Name: Calcium Imaging of Odor-evoked Responses in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2012-03-14T12:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 9 min
Description: Learn calcium imaging of odor-evoked responses in the Drosophila antennal lobe using GCaMP-expressing flies. This method reveals spatial and temporal patterns of neural activity in olfactory processing.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We acknowledge Silke Sachse and Beate Eisermann in the development of this methodology, Pablo Traversa for drawing the mounting block blueprints and Daniela Pelz for use of the schematic in Figure 1. We are grateful to Silke Sachse, Pavan Ramdya and Raphael Rytz for comments on the manuscript. R. Bell is supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation PhD Fellowship. Research in R. Benton&#x2019;s laboratory is funded by a European Research Council Starting Independent Researcher Grant and the Swiss National Science Foundation.

1. Mounting Block Assembly
<ol>
 <li>The plexiglass mounting block (Figure 1A) should be made to the exact specifications given in the blueprint (available from 
 <a href="http://neuro.uni-konstanz.de/jove_mountingblock_blueprint/" target="_blank">http://neuro.uni-konstanz.de/jove_mountingblock_blueprint</a>) to allow easy mounting and dissection of the fly. Thread through the screws from the back but do not extend them beyond the front of the block; their position will be adjusted during the preparation of the animal (see 2.7).</li>
 <li>Using a precision drill, make a dent in the upper border of the circular chamber for the fly, digging under the surface to make space for the fly's body, reducing the thickness of the block at this point.</li>
 <li>Cut a copper grid with a scalpel perpendicular and close to the bottom of the slit to create a "collar". Make sure the two resulting flaps are level, as this will help insertion of the fly.</li>
 <li>With a toothpick, place a small drop of superglue onto the mounting block above the circular chamber for the fly. Place the copper grid onto the glue and position so that the slit is centered on the block (Figure 1A). Press down gently and remove any excess glue. With a pair of tweezers, add tiny drops of glue under the flaps on each side and fold the grid over the front of the block so that the slit is pointing straight downwards. Make sure the top of the grid is level with the block. Allow to dry completely.</li>
 <li>Assemble a wire holder: cut a plastic coverslip in half and remove a central piece to make a "U" shape. Use beeswax to glue a piece of wire across the top of the "U"; do not make the wire too taut.</li>
 <li>Construct the antennal shield: make a hole in a plastic coverslip with a paper hole-punch. Trim the edges of the coverslip to 0.5 x 0.7 cm. Glue the pierced plastic coverslip to sticky tape and then place a drop of ethanol on the tape exposed through the hole to remove the adhesive.</li>
</ol>
2. Animal Preparation
<ol>
 <li>Flies of the appropriate genotype - i.e. bearing the desired combination of "driver" and activity-reporter transgenes - should be 1-3 weeks old; the cuticle of younger flies is too soft and difficult to cut. When experiments require direct comparison of different genotypes, and in order to match transgene expression levels, flies should be age-matched to avoid age-related physiological differences. If gender is not important, we prefer to use female flies since they have larger heads and are easier to manipulate.</li>
 <li>Anesthetize flies by cooling on ice.</li>
 <li>Introduce a single fly into the mounting block. Hold the fly by the wing joint and slide it, dorsal-surface first, along the slit of the copper grid so that it is suspended by its neck (Figure 1B-C). If necessary, rotate it until it is looking down.</li>
 <li>Place a fine cactus spine in front of the fly's head to prevent it from escaping (Figure 1B-C). Place the cactus spine in front of the proboscis to prevent it from moving. Fix the cactus spine to the block using beeswax. Make sure that the top of the head is level with the top of the block.</li>
 <li>Fix the head of the fly to the block with a small drop of rosin (dissolved in ethanol). Place the block in a humidified box and allow the rosin to harden for about one hour.</li>
 <li>Using forceps, pull the antennal plate forward and drop the wire on the holder (wax-side out; see 1.5) in the cuticular fold between the antenna and head. Fix the holder to the front of the block with beeswax.</li>
 <li>Using the screws built into the block, gently push the wire holder forward to create some space between the antennal plate and the head.</li>
 <li>Place the antennal shield (see 1.6) over the top of the fly's head with the hole positioned centrally. Fix with beeswax to the top of the mounting block.</li>
 <li>Using a blade-splitter, cut a small hole in the tape on the shield exposing the cuticle of the fly's head behind the antenna. The hole should not extend beyond the eyes to prevent the preparation from leaking.</li>
 <li>Seal the hole between the tape and the cuticle with two-component silicon. Remove any excess silicon from the top of the fly's head.</li>
 <li>Place a drop of Drosophila Ringer's saline (130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 36 mM saccharose, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.3) on the head. Make sure that there are no leaks: the antennae should remain completely dry. Using a sapphire blade, cut a hole in the cuticle. First, lightly score along the cuticular fold directly behind the antenna, then cut along the eyes and across the ocelli on the back. Finally, fold the piece of cuticle over the scored edge and cut from the underside to avoid severing the antennal nerves.</li>
 <li>Carefully remove glands and trachea with fine tweezers. Rinse repeatedly with Drosophila Ringer's, leaving a large drop on the head.</li>
</ol>
3. Odor Stimulus Delivery
<ol>
 <li>Odor syringes: insert a cellulose pad into a 2 ml plastic syringe with clean forceps and pipette onto it (using filter tips) 20 μl of odor, diluted as desired in an appropriate solvent, using the pipette tip to push the pad deep into the barrel. Plug and cap the syringe until required. Fresh odor dilutions should be prepared at least every 3 months (or more frequently for highly volatile and/or often-used odors), and new pads should be prepared for odor syringes just before each recording session. Do not use odor pads for more than three stimulations, since the odor concentration might decay.</li>
 <li>Custom-made olfactometer (Figure 2): a primary air stream (1 l/min) is directed through Teflon tubing (0.4 mm internal diameter); 27 cm upstream of the exit of this tube, a secondary air stream (1 l/min) is added. Both air streams are generated by membrane pumps, and the flow rate is regulated by two independent flowmeters. The air streams can be humidified by passing through water in gas washing bottles, although care should be taken to avoid over-humidification (i.e. more than ~60%). The secondary air stream is directed either through an odor syringe or an empty syringe: syringes are connected to the airflow through a syringe needle (1.2 mm outer diameter) piercing the plunger. A three-way magnetic valve controlled via a valve controller unit (e.g. Harvard Apparatus VC6) is used to switch between the clean air and odor stimulus.</li>
</ol>
4. In vivo Imaging
<ol>
 <li>We describe here imaging using an upright fluorescent microscope (e.g. upright fixed Stage Zeiss Axio Examiner D1) equipped with a 20x water objective (e.g. Zeiss W "Plan-Apochromat" 20x/1,0 M27 DIC) (Figure 2). For imaging with G-CaMP (excitation/emission: 488/509 nm), use a filter block with the following properties: 450-490 nm excitation filter, dichroic mirror (T495LP) and 500-550 nm emission filter (Chroma ET). Place the mounting block containing the fly under the microscope. Position the exit of the olfactometer approximately 0.5 cm in front of the fly's antennae.</li>
 <li>Lower the objective until it touches the Ringer's solution on the fly's head. Looking through the viewer under bright-field illumination, position the preparation so that the hole in the head capsule is centered and its borders are in focus. Switch to fluorescent light and adjust the focus until you can see the labeled neurons (apparent from basal green fluorescence of G-CaMP).</li>
 <li>Fine focus on the glomeruli of interest by acquiring images with a Charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (e.g. CoolSNAP-HQ2 Digital Camera System) mounted on the microscope using appropriate acquisition software (e.g. Metafluor) (Figure 3A). Close the diaphragm in the illumination light path to limit excitation light to the imaged area.</li>
 <li>For recording odor-evoked activity, set the acquisition rate to 4 Hz and adjust the exposure time to obtain fluorescence values within the dynamic range of your CCD camera, but not lower than 1000 (arbitrary units), with at least 12-bit dynamic resolution. The exposure time should not exceed 100 ms, if possible, to reduce G-CaMP photobleaching. If the spatial resolution of your camera allows, you can increase the binning (number of wells on the chip that will be binned into one digital pixel) to reduce the exposure time. We obtain images of 350x225 pixels (with a binning of 2x2), corresponding to 210x135 μm at the preparation. These settings are optimal to capture glomerular odor-induced responses of G-CaMP with good spatial and temporal resolution while limiting reporter bleaching.</li>
 <li>Set the measurement parameters. We typically record for 10 seconds (i.e. 40 frames), with odor stimulation typically starting 4 seconds after the beginning of the acquisition period (frame 15) and lasting one second (until frame 19). A fly preparation can normally be tested with up to 25-30 different odor stimuli, often limited by an irreversible decline in the fluorescent signal of the reporter due to photobleaching. The inter-stimulus interval will depend on the strength of response observed and the rate of photobleaching. The appropriate length of inter-stimulus interval to avoid sensory adaptation can be determined approximately by repeated presentation of a positive control odor (if known) in trial experiments. Inclusion of this odor every ~10 stimuli in a given series can allow verification of the continued viability and consistent responsiveness of the preparation.</li>
</ol>
5. Data Processing and Analysis
Data is processed using ImageJ (with Mac biophotonics plug-in, <a href="http://www.macbiophotonics.ca/">www.macbiophotonics.ca</a>) and custom written programs in Matlab and R as follows:
<ol>
 <li>Correct for sample movement artifacts: align all the images corresponding to one animal preparation (e.g. 30 measurements of 40 frames each) using the "rigid body" mode of StackReg/TurboReg (<a href="http://bigwww.epfl.ch/thevenaz/stackreg">bigwww.epfl.ch/thevenaz/stackreg</a>) in ImageJ. This step is required to remove shifts in the position of the labeled neurons with respect to the acquisition frame within and between measurements. However, it is only possible to remove shifts in the xy plane. Data should be discarded if strong changes in focus occur.</li>
 <li>Segment the stack into individual 10-second (40-frame) measurements.</li>
 <li>Correct for bleaching artifacts: exposure to fluorescent light will cause fluorescence to decay during a single measurement10. In some cases, it is important to correct for this decay before analyzing the data. For each measurement calculate a background frame. This should be the mean of several frames before stimulus onset (e.g. frames 6-14). Divide each frame by this background frame to obtain the relative fluorescence changes. Calculate the mean relative fluorescence value for each frame by averaging all pixels within the area labeled by G-CaMP. Fit a double exponential to the mean fluorescence curve, giving stronger weight to the frames before the stimulus and zero weight to the time of the odor response (20 frames after stimulus onset in our case). Subtract the fitted curve from the relative fluorescence curve of each pixel. Multiply the corrected frames by the background frame to re-obtain raw data. This kind of correction may lead to a modification in the response dynamics if the signal does not return to the baseline by the end of the measurement (e.g. if inhibitory or very strong excitatory responses are evoked) (Figure 4). While correction of bleaching artifacts is useful in many cases, interpretation of temporal parameters should be made with caution if a bleach correction is applied.</li>
 <li>Calculate the relative change in fluorescence (ΔF/F) for each frame of each measurement as (Fi-F0)/F0*100, where F0 is the background frame (see 5.3), and Fi the fluorescence value for the ith frame of the measurement.</li>
 <li>Calculate the mean ΔF/F within a circular region of interest in a glomerulus (Figure 3B) with a diameter of 10 pixels to obtain activity traces (Figure 5A). If desired, transform these traces into heatmaps using ImageJ (Figure 5A).</li>
 <li>Calculate the peak amplitude of the response by subtracting the mean ΔF/F of four frames before stimulation from the mean ΔF/F of four frames during the peak of the response. The same procedure is used both to illustrate spatial response patterns (see Figure 3B) and to quantify the response amplitude in specific regions of interest across flies (see Figure 5B). The peak response can also be quantified by integrating the area below the curve during the time of the stimulus, or averaging the frames around the maximum of the response.</li>
</ol>
6. Representative Results
We used the protocols above to record and analyze propionic acid-evoked responses of flies expressing G-CaMP1.628 under the control of the promoter for the olfactory co-receptor IR8a, which is active in several different populations of OSNs29,30 (Figures 3-5). Stimulation with 1% propionic acid elicits increases in G-CaMP fluorescence - indicating increases in intracellular calcium - in OSNs innervating two glomeruli, DC4 and DP1l (Figure 3B). We illustrate different ways of representing data from multiple flies in Figure 5: line activity traces, heatmaps and a bar plot of peak responses. Propionic acid-evoked responses have distinct peak amplitudes and temporal dynamics in DC4 and DP1l. Moreover, although responses are generally robust, variability between individual animals can also be observed in both glomeruli (see heatmaps in Figure 5A). Quantification of the peak responses (Figure 5B) allows a simple statistical comparison between different glomeruli and different odorants across animals. However, odor-evoked calcium responses can have non-uniform temporal dynamics, and quantifying their magnitude with a single value will disregard this complexity.
<img alt="Experimental setup for insect neurobiology; diagram with copper grid, cactus spine, antennal lobe." src="/files/ftp_upload/2976/2976fig1.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1. Schematic of the mounting block (A) before and (B) after introduction of the fly, and (C) a top view in close-up (adapted from31).
<img alt="Olfactometer diagram with light source, CCD-camera, fluorescence in antennal lobes for odor analysis." src="/files/ftp_upload/2976/2976fig2.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2. Schematic of the experimental set-up.
<img alt="Antennal lobe response to propionic acid, calcium imaging diagram, %ΔF/F peak amplitude analysis." src="/files/ftp_upload/2976/2976fig3.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3. (A) Top view of the fly preparation after step 2.8 (left panel) and raw fluorescence image of the antennal lobes labeled with G-CaMP1.6 (Genotype: IR8a promoter:GAL4; UAS:G-CaMP1.6). DC4 and DP1l glomeruli can be distinguished by their morphology, size and position and are marked in red and blue, respectively. 
(B) Color-coded image of the response to propionic acid (1% v/v). The image corresponds to the ΔF/F of the peak of the response calculated as explained in step 5.6 (see also Figure 5A). The colorscale on the left indicates the %ΔF/F value. The black circles indicate the position and size of the region of interest used to quantify the responses (see Figure 5).
<img alt="Odor response graph showing bleach correction, ΔF/F% change, data comparison in fluorescence signal." src="/files/ftp_upload/2976/2976fig4.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 4. Correcting bleaching of the fluorescent reporter signal. Examples of the effect of bleach correction as described in step 5.3. Sample data on the left panel can be corrected without major changes in the shape of the response. Sample data on the right panel is severely affected by bleach correction, likely because the signal drops and is maintained below baseline after odor stimulus termination.
<img alt="Fluorescence change graphs; analyze odor response, DC4 vs. DP1l, with ΔF/F % peak amplitude." src="/files/ftp_upload/2976/2976fig5.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 5. (A) Top: temporal dynamics of calcium responses of glomeruli DC4 (left) and DP1l (right) to propionic acid (1% v/v). The black traces show the median of the mean ΔF/F within the region of interest (see Figure 3B) across eight animals. The grey surface indicates the range between the first and third quartiles of the distribution. Presentation of median and quartile values provides more information about the variability and distribution of observed responses than mean and standard error. The green and magenta boxes indicate the frames averaged to calculate the peak responses shown in Figure 3B, and quantified in Figure 5B. Bottom: the heatmaps show the response data for all individual animals in separate rows, with ΔF/F values represented by the colorscale (far right). The horizontal black bars indicate the time and duration of the stimulus. (B) Median peak responses to propionic acid across eight animals for DC4 and DP1l glomeruli. The error bars indicate the range between first and third quartiles of the distribution.

<ol><li>Galizia, C. G., Rossler, W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Parallel+olfactory+systems+in+insects%3A+anatomy+and+function%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annu.+Rev.+Entomol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Parallel olfactory systems in insects: anatomy and function.</a> Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 399-420 (2010).</li>
<li>Vosshall, L. B., Stocker, R. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Molecular+Architecture+of+Smell+and+Taste+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annu.+Rev.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Molecular Architecture of Smell and Taste in Drosophila.</a> Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 505-533 (2007).</li>
<li>Wilson, R. I., Mainen, Z. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Early+events+in+olfactory+processing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annu.+Rev.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Early events in olfactory processing.</a> Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 163-201 (2006).</li>
<li>Masse, N. Y., Turner, G. C., Jefferis, G. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Olfactory+information+processing+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Olfactory information processing in Drosophila.</a> Curr. Biol. 19, 700-713 (2009).</li>
<li>Hansson, B. S., Anton, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Function+and+morphology+of+the+antennal+lobe%3A+new+developments%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annu.+Rev.+Entomol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Function and morphology of the antennal lobe: new developments.</a> Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 203-231 (2000).</li>
<li>Galizia, C. G., Joerges, J., Kuttner, A., Faber, T., Menzel, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+semi-in-vivo+preparation+for+optical+recording+of+the+insect+brain%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci.+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">A semi-in-vivo preparation for optical recording of the insect brain.</a> J. Neurosci. Methods. 76, 61-69 (1997).</li>
<li>Galizia, C. G., Menzel, R., Holldobler, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Optical+imaging+of+odor-evoked+glomerular+activity+patterns+in+the+antennal+lobes+of+the+ant+Camponotus+rufipes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Naturwissenschaften%22%5BJournal%5D)">Optical imaging of odor-evoked glomerular activity patterns in the antennal lobes of the ant Camponotus rufipes.</a> Naturwissenschaften. 86, 533-537 (1999).</li>
<li>Okada, K., Kanzaki, R., Kawachi, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((High-speed+voltage-sensitive+dye+imaging+of+an+in+vivo+insect+brain%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurosci.+Lett%22%5BJournal%5D)">High-speed voltage-sensitive dye imaging of an in vivo insect brain.</a> Neurosci. Lett. 209, 197-200 (1996).</li>
<li>Carlsson, M. A., Knusel, P., Verschure, P. F., Hansson, B. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Spatio-temporal+Ca2%2B+dynamics+of+moth+olfactory+projection+neurones%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+European+journal+of+neuroscience%22%5BJournal%5D)">Spatio-temporal Ca2+ dynamics of moth olfactory projection neurones.</a> The European journal of neuroscience. 22, 647-657 (2005).</li>
<li>Galizia, C. G., Vetter, R. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aGalizia%2C+CG+%22Methods+in+Insect+Sensory+Neuroscience+%28Frontiers+in+Neuroscience%29%22">Methods in Insect Sensory Neuroscience (Frontiers in Neuroscience)</a>. Christensen, T. A. 13, CRC Press. 349-392 (2005).</li>
<li>Nakai, J., Ohkura, M., Imoto, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+high+signal-to-noise+Ca%282%2B%29+probe+composed+of+a+single+green+fluorescent+protein%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Biotechnol%22%5BJournal%5D)">A high signal-to-noise Ca(2+) probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein.</a> Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 137-141 (2001).</li>
<li>Tian, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Imaging+neural+activity+in+worms%2C+flies+and+mice+with+improved+GCaMP+calcium+indicators%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators.</a> Nat. Methods. 6, 875-881 (2009).</li>
<li>Miyawaki, A., Griesbeck, O., Heim, R., Tsien, R. Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dynamic+and+quantitative+Ca2%2B+measurements+using+improved+cameleons%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+U.S.A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dynamic and quantitative Ca2+ measurements using improved cameleons.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 2135-2140 (1999).</li>
<li>Martin, J. R., Rogers, K. L., Chagneau, C., Brulet, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((In+vivo+bioluminescence+imaging+of+Ca+signalling+in+the+brain+of+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">In vivo bioluminescence imaging of Ca signalling in the brain of Drosophila.</a> PLoS One. 2, 275-275 (2007).</li>
<li>Murmu, M. S., Stinnakre, J., Martin, J. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Presynaptic+Ca2%2B+stores+contribute+to+odor-induced+responses+in+Drosophila+olfactory+receptor+neurons%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22The+Journal+of+Experimental+Biology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Presynaptic Ca2+ stores contribute to odor-induced responses in Drosophila olfactory receptor neurons.</a> The Journal of Experimental Biology. 213, 4163-4173 (2010).</li>
<li>Yuste, R., Miller, R. B., Holthoff, K., Zhang, S., Miesenbock, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Synapto-pHluorins%3A+chimeras+between+pH-sensitive+mutants+of+green+fluorescent+protein+and+synaptic+vesicle+membrane+proteins+as+reporters+of+neurotransmitter+release%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Methods+Enzymol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Synapto-pHluorins: chimeras between pH-sensitive mutants of green fluorescent protein and synaptic vesicle membrane proteins as reporters of neurotransmitter release.</a> Methods Enzymol. 327, 522-546 (2000).</li>
<li>Benton, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sensitivity+and+specificity+in+Drosophila+pheromone+perception%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Trends+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sensitivity and specificity in Drosophila pheromone perception.</a> Trends Neurosci. 30, 512-519 (2007).</li>
<li>Elliott, D. A., Brand, A. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+GAL4+system+%3A+a+versatile+system+for+the+expression+of+genes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Methods+Mol.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The GAL4 system : a versatile system for the expression of genes.</a> Methods Mol. Biol. 420, 79-95 (2008).</li>
<li>Lai, S. L., Lee, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Genetic+mosaic+with+dual+binary+transcriptional+systems+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Genetic mosaic with dual binary transcriptional systems in Drosophila.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 9, 703-709 (2006).</li>
<li>Yagi, R., Mayer, F., Basler, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Refined+LexA+transactivators+and+their+use+in+combination+with+the+Drosophila+Gal4+system%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+U.S.A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Refined LexA transactivators and their use in combination with the Drosophila Gal4 system.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 16166-16171 (2010).</li>
<li>Potter, C. J., Tasic, B., Russler, E. V., Liang, L., Luo, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+Q+System%3A+A+Repressible+Binary+System+for+Transgene+Expression%2C+Lineage+Tracing%2C+and+Mosaic+Analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">The Q System: A Repressible Binary System for Transgene Expression, Lineage Tracing, and Mosaic Analysis.</a> Cell. 141, 536-548 (2010).</li>
<li>Wang, J. W., Wong, A. M., Flores, J., Vosshall, L. B., Axel, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Two-photon+calcium+imaging+reveals+an+odor-evoked+map+of+activity+in+the+fly+brain%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Two-photon calcium imaging reveals an odor-evoked map of activity in the fly brain.</a> Cell. 112, 271-282 (2003).</li>
<li>Fiala, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Genetically+expressed+cameleon+in+Drosophila+melanogaster+is+used+to+visualize+olfactory+information+in+projection+neurons%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr.+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Genetically expressed cameleon in Drosophila melanogaster is used to visualize olfactory information in projection neurons.</a> Curr. Biol. 12, 1877-1884 (2002).</li>
<li>Ng, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Transmission+of+olfactory+information+between+three+populations+of+neurons+in+the+antennal+lobe+of+the+fly%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Transmission of olfactory information between three populations of neurons in the antennal lobe of the fly.</a> Neuron. 36, 463-474 (2002).</li>
<li>Sachse, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Activity-dependent+plasticity+in+an+olfactory+circuit%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Activity-dependent plasticity in an olfactory circuit.</a> Neuron. 56, 838-850 (2007).</li>
<li>Pelz, D., Roeske, T., Syed, Z., de Bruyne, M., Galizia, C. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+molecular+receptive+range+of+an+olfactory+receptor+in+vivo+%28Drosophila+melanogaster+Or22a%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurobiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The molecular receptive range of an olfactory receptor in vivo (Drosophila melanogaster Or22a).</a> J. Neurobiol. 66, 1544-1563 (2006).</li>
<li>Silbering, A. F., Galizia, C. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Processing+of+odor+mixtures+in+the+Drosophila+antennal+lobe+reveals+both+global+inhibition+and+glomerulus-specific+interactions%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Processing of odor mixtures in the Drosophila antennal lobe reveals both global inhibition and glomerulus-specific interactions.</a> J. Neurosci. 27, 11966-11977 (2007).</li>
<li>Reiff, D. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((In+vivo+performance+of+genetically+encoded+indicators+of+neural+activity+in+flies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">In vivo performance of genetically encoded indicators of neural activity in flies.</a> J. Neurosci. 25, 4766-4778 (2005).</li>
<li>Abuin, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Functional+architecture+of+olfactory+ionotropic+glutamate+receptors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Functional architecture of olfactory ionotropic glutamate receptors.</a> Neuron. 69, 44-60 (2011).</li>
<li>Benton, R., Vannice, K. S., Gomez-Diaz, C., Vosshall, L. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Variant+ionotropic+glutamate+receptors+as+chemosensory+receptors+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Variant ionotropic glutamate receptors as chemosensory receptors in Drosophila.</a> Cell. 136, 149-162 (2009).</li>
<li>Pelz, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Functional+characterization+of+Drosophila+melanogaster+Olfactory+Receptor+Neurons%22">Functional characterization of Drosophila melanogaster Olfactory Receptor Neurons</a>. , Freien Universitat Berlin. (2005).</li>
<li>Ai, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Acid+sensing+by+the+Drosophila+olfactory+system%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Acid sensing by the Drosophila olfactory system.</a> Nature. 468, 691-695 (2010).</li>
<li>Martin, J. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((In+Vivo+Brain+Imaging%3A+Fluorescence+or+Bioluminescence%2C+Which+to+Choose%3F%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Journal+of+Neurogenetics%22%5BJournal%5D)">In Vivo Brain Imaging: Fluorescence or Bioluminescence, Which to Choose?</a> Journal of Neurogenetics. , 1-23 (2008).</li>
<li>Jayaraman, V., Laurent, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evaluating+a+genetically+encoded+optical+sensor+of+neural+activity+using+electrophysiology+in+intact+adult+fruit+flies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front.+Neural+Circuits%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evaluating a genetically encoded optical sensor of neural activity using electrophysiology in intact adult fruit flies.</a> Front. Neural Circuits. 1, 3-3 (2007).</li>
<li>Pfeiffer, B. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tools+for+neuroanatomy+and+neurogenetics+in+Drosophila%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+U.S.A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in Drosophila.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 9715-9720 (2008).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The preparation and analysis methods described here can be used to analyze odor-evoked responses in any population of neurons in the antennal lobe (OSNs, LN and PNs) for which a corresponding driver transgene is available. While we describe its application using a fluorescence microscope, optical imaging of this preparation can equally be performed using confocal or two-photon microscopy22,32. Indeed, these latter instruments alleviate the light-scattering problem of wide-field microscopy, which can reduce the resolution of images, especially when large numbers of neurons express the reporter. This preparation usually permits recordings of odor-evoked responses for at least half an hour, but this time can be significantly longer or shorter depending on the number and length of measurements recorded, the exposure time used for each frame and the inter-stimulus interval. Furthermore, two-photon excitation can reduce photobleaching of the fluorescent reporter, as well as cellular phototoxicity, to permit measurement over longer time periods22,32.
Regardless of the choice of microscope, movement of the fly brain within the head capsule is the most recurrent problem when imaging in intact animals. While movement correction can correct minor issues (step 5.1), it is usually better only to record from highly stable preparations. Strategies to reduce movement artifacts include: (i) properly constraining the proboscis of the fly with the cactus spine; (ii) immobilizing the fly's legs by fixing them to the stage with eicosane (prior to step 2.6) (eicosane can be melted at ~37 &deg;C; use a silver wire to extend and refine the tip of the soldering iron for this purpose); (iii) nicking the oesophagus (visible between the antennal nerves) with fine tweezers.
In addition to G-CaMP1.6 used here, a number of optimized versions of G-CaMP and other calcium indicators are available, which differ in their signal-to-noise ratio, baseline fluorescence and temporal dynamics12,28,33. The precise choice of sensor should take into account all of these properties, the type of neurons to be analyzed and the biological question being addressed. Current sensors report calcium changes that correlate fairly well with action potentials12,34, and their further improvement, coupled with increasing numbers of specific genetic driver lines35 will continue to enhance the potential of optical imaging of neural activity in the intact fly.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Cactus spine</td><td>Garden center</td><td></td><td>~7mm long thin, not too flexible</td></tr><tr><td>Rosin</td><td>String instrument shop</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Two component silicon</td><td>World Precision Instruments, Inc.</td><td>KWIK-SIL</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Custom made plexiglass mounting block</td><td><a href="http://neuro.uni-konstanz.de/jove_mountingblock_blueprint/" target="_blank"><img src="/img/new_window.png"> Blueprints available</a></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Copper grids</td><td>Athene Grids</td><td>G220-5</td><td>Normally used for electron microscopy samples.</td></tr><tr><td>Screws</td><td>Hardware store</td><td></td><td>2 mm diameter</td></tr><tr><td>Plastic coverslips</td><td>Plano GmbH</td><td>L4193</td><td>22 X 22 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Soldering iron tips</td><td>Conrad Electronics</td><td>830283-62</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Regulated power supply</td><td>Conrad Electronics</td><td>511407-62</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Thin wire</td><td>Isabellenh&amp;#252;tte</td><td>Isa-ohm</td><td>0.013 mm</td></tr><tr><td>Eicosane</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>21,927-4</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Microscope</td><td>Carl Zeiss, Inc.</td><td>Axioexaminer D1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CCD camera</td><td>Visitron Systems</td><td>CoolSnap HQ</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Metafluor</td><td>Visitron Systems</td><td></td><td>Acquisition software</td></tr><tr><td>Monochromator</td><td>Visitron Systems</td><td>Visichrome</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Breakable blades</td><td>Fine Science Tools</td><td>10050-00</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Holder for blade</td><td>World Precision Instruments, Inc.</td><td>14134</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sapphire blade</td><td>World Precision Instruments, Inc.</td><td>500314</td><td>Double edged blade 1mm</td></tr><tr><td>Membrane gas pumps</td><td>KNF Neuberger</td><td>NMP 830 KVE</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sapphire blade holder</td><td>World Precision Instruments, Inc.</td><td>500317</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Three way valve</td><td>Lee Company</td><td>LFAA1200118H</td><td>Configuration E</td></tr><tr><td>Rotameter 500 ml/min</td><td>Analyt-MTC</td><td>112-08SA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Rotameter 5 L/min</td><td>Analyt-MTC</td><td>102-08SA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Beeswax</td><td>Siladent Technik</td><td>209212</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cellulose pad</td><td>Kettenbach</td><td>31003</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tweezers</td><td>Plano GmbH</td><td>T5130</td><td>Dumont biology #5</td></tr><tr><td>Syringes</td><td>BD Biosciences</td><td>300928</td><td>2ml, Discardit II, 2pieces</td></tr><tr><td>Needles</td><td>Braun Sterican</td><td>4665120</td><td>1.2mm OD</td></tr></tbody></table>

calcium imaging of odor-evoked responses in the drosophila antennal lobe

Calcium Imaging of Odor-evoked Responses in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe

The antennal lobe is the primary olfactory center in the insect brain and represents the anatomical and functional equivalent of the vertebrate olfactory bulb1-5. Olfactory information in the external world is transmitted to the antennal lobe by olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), which segregate to distinct regions of neuropil called glomeruli according to the specific olfactory receptor they express. Here, OSN axons synapse with both local interneurons (LNs), whose processes can innervate many different glomeruli, and projection neurons (PNs), which convey olfactory information to higher olfactory brain regions.
Optical imaging of the activity of OSNs, LNs and PNs in the antennal lobe - traditionally using synthetic calcium indicators (e.g. calcium green, FURA-2) or voltage-sensitive dyes (e.g. RH414) - has long been an important technique to understand how olfactory stimuli are represented as spatial and temporal patterns of glomerular activity in many species of insects6-10. Development of genetically-encoded neural activity reporters, such as the fluorescent calcium indicators G-CaMP11,12 and Cameleon13, the bioluminescent calcium indicator GFP-aequorin14,15, or a reporter of synaptic transmission, synapto-pHluorin16 has made the olfactory system of the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, particularly accessible to neurophysiological imaging, complementing its comprehensively-described molecular, electrophysiological and neuroanatomical properties2,4,17. These reporters can be selectively expressed via binary transcriptional control systems (e.g. GAL4/UAS18, LexA/LexAop19,20, Q system21) in defined populations of neurons within the olfactory circuitry to dissect with high spatial and temporal resolution how odor-evoked neural activity is represented, modulated and transformed22-24.
Here we describe the preparation and analysis methods to measure odor-evoked responses in the Drosophila antennal lobe using G-CaMP25-27. The animal preparation is minimally invasive and can be adapted to imaging using wide-field fluorescence, confocal and two-photon microscopes.

We describe an established technique to measure and analyze odor-evoked calcium responses in the antennal lobe of living Drosophila melanogaster.

The antennal lobe is the primary olfactory center in the insect brain and represents the anatomical and functional equivalent of the vertebrate olfactory ...

The overall goal of this procedure is to measure physiological activity of olfactory neurons in the drosophila and antenna lobe by optical imaging of intracellular calcium changes. This is accomplished by first assembling the mounting block wire holder and antenna shield. Next, a fly expressing the fluorescent calcium sensor GCaMP is mounted and fixed to the block.Once the fly is mounted, the cuticle on the top of the fly head is cut away to expose the antenna lobes. The final step of the procedure is to set the fly under the microscope and stimulate it with an odor. Ultimately, results can be obtained that show odor evoked activity patterns in the DLA antenna lobes through recorded changes in relative fluorescence of the calcium sensor G camp.This Method can help reveal how odors are represented as spatial and temporal patterns of neural activity at different levels of the olfactory circuitry. The main advantage of this technique over other methods like electrophysiology is that we can record the activity of genetically identified neurons that are not accessible to recording electrodes. Though this method can provide insights into the neural processing of odors.It can also be applied to other regions of the joof brain, such as the auditory and gassy systems. First, thread the screws through the back of the plexiglass mounting block, such that they do not extend beyond the front. Use a precision drill to make a dent in the upper border of the circular chamber for the fly by digging under the surface to reduce the thickness of the block.Under a dissecting scope, cut a copper grid with a scalpel perpendicular and close to the bottom of the slit to create a collar for holding the fly. Make sure the two resulting flaps are level as this will aid in the insertion of the fly. With a toothpick, place a small drop of super glue onto the mounting block above the circular chamber.For the fly, place the copper grid onto the glue and position so that the slit is centered on the block. Gently press down on the grid and remove any excess glue with a pair of tweezers. Add tiny drops of glue under the flaps on each side and fold the grid over the front of the block so that the slit is pointing straight downwards.Make sure the top of the grid is level with the block and allow it to dry completely. To make a wire holder, cut a plastic cover slip in half and remove a central piece to make a U shape. Use beeswax to glue a piece of wire across the top of the U so that the wire is not too t.Construct an antenna shield by using a paper hole punch to make a hole in a plastic cover slip. Trim the edges of the cover slip to 0.5 by 0.7 centimeters. Glue the pierced plastic cover slip onto sticky tape, and then place a drop of ethanol on the tape exposed through the hole.To remove the adhesive anesthetize one to three week old flies of the appropriate genotype by cooling them on ice. Under the dissecting scope, pick up a fly by the wing joint and slide it dorsal surface first along the copper grid so that it is suspended by the neck. If necessary, rotate the fly until it is looking down.Place a fine cactus spine in front of the fly's head to prevent it from escaping and position the spine in front of the probos to keep it from moving. Fix the cactus spine to the block using beeswax, making sure that the top of the head is level with the top of the block. Fix the head of the fly to the block with a small drop of rosin dissolved in ethanol.Place the block in a humidified box and allow the rosin to harden for about one hour. Using forceps, pull the antenna plate forward and drop the wire holder in the cuticular fold between the antenna and head. Fix the holder to the front of the block with more beeswax.Using the screws built into the block, gently push the wire holder forward to create some space between the antenna plate and the head. Place the antenna shield over the top of a fly's head with the whole positioned centrally. Fix the shield to the top of the mounting block with beeswax.Using a blade splitter, cut a small hole in the tape on the shield, exposing the cuticle of the fly head behind the antenna. The hole should not extend beyond the eyes to prevent the preparation from leaking. Seal the hole between the tape and the cuticle with two component silicon.Remove any excess silicon from the top of the fly head. Place a drop of drosophila ringer saline on the fly's head, making sure that there are no leaks and that the antennae remain completely dry. Using a sapphire blade lightly score along the cuticular fold directly behind the antenna.Then cut along the eyes and across the selli on the back. Finally, fold the piece of cuticle over the scored edge and cut from the underside. To avoid severing the antenna nerves, carefully remove glands and trachea with fine tweezers.Rinse repeatedly with Drosophila ringer solution, leaving a large drop on the head. Insert a cellulose pad into a two milliliter plastic syringe with clean forceps. Using a filtered pipette tip, apply 20 microliters of diluted odorant.Plug and cap the syringe until required for imaging. Place the mounting containing the fly under the microscope. Lower the objective until it touches the ringer solution on the fly's head.Looking through the viewer under brightfield illumination, position the preparation so that the hole in the head capsule is centered and its borders are in focus. Switch to fluorescent light and adjust the focus until you can see the labeled neurons, which should be apparent from the basal green fluorescence of GCaMP. Acquire images with a CCD camera mounted on the microscope using appropriate acquisition software and find focus on the glomeruli of interest.Be sure to close the diaphragm in the illumination light path to limit excitation light to the imaged area. Position the exit of the olfactometer approximately 0.5 centimeters in front of the flies antennae. Here, the anal lobes are shown in a fly expressing GCaMP 1.6 under the control of an olfactory sensory neuron promoter that drives expression in several glomeruli stimulation with 1%propionic acid elicits increases in GAMP fluorescence indicating increases in intracellular calcium, in olfactory sensory neurons, innervating glomeruli, DC four and DP one L.The temporal dynamics of calcium responses of glomeruli DC four and DP one L to propionic acid are shown here.The black traces show the median of the mean delta F over F within the region of interest across eight animals, and the gray surface indicates the range between the first and third quartiles of the distribution. The heat maps below show the responses of the individual animals. The greened magenta boxes indicate the frames averaged to calculate the peak responses of the glomeruli above baseline fluorescence levels of GCaMP and are shown quantified here.Correcting for bleaching of the fluorescent reporter can have effects on the response. Peak sample data on the left panel can be corrected without major changes in the shape of the response.Sample. Data on the right panel is severely affected by bleach correction, likely because the signal drops and is maintained below baseline after odor stimulus termination Once mastered, this technique can be done in about 30 minutes.If performed properly While attempting this procedure, it is important to keep the antenna completely dry or they'll be unable to detect odors. After watching this video. You should have a good understanding of how to prepare image and analyze odor.Evoke neuronal activity in the fruit fly.

calcium-imaging-odor-evoked-responses-drosophila-antennal

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

Bees can be conditioned in an appetitive olfactory learning paradigm (PER-conditioning). Using odors as stimuli, we established a method in which behavior is recorded while simultaneously Calcium Imaging is used to measure odor evoked activity in mushroom body neurons in vivo.

In vivo Ca2+- Imaging of Mushroom Body Neurons During Olfactory Learning in the Honey Bee

This video describes in vivo calcium imaging in Drosophila neurons using GCaMP. The featured protocol clip shows how to record changes in GCaMP fluorescence from mushroom body neurons during an olfactory conditioning experiment.

Drosophila In Vivo Calcium Imaging: A Method for Functional Imaging of Neuronal Activity

This video demonstrates a method for detecting sensory neuron responses in Drosophila using ligand binding and fluorescence imaging. Ligands bind to neuron receptors, causing calcium influx. The calcium binds to indicator complexes, leading to fluorescence emission, which confirms the neuronal response to the ligand.

Detecting Physiological Responses from Sensory Neurons in Drosophila

This video demonstrates a method for in vivo calcium imaging using synaptically localized calcium sensors in flies. It outlines the steps for preparing the flies for microscopy, conducting olfactory conditioning, and visualizing odor-induced calcium influx.

In Vivo Calcium Imaging Using Synaptically Localized Calcium Sensors in Drosophila melanogaster

Source: Ishimoto, H. et. al., Ex Vivo Calcium Imaging for Visualizing Brain Responses to Endocrine Signaling in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. (2018) This video demonstrates calcium imaging to study Drosophila brain responses to neuropeptides. Neurons expressing a fluorescent calcium indicator reveal intracellular calcium dynamics and functional responses to signaling molecules.

Ex Vivo Calcium Imaging to Study Drosophila Brain Responses to Neuropeptides

The forelegs and proboscis of Drosophila contain a rich repertoire of gustatory sensory neurons. Here, we present a method using calcium imaging to measure physiological responses from sensory neurons in the foreleg and proboscis of live flies upon exogenous application of a gustatory pheromone.

Measuring Physiological Responses of Drosophila Sensory Neurons to Lipid Pheromones Using Live Calcium Imaging

This article describes an adaptable ex vivo protocol for visualizing Ca2+ during egg activation in Drosophila.

Imaging Calcium in Drosophila at Egg Activation

Here we present a protocol with which pre- and/or postsynaptic calcium can be visualized in the context of Drosophila learning and memory. In vivo calcium imaging using synaptically localized calcium sensors is combined with a classical olfactory conditioning paradigm such that the synaptic plasticity underlying this type of associative learning may be determined.

In Vivo Optical Calcium Imaging of Learning-Induced Synaptic Plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster

A calcium imaging approach enables the recording of taste-induced responses in the brains of awake flies while a solution is applied to the labellum. Primary gustatory responses in Drosophila melanogaster are used as an example, but this protocol can be adapted to study downstream neurons or other species.

In Vivo Calcium Imaging of Taste-Induced Neural Responses in Adult Drosophila

A significant barrier to studying cellular activity during cognitive processes like learning and memory is the use of anesthetics for in vivo imaging preparation. Anesthesia impairs short-term memory and cognition in multiple models, including Drosophila. This study presents a unique method for preparing adult Drosophila for in vivo imaging without anesthesia.

In Vivo Imaging of Neural Activity in Unanesthetized Drosophila Adult Flies

We present calcium imaging protocols for a Drosophila larval olfactory neuron, using a topical tissue adhesive for immobilization. This method enhances stability, facilitating reliable in-vivo and ex-vivo experiments. Custom R scripts analyze calcium signals, providing an efficient platform for detailed neurophysiological research.

In-vivo and Ex-vivo Calcium Imaging of an Olfactory Circuit Neuron in the Third-Instar Drosophila melanogaster Larva

Learn calcium imaging of odor-evoked responses in the Drosophila antennal lobe using GCaMP-expressing flies. This method reveals spatial and temporal patterns of neural activity in olfactory processing.

Calcium Imaging of Odor-evoked Responses in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe

Explore More Videos