$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Left ventricular (LV) contractility is the intrinsic ability of myocardium to generate pressure independent of loading conditions1,2,3. It is a critical determinant of cardiac stroke volume, cardiac output, and blood pressure. Hence, when suffering from acute myocardial ischemia, the heart may quickly lose contractility4. Thus, impaired myocardial contractility may cause acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock (CS)5. CS results in hypotension and inadequate organ perfusion, leading to high mortality (30%–50% in-hospital) despite aggressive therapy5,6. Common medical therapies involve inotropic agents such as norepinephrine, dobutamine, and milrinone that increase contractility but may also directly affect the vascular tonus7. Assessment of contractility is of particular interest when investigating new pharmacological treatments, when evaluating disease severity, or when working with experimental models.
Traditional metrics like LV ejection fraction or dP/dt(max) are load-dependent and can misrepresent the true contractile state when preload or afterload changes. This underscores the value of load-independent indices of contractility such as end-systolic elastance (Ees), which can more reliably track myocardial performance1.
In vivo methods for assessing contractility have therefore been developed, with pressure–volume (PV) analysis considered the gold standard in experimental research8. The classical in vivo approach to quantify Ees is to perform an inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion to gradually and transiently reduce preload. By recording concomitant end-systolic pressure (ESP) and end-systolic volume (ESV) points during this preload reduction, a regression line of ESPVR can be fitted, and its slope, Ees, determined, with the x-intercept of that line defined as V₀ - the theoretical volume at zero pressure generation. However, in fragile states, such as CS, even a brief IVC occlusion can cause severe hypotension, arrhythmias, or further compromise end-organ perfusion in an already critically low cardiac output state, limiting feasibility and interpretability.
In the present study protocol, a practical alternative to the traditional IVC occlusion method for use in acute, closed-chest experiments is presented, where a single IVC occlusion is performed under stable baseline conditions to determine the volume-axis intercept V₀. This value is then assumed constant for subsequent single-beat Ees estimations. This approach builds on evidence from isolated and intact animal studies showing that acute inotropic changes primarily alter the ESPVR slope (Ees)while the intercept remains largely stable2,9,10. By avoiding repeated occlusions, the method minimizes arrhythmias and hemodynamic instability while preserving precise, load-independent assessment of LV contractility. In this protocol, this strategy is applied in a closed-chest porcine model of CS using an admittance-based PV catheter, based on experiences from previous studies4,8,11,12,13,14,15,16. While this fixed-intercept approach is intended for acute, closed-chest experiments with stable ventricular geometry, its applicability is limited in settings with evolving chamber size, altered thoracic pressures, or structural remodeling; these practical constraints should be considered when evaluating the method's suitability for a given study. Unlike prior single-beat or model-based approaches, this protocol determines V₀ empirically under stable baseline conditions and then applies it throughout the experiment, offering a safer and more feasible alternative for serial, load-independent contractility assessment in hemodynamically fragile large-animal models.