$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In vivo, except in avascular tissues, cells exchange nutrients with nearby capillaries located no more than 100–150 µm away23. Similarly, in vitro, the balance between nutrient consumption by peripheral cells and diffusion into the tissue is such that only cells within approximately 200 µm of the surface of an avascular engineered tissue are considered to receive an adequate nutrient supply24. Given that EVTs generally have widths of up to 1 mm, cells at the center of the tissue may experience reduced oxygen and nutrient availability relative to cells at the periphery because of diffusion limitations. Although oxygen availability may decrease toward the center of the tissue, EVTs are cultured under atmospheric oxygen conditions, and reduced oxygen diffusion toward the core does not necessarily indicate true hypoxia.
To assess how long human aortic SMCs remain viable in EVTs, we performed a TUNEL assay on transverse cryosections using fluorescein-dUTP. We consistently observed <10% TUNEL-positive cells in EVTs cultured for 3 days, which was the threshold used to define viable EVTs. This assay can also be used to monitor apoptosis following experimental perturbations. For example, we previously used TUNEL staining to assess cell death in EVTs cultured under calcifying conditions21.
Based on these findings, a 3-day culture period was selected for subsequent experiments. The EVT casting workflow is illustrated in Figure 1A, and representative EVTs after 1 day of culture are shown in Figure 1B. By day 3, EVTs exhibited aligned SMCs spanning the PDMS posts (Figure 1C) together with widespread deposition of type I collagen (COL1A1/2) and fibronectin (FN1) throughout the constructs (Figure 1D).

Figure 1. Casting and immunofluorescence staining of engineered vascular tissues. (A) Schematic overview of the EVT casting process. (B) Representative photograph of a rack of EVTs after 1 day of culture. (C) Representative fluorescence images of human smooth muscle cells within a longitudinal EVT section (10×). Blue = DAPI; red = smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2). The merged image is shown at the bottom. (D) Representative fluorescence images of human smooth muscle cells and surrounding extracellular matrix within longitudinal and transverse EVT sections (10×). Blue = DAPI; red = smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2); yellow = type I collagen (COL1A1/2); green = fibronectin (FN1). Merged images are shown in the bottom right. Insets (white boxes) show corresponding 40× magnified regions. Scale bars = 10 mm (B) and 200 µm (C,D). Panel A was created in BioRender. Duregotti, E. (2026) https://BioRender.com/cz4krdr. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
We next examined the composition of the de novo ECM deposited within EVTs after 3 days of culture using proteomics. To this end, we employed a sequential protein extraction workflow (Step 7 and Figure 2A) designed to isolate fractions enriched for soluble extracellular and intracellular proteins (TLB) and less soluble, highly crosslinked ECM proteins (GuHCl). The TLB extraction period was extended to 24 h to demonstrate that a proportion of the ECM was not readily soluble and had already become integrated into the developing matrix. In general, however, shorter TLB extraction periods are recommended to minimize the loss of ECM components.

Figure 2. Proteomic profiling of engineered vascular tissues. (A) Schematic overview of the sequential protein extraction workflow used to isolate tissue lysis buffer (TLB) and guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) fractions from EVTs, followed by protein processing and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). (B) Circular heatmap showing Log₂ fold changes for core matrisome proteins comparing paired GuHCl and TLB fractions from human aortic smooth muscle cell donors (n = 7). Positive values (red) indicate enrichment in the GuHCl fraction, whereas negative values (blue) indicate enrichment in the TLB fraction. Only proteins belonging to the NABA Core Matrisome gene set with an adjusted P < 0.05 (limma analysis) are shown. Collagen family members (COL) are highlighted in bold. (C) Comparison of average Log₂ abundance for fibrillar (red) and non-fibrillar (grey) collagens in the GuHCl fraction following database searches performed with or without hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine variable modifications (n = 7 donors). Panel A was created in BioRender. Duregotti, E. (2026) https://BioRender.com/dkeyebj. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Proteomic analysis of EVTs from seven human donors by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry with data-independent acquisition (Figure 2A) revealed enrichment of several collagen family members (COL) in the GuHCl fraction after 3 days of culture, together with regulators of collagen fibrillogenesis, including FMOD, PCOLCE, and PCOLCE2 (Figure 2B). The complete differential protein abundance dataset, including statistical analyses and core matrisome annotations, is provided in Supplementary Table 1. Conversely, more readily soluble SMC-secreted proteins, including MFGE8 and EDIL3, were more abundant in the TLB fraction, consistent with enrichment of the expected protein components in the sequentially extracted fractions.
Fibrillar collagens are characterized by a high hydroxyproline content that stabilizes their continuous triple-helical domains and promotes their assembly into large, cable-like fibrils. Consistent with this biology, detection of fibrillar collagens in the GuHCl fraction was sensitive to the inclusion of hydroxyproline and hydroxylysine as variable modifications during database searching (Figure 2C). In contrast, the measured abundance of non-fibrillar collagens was largely unchanged irrespective of whether these modifications were included, providing confidence that their identification was not driven by modification-dependent false-positive peptide assignments.
In addition to collagens, several basement membrane glycoproteins were enriched in the GuHCl fraction after 3 days of culture, including laminin (LAMA/B/C) subunits, nidogens (NID1 and NID2), and the heparan sulfate proteoglycans perlecan (HSPG2) and agrin (AGRN), demonstrating the presence of a diverse ECM within EVTs. Elastin (ELN), together with proteins involved in fibrillin-1 (FBN1) microfibril assembly (THSD4) and elastin deposition (MFAP2, EMILIN1, and EMILIN2), was also significantly enriched in the GuHCl fraction. Although FBN1 was enriched (Log2 fold change = 1.84), it did not reach statistical significance (adjusted P = 0.051). We previously demonstrated that TGF-β1 treatment induces elastin expression in murine EVTs21; therefore, a similar strategy may be used to further stimulate elastic matrix deposition in human EVTs.
Representative Western blot analysis demonstrated the presence of the SMC cytoskeletal protein transgelin (TAGLN) in both the TLB and GuHCl fractions, with stronger detection in the TLB fraction (Figure 3A). This finding suggests incomplete extraction of intracellular proteins by TLB, even after a 24 h incubation, potentially because cellular remnants remain trapped within the crosslinked ECM and are subsequently extracted using the more stringent GuHCl buffer. FN1, an ECM glycoprotein involved in the deposition of other matrix proteins, and the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan versican (VCAN) were also detected in both fractions (Figure 3A). Consistent with the proteomic analysis (Figure 2B), FN1 showed a modest enrichment in the GuHCl fraction. The distribution of FN1 and VCAN across both fractions likely reflects the presence of both readily soluble and more tightly matrix-associated forms within EVTs.

Figure 3. Analysis of engineered vascular tissue contraction and smooth muscle marker expression. (A) Left: Representative Western blot analysis of transgelin (TAGLN), type I collagen (COL1A1/2), fibronectin (FN1), versican (VCAN), and fibrinogen β chain/fibrin in paired GuHCl and TLB fractions from three representative human aortic smooth muscle cell donors (Donors 1–3). Ponceau S staining is shown as a loading control. Right: Western blot analysis of the corresponding TLB fractions probed for vimentin (VIM) and the smooth muscle cell markers TAGLN, smooth muscle alpha-actin (ACTA2), and calponin-1 (CNN1). GAPDH and Ponceau S staining are shown as loading controls. (B) Quantification of EVT contraction after 24, 48, and 72 h of culture under baseline (Vehicle, black) conditions or in the presence of TGF-β1 (20 ng/mL, pink). EVT length was measured from darkfield images using ImageJ. Data are shown for three representative human aortic smooth muscle cell donors corresponding to panel A (Donors 1–3). Individual data points represent technical replicates, and bars indicate the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Representative darkfield images acquired after 48 h of culture using a 4× objective are shown below each graph. Scale bar = 500 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In contrast, the abundant ECM component type I collagen (COL1A1/2) was detected exclusively in the GuHCl fraction (Figure 3A). In addition to de novo ECM proteins, remnants of fibrinogen β chain and the fibrin scaffold were also detected exclusively in the GuHCl fraction (Figure 3A). Protein abundance varied among extracts from three representative donors, with fibrinogen β chain/fibrin showing an inverse relationship with collagen and fibronectin abundance. These findings demonstrate that the sequential extraction approach can be used to qualitatively assess differences in de novo ECM production among SMC donors. We previously demonstrated that deposition of space-filling proteoglycans characterizes the early ECM response in EVTs, followed by increased collagen deposition21.
In addition to differences in ECM production among SMC donors, variation in contractile marker abundance (ACTA2 and CNN1) and the degree of tissue contraction during culture was also observed (Figure 3A,B). Donor 3, which exhibited lower COL1A1/2, ACTA2, and CNN1 abundance than the other donors, also showed reduced contraction under baseline conditions (Figure 3B). Upon stimulation with TGF-β1, contraction increased to levels comparable to those observed in the other donors under baseline conditions. These findings illustrate the donor-to-donor variability in matrix production, contractile phenotype, and tissue contraction that may be observed using this method. They also demonstrate the enhanced contraction induced by TGF-β1 treatment, consistent with our previous findings in murine EVTs21. Variability among technical replicates for each primary donor was minimal (Figure 3B), indicating good reproducibility of the EVT casting protocol.
The mass spectrometry proteomics data generated in this study have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository under accession number PXD080642. The complete processed quantitative proteomics dataset, including statistical analyses and core matrisome annotations, is provided in Supplementary Table 1.
Supplementary Table 1. Complete quantitative proteomic analysis of engineered vascular tissues (EVTs) following sequential extraction. Differential protein abundance between the guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) and tissue lysis buffer (TLB) fractions was determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry with data-independent acquisition. The table includes gene names, log₂ fold changes (GuHCl vs. TLB), 95% confidence intervals, mean protein abundance, moderated t-statistics, P-values, false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted P-values, B statistics, –log₁₀(P) values, –log₁₀(FDR) values, and core matrisome annotations. Please click here to download this file.