JoVE   
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Biology

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Neuroscience

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Immunology and Infection

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Bioengineering

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Applied Physics

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Chemistry

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Behavior

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Environment

|   

JoVE Science Education

General Laboratory Techniques

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Basic Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms I

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms II

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

 JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

MRI-guided Disruption of the Blood-brain Barrier using Transcranial Focused Ultrasound in a Rat Model

1, 1,2, 1,2, 1,3

1Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 3Department of Medical Biophysics, and Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering (IBBME), University of Toronto

Article
    Downloads Comments Metrics

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    This article is a part of   JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.

    Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian

    Current Access Through Your IP Address

    You do not have access to any JoVE content through your current IP address.

    IP: 54.226.133.196, User IP: 54.226.133.196, User IP Hex: 920815044

    Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address

    You aren't signed into JoVE. If your institution subscribes to JoVE, please or create an account with your institutional email address to access this content.

     

    Summary

    Microbubble-mediated focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a promising technique for non-invasive targeted drug delivery in the brain1-3. This protocol outlines the experimental procedure for MRI-guided transcranial BBB disruption in a rat model.

    Date Published: 3/13/2012, Issue 61; doi: 10.3791/3555

    Cite this Article

    O'Reilly, M. A., Waspe, A. C., Chopra, R., Hynynen, K. MRI-guided Disruption of the Blood-brain Barrier using Transcranial Focused Ultrasound in a Rat Model. J. Vis. Exp. (61), e3555, doi:10.3791/3555 (2012).

    Abstract

    Focused ultrasound (FUS) disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an increasingly investigated technique for circumventing the BBB1-5. The BBB is a significant obstacle to pharmaceutical treatments of brain disorders as it limits the passage of molecules from the vasculature into the brain tissue to molecules less than approximately 500 Da in size6. FUS induced BBB disruption (BBBD) is temporary and reversible4 and has an advantage over chemical means of inducing BBBD by being highly localized. FUS induced BBBD provides a means for investigating the effects of a wide range of therapeutic agents on the brain, which would not otherwise be deliverable to the tissue in sufficient concentration While a wide range of ultrasound parameters have proven successful at disrupting the BBB2,5,7, there are several critical steps in the experimental procedure to ensure successful disruption with accurate targeting. This protocol outlines how to achieve MRI-guided FUS induced BBBD in a rat model, with a focus on the critical animal preparation and microbubble handling steps of the experiment.

    Protocol

    1. Ultrasound and MRI Setup

    An MRI-compatible three-axis focused ultrasound system was used in this study (FUS Instruments, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada). Two different ultrasound transducers were used: an in-house constructed 551.5 kHz spherically-focused transducer (radius of curvature = 60 mm, external diameter = 75 mm, internal diameter = 20 mm), and a 1.503 MHz, 8-sector array with integrated PZT hydrophone (Imasonic Inc., Voray-sur-L'Orgnon, France) driven as a single element spherically focused transducer (FN = 0.8, aperture = 10 cm). An MRI-compatible (PVDF) receiver8 was used to record acoustic emissions when the 551.5 kHz transducer was used. If different equipment is used, the following are suggested:

    1. Select an appropriate, calibrated ultrasound transducer with a center frequency in the range 0.25 MHz -1.5 MHz and an f-number (radius of curvature/aperture) of 1 or less.
    2. Place a water bath filled with warm, degassed, de-ionized water on the bed of a 1.5 T or 3 T MRI. The water bath should have a top-plate which can hold the animals. Mount the ultrasound transducer in the tank on an MRI compatible three-axis positioning stage or system9, facing the water surface.
    3. Run the transducer cable to the ultrasound driving equipment through a penetration panel.
    4. Generate the transducer driving signal using a function generator and power amplifier. Use an external matching circuit to minimize the reflected electrical power.
    5. Knowing the transducer focal length, place the transducer focus at the water surface and sonicate the water surface to generate a visible water fountain. Steps 1.6 and 1.7 describe how to register the focus using the generated water fountain. A more precise method for locating the focus, which involves sonicating a heat absorbing gel and imaging the resulting temperature elevation at the focus with MRI, can be found in9.
    6. Mark the location of the focus using a marker that will be visible on the MR images. This can be done using a plate with a center hole that will fill with water when placed over the focus. The water-filled hole will be visible on the MRI and will provide focal coordinates in two planes, while the coordinate in the axial direction of the transducer can be determined from the water surface.
    7. Using a 3-plane localizer sequence, image the focus marker and record the location of the focus in the MRI coordinate system.
    8. To monitor acoustic emissions, mount an MR-compatible hydrophone8 that is used as a passive cavitation detector (PCD) in the water bath directed at the transducer focus, or use a transducer with integrated hydrophone.
    9. Run the PCD cables to a scope card that is sufficiently fast to capture bursts of up to 10 ms at PRFs up to 2 Hz (e.g. ATS460, AlazarTech, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada). Cables must be grounded to the penetration panel or RF shield to minimize noise.

    2. Animal Preparation

    1. Anesthetize the animals using isofluorane gas. Since isofluorane has an effect on BBB disruption10, the animals should be taken off the gas 10 minutes prior to the start of the experiment. Place ocular lubricant ointment in each eye at the start of anesthesia to protect the cornea from desiccation or other injury.
    2. Using an electric razor shave the fur from the top of the animal's head and neck, then remove the remaining fur using a depilatory cream (e.g Nair, Church & Dwight Co., Princeton, NJ, USA) and rinse the scalp with mild soap and water.
    3. Prepare the tail with a betadine skin scrub followed by a bridine wash. Perform a final wipedown with alcohol in order to visualize the tail vein.
    4. Insert a 22 gauge catheter with 3-way stopcock into the tail vein and flush with a heparin/saline mixture (33 U/mL) to prevent clot formation in the catheter.
    5. Deliver injectable anesthetics (40-50 mg/kg ketamine, 10 mg/kg xylazine) via intramuscular injection, and remove the animal from the isofluorane.
    6. Place the anesthetized animal supine on the ultrasound positioning system with the top of the head contacting the waterbath through a hole in the top-plate (Fig.1). A small amount of ultrasound gel maybe applied to the top of the animal's head to minimize the chance of trapped airbubbles.
    7. Tape the legs to the positioning system. The head may be held in place using either a bite bar, if available, or tape placed firmly across the chin.
    8. Cover the animal with a towel and circulating water blanket in order to keep it warm.

    3. Target Selection


    1. Acquire baseline axial T2-weighted and T1-weighted MR images of the brain. If using a 1.5 T MRI and dedicated head-sized RF-receive surface coil, suitable scan parameters might be:

      T2 weighted: FSE, TE = 60 ms, TR =2000 ms
      T1 weighted: FSE, TE=10 ms, TR=500 ms
    2. Select the target from the T2-weighted scans, avoiding the ventricles and the brain midline, and selecting a mid-brain depth.
    3. Move the transducer focus to the target location.

    4. Microbubble Preparation

    Definity microbubbles (Lantheus Medical Imaging, MA, USA) are used by several groups for microbubble mediated FUS induced BBBD2,5,7. Appropriate dosages for other microbubble types can be found in the literature11,12.

    1. Activate the Definity microbubbles and slowly draw up a small volume into a 1 mL syringe using an 18-gauge needle.
    2. Remove trapped air from the syringe by gently moving the plunger back and forth. Do not tap the syringe as this can break the bubbles.
    3. Dilute the Definity in normal saline in a ratio of 10:1 saline to Definty by slowly injecting the required volume of Definity into a syringe of saline. If an infusion delivery is used, the Definity can be further diluted, to 50:1 or 100:1.
    4. Gently invert the syringe to thoroughly mix the Definity and saline until an even appearance is achieved. Gentle inversion of the syringe immediately prior to injection may also be necessary if the bubbles have started to float out of suspension.
    5. Calculate the required dose volume based on 0.02 mL/kg of Definity, or 0.2 mL/kg of the solution (at 10:1 dilution).

    5. Ultrasound Delivery

    1. Set the sonication parameters, using low duty cycle bursts, not continuous wave sonications. Appropriate sonication parameters at 0.5 MHz are 0.23 MPa in situ pressure, 10 ms bursts at 1 Hz PRF, 2 min. total sonication time. At 1.5 MHz appropriate in situ pressures fall around 0.45-0.5 MPa.

    Appropriate pressures at different frequencies can be estimated using a mechanical index of 0.46 13.

    1. Check that the animal's head is still coupled to the water.
    2. Inject the microbubbles slowly into the tail vein catheter and flush with 0.5 mL normal saline. Begin the sonication simultaneously with the start of injection.

    6. MRI Evaluation of Treatment Outcome

    1. Following the sonication, inject an MRI contrast agent (e.g. 0.2 ml/kg Omniscan, GE Healthcare) via the tail vein catheter followed by a 0.5 mL saline flush.
    2. Perform T1-weighted imaging until the contrast peak has passed. Sonication sites which have been successfully disrupted will show greater enhancement than the surrounding tissue.
    3. Perform T2-weighted imaging to check for edema. High signal at the sonication sites is indicative of edema.

    7. Representative Results

    MRI contrast agents can be successfully delivered through the BBB using focused ultrasound and circulating microbubbles. Figure 2 shows typical pre and post-FUS T1-w images. Figure 2B shows a contrast enhanced (CE) T1-w image with distinct focal openings in four sonicated locations. Sonication locations 1 and 2 show particularly bright enhancement. In Fig.3 locations 1 and 2 can also be seen to correspond with T2-w high signal, indicating edema.

    The extent of T2-w edema can sometimes be more easily visualized on sagittal slices. Figure 4 shows CE-T1-w and T2-w sagittal slices through sonication locations 1 and 3. Edema is visible at location 1 but not location 3.

    Spectral analysis of captured acoustic emissions data (Fig.5) may show harmonic emissions and/or sub/ultra harmonic emissions when stable cavitation is occurring. Harmonics can also arise from tissue non-linearities, while sub and ultraharmonic emissions can only occur as a result of bubble activity14. At higher pressures wideband emissions indicating inertial cavitation may also be detected. However these have been associated with greater amounts of red blood cell extravasations and microdamage than sonications without inertial cavitation11.

    The use of higher sonication frequencies results in more localized openings due to the smaller focal spot size. Figure 6 shows that higher frequencies can be used to create smaller regions of opening. This allows investigation of effects mid-brain with fewer near-skull effects.

    Figure 1.
    Figure 1. Experimental setup.

    Figure 2.
    Figure 2. Pre (left) and post (right) treatment T1-w images of a rat brain showing enhancement at four sonication locations.

    Figure 3.
    Figure 3. Pre (left) and post (right) treatment T2-w images of a rat brain (same animal as Fig.2) showing T2-w edema at sonication locations 1 and 2.

    Figure 4.
    Figure 4. Post treatment sagittal T1-w (left) and T2-w (right) images from the same rat brain as Figs. 2 and 3. The opening at location 1 (left) correlates with T2-w edema (right). Location 3 shows opening (left) but no T2-w edema.

    Figure 5.
    Figure 5. Frequency spectrum from data captured during a single 10 ms burst at 551.5 kHz. The fundamental frequency ( f0) as well as harmonics (2f0) and sub/ultraharmonics (0.5 f0, 1.5f0) are visible.

    Figure 6.
    Figure 6. Post treatment CE-T1-w axial (left) and sagittal (right) images from a rat brain sonicated in four locations at 1.503 MHz. BBB openings at this frequency are seen to be more localized.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Discussion

    Preparation of the animals and microbubbles are the most critical aspects of this procedure. The hair on the animal's head must be entirely removed to avoid attenuating the ultrasound beam. The BBB can be disrupted under isofluorane anesthetic, however, it becomes more difficult to achieve consistent opening.

    The microbubbles should always be handled with care and small gauge, large diameter needles must be used when drawing up, in order to avoid breaking them. Similarly, the smallest gauge catheter which can be reasonably used in the tail vein should be employed (22-gauge is recommended). If a smaller catheter is required to achieve proper placement in the vein then extra care must be taken during the microbubble injection. The microbubble injections should always be done slowly.

    Burst mode sonications should always be employed. If continuous wave sonications are used the microbubbles will not replenish into the vessels at the transducer focus and BBBD will not be achieved. If CE-T1-w images post-treatment do not show disruption, the treatment can be repeated checking that the water level is topped up so that the animals head is in the water and that there are no air bubbles trapped on the skin surface.

    Higher frequencies provide better localization in small animal models but require higher in situ pressures to induce opening. It is also important to consider that losses due to the skull are higher at higher pressure and must be accounted for when estimating in situ pressures. At 0.5 MHz transmission through rat skull is approximately 73%8, but drops to approximately 50%15 at 1.5 MHz. Attenuation can be assumed to be 5 Np m-1 MHz-1 in brain tissue4. Higher frequencies are better suited for work in small animal models but are less clinically relevant.

    This MRI-guided approach provides advantages over ultrasound-guided techniques by allowing very precise targeting as well as treatment outcome assessment immediately post-treatment.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Disclosures

    K. Hynynen and R. Chopra are co-founders of FUS Instruments, Inc. R. Chopra, A. Waspe and K. Hynynen are shareholders in FUS Instruments, Inc. K. Hynynen receives research support from FUS instruments, Inc.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank Shawna Rideout-Gros and Alexandra Garces for their help with the animal care, and Ping Wu for her technical assistance. Support for this work was provided by the National Institutes of Health under grant no. EB003268, and the Canada Research Chairs Program.

    Materials

    Name Company Catalog Number Comments
    Small Animal Focused Ultrasound System FUS Instruments, Inc. RK-100
    Definity Lantheus Medical Imaging
    Omniscan GE Healthcare

    References

    1. Kinoshita, M., McDannold, N., Jolesz, F.A., & Hynynen, K. Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 11719-11723 (2006).
    2. Jordão, J.F., Ayala-Grosso, C.A., Markham, K., Huang, Y., Chopra, R., McLaurin, J., Hynynen, K., & Aubert, I. Antibodies targeted to the brain with image-guided focused ultrasound reduces amyloid-beta plaque load in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 5 (5), e10549 (2010).
    3. Liu, H.-L., Hua, M.-Y., Chen, P.-Y., Chu, P.-C., Pan, C.-H., Yang, H.-W., Huang, C.-Y., Wang, J.-J., Yen, T.-C., & Wei, K.-C. Blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound enhances delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs for glioblastoma treatment. Radiology. 255, 415-425 (2010).
    4. Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Jolesz, F.A. Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. Radiology. 220, 640-646 (2001).
    5. Choi, J.J., Wang, S., Tung, Y.-S., Morrison, B., & Konofagou, E.E. Molecules of various pharmacologically-relevant sizes can cross the ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in vivo. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 58-67 (2010).
    6. Pardridge, W.M. The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx. 2, 3-14 (2005).
    7. Bing, K.F., Howles, G.P., Qi, Y., Palmeri, M.L., & Nightingale, K.R. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a diagnostic ultrasound scanner and Definity in mice. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35, 1298-1308 (2009).
    8. O'Reilly, M.A. & Hynynen, K. A PVDF receiver for ultrasound monitoring of transcranial focused ultrasound therapy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 2286-2294 (2010).
    9. Chopra, R., Curiel, L., Staruch, R., Morrison, L., & Hynynen, K. An MRI-compatible system for focused ultrasound experiments in small animal models. Med. Phys. 36, 1867-1874 (2009).
    10. McDannold, N., Zhang, Y., & Vykhodtseva, N. Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption and Vascular Damage Induced by Ultrasound Bursts Combined with Microbubbles can be Influenced by Choice of Anesthesia Protocol. Ultrasound Med. Biol., doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.04.019 (2011).
    11. McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Hynynen, K. Targeted disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity. Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 793-807 (2006).
    12. Yang, F.-Y., Liu, S.-H., Ho, F.-M., & Chang, C.-H. Effect of ultrasound contrast agent dose on the duration of focused-ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126, 3344-3349 (2009).
    13. McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Hynynen, K. Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 834-840 (2008).
    14. Neppiras, E.A. Acoustic Cavitation. Physics Reports (Review Section of Physics Letters). 61, 159-251 (1980).
    15. O'Reilly, M.A., Huang, Y., & Hynynen, K. The impact of standing wave effects on transcranial focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier in a rat model. Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 5251-5267 (2010).

    Comments

    1 Comment

    Were there any debilitating effects, from the procedure, to the mouse?
    Reply

    Posted by: AnonymousMarch 20, 2012, 2:32 PM

    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Metrics

    Waiting
    simple hit counter