We describe a detailed protocol for the preparation of post-cryopreserved hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells and the sub-retinal delivery of these cells in rd10 mice.
Regeneration of photoreceptor cells using human pluripotent stem cells is a promising therapy for the treatment of both hereditary and aging retinal diseases at advanced stages. We have shown human recombinant retina-specific laminin isoform matrix is able to support the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) to photoreceptor progenitors. In addition, sub-retinal injection of these cells has also shown partial restoration in the rd10 rodent and rabbit models. Sub-retinal injection is known to be an established method that has been used to deliver pharmaceutical compounds to the photoreceptor cells and retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) layer of the eye due to its proximity to the target space. It has also been used to deliver adeno-associated viral vectors into the sub-retinal space to treat retinal diseases. The sub-retinal delivery of pharmaceutical compounds and cells in the murine model is challenging due to the constraint in the size of the murine eyeball. This protocol describes the detailed procedure for the preparation of hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells for injection and the sub-retinal delivery technique of these cells in genetic retinitis pigmentosa mutant, rd10 mice. This approach allows cell therapy to the targeted area, in particular the outer nuclear layer of the retina, where diseases leading to photoreceptor degeneration occur.
Inherited retinal diseases and age-related macular degeneration lead to photoreceptor cell loss and eventual blindness. The retinal photoreceptor is the outer segment layer of the retina comprised of specialized cells responsible for phototransduction (i.e., conversion of light to neuronal signals). The rod and cone photoreceptor cells are adjacent to the retinal pigmented layer (RPE)1. Photoreceptor cell replacement therapy to compensate the cell loss has been an emerging and developing therapeutic approach. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs)2,3,4, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived RPE cells, and retinal progenitor cells (RPCs)4,5,6,7,8 were used to restore the damaged photoreceptor cells. Sub-retinal space, a confined space between the retina and the RPE, is an attractive location to deposit these cells to replace damaged photoreceptor cells, RPE, and Mueller cells due to its vicinity9,10,11.
Gene and cell therapies have been utilizing the sub-retinal space for regenerative medicine for various retinal diseases in pre-clinical studies. This includes the delivery of functional copies of the gene or gene editing tools in the form of either anti-sense oligonucleotide therapy12,13 or CRISPR/Cas9 or base editing via adeno-associated virus (AAV) based strategy14,15,16, implantation of materials (e.g., RPE sheet, retinal prosthetics17,18,19) and differentiated stem cell-derived retinal organoids20,21,22 to treat retinal and RPE-related diseases. Clinical trials using hESC-RPE31 in the sub-retinal space to treat RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA)23,24, CNGA3-linked achromatopsia25, MERTK-associated retinitis pigmentosa26, choroideremia27,28,29,30 have been proven to be an effective approach. Direct injection of cells to the vicinity of the damaged area greatly improves the chance of cell settlement at the appropriate region, synaptic integration, and eventual visual improvement.
Even though sub-retinal injection in human and large-eyed models (i.e., pig32,33,34,35, rabbit36,37,38,39,40, and non-human primate41,42,43) has been established, such injection in the murine model is still challenging due to the constrain of the eyeball size and enormous lens occupying the mouse eye44,45,46. However, genetically modified models are only readily available in small animals and not in large animals (i.e., rabbits and non-human primates), therefore sub-retinal injection in mice draws attention to investigate novel therapeutic approaches in retinal genetic disorders. Three major approaches are being used to deliver cells or AAVs into the sub-retinal space, namely the trans-corneal route, trans-scleral route, and the pars plana route (See Figure 2). Trans-corneal and trans-scleral routes are associated with cataract formation, synechiae, choroidal bleeding, and reflux from the injection site11,44,45,47,48,49. We adopted the pars plana approach as a direct visualization of the injection process, and the injection site can be achieved in real-time under the microscope.
We recently described a method that can differentiate human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) into photoreceptor progenitors under xenofree, chemically defined conditions using recombinant human retina-specific laminin isoform LN523. Since LN523 was found to be present in the retina, we hypothesized that the extracellular matrix niche of the human retina could be recapitulated in vitro and thereby support photoreceptor differentiation from the hESCs36. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis showed that photoreceptor progenitors co-expressing cone-rod homeobox and recoverin were generated after 32 days. A retinal degeneration 10 (rd10) mutant mouse model that mimics autosomal human retinitis pigmentosa was used to evaluate the efficacy of the day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors in-vivo. The hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells were injected into the sub-retinal space of rd10 mice at P20, where photoceptor dysfunction and degeneration are ongoing36. Here, we describe a detailed protocol for the preparation of the post-cryopreserved hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors and delivery into the sub-retinal space of rd10 mice. This method can also be used to administer AAVs, cell suspensions, peptides, or chemicals into the sub-retinal space in mice.
The in vivo experiments were done in accordance with the guidelines and protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of SingHealth (IACUC) and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Statement for the use of animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The pups were immunosuppressed from P17 (pre-transplantation) to P30 (post-transplantation) by feeding them drinking water containing cyclosporine (260 g/L).
1. Preparation of Day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors after cryopreservation
2. Sub-retinal delivery of the hESCs in rd10 mice
The 10 µL glass syringe was assembled according to the manufacturer's instructions (Figure 1), and the blunt needle used to deliver the cell suspension/media is shown in Figure 1B. Different approaches for sub-retinal injection are illustrated in Figure 2. We describe the pars plana approach in this protocol (Figure 2C). The blunt needle mounted on a glass syringe was inserted through a sclerotomy wound and accessed the sub-retinal space across the globe. As shown in Figure 3A, the trajectory of the needle, penetration through the retina, and delivery of the cells were monitored directly under the microscope when performing the injection. Successful delivery of the cells/media was confirmed by observing a bleb at the injection site (Figure 3B). A successful bleb can be identified as a light whitish color resembling a water balloon. A failed delivery is observed by leakage of the cells/media into the vitreous space at the injection site and failure to form a bleb. The OCT scan was performed on the injected area, and the scan showed floating individualized hESCs in the cell-treated eye (Figure 4A), while the media-treated eye showed clear fluid without cells in the sub-retinal space (Figure 4B). The individualized hESCs are identified as hyperreflective materials distributed in the sub-retinal space (Figure 4A). The success rate of the injection was computed by noting the number of eyes with successful formation of the bleb. We included the applications that adopted this approach in our laboratory and the success rate of the injections (Table 1).
Figure 1: Instruments used during the injection. (A) The 10 µL glass syringe is mounted with a 33G blunt needle. (B) Zoom-in picture of the 33G blunt needle. (C) Pillow for the animal's head to rest on. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Different routes of sub-retinal injection. (A) Trans-corneal route: The injection needle passes through the cornea and the pupil to enter the sub-retinal space. (B) Trans-scleral route: The sub-retinal space is directly accessed through the sclera. (C) Pars plana route: The injection needle is inserted into the vitreous space via an incision at the limbus. The needle reaches the sub-retinal space by penetrating the retina. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Fundus images of the eye during the sub-retinal injection. (A) Before the sub-retinal injection was performed, the tip of the needle could be seen in the vitreous space touching the retina, avoiding the major retinal blood vessels. (B) After the sub-retinal injection, a visible bleb was formed at the injection site (yellow dotted line). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Intraoperative OCT scans of the injected eyes. The scans were done immediately after the injection. (A) hESCs treated eye: the top panel showed the location of the OCT scan (cyan and pink cross-sectional lines) on the eye; hESCs were observed in the treated eye in the sub-retinal space (yellow dotted line, middle and bottom panels). (B) Media-treated eye: the top panel showed the location of the OCT scan (cyan and pink cross-sectional lines) on the eye; clear fluid without cells was observed in the sub-retinal space in the media-injected eye (yellow dotted line, middle and bottom panels). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Applications | Recipient Strain | Success Rate |
AAV | Rpe65rd12/J | 80% |
AAV | C57BL/6 | 95% |
hESC derived progenitor cells | Rd10-/- | 95% |
Table 1: The success rate of sub-retinal injection in different applications.
The sub-retinal injection has been used for cell suspension transplantation to treat RPE and retinal diseases23,25,26,27,28,31,40. This approach is highly essential in rodent studies not only for cell transplantation and gene therapy approaches but also to evaluate novel therapeutic compounds for retinal diseases. Currently, three major routes are being used to deliver cells or AAVs into the sub-retinal space i.e., trans-corneal route, trans-scleral, and pars plana routes.
In the trans-corneal approach, the injection needle passes through the cornea, pupil, and lastly, the retina to deliver the cells into the sub-retinal space and form a successful bleb. The advantage of the trans-corneal approach is the ability to create a complete retinal detachment in the recipient47. It can deliver a larger number of cells; however, longitudinal observation to study structural conformation and cell integration is challenging in this approach. In addition, complications include cataract formation, synechiae, and cornea opacity, making the longitudinal observations challenging11,45,47,48. Alternatively, the trans-scleral approach is also used to deliver AAV to the sub-retinal space44,49. This approach is useful for neonatal mice and considered safer as it is not necessary for the needle to go through the ocular media. However, choroidal bleeding, reflux of the solution from the injection site, perforation of the retina, and leakage into the vitreous space should not be ignored.
We adopted the pars plana approach to introduce the hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors into the sub-retinal space using a 33G blunt needle. In this approach, the injection needle was inserted via the incision at the limbus area. The needle was then passed through the vitreous cavity and finally accessed the sub-retinal space through the retina. Cell clumps were often observed and may block the delivery of cells when using unsuitable needle sizes. Resuspension of cells in the microfuge tube ought to be diligently performed using a 10 µL pipette tip before loading into the injection syringe. We initially attempted to use a 34G needle, where the blockage of the needle by the cells was often observed. An appropriate size of the needle should be tested for specific cell types, especially narrow-bore needles tend to give lesser viable cells when injected50. One of the advantages of this approach is direct visualization during injection, allowing the surgeon to monitor and carefully select the specific location for cell delivery. The area of injection and the needle should be clearly visible during the procedure. Anesthesia-induced cataract and cornea opacity can greatly affect the proper delivery of cells to a specific location.
While performing the injection, the needle should penetrate the retina perpendicularly, and the blunt end of the needle should be parallel to the sclera to minimize the leakage of the injected cells into the vitreous space (Figure 3). Only gentle pressure should be applied to the syringe when performing the injection. A strong pressure can lead to retina tears, hemorrhage, leakage of the cells into the choroidal space, failure of the cells to pass through the needle, and puncturing of the eyeball. The optimal pressure can be assured when the needle tip just passed through the retina, and a small white pressure dot is seen at the needle tip. After the injection, the needle should be retracted slowly and gently from the injection spot to prevent the leakage of injected cells into the vitreous space.
The limitation of this approach is the challenging learning curve. A study showed that a trained ophthalmologist needed to perform 364 injections in mice to achieve a 95% success rate, while less experienced trainees with surgical experience were expected to require a higher number of trainings46. Complications of this approach include needle track in the retina, reflux of cells into the vitreous space, bleeding from the choroid/retina, and iatrogenic cataract. However, with a sufficient amount of training, these complications are significantly less observed46.
In conclusion, our method can deliver the hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors into the sub-retinal space of rd10 mice, as evidently shown by the OCT scans. This approach can be adopted to explore novel therapeutic compounds, different cell type transplantation, and gene therapy for the treatment of outer retina and RPE-related diseases.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Wei Sheng Tan, Luanne Chiang Xue Yen, Xinyi Lee, and Yingying Chung for providing technical assistance for the preparation of the day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitors after cryopreservation. This work was supported in part by grants from the National Medical Research Council Young Investigator Research Grant Award (NMRC/OFYIRG/0042/2017) and National Research Foundation 24th Competitive Research Program Grant (CRP24-2020-0083) to H.G.T.
0.3% Tobramycin | Novartis | NDC 0078-0813-01 | Tobrex (3.5 g) |
0.3% Tobramycin and 0.1% Dexamethasone | Novartis | NDC 0078-0876-01 | Tobradex (3.5 g) |
0.5% Proparacaine hydrochloride | Alcon | NDC 0998-0016-15 | 0.5% Alcaine (15 mL) |
1 mL Tuberculin syringe | Turemo | SS01T2713 | |
1% Tropicamide | Alcon | NDC 0998-0355-15 | 1% Mydriacyl (15 mL) |
2.5% Phenylephrine hydrochloride | Alcon | NDC 0998-0342-05 | 2.5% Mydfrin (5 mL) |
24-well tissue culture plate | Costar | 3526 | |
30 G Disposable needle | Becton Dickinson (BD) | 305128 | |
33 G, 20 mm length blunt needles | Hamilton | 7803-05 | |
Automated Cell Counter | NanoEnTek | Model: Eve | |
B27 without Vitamin A | Life Technologies | 12587001 | 2%36 |
Buprenorphine | Ceva | Vetergesic vet (0.3 mg/mL) | |
CKI-7 | Sigma | C0742 | 5 µM36 |
Cyclosporine | Novartis | 260 g/L in drinking water | |
Day 32 hESC-derived photoreceptor progenitor cells | DUKE-NUS Medical School | Human embryonic stem cells are differentiated for 32 days. See protocol in Ref 36. | |
Gauze | Winner Industries Co. Ltd. | 1SNW475-4 | |
Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium | Gibco | 11710–035 | |
hESC cell line H1 | WiCell Research Institute | WA01 | |
Human brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) | Peprotech | 450-02-50 | 10 ng/mL36 |
Human ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) | Prospec-Tany Technogene | CYT-272 | 10 ng/mL36 |
Ketamine hydrochloride (100 mg/mL) | Ceva Santé Animale | KETALAB03 | |
LN-521 | Biolamina | LN521-02 | 1 µg36 |
mFreSR | STEMCELL Technologies | 5854 | |
Microlitre glass syringe (10 mL) | Hamilton | 7653-01 | |
N-[N-(3,5-difluorophenacetyl-L-alanyl)]-S-phenylglycine t-butyl ester (DAPT) | Selleckchem | S2215 | 10 µM36 |
N-2 supplement | Life Technologies | A13707-01 | 1%36 |
Non-essential amino acids (NEAA) | Gibco | 11140–050 | 1x36 |
NutriStem XF Media | Satorius | 05-100-1A | |
Operating microscope | Zeiss | OPMI LUMERA 700 | With Built-in iOCT function |
PRDM (Photoreceptor differentiation medium, 50ml) | DUKE-NUS Medical School | See media composition36. Basal Medium, 10 µM DAPT, 10 ng/mL BDNF, 10 ng/mL CNTF, 0.5 µM Retinoic acid, 2% B27 and 1% N2. Basal Medium: 1x GMEM, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.1 mM B-mercaptoethanol, 1x Non-essential amino acids (NEAA). | |
Pyruvate | Gibco | 11360–070 | 1 mM36 |
Rd10 mice | Jackson Laboratory | B6.CXB1-Pde6brd10/J mice | Gender: male/female, Age: P20 (injection), Weight: 3-6 g |
Retinoic acid | Tocris Bioscience | 0695/50 | 0.5 µM36 |
Round Cover Slip (12 mm) | Fisher Scientific | 12-545-80 | |
SB431542 | Sigma | S4317 | 0.5 µM36 |
Vidisic Gel (10 g) | Dr. Gerhard Mann | ||
Xylazine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL) | Troy Laboratories | LI0605 | |
β-mercaptoethanol | Life Technologies | 21985–023 | 0.1 mM36 |