Surface Stress Measurement
Surface Stress Measurement - Related Videos
08:23
Comet Assay as an Indirect Measure of Systemic Oxidative Stress
0 Views •
Cited by 23 •
2015
Comet assay measures DNA breaks, induced by different factors. If all factors (except oxidative stress) causing DNA damage are kept constant, the amount of DNA damage is a good indirect parameter of oxidative stress. The goal of this protocol is to use comet assay for indirect measurement of oxidative stress.
02:58
Measurement of Compressive Stress-Strain Response at Small-Strains
0 Views •
2025
This protocol presents the configuration of a compression test device capable of precisely measuring the mechanical properties of microstructures in the small-strain region, along with a systematic method for compression testing using this device. The proposed device can be used to analyze various microstructures and the mechanical behavior of polymer-based materials.
12:49
Measurement of Aggregate Cohesion by Tissue Surface Tensiometry
0 Views •
Cited by 10 •
2011
We describe a method of measuring binding energy, expressible as tissue surface tension, between cells within 3D tissue-like aggregates. Differences in tissue surface tension have been demonstrated to correlate with invasiveness of lung, muscle, and brain tumors, and are fundamental determinants of establishing spatial relationships between different cell types.
08:53
The Measurement of Unsteady Surface Pressure Using a Remote Microphone Probe
0 Views •
Cited by 11 •
2016
Here, we present a protocol to measure, with high spatial resolution, the unsteady surface pressure in turbulent flows. This method demonstrates the construction of a remote microphone probe (RMP) and the determination of its frequency-dependent, complex transfer function. An analytical determination of the dynamic response is presented and validated.
10:36
Measurements of Physiological Stress Responses in C. Elegans
0 Views •
Cited by 44 •
2020
Here, we characterize cellular proteotoxic stress responses in the nematode C. elegans by measuring the activation of fluorescent transcriptional reporters and assaying sensitivity to physiological stress.
FAQs
Adsorption or molecular binding changes the surface free energy on the functionalized side of a microcantilever. If that change differs from the opposite side, the resulting surface-stress imbalance produces bending or deflection. Measuring this mechanical response links an interfacial molecular event to an observable signal without requiring a separate labeling step.
Functionalization supplies the molecular recognition layer that makes the surface responsive to selected interactions. In immunology studies, an antibody or antigen at the cantilever surface can respond when its complementary partner binds. In infection research, related surface chemistry can reveal interactions involving pathogen-associated molecules, connecting selectivity at the interface with the measured stress response.
Surface stress measurement depends on the contrast between the cantilever’s two surfaces. Binding or adsorption on a functionalized side changes its interfacial state relative to the other side, and that asymmetry generates mechanical deformation. This distinction matters when interpreting signals: the measured deflection reflects a difference in surface stress associated with the interaction, rather than a direct readout of molecular identity alone.
A typical measurement begins by functionalizing a microcantilever, then exposing it to a biological sample containing potential binding partners. The instrument tracks bending or deflection after adsorption or recognition changes the surface stress. Comparing the observed response with the functionalized interface provides a label-free way to assess whether an interfacial interaction occurred.
Researchers can choose this approach when they need to monitor molecular recognition at a material interface without attaching a detectable label to the interacting species. Its usefulness extends from antibody-antigen recognition to pathogen-associated molecular interactions and responses to biological samples. The mechanical signal offers evidence that exposure has altered surface interactions, supporting studies of binding at the interface.
In immunology and infection research, the outcome is a measurable bending or deflection associated with exposure, adsorption, or binding. That response can be used to examine antibody-antigen recognition, pathogen-associated molecular interactions, or changes caused by biological samples. Because the technique reports an interfacial mechanical consequence, it connects recognition events with changes in surface behavior.