$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Duodenal papillary adenoma is a rare benign tumor. With the widespread adoption of endoscopic screening, the detection rate of duodenal papillary adenomas has increased in recent years. Duodenal papillary adenoma often presents with nonspecific symptoms in the early stages1. As a precancerous tumor, it has the potential to progress to adenocarcinoma, posing significant challenges to patient treatment and survival.
Tumor resection remains the most effective treatment option. Currently, available surgical options include pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), function-preserving local resection (LR), and endoscopic resection (ER) of duodenal papillary adenoma2. Traditional PD is complicated and highly invasive, with the highest risk of perioperative complications and mortality3. With advancements in minimally invasive techniques and function-preserving concepts, the less invasive LR of tumors has become possible4. This procedure integrates the benefits of surgical resection with a simplified surgical procedure that significantly reduces the risk of surgical complications and loss of function; in addition, it can be converted to PD if malignant lesions are detected. ER is the least invasive option and has advanced rapidly in recent years, with continually expanding indications. Although ER is comparable to surgery in terms of overall survival, it is associated with a higher rate of incomplete resection and postoperative recurrence. For ER, LR, and PD, the pooled R0 resection rates were 76.6%, 96.4%, and 98.9%, respectively; adverse events were 24.7%, 28.3%, and 44.7%; and recurrence rates were 13.0%, 9.4%, and 14.2%, respectively5,6.
Current evidence suggests that ER is the preferred option if an R0 resection can be achieved. If this is not feasible, the LR option should be considered. However, PD is recommended for patients with adenocarcinoma (AC) beyond the pT1a N0 stage7. Although ER is frequently chosen as the primary treatment, further research is needed to identify the most suitable cases compared with those of LR. Especially for patients with larger tumors (>3 cm) or central duodenal involvement, ER is less effective, often requiring multiple procedures and posing significant risks of serious complications such as bleeding and perforation8. In this situation, LR may be more appropriate because of its inherent advantages: organ/function preservation (avoiding PD morbidity), minimally invasive nature (laparoscopic benefits), and utilization of established surgical principles familiar to hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons. These characteristics increase its accessibility and generalizability in clinical practice9,10,11. Nevertheless, relevant reports remain limited. This is partly attributable to the anatomical complexity of the duodenal ampulla and partly due to the technical challenges associated with the procedure.
This article reports how duodenal papillary adenomas that are not feasible to remove endoscopically can be resected laparoscopically at this center. The procedure commenced with the preoperative placement of the pancreatic duct and biliary stents. After adequate mobilization of the descending portion of the duodenum with kocherization12, longitudinal duodenotomy was performed to localize the tumor and the duodenal papilla. After the complete resection of the tumor along its base, the duodenal papilla and duodenal wall were repaired and reconstructed. The primary objective of this procedure is to preserve the function of the duodenal papilla while completely excising the tumor. In addition, it helps minimize surgical trauma and enhances surgical safety.
The patient, a 52-year-old female, was admitted to the Department of Gastroenterology due to recurrent chest tightness and pain lasting for over a year. A preadmission gastroscopy revealed a duodenal papillary mass measuring approximately 3 cm x 2 cm, characterized by a rough surface. Biopsy pathology revealed a low-grade adenoma. The patient had a history of breast cancer, and was treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy ten years prior. A physical examination revealed no apparent positive signs. Preoperatively, the patient's CA19-9, CA-125, and CEA levels and liver and kidney function test results were within the normal range. A CT and MRI scan revealed a nodular mass in the duodenal papilla region, which exhibited homogeneous enhancement on contrast imaging. MRI revealed that the sizes of the prepapillary common bile duct and pancreatic main duct were 5 mm and 3 mm, respectively. The patient first underwent an endoscopic resection on February 20, 2024. During the procedure, the mass was observed to extend significantly below the duodenal papilla, with its lower portion reaching the horizontal segment of the duodenum. This complication makes endoscopic resection challenging and increases the risk of bleeding and perforation. The endoscopic method was unsuccessful in removing the tumor. The patient was subsequently transferred to the department for surgical resection of the tumor. Preoperative placement of the pancreatic duct and biliary stents was performed on February 23, 2024. Laparoscopic resection with reconstruction of the duodenal papilla was performed on February 26, 2024. Postoperative pathology confirmed the presence of villous tubular adenoma with focal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (occupying approximately 25%-30% of the tumor volume) and excluded adenocarcinoma in the adenoma (Figure 1). The patients recovered without complications, and their pancreatic duct and biliary stents were removed 30 days after the operation.