Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used in the treatment of right-sided colon cancer. It offers advantages such as minimal trauma and faster postoperative recovery compared with traditional open surgery. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) combined with complete mesocolon excision (CME) and D3 lymph node dissection has become the standard treatment for right-sided colon cancer1,2. However, many controversies still exist in its application, including the surgical approach, the definition of the medial boundary of mesenteric resection, and the extent of lymph node dissection3. Traditional open surgery mainly employs the lateral-to-medial approach, whereas LRH differs and employs various approaches, primarily including the medial-to-lateral (medial) approach, the cranial-to-caudal approach (cranial), and the caudal-to-cranial (caudal) approach. Whether these different approaches impact patient oncological prognoses and surgical safety remains controversial and lacks consensus4,5.
In the early stages of LRH, most practitioners applied the medial approach. The medial approach prioritizes vascular ligation before developing the dissection plane, which may better adhere to the principles of tumor-free operation and the No-touch Isolation Technique (NTIT)6,7. Jiao et al.8 suggested that the cranial approach is an effective and safe surgical method that clearly exposes the branches of Henle's trunk, offering advantages such as less intraoperative bleeding, shorter operation time, and lower risk of vascular injury. However, due to the numerous vessels involved in right hemicolectomy and the variable vascular anatomy, both methods may have a steep learning curve for beginners8.
Currently, for right-sided colon cancer surgery, our center primarily employs the caudal approach. The caudal approach prioritizes plane dissection, first developing and expanding the dissection plane before ligating the central vessels. It provides excellent exposure to the Gerota's fascia, the posterior ureter and gonadal vessels, as well as the descending and horizontal portions of the duodenum and the pancreatic head9. This facilitates a more thorough exploration of the posterior area of the tumor, which is essential for T4-stage tumors. It may also assist the surgeon in achieving a comprehensive assessment of the entire surgical procedure at an early stage. This approach can also be applied to patients with a high Body Mass Index (BMI). In high-BMI patients, adipose tissue is more abundant, the mesentery is thick, and vascular dissection is relatively difficult10. After dissecting the dorsal aspect of the right colon mesentery from Gerota's fascia, the dorsal endpoints of the vascular anatomy can be exposed, which may facilitate vessel skeletonization and reduce the risk of vascular injury. However, in patients with a history of previous lower abdominal or pelvic surgery, or in those with persistent descending mesocolon (PDM), if severe adhesions are present at the dorsal membranous bridge of the right colon mesentery, this approach may not be suitable, and the medial or the cranial approach should be considered instead. From September 1, 2022, to June 30, 2025, we performed 33 cases of laparoscopic radical resection surgeries for right-sided colon cancer using the caudal approach, which appears to be a safe approach.