOO- production by introducing polarized sites that facilitate intermediate adsorption and electron transfer. These few theoretical studies guide the potential of exploring MXene-based bimetallic catalysts in tailoring CO2RR pathways.

Here, we have synthesized CuZn@Ti3C2Tx MXene cathodes and NiCo@Ti3C2Tx MXene anodes for CO2R and water electrolysis by simple one-pot electrodeposition. The optimized procedure can be used to deposit a range of bi-metallic or polymetallic systems in concentration ranges from 5 to 100 mM each with pH control. Each set of desired systems would demand tuning the pH and current density according to their electrochemical potentials, deposition potential, reaction conditions, etc. Although the deposition can be carried out on a two-electrode setup, better control over the deposition voltage through reference electrodes is advised. The method can deposit large structures as well as fine particles by controlling reaction parameters like current density, ON-OFF time ratio, and pH. The refined and optimized grain structure tuned by reverse current pulses shows high Faradaic efficiency (56% for hydrocarbons) for CO2R with very low catalyst degradation. Water electrolysis is demonstrated on NiCo@Ti3C2Tx MXene in an H-cell for laboratory conditions with 98% FE and in a zero-gap cell for industrial conditions. A demonstration of in-line product determination by gas chromatography is also featured. The overall system integration and its operation have been closely monitored using the safe-by-design protocols established in our lab34.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The reagents and the equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene

  1. Wash 1 g of optimized Ti3AlC2 MAX phase using 9 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) for 18 h to remove intermetallic impurities.
  2. Prepare the etchant solution by mixing 12 M HCl, deionized (DI) water, and 50 wt% hydrofluoric acid (HF) in a 6:3:1 volume ratio.
    NOTE: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is highly toxic and corrosive. Perform all steps involving HF in a certified fume hood while wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including gloves, lab coat, and face shield.
  3. Add the HCl-washed MAX powder to the etchant solution and stir at 400 rpm for 24 h at 35 °C.
  4. Wash the etched Ti3C2Tx MXene with DI water by repeated centrifugation at 3234 x g for 4-5 cycles (~200 mL each), each cycle of 10 min, until the supernatant reaches a neutral pH of approximately 6.
  5. Delaminate the MXene by adding the washed sediment to a lithium chloride (LiCl) solution (50 mL per gram of etched powder) and stir at 400 rpm for 1 h at 65 °C under argon gas flow.
  6. Wash the mixture by centrifugation at 3234 x g for 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, and 20 min sequentially at room temperature.
  7. Vortex mix the final suspension for 30 min at room temperature, then centrifuge at 2380 x g for 30 min to obtain single-to-few-layered Ti3C2Tx MXene flakes.

2. Preparation of precursors

  1. Disperse 300 mg of Ti3C2Tx MXene in 100 mL of DI water. Sonicate for 5 min to ensure stable dispersion.
  2. Prepare a 30 mM copper citrate solution and a 10 mM zinc oxalate solution in DI water. Ensure to make all solutions in a hood with proper PPE, avoiding spillage or direct contact with skin.
  3. Prepare 50 mM solutions of nickel nitrate and cobalt nitrate in DI water.
  4. Prepare a dispersion of 5 mg of Pt/C in 50 mL of DI water and sonicate for 10 min at room temperature.

3. Fabrication of electrodes

  1. Clean the nickel foam using acetone and then sonicate in DI water for 5 min.
  2. Activate the carbon fiber paper (CFP) by soaking it in 1 M nitric acid (HNO3) for 20 min. Activate the CFP in a hood and use gloves and proper PPE.
  3. Immerse the cleaned nickel foam (5 cm × 5 cm) in MXene solution for 5 min. Dry at room temperature under vacuum. Label this sample as MXene-Ni-Foam.
  4. Spray-coat MXene solution onto activated CFP. Label the sample as MXene-CFP. Load 50 mL of Mxene solution in a spray gun. At a distance of 5 cm, spray the ink on the activated CFP, covering the whole surface of the 2 cm x 2 cm CFP.
  5. In a glass electrochemical cell, add the Cu and Zn precursor solutions. Use an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, a platinum counter electrode, and MXene-CFP as the working electrode, and connect the electrodes to their respective connection on the potentiostat.
    NOTE: For example, the MXene-CFP electrode will be connected to the working electrode connection, and likewise. The electrolyte bath consisted of 50 mL of 30 mM Cu citrate solution and 10 mM Zn oxalate in DI water.
  6. Apply the following pulsed current deposition sequence: -10 mA/cm2 for 1 s, 0 mA/cm2 (null pulse) for 0.5 s, +10 mA/cm² for 0.5 s.
  7. Repeat for 1000 cycles to deposit CuZn. Label the resulting electrode as CuZn@Ti3C2Tx-MXene-CFP.
  8. In another cell, add Ni and Co precursor solutions. Use the same electrode configuration but replace the working electrode with MXene-Ni-Foam. Ensure the electrodes in the electrochemical cell are connected properly with the respective connections on the potentiostat. The electrolytic bath consists of 50 mL of 50 mM Ni nitrate and Co nitrate in DI water.
  9. Apply the same pulsed deposition cycle (as in step 3.6) for 1000 sets to obtain NiCo@Ti3C2Tx-MXene-Ni-Foam.
  10. Fill 50 mL of Pt/C in the spray gun. From a distance of 5 cm, spray-coat Pt/C onto Ni mesh and dry in a vacuum oven at 60 °C to prepare the reference cathode for water electrolysis.

4. Structural characterization

  1. Cut each electrode into 0.5 cm × 1 cm pieces.
  2. Perform X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for phase and morphology analysis.
    NOTE: The size of electrode pieces should be similar to what fits the XRD and SEM instrument sample preparation guidelines.

5. Electrochemical CO2 reduction

  1. Assemble an H-cell with an alkaline exchange membrane separating the two chambers.
  2. Use Ni-Foam as anode and CuZn@Ti3C2Tx-MXene-CFP (2 cm × 2 cm) as cathode. Use 1 M KOH as an electrolyte in both chambers. Check thoroughly for any electrolyte leaks at the membrane junction. Tighten the junction for any leaks.
    NOTE: KOH is highly corrosive; wear proper PPE, put all solutions in a fume hood, and avoid contact with skin. Keep all solutions on flat surfaces away from personal intrusion and electrical plugs.
  3. Insert an Hg/HgO reference electrode in the cathode compartment. Seal the system to be gas-tight. Add a tubing for the CO2 inlet and one for the gas outlet in the cathodic chamber.
  4. Purge CO2 into the cathodic chamber at 30 mL/min for 15 min to saturate the electrolyte.
  5. Illuminate the photovoltaic (PV) cell with 1-sun intensity and connect it to the cell (positive to anode, negative to cathode).
  6. Record cyclic voltammetry (CV) from 0 V to -2.5 V at 50 mV/s and EIS (100 kHz to 0.1 Hz) at open circuit potential.
  7. Perform a 0 A chrono potentiometric measurement for 2 h, recording current periodically using a multimeter. The recorded current can be used to calculate the faradaic efficiency of products.
  8. Connect the cathodic chamber outlet to a gas chromatograph (GC) for in-line sampling every 10 min. Program the GC for the detection and quantification of permanent gases. Use a packed column, such as the Molecular sieve, to identify the gases.
    NOTE: The temperature of the oven is set at ramping with an initial temperature of 150 °C with a hold time of 2 min and further ramped to 200 °C with a hold time of 1 min to allow proper separation and elution of the gases from the mixture.

6. Electrochemical water electrolysis (OER)

  1. Repeat the H-cell setup with NiCo@Ti3C2Tx-MXene-Ni-Foam as anode and Pt/C@Ni mesh as cathode. Insert an Hg/HgO electrode as a reference electrode in the anodic chamber with the working electrode.
  2. Fill both chambers with 1 M KOH electrolyte.
  3. Record CV from 0 V to 1.2 V at 50 mV/s and EIS (10 kHz to 0.1 Hz, 10 mV amplitude) at open circuit potential. On the autolab potentiostat, use the OCP (open circuit potential) determination function to record OCP.
  4. Illuminate the PV cell with 1-sun light using a solar simulator placed 6 cm away, or luminosity of 1 sun on the cell.
  5. Connect PV terminals to electrodes and record a 0 A chrono potentiometric curve. Monitor and log current for efficiency calculations.
  6. Connect the cathode outlet to GC and analyze hydrogen production every 10 min using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) with nitrogen as carrier gas.

7. Zero-gap electrolyzer assembly

  1. Wash with water and prepare a zero-gap cell. Prepare clean polyvinyl propylene tubing and other accessories, like push and pull values that fit the tubing to create junctions between various parts of the alkaline water electrolysis assembly.
  2. Stack the following in sequence: Cell anode plate, NiCo@Ti3C2Tx-MXene-Ni-Foam anode, gasket (same or slightly thicker (0.1 mm) than the thickness of anode), alkaline exchange membrane, gasket, Pt/C cathode, and finally cathode cell plate. Use positioning rods for alignment if available, or make sure to keep the layers firm and stationary on a table.
  3. Assemble the electrolyzer with proper alignment of all layers and end plates. Secure tightly using screws.
  4. Connect the cell to peristaltic pumps circulating 30% KOH at 30 mL/min. The flow rate of electrolytes can be adjusted, and depending on the gas evolution and temperature, the electrolytes can be increased for better gas removal and activity.
  5. Maintain the electrolyte reservoir at 60 °C using an oil bath and monitor with a temperature probe. Ensure not touching the cell or reservoir without thermal gloves.
    NOTE: 30% KOH is highly caustic and can cause burns. Perform all experiments using proper personal protective equipment. Store extra electrolytes in a fume hood and keep the electrolyte reservoir on a flat surface that is well supported and balanced to avoid spills.

8. Calculation of Faradaic efficiency

  1. Use the following equation:
    Faradaic efficiency formula, FE = (Qprod/Qtotal)×100%, electrochemistry equation.
    Where  Qprod is the charge used to form the product (e.g., hydrogen or CO2R product), and Qtotal is the total charge passed.
    NOTE: Dispose of all HF- and HCl-containing waste following institutional hazardous waste protocols. Consult Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) and environmental health and safety (EHS) personnel for disposal guidance.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The X-ray diffraction technique is used to analyse the solid crystal structure of the metal films. Cut appropriately sized (fits the sample stub of the XRD machine) film samples. Load the samples in the machine and scan a range of 2Θ from 10°to 80°. The XRD graph obtained shows peak signals for the crystal planes present in the material. Use the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) reference pattern to identify and further analyse the crystal structure, like main peaks, d-spac...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

This study presents the protocol for the synthesis of bi-metallic electrodes for solar-driven redox reactions for fuel generation. Decarbonizing the energy sector heavily depends on CO2 conversion035,36,37 and use of zero-emission fuels like hydrogen generated from water38,39. Solar-driven electrochemical transformation of carbon dioxide and water needs a...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials through the Industrial Collaboration Programme (RICP-R4-100061) and MATcelerateZero (MATZ0), funded from a grant provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/X527257/1. The authors acknowledge the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (Project ID: NEXTCCUS), University College London's Research, Innovation and Global Engagement, University of Sydney - University College London Partnership Collaboration Awards, UCL-Peking University Strategic Partner Funds, Cornell-UCL Global Strategic Collaboration Awards, and IISc-UCL Joint seed fund for their financial support. The authors acknowledge the ACT program (Accelerating CCS Technologies, Horizon 2020 Project No. 691712) for the financial support of the NEXTCCUS project (project ID: 327327). This work was supported by the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials through the Equipment Access Scheme, enabling access to the Royce SEM-FIB Suite at Cambridge; Cambridge Royce facilities grant EP/P024947/1 and Sir Henry Royce Institute - recurrent grant EP/R00661X/1.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Autolab 302Metrohm UKPGSTAT302NIt assess the electrochemical activity of the system (CO2R and WE)
Cobalt nitrate hexahydrateSigma aldrich 98 10026-22-9precursor for water electrolysis anode
Copper nitrate trihydrateSigma aldrich10031-43-3.precursor for CO2R cathode
Light sourceSOION techxenon lampLight source to illuminate the solar cell
Nickel nitrate hexahydrateSigma aldrich13478-00-7precursor for water electrolysis anode
Online gas chromatographyAgilent8890connected to the electrochemical cell and loops a sample , ~10microlitre gas every 10 minutes or time described in the command for identification and quantification.
Peristaltic pumps SOION techBT100-3Jto flow electrolyte in zero-gap cell.
Potassium hydroxideSigma aldrich1310-58-3Electrolyte for CO2R and water electrolysis.
Solar cell (photovoltaic cell)Fuel cell storeSilicon tandem cell that can supply upto 4 volts of potential and currents of ~300mA
Sustainion membraneDioxide materialsX37-50 Grade RTanion exchange membrane used for ion transport from cathode to anode and stop gas and product crossovers.
Ti3C2Tx MXeneAnasori Lab, Purdue University
VionicMetrohm UK3500001080It assess the electrochemical activity of the system (CO2R and WE) at higher currents. It has higher current and potential windows.
Zinc citrateSigma aldrich480762precursor for CO2R cathode

References

  1. Brauns, J., Turek, T. Alkaline water electrolysis powered by renewable energy: A review. Processes. 8 (2), 248(2020).
  2. Dinh, C. T., Li, Y. C., Sargent, E. H. Boosting the single-pass conversion for renewable chemical electrosynthesis. Joule. 3 (1), 13-15 (2019).
  3. Züttel, A., et al. Storage of renewable energy by reduction of CO2 hydrogen. Chimia (Aarau). 69 (5), 264-268 (2015).
  4. Liu, S., et al. To convert or not to convert: a comparative techno-economic analysis on CO2-to-methanol and CO2-EOR. Appl Energy. 388, 125698(2025).
  5. Lemmon, J. P. Energy: Reimagine fuel cells. Nature. 525 (7570), 447-449 (2015).
  6. Klemeš, J. J., et al. Sustainable energy integration within the circular economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 177, 113143(2023).
  7. Hydrogen Storage. , US Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-storage (2025).
  8. Mao, S. S., Shen, S. Hydrogen production: Catalysing artificial photosynthesis. Nat Photonics. 7 (12), 944-946 (2013).
  9. Lin, H., Luo, S., Zhang, H., Ye, J. Toward solar-driven carbon recycling. Joule. 6 (2), 294-314 (2022).
  10. Sacco, A., et al. An integrated device for the solar-driven electrochemical conversion of CO2 to CO. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 8 (20), 7563-7568 (2020).
  11. Rahaman, M., et al. Solar-driven liquid multi-carbon fuel production using a standalone perovskite-BiVO4 leaf. Nat Energy. 8 (6), 629-638 (2023).
  12. Chen, X., et al. Promoting water dissociation for efficient solar driven CO2 via improving hydroxyl adsorption. Nat Commun. 14 (1), 1-12 (2023).
  13. Rashid, N., Yang, S., Abdi Jalebi, M. Socio-economic impact and regulatory measurements for next-generation electrochemical CO2 system. Nanoscale Adv. 2 (1), 1-9 (2025).
  14. Lamb, W. F., Rao, N. D. Human development in a climate-constrained world: what the past says about the future. Global Environ Change. 33, 14-22 (2015).
  15. Staffell, I., et al. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ Sci. 12 (2), 463-491 (2019).
  16. Rashid, N., Bhat, M. A., Ingole, P. P. Unravelling the chemistry of catalyst surfaces and solvents towards C-C bond formation through activation and electrochemical conversion of CO2 hydrocarbons over micro-structured dendritic copper. Sustain Energy Fuels. 6 (1), 128-142 (2021).
  17. Rashid, N., Dar, F., Bhat, M., Ingole, P. Tailoring motif and channel terminating groups of conventional copper MOFs for their enhanced activity, selectivity, and stability toward the electroreduction of CO2 to hydrocarbons. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 6 (2), 1378-1388 (2023).
  18. Yang, F., et al. Highly efficient electroconversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons by cathodized copper-organic frameworks. Chem Sci. 10 (35), 7975-7981 (2019).
  19. Weng, Z., et al. Active sites of copper-complex catalytic materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nat Commun. 9 (1), 1-9 (2018).
  20. Abdi-Jalebi, M. The Future of Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanoscale and Advanced Materials. 2, 87-94 (2024).
  21. Karaiskakis, A. N., Golru, S. S., Biddinger, E. J. Effect of electrode geometry on selectivity and activity in CO2 electroreduction. Ind Eng Chem Res. 58 (47), 22506-22515 (2019).
  22. Astakhov, O., Cibaka, T., Wieprecht, L., Rau, U., Merdzhanova, T. Unfolding electrolyzer characteristics to reveal solar-to-chemical efficiency potential: Rapid analysis method bridging electrochemistry and photovoltaics. ChemSusChem. 18 (11), e202402027(2024).
  23. Angeles-Olvera, Z., et al. Nickel-based electrocatalysts for water electrolysis. Energies. 15 (5), 1609(2022).
  24. Irshad, A., Munichandraiah, N. Electrodeposited nickel-cobalt-sulfide catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 9 (23), 19746-19755 (2017).
  25. Pašti, I. A., et al. Atomically thin metal films on foreign substrates: From lattice mismatch to electrocatalytic activity. ACS Catal. 9 (4), 3467-3481 (2019).
  26. Heikkinen, M., Ghiyasi, R., Karppinen, M. Layer-engineered functional multilayer thin-film structures and interfaces through atomic and molecular layer deposition. Adv Mater Interfaces. 12 (10), 2400262(2025).
  27. Lim, C., Handoko, A. D., Seh, Z. W. A realistic take on MXenes for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Diam Relat Mater. 130, 109461(2022).
  28. Meng, L., Tayyebi, E., Exner, K. S., Viñes, F., Illas, F. MXenes as electrocatalysts for the CO2 reaction: recent advances and future challenges. ChemElectroChem. 11 (8), e202300598(2024).
  29. Handoko, A. D., et al. Two-dimensional titanium and molybdenum carbide MXenes as electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. iScience. 23 (9), 101181(2020).
  30. Li, N., et al. Understanding of electrochemical mechanisms for CO2 and conversion into hydrocarbon fuels in transition-metal carbides (MXenes). ACS Nano. 11 (11), 10825-10833 (2017).
  31. Govindan, B., et al. Synergistic bimetallic sites in 2D-on-2D heterostructures for enhanced C-N coupling in sustainable urea synthesis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 12 (12), 8174-8187 (2024).
  32. Wang, R., et al. Element-doped MXenes: Mechanism, synthesis, and applications. Small. 18 (25), 2201740(2022).
  33. Cao, S., et al. MXene-based single atom catalysts for efficient CO2RR towards CO: A novel strategy for high-throughput catalyst design and screening. Chem Eng J. 461, 141936(2023).
  34. Kumar Sharma, P., Rashid, N., Abdi Jalebi, M. Safe-by-design approach for next-generation electrochemical CO2 prototype with risk assessment and safety considerations. Nanoscale Adv. 2 (1), 74-83 (2025).
  35. Fang, B., et al. Large-scale synthesis of TiO2 with hierarchical nanostructure for highly efficient photodriven reduction of CO2 to CH4. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 6 (17), 15488-15498 (2014).
  36. Somoza-Tornos, A., Guerra, O. J., Crow, A. M., Smith, W. A., Hodge, B. M. Process modeling, techno-economic assessment, and life cycle assessment of the electrochemical reduction of CO2: A review. iScience. 24 (7), 102813(2021).
  37. Wyndorps, J., Ostovari, H., von der Assen, N. Is electrochemical CO2 the future technology for power-to-chemicals? An environmental comparison with H2-based pathways. Sustain Energy Fuels. 5 (22), 5748-5761 (2021).
  38. Zlatar, M., et al. Standardizing OER electrocatalyst benchmarking in aqueous electrolytes: comprehensive guidelines for accelerated stress tests and backing electrodes. ACS Catal. 13 (23), 15375-15392 (2023).
  39. Marini, S., et al. Advanced alkaline water electrolysis. Electrochim Acta. 82, 384-391 (2012).
  40. Miao, M., Duan, H., Luo, J., Wang, X. Recent progress and prospect of electrodeposition-type catalysts in carbon dioxide reduction utilization. Mater Adv. 3 (18), 6968-6987 (2022).
  41. Zangari, G. Fundamentals of electrodeposition. Encyclopedia of Interfacial Chemistry: Surface Science and Electrochemistry. , 141-160 (2018).
  42. Guruprasad, N., van der Schaaf, J., de Groot, M. T. Unraveling the impact of reverse currents on electrode stability in anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. J Power Sources. 613, 234877(2024).
  43. Rashid, N., Ingole, P., Delhi, N. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 ionic liquid stabilized reverse pulse electrodeposited copper oxides. Bose, M., Modi, A. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Energy Research, , Springer Proceedings in Energy. 1551-1558 (2020).
  44. Rashid, N., Ingole, P. P. Pulse electrodeposition of copper octahedrons: Investigations into the CO2RR on these surfaces. Meet. Abstr. MA202802, 816(2018).
  45. Voncken, J. H. L., Verkroost, T. W. Powder diffraction of cubic α-brass. Powder Diffr. 12 (4), 228-229 (1997).
  46. Salehi, M., Saidi, A., Ahmadian, M., Raeissi, K. Characterization of nanocrystalline nickel-cobalt alloys synthesized by direct and pulse electrodeposition. Int J Mod Phys. 28 (6), 1450043(2014).
  47. Walsh, F. C., Herron, M. E. Electrocrystallization and electrochemical control of crystal growth: fundamental considerations and electrodeposition of metals. J Phys D Appl Phys. 24 (2), 217(1991).
  48. Shi, Y., et al. Atomic-level metal electrodeposition: synthetic strategies, applications, and catalytic mechanism in electrochemical energy conversion. Small Struct. 3 (3), 2100185(2022).
  49. Kaneco, S., et al. Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene with high Faradaic efficiency at a Cu electrode in CsOH/methanol. Electrochim Acta. 44 (26), 4701-4706 (1999).
  50. Lv, W., Zhang, R., Gao, P., Lei, L. Studies on the Faradaic efficiency for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate on tin electrode. J Power Sources. 253, 276-281 (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Solar Fuel ProductionElectrochemical CO2 ReductionWater ElectrolysisMXene Supported CatalystsCopper Zinc CathodeNickel Cobalt AnodePulse ElectrodepositionAlkaline ElectrolysisGas ChromatographyCyclic Voltammetry