Social Class Stereotypes
Social Class Stereotypes - Related Videos
02:09
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
0 Views •
2020
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
02:16
Stereotype Content Model
0 Views •
2020
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
02:55
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
0 Views •
2020
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
04:56
Perspectives on Social Psychology
0 Views •
2023
Social Psychology is a complex field—one that investigates how social contexts affect people’s actions, thoughts, and attitudes. It brings the scientific method into our everyday lives by addressing questions relevant to interactions amongst individuals near and far or even over the internet. For example, the video about ostracism details an approach to induce feelings of exclusion without direct face-to-face contact. These videos are meant to show the wide reactionary nature of human beings,...
11:13
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
0 Views •
Cited by 13 •
2015
Previous research on the social dimension of stress has focused on two important variables: social identity and social support. This protocol introduces an effective experimental manipulation of these two social variables and describes their implementation in a standard stress induction paradigm (Trier Social Stress Test).
FAQs
Social categorization groups people according to perceived social differences, making socioeconomic status a cue for forming expectations. Learned cultural messages can attach assumptions about ability, behavior, or character to those categories. Once established, these associations may guide interpretation of later information, helping explain how status beliefs become persistent rather than remaining isolated impressions.
Selective attention directs notice toward information that appears consistent with an existing stereotype, while confirmation bias encourages people to interpret or remember evidence in ways that support it. Together, these processes can make stereotype-consistent examples seem especially convincing and contradictory information less influential, reinforcing judgments about people across repeated social encounters.
Repeated status-based expectations can influence how individuals understand their own abilities, behavior, and social value. In psychology, this makes self-perception an important outcome alongside judgments by others. Studying both perspectives helps clarify how stereotypes may operate internally and socially, including their relationship to stigma, decision-making, and unequal opportunities.
Their effects can appear wherever people evaluate ability, character, or deservingness, including education, employment, healthcare, and interpersonal relationships. In these settings, expectations shaped by perceived socioeconomic status may influence social evaluations and opportunities. Examining several contexts allows psychologists to distinguish broad status beliefs from consequences that emerge in particular institutions or relationships.
Researchers can examine how status beliefs shape judgments, expectations, and interpretations of social differences, while also considering selective attention and confirmation bias. They can connect these processes to outcomes such as stigma, discrimination, and unequal opportunities. Including self-perception in the analysis shows whether stereotype effects involve both how people evaluate others and how individuals view themselves.
Interventions should be evaluated by whether they reduce the influence of status beliefs on social evaluations and decision-making. The relevant outcomes include less stigma and discrimination, fairer expectations, and more equal opportunities across education, employment, healthcare, and interpersonal settings. Psychological research on these outcomes can also reveal how stereotypes are maintained and where change is most needed.