
In cardiology and radiology, ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are routinely used to assess blood perfusion using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. An example of an UCA is microbubbles that have a core of gas which is stabilized by a shell consisting of a lipid, protein, sugar and/or polymer. These microbubbles have a diameter of ~1 to 10 µm. When exposed to ultrasound, the microbubble’s gas core responds to the pressure change by compressing and expanding, which results in the vibration of the microbubble. This vibration provides acoustic signals for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and can stimulate and enhance cellular drug uptake. Although the initial use of UCA was for diagnostic imaging only, their potential as local drug delivery systems is nowadays well established and further expansion of their use is expected. In addition to this, clinical studies show the safety of the microbubble-mediated treatment. At the same time, a more detailed insight into the underlying mechanism of the microbubble-cell-drug interaction is needed for maximum therapeutic outcome and widespread clinical use. For contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging, novel pulsing schemes or beamforming techniques continue to be developed for better diagnostics through for example enhanced resolution. This methods collection aims to collate models to investigate ultrasound contrast agents and cavitation nuclei for imaging and therapy, both in vitro and in vivo. These models will offer existing and new researchers in the ultrasound contrast agent and cavitation nuclei field a resource providing in-depth details as well as advantages and limitations of each current model.
0 Views
•
Cited by 2
•
2021
•
0 Views
•
Cited by 7
•
2022
•
Charissa Poon1,2, Melina Mühlenpfordt*3, Marieke Olsman*3, Spiros Kotopoulis4,5, Catharina de Lange Davies3, Kullervo Hynynen1,2,6
1Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, 3Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 4Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5Exact Therapeutics AS, 6Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto
0 Views
•
Cited by 8
•
2021
•
Charlotte Nawijn1, Tim Segers1,2, Guillaume Lajoinie1, Ýrr Mørch3, Sigrid Berg4,5,6, Sofie Snipstad3,6,7, Catharina de Lange Davies7, Michel Versluis1
1Physics of Fluids group, Department of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and Technical Medical (TechMed) Center, University of Twente, 2BIOS Lab-on-a-Chip group, Max Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology and Technical Medical (TechMed) Center, University of Twente, 3Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, SINTEF Industry, 4Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 5Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, 6Cancer Clinic, St. Olav’s Hospital, 7Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
0 Views
•
Cited by 5
•
2021
•
0 Views
•
Cited by 6
•
2021
•
Pharmacokinetic modeling of PSMA-targeted Nanobubbles in subcutaneous mouse tumors
Chuan Chen*1
1Eindhoven University of Technology