Postoperative adhesions are a major source of morbidity following abdominal and pelvic surgery, developing in up to 93% of patients1,2, with approximately 20% requiring hospitalization within five years for adhesion-related complications3,4. Peritoneal injury arises from abdominal surgical procedures as well as intra-abdominal irritation (infection or chemical exposure) or chronic inflammatory conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease. The resulting adhesions can lead to a wide range of clinical consequences, including recurrent bowel obstructions sometimes requiring additional surgeries, or causing infertility and chronic pain5,6,7. Adhesion formation can be particularly severe following multi-visceral resections for malignancy, such as cytoreductive surgeries, chronic inflammation, or bowel perforation, where extensive peritoneal injury amplifies the fibrotic response. Additionally, adhesive disease can significantly complicate subsequent surgical interventions, often making it impossible to proceed with a minimally invasive approach or causing inadvertent iatrogenic injury to the bowel or other organs.
Despite their clinical significance, the development of effective anti-adhesion strategies is limited - likely hindered in part by limitations in preclinical models that recapitulate the anatomy, physiology, and wound-healing responses seen in humans8. Rodent models are widely used due to their availability, experimental tractability, and reliable adhesion generation9,10,11. However, their small peritoneal cavity, thin mesentery, and distinct inflammatory milieu can limit translational relevance8,12. Such models have contributed to the development of anti-adhesion approaches that demonstrated robust efficacy in animal studies but demonstrated limited or context-dependent clinical benefit in humans8,13,14,15,16,17. In addition, human-comparable surgical procedures such as bowel resection and anastomosis are difficult to model in a translationally relevant manner in rodents, and species-specific differences in drug metabolism further limit clinical extrapolation18.
Large animal models, particularly swine, are widely used to study abdominal processes due to their anatomical and physiological similarity to humans and their comparable surgical handling, providing a platform to study both adhesion formation and test therapeutic interventions19,20,21,22. Existing porcine adhesion models have provided important insights, yet many focus on procedure-specific adhesion formation and often lack standardized procedures limiting their applicability particularly to severe adhesions arising after open intestinal surgery23,24,25,26,27.
To address these limitations, we developed a porcine model of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions that integrates midline laparotomy, small bowel resection, and a unilateral, parietal peritoneal abrasion. This multifocal peritoneal strategy recapitulates adhesion-promoting insults commonly encountered during abdominal surgical procedures and produces adhesions of different strengths and locations at the four-week timepoint with guaranteed adhesions on the side of the abdomen where directed parietal abrasion is performed as well as stochastic adhesions throughout the abdomen. By incorporating a clinically relevant intestinal surgical procedure with a defined and reproducible peritoneal injury, this model overcomes key limitations of prior porcine systems and provides a consistent platform for studying postoperative adhesion formation and evaluating anti-adhesion interventions.