There are a number of issues that must be taken into consideration when planning an experiment using PRV1524,21. Most importantly, pseudorabies virus is lethal. As mentioned previously, great apes, including humans are not susceptible to infection, but appropriate care must be exercised to protect other animals. Adult mice typically survive five to seven days after inoculation with the attenuated PRV152 strain. Therefore, PRV152 is not appropriate for experiments that require survival times longer than one week. Moreover, infected animals typically display signs of illness during the survival period, thereby limiting the utility of PRV152 for experiments requiring observation of normal behavior.
Additionally, PRV152 triggers a cytotoxic immune response22. Because the replication and transmission of virus are titer- and time-dependent4, the pattern of neurons revealed by immunochemical detection of viral proteins or the eGFP reporter gene will change over the course of the survival period as cells progress through stages of infection. Five days after inoculation in muscle, 3rd or 4th order neurons may be detectable, but the earliest infected neurons may become apoptotic. Thus the optimal survival time should be determined experimentally for each study. It is recommended to perform a time-series analysis to determine the progression of infection through a circuit and the best time point for labeling the specific neurons of interest without risking cell or animal death.
One of the most important factors affecting the success of labeling with PRV is the viral titer. Marked reductions in the number of infected cells have been reported when decreasing the titer of PRV-Bartha from 1.4 x 105 to 7 x 104 pfu/ml23. Therefore, we recommend using titers above 1 x 107 pfu/ml and keeping aliquoted virus at -80°C until it is used to maintain its infectivity. Even when using a high titer, one should keep in mind that not all cell types may be permissive for infection. Therefore, the cells identified by PRV tracing may not be completely representative of the inputs to an infected target.
The described method focuses on the utility of PRV for analyzing central efferents regulating peripheral targets, specifically muscles, through multi-synaptic circuits. Other neural circuits, such as visual and autonomic24, are well suited for this technique because they can also be infected by peripheral inoculation. However, PRV can be used effectively for direct injection into the central nervous system when some issues are carefully considered, as discussed extensively in a prior review3. Those authors mention that PRV-Bartha and related strains extensively fill the dendritic arbors of infected neurons, making PRV152 well suited for identifying afferents to distal dendrites. This property of the virus makes the described technique particularly useful for deducing a preliminary list of inputs to distal dendrites located outside of the cell body region that is typically studied with conventional tracers.
When tracing from peripheral targets, sympathetic innervation should be considered a possible confound. Therefore, we recommend initially comparing labeling patterns in normal and sympathectomized animals to determine whether PRV labeling of sympathetic inputs will affect interpretation of the results.
Signal in infected cells from eGFP expressed by PRV152 can be imaged directly using fluorescence microscopy without the need for immunohistochemistry; however, this signal is subject to photo-bleaching and degrades over time. The main advantage of immunohistochemistry combined with DAB staining for tract tracing is the permanent nature of the reaction products. While it is also possible to use antibodies against viral proteins to detect infected cells, different viral elements will not necessarily co-localize with each other25 or with the eGFP signal. Therefore, we recommend using antibodies against eGFP to preserve the labeling pattern observed by fluorescence.
Because all afferents to an infected cell are likely to become conduits for transsynaptic passage of virus, including those that contact distal dendrites, we considered it important to select a conventional tracer that reliably stains such dendrites for subsequent confirmation of relays in the identified circuit. We selected CTb for this purpose, and found that it provides good staining of the dendrites and strong contrast with both the surrounding neuropil and the descending axons from the motor cortex. Although it is possible to reverse the coloration of the stained axons and cell bodies (BDA = brown; CTb = black), we find that black provides the best contrast for visualizing fine caliber axons.
An important point to keep in mind when interpreting BDA labeling patterns is that BDA10kDa is mainly used as an anterograde tracer but can also label cells retrogradely (Figure 6)6. Moreover, BDA can be transported retrogradely into a cell then distributed along an axon collateral to another terminal site. If those axon collaterals are present in the same region as the projection target of the injected region, then it is difficult to distinguish them from anterograde labeling.
A final technical note is that the 34 G NanoFil metal syringe performs better than a fine caliber, pulled glass pipette for injecting tracers into muscles, but causes too much mechanical damage when used for intracerebral injections in small animals. We therefore recommend using the metal syringe for peripheral injections and the glass pipette for central injections.