$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
We refined the thromboembolic rodent model of ischemic stroke for use in a multi-laboratory pre-clinical testing network, SPAN. We greatly reduced the number of animals used by developing a method to store donor blood for later use. We also simplified the preparation of thromboemboli and the surgical approach to facilitate the performance of several MCAo procedures in one day. Our intention is that the TE-MCAo reach the same levels of user comfort and surgical volumes as are possible with the widely used nylon filament version of the MCAo. To achieve this result, we held two in-person surgeon training workshops, and all of the surgeons involved in this study had already several months, if not years, of experience with the more standard filament model. We demonstrated feasibility across six different research laboratories and showed excellent protocol adherence.
In choosing to implement this protocol, an investigator should consider the following items that determine protocol success. First, scrupulous care in collecting blood will influence successful thrombus formation. Arterial, not venous, blood should be collected to avoid premature clotting. Second, it is important to collect more blood than seems to be needed. Sometimes one specimen will fail to thrombose overnight, while the others will. Third, we strongly recommend that catheter loading be done using optical magnification, either surgical loupes with a headlamp or a magnifying lens with illumination. Fourth, cautious and careful dissection of the CCA, ICA, and ECA is essential to avoid tearing and intravascular thrombosis. Also, it is essential to visualize the PPA to ensure that the delivery catheter properly enters the ICA. Fifth, it is rare to see any adverse effect in the rodents due to the injection of thrombolytics. In our studies, we did not see any adverse events, such as angioedema or peripheral bleeding, following TNK injection. This is not to say it's not possible, but we are not aware of any reports of systemic side effects of thrombolytics in rodents. An investigator choosing to implement this protocol for the first time may well be advised to consult with one of the investigators named as co-author here, as we found personalized instruction to be very helpful.
In selecting an animal disease model for testing candidate therapies, it is important to accurately represent the patient population the drug is intended to treat. Focal ischemic stroke models include Rose Bengal photothrombotic models, cortical pial artery occlusion, and stereotactic endothelin-1 injection13,14,15. These models have the advantage of creating highly reproducible lesions in predictable areas of the cortex. This advantage makes them preferable in studies of cellular mechanisms, or in correlating lesion location with behavioral outcomes. Added cost, complexity, and lack of reperfusion component make them less useful for drug screening.
The MCAo with intraluminal monofilament or thromboembolism are the established models of choice for large vessel occlusion (LVO)10,16,17. The silicon-coated monofilament model is simple to execute and widely used. Although the location and size of the lesion are less predictable, in large-scale drug testing, this heterogeneity is viewed as an advantage because human strokes are also quite heterogenous18,19. A disadvantage of the monofilament method is that the occlusion is biologically inert. In patients, thrombi and thrombolysis produce an inflammatory cascade associated with the release of thrombin, plasminogen, and other thrombus elements20,21,22. To overcome this limitation, many have proposed models of thromboembolism in rabbit, porcine, canine, and non-human primate studies23,24,25,26,27. These studies are complex and require specialized expertise in general. Nevertheless, we sought to adapt the thromboembolic model for use in our multi-laboratory, pre-clinical testing network. This required that we simplify the thromboemboli preparation, streamline the surgical approach, and significantly reduce the number of animals needed. We devised a thromboembolic model, the TE-MCAo, that could be deployed successfully at six different laboratories with excellent protocol adherence (Table 1) and reasonably consistent lesion size (Table 2). Throughput was sufficient, averaging 6 subjects per week.
There are several troubleshooting steps that may become useful. Failure of blood to thrombose is the most frequent source of protocol failure and is most often due to contamination of the preparation catheter with EDTA or heparin if placed on the surgical table. We recommend a scrupulous collection technique. We also recommend preparing the calcium chloride solution used to inactivate the EDTA fresh every week or every other week. After eluting the thrombus from the preparation catheter, it can be challenging to slice the thrombus into the required 5 cm fragments. Some thrombi are fragile and easily fractured. We recommend preparing the clots with optic magnification, and in extreme cases, moving on to a different donor thrombus. Aspirating and eluting thrombi requires a moderate level of skill; hence we recommend quite a long training period. Assure that the tip of the aspiration catheter is free of snags using optical magnification. Thrombi can be jammed in the implantation catheter - we recommend gentle 'back-and-forth' alternation between aspiration and elution. For surgeons experienced with the typical MCAo filament model, identification of the PPA may be a new step. We strongly recommend labeling the thrombi with Evan's blue, so that the catheter can be traced and followed as it ascends through the ICA. The bifurcation of the ICA/PPA may be easily located by careful, deep dissection following the ICA, and is reliably located deep to a thin branch of the internal carotid nerve.
This protocol comes with some limitations. There is an element of surgical skill necessary to perform cannulation of rodent carotid arteries. However, this is equally true of the filament model. Handling of the blood thrombi also requires surgical skill. As with all thromboembolic models, there is a lower rate of successful infarction compared to the filament model. If the goal of the investigation is more frequent incidents of infarction, the filament model would be preferable. On the other hand, if the goal is a replication of thrombus and thrombolysis then this model is desirable.
This model is intended for testing candidate cerebral protectants using a model that faithfully employs thrombus and thrombolysis. Future directions could include as well, studies of adjuvant therapy targeting the no reflow phenomenon. Many have proposed anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for this purpose.
In conclusion, the TE-MCAo protocol presented here is adapted to allow deployment in multiple laboratories. We simplified the preparation of thrombi and streamlined the surgical approach. We devised a method to store donor blood, significantly reducing the numbers of animals needed.