This protocol describes the preparation of the inoculum, the biofilm quantification on microtiter plates using crystal violet dye, the viable count in biofilms, and the visualization of biofilms of Acinetobacter.
Acinetobacter causes nosocomial infections and its biofilm formation can contribute to the survival on dry surfaces such as hospital environments. Thus, biofilm quantification and visualization are important methods to assess the potential of Acinetobacter strains to cause nosocomial infections. The biofilms forming on the surface of the microplate can be quantified in terms of volume and cell numbers. Biofilm volumes can be quantified by staining using crystal violet, washing, destaining using ethanol, then measuring the solubilized dye using a microplate reader. To quantify the number of cells embedded in the biofilms, the biofilms are scrapped off using cell scrapers, harvested in the saline, vigorously agitated in the presence of glass beads, and spread on Acinetobacter agar. Then, the plates are incubated at 30 °C for 24-42 h. After incubation, the red colonies are enumerated to estimate the number of cells in biofilms. This viable count method can also be useful for counting Acinetobacter cells in mixed-species biofilms. Acinetobacter biofilms can be visualized using fluorescent dyes. A commercially available microplate designed for microscopic analysis is employed to form biofilms. Then, the bottom-surface attached biofilms are stained with SYTO9 and propidium iodide dyes, washed, then visualized with confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Acinetobacter is known to cause nosocomial infections, and its human infection, especially in healthcare facilities, is increasingly reported1. It is widespread in hospitals, healthcare facilities, and food-associated environments2,3,4. It can survive for a long period in environments including hospital surfaces such as bed rails, bedside tables, the surface of ventilators, and sinks4. Such persistence on environmental surfaces may be one of the significant factors contributing to the nosocomial infections of Acinetobacter4.
Biofilm is a form of microbial life and is a microbial matrix composed of live microbial cells and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from the cells5. The microbial cells are embedded in the matrix and are often highly resistant to environmental stresses such as heat, salts, dryness, antibiotics, disinfectants, and shear forces6,7.
Acinetobacter can form biofilms on surfaces, suggesting that it may contribute to extended survival on environmental surfaces, including hospital surfaces, and enhanced resistance to antibiotic treatment8,9. In addition, the biofilm formation of Acinetobacter could be highly associated with human clinical outcomes8. Therefore, the biofilm formability of Acinetobacter strains could be one of the indicators in predicting environmental survival and human infections8,10.
The surface-attached biofilms can be quantified and visualized to assess biofilm formability. To quantify surface-attached biofilms, the biofilms are normally stained by biofilm-staining dyes such as crystal violet, and the dyes are eluted in solution and measured for optical density11. Visualization of biofilms is another good approach to assess biofilm formability11. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) visualization method employing specificity using fluorescent dyes could be more useful to characterize biofilm morphology compared to other techniques such as SEM12,13.
The viable cells in biofilms can be counted to estimate the number of viable cells in biofilms11. The viable cells embedded in biofilms are detached, diluted, spread on agar plates, incubated, and enumerated. Because the higher number of cells is likely to meet the infectious dose, it can provide more detailed information on biofilms, such as infection potentials associated with the number of cells13,14.
This article presents step-by-step protocols to (1) quantify surface-attached biofilms, (2) count viable cells in the biofilms, and (3) visualize the biofilms using CLSM of Acinetobacter. The presented protocols describe the methods to assess the biofilm formability of Acinetobacter isolates and characterize their biofilms.
1. Preparation of bacterial inoculum
2. Biofilm quantification using crystal violet
3. Biofilm viability count
4. Biofilm visualization using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)
Following the protocol, the biofilms of Acinetobacter isolates, originally isolated from kitchen surfaces, were formed on a polystyrene 96-well plate, stained with crystal violet, and the dyes were solubilized in ethanol and measured for biofilm mass (Figure 1). The number of biofilms greatly varied depending on the strains ranging from OD 0.04 to 1.69 (Figure 1). Based on the criteria established by Stepanović et al.16, all of the isolates except for A. bouvetii formed biofilms. A. radioresistens formed a weak biofilm. A. junii and A. baumannii formed moderate biofilms, while A. pittii and A. ursingii formed strong biofilms.
To count viable cells in biofilms, the biofilms were scraped off using cell scrapers, vortexed at high speed, diluted, and spread on the Acinetobacter selective plates. After incubation, the number of colonies was counted to estimate the number of biofilm cells (Figure 2). All the isolates except for A. bouvetii had cells equivalent to 7-8 Log CFU in their biofilms. Consistent with the biofilm non-forming property shown by crystal violet assay, A. bouvetii had a much lower level of cell number at 4.4 Log CFU.
The bottom-surface attached biofilms were visualized using CLSM (Figure 3). A substantial amount of biofilm was found in A. junii, A. baumannii, and A. ursingii with distinct biofilm morphologies. While A. pittii was a strong biofilm former in crystal violet assay, it did not form much biofilm on the bottom surface.
Figure 1: Measurement of biofilm mass of Acinetobacter formed on a polystyrene 96-well plate using crystal violet assay. The error bars represent the standard deviation from triplicate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Viable counts of Acinetobacter biofilms formed on a polystyrene 12-well plate. The error bars represent the standard deviation from the duplicate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Bottom-surface attached Acinetobacter biofilms formed on a 96-well plate visualized by CLSM using SYTO 9 and propidium iodide dyes. Scale bars: 50 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Using the protocol described, the biofilm formation of Acinetobacter isolates with varying degrees was measured, visualized, and the viable cells in the biofilms were estimated (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3).
In this protocol, two different temperatures were used, 30 °C for the growth and 25 °C for the biofilm formation of Acinetobacter. 30 °C was used because many studies used more than 30 °C for the optimal growth of Acinetobacter, which would be appropriate to obtain sufficient inoculum12,13,14,17. However, this temperature is generally higher than the temperatures of the environment where biofilm formation would occur, such as hospital surfaces or food processing environments. Therefore, 25 °C was used for biofilm formation, which would simulate these environmental conditions more.
This protocol used 10-fold diluted BHI instead of the original BHI to form biofilms (step 1.12). Many surfaces, such as hospital surfaces or food processing environments, are likely to be low-nutrient18,19. In addition, microorganisms on the contaminated surfaces remain on the surfaces after cleaning and persist in the low-nutrient conditions20. Therefore, low-nutrient conditions such as 10-fold diluted BHI are more desirable than high-nutrient conditions such as original BHI.
Crystal violet assay is a generally accepted and well-established method to measure biofilm mass, and this study showed that the biofilm formability of Acinetobacter is discernible at varying levels by using this method.
Viable count in biofilm is also important because the viable cells in biofilms are responsible for human infections that are more likely to occur by a higher number of cells21. In addition, the viable count may be a good tool to distinguish poor biofilm producers, as demonstrated in A. bouvetii and A. radioresistens (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The viable count of A. radioresistens was much higher than the one of A. bouvetii, while little difference was found in biofilm mass, suggesting a higher potential of infection by A. radioresistens (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Also, this method can be used to estimate the proportion of Acinetobacter in multi-species biofilms, which is more common in the environment.
Acinetobacter forms biofilm not only on the bottom surface but also on the sidewall, especially at the air-liquid interface in tubes17,22. CLSM analysis using a microtiter plate is limited to the bottom-surface attached biofilms, which makes it sometimes hard to compare to the results by crystal violet assay, which measures all the submerged surfaces, including the wall surfaces. A substantial amount of biofilm at the air-liquid interface was also found in these isolates, especially the strong biofilm producer, A. pittii. It formed relatively poor biofilm on the bottom surface compared to other isolates (Figure 3). Therefore, a microscopic analysis technique must be further developed to visualize the biofilms formed at the sidewall.
In this study, three different assays, crystal violet, viable count, and CLSM, were used to characterize the biofilms of Acinetobacter. Crystal violet assay is the well-established method to quantify biofilms, and the criteria to determine biofilm formability exist16. However, it measures not only live cells and EPS but also dead cells, which are less meaningful in terms of human infection and virulence. The live cells in biofilms can be measured by the viable count method. However, biofilm formability cannot be determined by the viable count method because this method does not measure EPS, a critical component in biofilm structure. Therefore, this method does not have the criteria or cut-off value to determine biofilm formability. In addition, the viable count method measures only the culturability of the cells and does not measure the cells under 'viable but not culturable state'11. The presence of biofilms can be confirmed by the CLSM method, which effectively visualizes biofilms. However, it measures only bottom surface-attached biofilms, although biofilms are often formed on the sidewalls as well. Therefore, using crystal violet assay to determine the biofilm formability is recommended. Then, the live and culturable cells in biofilms can be quantified by the viable count method, and the bottom surface-attached biofilms can be confirmed or characterized by the CLSM method.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E0210702-03) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT.
96-well cell culture plate | SPL | 30096 | Polystyrene 96-well plate |
BHI (Brain Heart Infusion) broth | Merck KGaA | 1.10493.0500 | |
Blood Agar Base Plate | KisanBio | MB-B1005-P50 | Growth media for Acinetobacter |
CHROMagar Acinetobacter | CHROMagar | AC092 | Selective plate for Acinetobacter |
Crystal violet solution | Sigma-Aldrich | V5265 | |
Filmtracer LIVE/DEAD biofilm viability kit | Invitrogen | L10316 | SYTO9 and propidium iodide |
Microplate reader | Tecan | Infinite M200 PRO NanoQuant | Biofilm measurement |
RBC Glass Plating Beads | RBC | RG001 | Glass beads |
μ-Plate 96 Well Black | ibidi | 89621 | Microplate intended for CLSM |