$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Hepatic lymph duct cannulation is a technically difficult procedure, even for experienced microsurgeons. Several critical steps can improve the likelihood of preserving lymph duct integrity and achieving stable lymph flow. When identifying and isolating the hepatic lymph duct (Protocol steps 5.7-5.10), the initial step is to remove the connective tissue and fat overlying the mesenteric lymph duct and vena cava near the hepatic lymph duct. The hepatic lymph duct is translucent and fragile compared with the thicker and more opaque mesenteric lymph duct and can be easily ruptured if handled directly. The mesenteric lymph duct serves as a useful anatomical landmark, as clearance of its overlying tissue reveals the hepatic lymph duct located superiorly. Because the hepatic lymph duct often exhibits kinks or curvature, the operator should select a cannulation point along a straight segment and orient the cannula parallel to the duct’s natural course to minimize the risk of occlusion or tearing (step 5.11-5.14).
The cannulation itself is the most critical determinant of success. After puncturing the duct (step 5.13), intraluminal access can be confirmed visually by inserting the tip of the forceps into the opening and ensuring that only one vessel wall overlies the instrument. The appearance of two opposing walls indicates a through-and-through puncture. Once intraluminal access is confirmed, the cannula can be advanced smoothly along the duct at the same angle. Care should be taken to avoid damaging adjacent vasculature, as bleeding into the field can introduce blood into the lymph collection cannula, contaminating the sample and substantially increasing the risk of clot formation. After establishing lymph flow (step 5.15), the collecting end of the cannula should be capped, and veterinary adhesive should be applied carefully to prevent it from entering the lumen. The cannula must also be checked for air bubbles, as trapped air increases back pressure and can impede lymph flow. Because hepatic lymph is generated under low driving pressure, the collecting end of the cannula should always be positioned below the level of the surgical site to facilitate drainage by gravity.
Successful hepatic lymph duct cannulation is indicated by the immediate onset of lymph flow. Once established, hepatic lymph typically flows at approximately 0.1 mL/h, with stable output for several hours. The flow rate may vary depending on the animal’s anatomy, physiology, and experimental conditions. For example, lymph was collected under isoflurane anesthesia in this protocol. Isoflurane anesthesia may influence physiological parameters relevant to lymphatic function, and experimental conditions involving anesthesia should therefore be considered when interpreting lymph formation rates16. Hepatic lymph duct cannulation requires laparotomy and delicate microsurgical manipulation of abdominal lymphatic vessels, and therefore, lymph collection from conscious rats is not feasible in this model. Previous studies comparing lymph transport under anesthetized and conscious conditions or using different anesthetic regimens have shown that anesthesia may modestly influence absolute lymph flow rates but does not substantially alter overall lymphatic transport patterns4. Therefore, lymph flow values obtained in this model should be interpreted within the context of anesthetized experimental conditions.
A gradual reduction or cessation of flow during collection is most often caused by clot formation within the cannula, resulting from blood contamination or fibrin deposition. Flow can sometimes be restored by localizing and gently pinching the cannula with fine forceps to mechanically fragment the clot, or by gently aspirating through the cannula's collecting end to dislodge the obstruction. If the blockage is confined to the external portion, the cannula may be cut proximal to the clot and reconnected to fresh tubing using a sterile silicone connector. If the clot forms at the cannulation site, re-cannulation is usually required. In such cases, removal of the adhesive may be attempted with great care to avoid rupture of the duct or adjacent blood vessels. Hemostasis must be achieved before reattempting cannulation, as even minor blood leakage into the cannula markedly promotes clotting within the low-pressure hepatic lymph system.
Physiological factors also influence lymph flow and patency. Hepatic lymph flow in rats is inherently slower than mesenteric or thoracic duct flow, even under basal conditions17,18. Moreover, general anesthesia can reduce lymph flow in other lymphatic circuits compared with conscious, freely moving rats19. Because hepatic lymph cannulation requires anesthesia and laparotomy, these factors likely contribute to the relatively low flow rates and increased tendency to clot observed during prolonged collections. Maintaining hydration through the jugular vein or gastrointestinal cannula during collection helps to stabilize lymph flow and reduce clot formation. In this model, stable hepatic lymph flow is typically achievable for 2–3 hours, after which flow can deteriorate and clotting is more likely. However, under optimal experimental conditions, lymph collection can be maintained for longer periods, with a maximum duration of up to ~8 hours reported4.
The inclusion of hepatic artery and portal vein sampling (Figure 6 and Figure 7) expands the applicability of the model by allowing direct comparison between hepatic inflow, lymphatic efflux, and systemic circulation. This terminal sampling step enables simultaneous assessment of hepatic microvascular transport and interstitial clearance within a single animal. Such comparisons provide valuable insights into the distribution of solutes between the hepatic vascular and lymphatic compartments, particularly for large macromolecules or lipophilic compounds that are dependent on interstitial diffusion.
Despite these challenges, the hepatic lymph cannulation model remains a valuable and informative technique. The liver contributes a significant proportion of total body lymph flow, and hepatic lymph contains proteins and other components that originate from hepatic interstitial fluid. By sampling lymph draining directly from the liver, this model enables analysis of molecules and cells leaving the liver before they are diluted by mesenteric and systemic lymph in the thoracic duct. Biochemical analysis of hepatic lymph provides insight into hepatic interstitial metabolism and lipid transport processes12,20. This complements information obtained from the portal or systemic blood, which integrates the effects of hepatic metabolism and extrahepatic exchange. Importantly, this configuration, combining hepatic lymph, carotid arterial, and jugular venous cannulations, permits dynamic assessment of solute gradients between hepatic efflux and vascular inflow, providing a more comprehensive view of hepatic transport and clearance.
Previous studies using this model demonstrate that hepatic lymph sampling enables evaluation of lymphatic recovery of macromolecular therapeutics and comparison of solute transport between hepatic lymph and systemic circulation. Together, hepatic lymph cannulation, concurrent vascular sampling, and biochemical profiling provide a robust experimental platform for studying hepatic microvascular and interstitial dynamics. The model enables simultaneous evaluation of hepatic transport, metabolism, lipid processing, and immune signalling, and can be adapted to investigate changes under pathophysiological conditions such as MASLD or hepatic inflammation.
In conclusion, this refined surgical model, integrating hepatic lymphatic, hepatic arterial, and portal venous access, offers a comprehensive and reproducible approach for examining hepatic transport pathways. It allows direct comparison of vascular inflow, interstitial efflux, and lymphatic drainage, which supports studies that provide mechanistic insight into liver-specific transport, metabolism, and pharmacokinetic processes. In addition, the ability to sample hepatic lymph provides a unique opportunity to study immune cell and antigen trafficking from the liver, offering valuable insights into hepatic immune surveillance, inflammation, and tolerance mechanisms.