-1::1
Simple Hit Counter
Skip to content

Products

Solutions

×
×
Sign In

EN

EN - EnglishCN - 简体中文DE - DeutschES - EspañolKR - 한국어IT - ItalianoFR - FrançaisPT - Português do BrasilPL - PolskiHE - עִבְרִיתRU - РусскийJA - 日本語TR - TürkçeAR - العربية
Sign In Start Free Trial

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

Behavior
Biochemistry
Bioengineering
Biology
Cancer Research
Chemistry
Developmental Biology
View All
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

Biological Techniques
Biology
Cancer Research
Immunology
Neuroscience
Microbiology
JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduate courses

Analytical Chemistry
Anatomy and Physiology
Biology
Calculus
Cell Biology
Chemistry
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
View All
JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

Advanced Biology
Basic Biology
Chemistry
View All
JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

Biology
Chemistry

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

Accounting
Finance
Macroeconomics
Marketing
Microeconomics

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Authors

Teaching Faculty

Librarians

K12 Schools

Biopharma

Products

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal

Peer reviewed scientific video journal

JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods

JoVE Visualize

Visualizing science through experiment videos

EDUCATION

JoVE Core

Video textbooks for undergraduates

JoVE Science Education

Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments

JoVE Lab Manual

Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses

BUSINESS

JoVE Business

Video textbooks for business education

OTHERS

JoVE Quiz

Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments

Solutions

Authors
Teaching Faculty
Librarians
K12 Schools
Biopharma

Language

English

EN

English

CN

简体中文

DE

Deutsch

ES

Español

KR

한국어

IT

Italiano

FR

Français

PT

Português do Brasil

PL

Polski

HE

עִבְרִית

RU

Русский

JA

日本語

TR

Türkçe

AR

العربية

    Menu

    JoVE Journal

    Behavior

    Biochemistry

    Bioengineering

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Chemistry

    Developmental Biology

    Engineering

    Environment

    Genetics

    Immunology and Infection

    Medicine

    Neuroscience

    Menu

    JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments

    Biological Techniques

    Biology

    Cancer Research

    Immunology

    Neuroscience

    Microbiology

    Menu

    JoVE Core

    Analytical Chemistry

    Anatomy and Physiology

    Biology

    Calculus

    Cell Biology

    Chemistry

    Civil Engineering

    Electrical Engineering

    Introduction to Psychology

    Mechanical Engineering

    Medical-Surgical Nursing

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Science Education

    Advanced Biology

    Basic Biology

    Chemistry

    Clinical Skills

    Engineering

    Environmental Sciences

    Physics

    Psychology

    View All

    Menu

    JoVE Lab Manual

    Biology

    Chemistry

    Menu

    JoVE Business

    Accounting

    Finance

    Macroeconomics

    Marketing

    Microeconomics

Start Free Trial
Loading...
Home
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
An Olfactory Preference Test for Measuring Olfactory Hedonic Biases in Mouse Models of Depression
An Olfactory Preference Test for Measuring Olfactory Hedonic Biases in Mouse Models of Depression
JoVE Journal
Neuroscience
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Journal Neuroscience
An Olfactory Preference Test for Measuring Olfactory Hedonic Biases in Mouse Models of Depression

An Olfactory Preference Test for Measuring Olfactory Hedonic Biases in Mouse Models of Depression

Full Text
1,137 Views
06:27 min
July 11, 2025

DOI: 10.3791/68391-v

Claire-Hélène de Badts1,2, Gilles Gheusi1,3, Chantal Henry1,4,5, Pierre-Marie Lledo1, Mariana Alonso1

1Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 3571,Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, 2Ecole Doctorale 158 - Cerveau, Cognition, Comportement,Université Paris Cité, 3Laboratoire d’Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée – UR 4443,Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 4Université de Paris Cité, 5Department of Psychiatry, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire,GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neuroscience

Overview

This study presents a protocol for an olfactory preference test to evaluate negative olfactory biases towards both appetitive and aversive odor stimuli in mouse models of depression. Understanding these biases is crucial for investigating the physiopathology of depressive disorders and can aid in elucidating the underlying neural mechanisms and treatment outcomes.

Key Study Components

Area of Science

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Analysis
  • Psychiatric Disorders

Background

  • Negative bias in emotional processing is prevalent in depressive disorders.
  • The assessment of innate odor valuation can help evaluate depressive-like phenotypes.
  • Research aims to explore neural circuits disrupted by depression.
  • Future work may include examining sex-specific mechanisms and antidepressant effects.

Purpose of Study

  • To develop a reliable method for assessing hedonic bias in mice.
  • To relate behavioral outcomes to neural mechanisms in depression.
  • To explore translational research avenues for understanding depression.

Methods Used

  • A two-compartment arena measuring 45 cm x 50 cm x 25 cm.
  • Mice were divided into control and experimental groups exposed to various odor stimuli.
  • Important steps included odor preparation, behavioral observation, and data tracking.
  • Mouse behavior was recorded for ten minutes to analyze preference and exploration.

Main Results

  • Control females showed greater movement in response to male urine than UCMS females.
  • UCMS mice exhibited reduced preference for odors associated with negative valence.
  • Behavioral indices positively correlated with emotionality scores in females.
  • In male mice, no significant differences in behavior were noted, highlighting sex-specific responses.

Conclusions

  • The protocol allows effective assessment of odor preference linked to depressive phenotypes.
  • Findings support insights into behavioral changes associated with depression and potential treatment efficacy.
  • This approach enhances understanding of mechanisms underlying emotional processing in depressive disorders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the advantages of using the olfactory preference test?
This test reliably assesses the innate value of odors and their emotional connotations in mouse models, providing insights into depressive behaviors.
How is the experimental setup prepared for the olfactory test?
A two-compartment arena is set up with odor stimuli placed on filter paper within Petri dishes. Mice are introduced into the center for observation.
What data is collected during the experiment?
Behavioral data including time spent in odor zones and exploration patterns are recorded. Automatic tracking software aids in analysis.
What types of odor stimuli are used in the assessment?
The study employs odors related to negative and positive emotional valence, specifically using stimuli such as male urine and TMT.
How can the methodology be adapted for further studies?
Future adaptations may include varying the types of odors or modifying the experimental conditions to assess different behavioral responses.
Are there any limitations to this olfactory preference test?
Potential limitations include the variability in individual mouse responses and the need for careful odor preparation to ensure consistency.

Here, we present a protocol of an olfactory preference test that allows for the assessment of negative olfactory biases towards both appetitive and aversive odor stimuli in mouse models of depression.

A negative bias in emotional processing is a major characteristic of depressive disorders. This bias is particularly interesting to better understand the physiopathology of the disease. Here we propose a protocol for the reliable assessment of innate odor valuation using odors associated with various valence in both male and female mouse models of depression.

Assessing hedonic bias in mouse models is essential, both to better evaluate the induced depressive-like phenotype, and also as a tool to investigate neural mechanisms behind these changes in valence assignment. Overall, this protocol provides new avenues for translational research to understand the mechanism underlying depression and treatment efficacy. In the future, we will try to decipher the brain circuits behind these disrupted emotional processing and potential sex-specific mechanisms, along with the action of antidepressants onto these pathways.

To begin, prepare the experimental setup using a two-compartment arena measuring 45 centimeters by 50 centimeters by 25 centimeters with gray plexiglass walls and a white floor. Divide the arena into two equal compartments of 25 centimeters by 45 centimeters, using a gray plexiglass wall measuring 37 centimeters by 25 centimeters. Secure perforated Petri dish with adhesive and place them at the bottom of the wall in each compartment.

Then use dual-sided adhesive or Blu Tack to fixate each Petri dish vertically onto the wall of the arena. Next, position a camera two meters above the arena to record the behavior of the animals and enable automatic tracking of their movements throughout the experiment. Now divide the mice into at least two experimental groups, the control mice and test group mice.

Transfer each mouse to the behavioral testing room 30 minutes before the experiment begins. Using a lux meter, set the lighting in the arena to approximately 40 lux and verify that the illumination is evenly distributed. Next, add a clean filter paper measuring 42.5 millimeters into each of the two Petri dishes in the arena.

On the first day, gently place all mice from the same housing cage together into the arena for 10 minutes to reduce neophobia. On the day of testing, prepare in a glass vial the odor under a chemical hood, using the correct dilution. Dilute the odorant in mineral oil or distilled water depending on its chemical properties.

Just before testing each mouse, use a micro pipette with a filter tip to collect 200 microliters of the odor solution under the hood. Dispense the solution onto the filter paper in one of the Petri dishes. Leave the second filter paper in the other Petri dish untreated.

Transfer the Petri dishes to the testing room. Then vertically fix them onto the wall of the arena. Place each mouse individually into the arena at the center between the two compartments.

Record the behavior for 10 minutes using the overhead camera. Remove the mouse from the arena after the observation period ends. Remove the odor Petri dish from the arena.

Then clean the arena using a 70%ethanol disinfectant solution and dry it thoroughly. Discard the used filter paper and prepare the next odor sample for the next mouse. Use an automatic tracking software to record the mouse's position throughout the test.

Define distinct zones within the arena for analysis. During habituation, all mice spent at least 50 seconds in both the odor and control zones, indicating adequate task engagement. Importantly, mice exposed to UCMS spent the same time in the odor zone than controls.

Although some difference could be observed in other zones. Control female mice moved significantly more than UCMS females when exposed to male urine, but not during habituation or TMT exposure. All readouts of hedonic response show significant differences or a statistical tendency between control and UCMS females.

This effect is also visible through the Global Odor Exploration Index, which is a combined measure of hedonic and locomotor response. The Odor Exploration Index positively correlated with the emotionality score for both male urine and TMT in female mice. In male mice, no differences were observed during habituation or in total distance moved through the test.

The time spent in the odor zone shows a significant reduction of female urine and TMT exploration in UCMS compared to controls. UCMS mice enter significantly less in the odor zone, or tend to, and present a significantly reduced preference index for both female urine and TMT. The Odor Exploration Index shows a negatively shifted behavioral response to female urine and TMT of UCMS mice compared to controls, which tend to be positively correlated with the animal's emotionality score.

Explore More Videos

Neuroscience

Related Videos

Olfactory Behavioral Testing in the Adult Mouse

09:00

Olfactory Behavioral Testing in the Adult Mouse

Related Videos

20.4K Views

Olfactory Assays for Mouse Models of Neurodegenerative Disease

07:27

Olfactory Assays for Mouse Models of Neurodegenerative Disease

Related Videos

22.7K Views

Testing for Odor Discrimination and Habituation in Mice

06:41

Testing for Odor Discrimination and Habituation in Mice

Related Videos

19K Views

Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice

06:40

Simple and Computer-assisted Olfactory Testing for Mice

Related Videos

10.9K Views

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

04:56

Assessment of Social Transmission of Food Preferences Behaviors

Related Videos

8.6K Views

An Objective and Reproducible Test of Olfactory Learning and Discrimination in Mice

09:33

An Objective and Reproducible Test of Olfactory Learning and Discrimination in Mice

Related Videos

9.2K Views

Sucrose Preference and Novelty-Induced Hypophagia Tests in Rats using an Automated Food Intake Monitoring System

07:33

Sucrose Preference and Novelty-Induced Hypophagia Tests in Rats using an Automated Food Intake Monitoring System

Related Videos

11.5K Views

Animal Models of Depression - Chronic Despair Model (CDM)

05:47

Animal Models of Depression - Chronic Despair Model (CDM)

Related Videos

8.3K Views

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Related Videos

3.2K Views

Electrophysiological Measurements from a Moth Olfactory System

06:16

Electrophysiological Measurements from a Moth Olfactory System

Related Videos

14.5K Views

JoVE logo
Contact Us Recommend to Library
Research
  • JoVE Journal
  • JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
  • JoVE Visualize
Business
  • JoVE Business
Education
  • JoVE Core
  • JoVE Science Education
  • JoVE Lab Manual
  • JoVE Quizzes
Solutions
  • Authors
  • Teaching Faculty
  • Librarians
  • K12 Schools
  • Biopharma
About JoVE
  • Overview
  • Leadership
Others
  • JoVE Newsletters
  • JoVE Help Center
  • Blogs
  • JoVE Newsroom
  • Site Maps
Contact Us Recommend to Library
JoVE logo

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved

Privacy Terms of Use Policies
WeChat QR code