This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the institutional regulations governing human research. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Xingtai People’s Hospital, Department of Dermatology (Approval ID: 2021[029]). All participants provided written informed consent before participation.
Patient selection
A total of 232 patients clinically diagnosed with vitiligo were enrolled over a 3-year period from January 2021 to December 2023. All participants were diagnosed with non-segmental vitiligo (generalized or localized type) and classified as stable or progressive based on the absence or presence of new lesions within 3 months before enrollment. Disease duration and lesion distribution were recorded at baseline. Enrollment criteria included individuals aged 18 to 65 years with stable or progressive vitiligo confirmed by dermatologists through clinical examination, Wood’s lamp illumination, and dermoscopy. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, lactation, photoallergic disorders, systemic autoimmune disease, severe hepatic or renal dysfunction, and prior use of systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, or phototherapy within 3 months. All procedures were performed under continuous ethical supervision, ensuring patient comfort and safety throughout the treatment course.
Study overview and treatment workflow
The overall workflow of the study, including patient enrollment, group allocation, follow-up assessments, and biomarker analysis, is illustrated in Figure 1. Eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel study groups: the 308-nm excimer laser monotherapy group (excimer laser alone; n = 116) and the combination therapy group (308-nm excimer laser plus oral matrine; n = 116). Group allocation was performed using a computer-generated random sequence prepared by an independent research staff member who was not involved in outcome assessment; assignments were placed in sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes and opened after enrollment to determine treatment allocation. The therapeutic workflow consisted of three major phases: (1) baseline assessment and documentation, (2) 12 weeks of active treatment according to the assigned regimen, and (3) post-treatment evaluation, including laboratory testing of serum immunoglobulins and inflammatory cytokines. Each patient received a standardized care plan, identical follow-up intervals, and uniform laboratory analysis procedures. Clinical photographs and VASI scoring were performed by dermatologists blinded to treatment allocation. All procedures were performed in the dermatology phototherapy suite of Xingtai People’s Hospital under controlled ambient conditions (room temperature 22–24 °C, relative humidity 40%–60%).
Preparation of the treatment area
Prior to each laser session, the target depigmented areas were gently cleansed with sterile physiological saline and patted dry with lint-free medical gauze. Lesional skin was inspected to confirm the absence of infection, excoriation, or crusting. When more than one lesion was treated in a single visit, each lesion was prepared and treated sequentially. Lesions exceeding a single irradiation field were subdivided into adjacent irradiation fields, and surrounding normal skin was shielded with an opaque UV-blocking sheet for each field to minimize unnecessary exposure. Patients were instructed to avoid topical agents, photosensitizing cosmetics, or perfumes for 24 h before treatment. Protective goggles were worn by both the patient and the operator throughout the procedure.
308-nm excimer laser irradiation procedure
A monochromatic 308-nm xenon-chloride (XeCl) excimer laser system was used. All laser sessions were performed by two trained dermatologic physicians under a standardized protocol to ensure consistent energy output, irradiation distance, and reproducibility. The device output was verified with a calibrated UV power meter before each treatment day, and all systems underwent weekly calibration by a certified technician to maintain an error margin below ±5%. Before the first irradiation, the minimal erythema dose (MED) for each patient was determined by applying incremental doses (100–400 mJ/cm2) to small test areas on the inner forearm and evaluating the erythema response after 24 h; results were photographed and recorded in patient charts. A representative MED documentation and session-by-session dose-adjustment chart is provided in Supplementary Table 1. MED was defined as the lowest test dose producing a clearly discernible, uniform erythema at 24 h. The initial treatment dose was set at 80%–90% of the individual MED, and subsequent dose changes followed a predefined algorithm based on the prior-session 24-h erythema response (increase by 10%–20% for absent or mild erythema, maintain the same dose for moderate erythema, and reduce by 10%–20% for blistering or significant pain). The initial therapeutic dose was set at 150–250 mJ/cm2 (approximately 80%–90% of the individual MED). Each session began with the patient comfortably seated on an adjustable chair. The laser handpiece was held perpendicular (90°) to the skin at a distance of 10–15 cm, and circular or rectangular irradiation fields were aligned to fully cover depigmented areas with minimal overlap. Irradiation lasted 1–3 s per exposure field, depending on fluence. Doses were subsequently increased by 10%–20% per session according to the prior erythema response; if moderate erythema occurred, the previous dose was maintained, whereas blistering or pain warranted a 10%–20% reduction. The maximum dose did not exceed 2,000 mJ/cm2. Each session covered all visible lesions and lasted 10–20 min, depending on the extent. Treatments were performed 2x weekly with at least 72 h between sessions over a total period of 12 weeks (24 sessions). Following irradiation, a thin layer of sterile aloe-based gel was applied to relieve local erythema. Patients were instructed to avoid sun exposure for 48 h and to use a broad-spectrum sunscreen (SPF >30) throughout the treatment. Lesions showing >50% repigmentation continued under the same parameters until stable pigmentation was achieved.
Oral matrine administration
In the combination group, a sterile aqueous extract of Sophora flavescens roots was prepared in accordance with the Chinese Pharmacopoeia (2020 edition)30 and standardized to a concentration of 5 mg/mL with ≥98% purity, verified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The solution was stored at 4 °C in amber glass bottles to prevent photodegradation. Random batch testing confirmed alkaloid concentration (5 ± 0.3 mg/mL) and microbial sterility. Each patient received the matrine solution by oral administration at a dose of 0.3 g (60 mL) twice daily for 12 weeks, synchronized with the laser treatment schedule. The dosage was selected based on prior pharmacological data demonstrating effective immunomodulation with a favorable safety profile in chronic inflammatory dermatoses31,32. Patients were instructed to take the solution 30 min after meals to minimize gastrointestinal discomfort and to avoid alcohol, strong tea, and spicy food during therapy to reduce hepatic burden. Mild nausea or fatigue was managed by the administration of a small amount of warm water. Treatment adherence was assessed through a medication diary and bottle-return verification at each follow-up visit. Safety was assessed at each visit by structured symptom inquiry and documentation of adverse events, including gastrointestinal discomfort, fatigue, and any signs suggestive of hepatic intolerance. No additional systemic medications, topical corticosteroids, or immunosuppressants were permitted during the observation period to prevent confounding effects.
Evaluation of clinical response
Pigmentation changes were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12 by two experienced dermatologists blinded to treatment information. Standardized digital photographs were taken under identical lighting and camera settings (distance 60 cm, exposure 1/60 s, ISO 200). The degree of repigmentation was quantified using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Lesions were additionally graded into four categories: Excellent (≥75% repigmentation), Good (50%–74%), Moderate (25%–49%), Poor (<25%). Patients also completed a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for satisfaction and symptom relief. Adverse events such as erythema, burning, pruritus, blistering, and hyperpigmentation were documented at each visit.
Serum sample collection
For biomarker analysis, fasting peripheral blood (5 mL) was collected from each patient at baseline and at the end of week 12 using serum separation tubes. Samples were allowed to clot for 30 min at room temperature and centrifuged at 800 x g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant serum was aliquoted into 0.5 mL cryovials and stored at −80 °C until analysis. All samples were processed within 2 h of collection to minimize cytokine degradation.
Quantification of serum immunoglobulins
Serum IgG, IgA, and IgM concentrations were determined using automated immunonephelometry following the manufacturer’s instructions. Calibration curves were prepared using serial dilutions of reference standards. Each assay included quality control sera at high and low concentrations. Measurements were expressed in g/L and repeated 2x to ensure intra-assay variation < 5%. The instrument’s precision and calibration were verified daily using traceable control standards. Results were recorded electronically and reviewed by two independent technicians blinded to patient information.
Measurement of inflammatory cytokines
Cytokine profiling included IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-10, quantified using a multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) platform. Reagent preparation followed the manufacturer’s standard protocol. Briefly, 100 µL of diluted serum was added to each antibody-coated well and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST), 100 µL of biotinylated detection antibody was added and incubated for 1 h. Wells were then incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase for 30 min, followed by color development using tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate for 10 min in the dark. The reaction was stopped with 50 µL of 2 mol/L sulfuric acid, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. Standard curves were generated from serial dilutions of recombinant cytokines, and concentrations were expressed as pg/mL. All samples were measured in duplicate. To ensure reproducibility, the inter-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was maintained below 10%. Blank wells contained assay buffer without serum, and negative control wells contained cytokine-free matrix processed identically to the samples and equivalent to the 0 pg/mL standard to confirm assay specificity. Any hemolyzed or lipemic samples were excluded from the final analysis.
Statistical analysis
Data were entered into a dedicated electronic database and cross-checked for accuracy by two independent data managers. Sample size was estimated based on expected effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.5) with α = 0.05 and power (1–β) = 0.8, yielding a minimum of 100 participants per group. To control for multiple comparisons across cytokines, the Bonferroni correction was applied when appropriate. Multivariate linear regression was applied where necessary to adjust for potential confounders, including age, sex, disease duration, and baseline lesion area. Normal distribution of continuous variables was verified using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data or as median (interquartile range, IQR) for skewed data. Changes before and after treatment were analyzed using paired t-tests, whereas between-group comparisons were analyzed with independent-sample t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests as appropriate. Categorical data were compared with the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Correlations between cytokine levels, immunoglobulins, and pigmentation improvement were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. All analyses were performed with SPSS v26.0 (RRID: SCR_002865), and a two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.