Method Article

Polymeric Microneedle Array Fabrication by Photolithography

DOI:

10.3791/52914

November 17th, 2015

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here, we present a protocol describing a mold-free fabrication process of the polymeric microneedles by photolithography.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This manuscript describes the fabrication of polymeric microneedle (MN) arrays by photolithography. It involves a simple mold-free process by using a photomask consisting of embedded micro-lenses. Embedded micro-lenses were found to influence MN geometry (sharpness). Robust MN arrays with tip diameters ranging between 41.5 µm ± 8.4 µm and 71.6 µm ± 13.7 µm, with two different lengths (1,336 µm ± 193 µm and 957 µm ± 171 µm) were fabricated. These MN arrays may provide potential applications in delivery of low molecular and macromolecular therapeutic agents through skin.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Transdermal drug delivery offers an attractive alternative approach for drug administration, especially for biomolecules, which are almost exclusively administered by hypodermic injections. However, skin, especially the top layer (the stratum corneum), is a formidable barrier preventing exogenous molecules from entering the human body. Recently, MN devices have emerged as enabling tools to deliver drugs through skin. The MN devices create temporary pores inside the stratum corneum to allow the passage of drug molecules to achieve the desired physiological activity with improved patient compliance and convenience1-3.

Various fabrication methods have been adopted to fabricate polymeric MNs4. However, they usually involve complicated and multiple step processes requiring long times and/or high temperatures to fabricate MNs arrays.4 To simplify the fabrication process, a single step mold-free process using a photomask was developed recently5,6. However, with this method, fabricated MNs had blunt needle tips, as no mechanism was in place to modify the ultraviolet (UV) light path involved in photolithography.

In this study, embedded microlenses in the photomask have been proposed to define the geometry of the MNs. The protocol to fabricate photomasks consisting of embedded microlenses and subsequently MN fabrication with sharp tips using the photomask are reported.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

1. Photomask Fabrication

  1. Clean a 4” glass wafer with piranha solution (H2SO4/H2O2 in 2:1 ratio) for 20 min at 120 °C by immersion in a quartz tank.
  2. Deposit a layer of Chromium/Gold (30 nm of Cr/1 µm of Au) layer on the glass wafer using an e-beam evaporator7 (Figure 1A).
    1. Place the wafers in an e-beam evaporator. Once the vacuum reaches 5 x 10-6 Torr, turn on the high voltage source (10 kV). Control the thickness by the monitor control panel.
    2. Pre-clean each material for 30 sec using the e-beam gun, keeping the shutter “OFF” (in order to avoid the deposition on the wafers).
  3. Generate a Cr/Au photoresist masking layer for deep wet etching of the glass.
    1. Apply a 2 µm thick photoresist by spinning 5 ml of the solution for 30 sec at 3,000 rpm using a spin-spray coater system. Prebake the photoresist on a hotplate at 100 °C for 1.5 min.
    2. Expose and hard bake the photoresist at 120 °C for 30 min on a hot plate. It is critical to generate a hydrophobic surface and a strong adhesion of the photoresist to the metal layer. Pattern the Cr/Au layer using Cr and Au etchants through the photoresist mask8,9.
  4. For protection of the un-patterned glass surface, temporarily bond the glass wafer to a dummy silicon wafer.9
    1. Place the glass wafer on a hot plate at 110 °C and melt the wax on the opposite side of the glass wafer (in such a way that the entire surface of the wafer is covered with wax).
    2. Place a dummy silicon wafer in contact with the glass wafer and press to remove the excess wax. In order to avoid spilling of the wax, place a clean room tissue paper on the hotplate.
  5. Perform isotropic etching of the lens using optimized hydrofluoric acid (49% v/v) and hydrochloric acid (37% v/v) solution ( in a volumetric ratio of 10:1) with a magnetic stirrer for 8.5 min.10 Presence of the HCl is critical in achieving a good surface quality of generated lenses.
    1. Ensure that the etching rate is 7 µm/min; using a total volume of 200 ml of etching solution. Perform etching in a plastic container and take safety precaution for this processing step.
    2. Clean the wafer in the deionized (DI) water by rinsing and further drying at RT.
  6. After the process completion, separate the glass wafer from the dummy silicon wafer and warm up the wax using a hot plate at 100 °C for 15 sec. As the wax melts at this temperature, detach the glass wafer from the dummy silicon wafer.
  7. Remove remaining wax, the photoresist and the overhanging Cr/Au layers at the edges of the lenses using ultrasonication for 1 hr using N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone as the solvent at 80 °C in an ultrasonic tank.
  8. Create a PDMS mold replica of the microlenses fabricated on the photomasks11.
  9. Characterize the photomask dimensions (length and width) and the microlenses PDMS mold (depth and diameter) replicas using a scanning electron microscope and stereomicroscope respectively.12-14

2. MN Shafts Fabrication

  1. Create a cavity of 2.5 cm × 0.9 cm using the glass slides mounted on either sides of a glass. The number of the glass slides stacked on either side will determine the height of the cavity known as spacer thickness (Figure 1B).
  2. Secure each layer of the glass slide by applying a thin layer of the prepolymer solution containing Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA, MW = 258 Da) with 0.5% w/w 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propiophenone (HMP) onto the glass slide followed by irradiation of the set up with the high intensity ultraviolet (UV) light for 2 sec.
  3. Position the photomask (previously fabricated) with the Cr/Au coated surfaces facing the interior of the cavity. Ensure that the sides of the cavity walls are not obscuring the lenses embedded in the photomask.
  4. Fill the cavity with the prepolymer solution until the Cr/Au coated surface is in contact with the solution without any visible bubbles.
  5. Irradiate the setup with high intensity UV light of a desired intensity for 1 sec at a distance of 3.5 cm from the UV source using the UV curing station with a UV filter range of 320-500 nm. Use a collimating adaptor with the UV light probe.
  6. Measure the intensity of UV light used using a radiometer.
  7. Following UV exposure, remove the photomask with the array of MNs. Pour the excess prepolymer solution that is not polymerized in the process back into its original container for reuse.
  8. Quantify the length and tip diameter of the MNs using a stereomicroscope according to manufacturer’s instructions.

3. MN Backing Layer Fabrication

  1. With forceps, place the MNs (previously fabricated) attached onto the photomask in a well of a 24-well plate as shown in the Figure 1C.
  2. Add a specified volume (300 - 400 µl) of the prepolymer solution into the well until the needles are submerged to a desired height. This volume determines the thickness of the resultant backing layer.
  3. Irradiate the setup with high intensity UV light (15.1 W/cm2), 10.5 cm away from the UV source for a duration of 1 sec.
  4. Separate the backing layer on the MN array from the photomask using a sharp blade.
  5. Quantify the length, tip diameter and base diameter of the MNs with the backing layer using a stereomicroscope according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The geometry of the MNs can be significantly affected by the photomask characteristics and embedded microlens. The degree of refraction affects the transmission path of the UV rays, which influenced the MN geometry (Figure 2A). Each microlens was found to have a 350 µm diameter, a 130 µm flattened convex surface, and a 62.3 µm depth (Figure 2B-D). Using the Pythagoras theorem, the radius of curvature of the first surface was found to be 272.89 µm. The focal length was calculated to be 50...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The protocol described above for fabrication of the MNs array has been presented to fabricate the MNs array of ~1 cm2. The arrays can be scaled up by creating a large size cavity and by using a larger photomask. The increased cavity size can be created by increasing the width between the spacers on either side. Though each step to fabricate the MN arrays in the protocol was important, the most crucial steps were: the photomask positioning, the filling of prepolymer solution, and irradiation of the setup. Posit...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare no conflict of Interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study was supported by a Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) Grant NRF2012NRF-POC001-043.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA Mn=258)SIGMA 475629-500ML
2-hydroxy-2-methyl-propiophenone (HMP)SIGMA 405655-50ML
Bovine collagen type 1, FITC conjugate SIGMA C4361
UV curing station   EXFO Photonic Solutions Inc., CanadaOmniCure S2000-XL
Collimating Adaptor EXFO Photonic Solutions Inc., CanadaEXFO 810-00042
24-well plateThermo Fisher Scientific, USA
Nikon SMZ 1500 stereomicroscope Nikon, Japan
Dillon GL-500 digital force gauge Dillon, USA
A-1R confocal microscope Nikon, Japan

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Zhou, C. P., Liu, Y. L., Wang, H. L., Zhang, P. X., Zhang, J. L. Transdermal delivery of insulin using microneedle rollers in vivo. International journal of pharmaceutics. 392, 127-133 (2010).
  2. Lee, J. W., Choi, S. O., Felner, E. I., Prausnitz, M. R. Dissolving microneedle patch for transdermal delivery of human growth hormone. Small. 7, 531-539 (2011).
  3. Raphael, A. P., et al. needle-free vaccinations in skin using multi layered, densely-packed dissolving microprojection arrays. Small. 6, 1785-1793 (2010).
  4. Lee, J. W., Han, M. R., Park, J. H. Polymer microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Journal of drug targeting. 21, 211-223 (2012).
  5. Kochhar, J. S., Goh, W. J., Chan, S. Y., Kang, L. A simple method of microneedle array fabrication for transdermal drug delivery. Drug development and industrial pharmacy. 39, 299-309 (2013).
  6. Kochhar, J. S., Zou, S., Chan, S. Y., Kang, L. Protein encapsulation in polymeric microneedles by photolithography. International journal of nanomedicine. 7, 3143-3154 (2012).
  7. Tay, F. E. H., Iliescu, C., Jing, J., Miao, J. Defect-free wet etching through pyrex glass using Cr/Au mask. Microsystem Technologies. 12, 935-939 (2006).
  8. Iliescu, C., Chen, B., Miao, J. On the wet etching of Pyrex glass. Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical. 143, 154-161 (2008).
  9. Iliescu, C., Taylor, H., Avram, M., Miao, J., Franssila, S. A practical guide for the fabrication of microfluidic devices using glass and silicon. Biomicrofluidics. 6, 16505-16516 (2012).
  10. Iliescu, C., Jing, J., Tay, F. E. H., Miao, J., Sun, T. Characterization of masking layers for deep wet etching of glass in an improved HF/HCl solution. Surface and Coatings Technology. 198, 314-318 (2005).
  11. Pan, J., et al. Fabrication of a 3D hair follicle-like hydrogel by soft lithography. Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A. 101, 3159-3169 (2013).
  12. Jay, T. R., Stern, M. B. Preshaping photoresist for refractive microlens fabrication. P Soc Photo-Opt Ins. 1992, 275-282 (1993).
  13. Friedman, G. B., Sandhu, H. S. Longitudinal Spherical Aberration of a Thin Lens. Am J Phys. 35, 628(1967).
  14. Xu, Q. A., Li, J., Zhang, W. Collimated the laser diode beam by the focus lens. Semiconductor Lasers and Applications IV. 7844, (2010).
  15. Lin, T. W., Chen, C. F., Yang, J. J., Liao, Y. S. A dual-directional light-control film with a high-sag and high-asymmetrical-shape microlens array fabricated by a UV imprinting process. J Micromech Microeng. 18, (2008).
  16. Dunne, S. M., Millar, B. J. Effect of distance from curing light tip to restoration surface on depth of cure of composite resin. Prim Dent Care. 15, 147-152 (2008).
  17. Kochhar, J. S., et al. Microneedle integrated transdermal patch for fast onset and sustained delivery of lidocaine. Molecular pharmaceutics. 10, 4272-4280 (2013).
  18. Kochhar, J. S., et al. Direct microneedle array fabrication off a photomask to deliver collagen through skin. Pharmaceutical research. 31, 1724-1734 (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Photolithography FabricationEmbedded Micro LensesUV PolymerizationMicroneedle GeometryStereo MicroscopyPre Polymer SolutionPhoto Mask AlignerHydrofluoric Acid EtchingBacking Layer Formation

Related Articles