Name: Profiling of Permethylated Mucin O-glycans Using Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2025-06-20T13:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 8 min 51 s
Description: Learn MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for profiling permethylated mucin O-glycans using beta-elimination and bioinformatic analysis. This high-throughput method advances glycobiology research.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

The author(s) gratefully acknowledge the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC); this research was funded by the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Food Microbiome and Health BB/X011054/1 and its constituent project BBS/E/F/000PR13632 (Theme 3, Elucidating how plant-based foods influence host responses).

NOTE: See Figure 1 for a schematic representation of the workflow.
<img alt="Carbohydrate analysis process diagram; glycan preparation, detection in a microplate reader, data output." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig01.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1783396841000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the experimental workflow. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
1. Glycan release
<ol>
	<li>Preparation of the β-elimination buffer 
	NOTE: This must be prepared fresh before each use.
	<ol>
		<li>Weigh a pellet of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and dissolve it in a suitable amount of H2O in a 50 mL tube to get a 0.1 M solution.</li>
		<li>In a 5 mL tube, dissolve 189 mg of sodium borohydride (NaBH4) in 5 mL of the alkaline solution prepared above in step 1.1.1. 
		CAUTION: NaOH is corrosive and NaBH4 is corrosive, toxic, flammable, and poses a health hazard. Both chemicals should be handled under a fume cupboard using suitable personal protective equipment. Do not dissolve NaBH4 directly in H2O, as it decomposes and releases hydrogen that can be self-ignited.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Setup of the β-elimination reaction
	<ol>
		<li>In a 4 mL glass vial, dissolve up to 100 µg of purified mucins in 250 µL of H2O. 
		NOTE: Some mucins may not dissolve fully and instead form a suspension of very small particles.</li>
		<li>Add 250 µL of the β-elimination buffer and close the vial tightly with a PTFE-lined cap. Incubate the reaction at 45 oC for 16 h.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Stopping the reaction
	<ol>
		<li>In a 100 mL glass bottle, add 5 mL of glacial acetic acid to 95 mL of H2O (5% (v/v) concentration). 
		NOTE: This can be stored at room temperature and reused.  CAUTION: Acetic acid is flammable and corrosive and should be used in a fume cupboard with the necessary personal protective equipment.</li>
		<li>On ice, add 1 mL of the 5% acetic acid solution to each reaction (step 1.2.3) in a dropwise manner. At this point, look for effervescence from the release of hydrogen from the excess of NaBH4. If effervescence has not stopped after the addition of 1 mL of 5% acetic acid, repeat this step. 
		NOTE: If there is no effervescence upon the addition of 5% acetic acid, then the β-elimination reaction might be incomplete or unsuccessful.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Desalting of the samples
	<ol>
		<li>In a 100 mL glass bottle, prepare a dense suspension of cation exchange resin, H+ form, 200-400 mesh in 5% (v/v) acetic acid.</li>
		<li>Plug a glass pipette with a small amount of glass wool. Add 1.5 mL of the resin suspension onto the glass pipette from the top and let it settle and drain. This will make the desalting column.</li>
		<li>Wash the resin with 2 mL of 5% acetic acid. Discard the flowthrough.</li>
		<li>Add the mucin sample to the desalting column. Collect the flowthrough in a 5 mL tube.</li>
		<li>Rinse the sample vials with 1 mL of 5% acetic acid and load this to the desalting column. Collect the flowthrough in the same tube.</li>
		<li>Wash the column 2x with 1 mL of 5% acetic acid. Collect the flowthrough in the same tube.</li>
		<li>Use a centrifugal evaporator to remove the acetic acid and concentrate the samples (5 mbar, 30 oC, 2 h).</li>
		<li>Freeze the samples at -80 oC and dry them overnight on a freeze dryer. 
		NOTE: Alternatively, the centrifugal evaporation can continue to dryness, but it will make redissolving the samples more difficult.</li>
		<li>In a 100 mL glass bottle, add 5 mL of acetic acid to 95 mL of methanol (5% (v/v) concentration). 
		CAUTION: Methanol is flammable and toxic. It should be used in a fume cabinet with the necessary personal protective equipment.</li>
		<li>Dissolve the samples in 0.5 mL of methanolic acetic acid and dry the samples under a stream of nitrogen. Repeat this step 3-5x. Store the dried samples at 4 oC.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Permethylation of the glycans
	<ol>
		<li>In an 8 mL glass vial, mix 50% NaOH solution (0.2 mL) with 0.4 mL of methanol and vortex thoroughly. A white precipitate will form that will quickly dissolve again.</li>
		<li>Using a glass syringe, add 4 mL of anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and vortex thoroughly.</li>
		<li>Centrifuge the solution for 2 min at 2,000 × g. This will form a gel at the bottom of the tube, a liquid phase in the middle, and salts accumulated at the top.</li>
		<li>Carefully decant the supernatant and the salts, without disturbing the gel.</li>
		<li>Repeat steps 1.5.2-1.5.4 5x until no more salts are formed. If the salts stick to the walls of the tube, gently swirl the tube to bring the salts in suspension, without disturbing the gel at the bottom, or remove them using a glass Pasteur pipette.</li>
		<li>After no more salts are formed, resuspend the gel in 4 mL of anhydrous DMSO. This suspension is the permethylation base. 
		NOTE: This amount of permethylation base is enough for ~25 samples. Quantities can be adjusted accordingly.</li>
		<li>To the dried samples, add 100 µL of anhydrous DMSO and 150 µL of the permethylation base. Using a glass pipette, add 80 µL of iodomethane as quickly as possible, to avoid moisture absorption from the environment. 
		CAUTION: Iodomethane is toxic and poses a health and environmental hazard. It should be used in a fume cabinet with the necessary personal protective equipment.</li>
		<li>Incubate the permethylation reactions for 30 min at room temperature with vigorous shaking.</li>
		<li>Add 0.5 mL of H2O to terminate the reaction. The samples will turn cloudy. 
		NOTE: If the samples do not become cloudy, it is possible that the permethylation reaction was incomplete.</li>
		<li>Flush the samples with nitrogen until they become clear.</li>
		<li>Load the samples on a Hydrophilic-Lipophilic-Balanced (HLB) 96-well extraction plate (60 mg) or HLB cartridges. Apply positive pressure to push the samples through the solid phase at a flow rate of ~1 mL/ min. If using HLB cartridges, use a rubber teat or vacuum manifold to apply pressure to the samples. Discard the flowthrough.</li>
		<li>Wash wells with 2 x 1 mL of H2O. Apply positive pressure and discard the flowthrough.</li>
		<li>Elute the glycans from the HLB plate using 1 mL of methanol. Apply pressure is only until methanol starts coming out of the plate. Then, the gravity flow is enough to give the required flow rate. Collect the flowthrough.</li>
		<li>Repeat the elution step once more.</li>
		<li>Dry the samples using a centrifugal evaporator</li>
		<li>In a 4 mL glass vial, prepare TA50 buffer by mixing 1 mL of acetonitrile, 998 µL of H2O, and 2 µL of trifluoroacetic acid. 
		CAUTION: Acetonitrile is flammable and trifluoroacetic acid is corrosive. Both should be used in a fume cupboard, using suitable personal protective equipment.</li>
		<li>In a microcentrifuge tube, prepare the matrix solution by dissolving 10 mg of super-DHB [9:1 (w/w) mixture of 2,5-dihydroxy benzoic acid and 2-hydroxy-5-methoxybenzoic acid] in 1 mL of TA50.</li>
		<li>Dissolve the dried samples in 10 µL of TA50.</li>
		<li>Mix 1 µL of the sample with 1 µL of the matrix solution, spot it onto a steel MALDI target plate, and let it dry.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. MALDI TOF analysis of the samples
<ol>
	<li>Setting up to acquire parent-ion data
	<ol>
		<li>Fire 1,000 shots from the laser at 50% intensity. 
		NOTE: These can vary depending on the global instrument settings and can be adjusted as required.</li>
		<li>Under the Laser carrier tab, set the random walk setting to complete sample.</li>
		<li>Under the Detection tab, set the mass range to 500 - 3,000; increase this range if strong peaks are observed at 2,500-3,000 m/z. Set the detector gain to 20x. 
		NOTE: The gain can vary based on the global settings of the instrument and can be adjusted as required.</li>
		<li>Under the Spectrometer tab, set the polarity to positive and the Matrix Suppression to Deflection, 300 Da.</li>
		<li>Click on Start | once data acquisition finishes, Save as to save the data in an appropriate directory.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Opening the parent spectra to acquire fragmentation spectra
	<ol>
		<li>After right-clicking on the spectra, select Find Mass list.</li>
		<li>From the generated list, select the relevant ions for fragmentation and click on add to MS/MS list after right-clicking on the selected peaks.</li>
		<li>Right-click again on the mass list and select MS/MS list.</li>
		<li>Click on Send to flexControl.</li>
		<li>On flexControl, load the LIFT method and navigate to the LIFT tab.</li>
		<li>Select each loaded peak one by one and acquire both parent and fragment ions by switching between the Parent and Fragments modes. Adjust the laser intensity and number of shots as required. Click on Save to save the data after the fragmentation of each parent ion.</li>
		<li>Export the spectra in '.ascII' format. 
		NOTE: This can be later imported into Glycoworkbench for further analysis.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Data analysis using glycoworkbench
	<ol>
		<li>In Glycoworkbench, load the exported .ascII file of the mass spectrum and carry out a baseline correction and noise filtering using the relevant buttons at the bottom of the window, before computing the peak centroids. In the pop-up window, choose the appropriate mass range, Min signal/noise ratio, and Min MS peak intensity.</li>
		<li>Once the peak centroids are computed, use the Glyco-Peakfinder tool to find structure compositions matching the peak list. Select perMe as the Derivatization, redEnd as the Reducing End, and the min and max number of expected residues.
		<ol>
			<li>For mucins, select Hexose, N-Acetyl-Hexosamine, Deoxy-Hexose, and N-Acetyl-Neuraminic acid. For sulfated glycans, use the other residue option with a mass of 87.9. For MALDI-TOF data, set Max # Na ions and Max # charges are set to 1 and the accuracy to 0.5 Da. 
			​NOTE: The accuracy may need to be further increased, depending on the calibration of the mass spectrometer.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Select all the correct annotations by holding down the control key and clicking on each annotation; then right-click on the annotation and click on Add to the annotated peak list.</li>
		<li>To generate a report comparing multiple annotated spectra, in the tools tab, under reporting, select Create a report comparing different profiles. Print the report as PDF to save it.</li>
		<li>After identifying the glycan peaks, calculate the relative abundance of each individual structure as a percentage of the total area under the curve of all glycan peaks.</li>
		<li>For the analysis of fragmentation spectra, load the spectra onto Glycoworkbench and generate the peak list as in step 2.3.1.</li>
		<li>Draw putative glycan structures that correspond to the annotated glycan compositions. Generate fragments for each drawn structure by selecting the relevant compute fragments option under the Fragments tool. Then, select all fragments, right-click on them, and click on Copy fragments into canvas.</li>
		<li>To further support the analysis of fragmentation, select a peak of interest by clicking on it in the spectrum viewer. Next, by right-clicking and selecting Find all structures matching the peaks, interrogate the m/z of the selected peak against online databases for putative glycan structures.</li>
		<li>Select putative structures of interest and copy them to the canvas window of the software following a right-click and selecting the appropriate option.</li>
		<li>To compute the possible fragments that can be generated from each glycan structure, select the structure of interest in the canvas, and then, under the Tools tab, choose Fragments and Compute fragments for the current structure.</li>
		<li>If fragments for more than one glycan structure have been computed, view the comparison table in the summary tab, under the Fragments table view.</li>
		<li>Select the fragments that match the peak list for each potential glycan structure and select Copy fragments to canvas from the right-click dropdown menu.</li>
		<li>In the Tools tab, under profiler, select annotate peaks with all structures and then click on Tools | Reporting | Create a report of the annotations. Print the report as PDF to save it.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Bergstrom, K. S. B., Xia, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mucin-type+O-glycans+and+their+roles+in+intestinal+homeostasis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Glycobiology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mucin-type O-glycans and their roles in intestinal homeostasis.</a> Glycobiology. 23 (9), 1026-1037 (2013).</li>
<li>Leal, J., Smyth, H. D. C., Ghosh, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Physicochemical+properties+of+mucus+and+their+impact+on+transmucosal+drug+delivery%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Pharm%22%5BJournal%5D)">Physicochemical properties of mucus and their impact on transmucosal drug delivery.</a> Int J Pharm. 532 (1), 555-572 (2017).</li>
<li>Ambort, D., Johansson, M. E. V., Gustafsson, J. K., Ermund, A., Hansson, G. C. Perspectives on mucus properties and formation--lessons from the biochemical world. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aAmbort%2C+D+%22Cold+Spring+Harb+Perspect+Med%22">Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med</a>. 2 (11), a014159(2012).</li>
<li>Cone, R. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Barrier+properties+of+mucus%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Adv+Drug+Deliv+Rev%22%5BJournal%5D)">Barrier properties of mucus.</a> Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 61 (2), 75-85 (2009).</li>
<li>Kim, Y. S., Ho, S. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Intestinal+goblet+cells+and+mucins+in+health+and+disease%3A+recent+insights+and+progress%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Curr+Gastroenterol+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Intestinal goblet cells and mucins in health and disease: recent insights and progress.</a> Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 12 (5), 319-330 (2010).</li>
<li>Bell, A., Severi, E., Owen, C. D., Latousakis, D., Juge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Biochemical+and+structural+basis+of+sialic+acid+utilization+by+gut+microbes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Biol+Chem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Biochemical and structural basis of sialic acid utilization by gut microbes.</a> J Biol Chem. 299 (3), 102989(2023).</li>
<li>Shuoker, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sialidases+and+fucosidases+of+Akkermansia+muciniphila+are+crucial+for+growth+on+mucin+and+nutrient+sharing+with+mucus-associated+gut+bacteria%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sialidases and fucosidases of Akkermansia muciniphila are crucial for growth on mucin and nutrient sharing with mucus-associated gut bacteria.</a> Nat Commun. 14 (1), 1833(2023).</li>
<li>Tailford, L. E., Crost, E. H., Kavanaugh, D., Juge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mucin+glycan+foraging+in+the+human+gut+microbiome%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Genet%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mucin glycan foraging in the human gut microbiome.</a> Front Genet. 6, 81(2015).</li>
<li>Fukuda, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Roles+of+mucin-type+O-glycans+in+cell+adhesion%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Biochim+Biophys+Acta%22%5BJournal%5D)">Roles of mucin-type O-glycans in cell adhesion.</a> Biochim Biophys Acta. 1573 (3), 394-405 (2002).</li>
<li>Zhang, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mucin-type+O-glycans%3A+Barrier%2C+microbiota%2C+and+immune+anchors+in+inflammatory+bowel+disease%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Inflamm+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mucin-type O-glycans: Barrier, microbiota, and immune anchors in inflammatory bowel disease.</a> J Inflamm Res. 14, 5939-5953 (2021).</li>
<li>Sheng, Y. H., Hasnain, S. Z., Florin, T. H. J., McGuckin, M. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mucins+in+inflammatory+bowel+diseases+and+colorectal+cancer%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Gastroenterol+Hepatol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mucins in inflammatory bowel diseases and colorectal cancer.</a> J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 27 (1), 28-38 (2012).</li>
<li>Juge, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Relationship+between+mucosa-associated+gut+microbiota+and+human+diseases%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Biochem+Soc+Trans%22%5BJournal%5D)">Relationship between mucosa-associated gut microbiota and human diseases.</a> Biochem Soc Trans. 50 (5), 1225-1236 (2022).</li>
<li>Wilkinson, H., Saldova, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Current+methods+for+the+characterization+of+O-glycans%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Proteome+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Current methods for the characterization of O-glycans.</a> J Proteome Res. 19 (10), 3890-3905 (2020).</li>
<li>Goso, Y., Kurihara, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((MALDI-TOF+MS%2FMS+analysis+of+permethylated+O-glycan+alditols+released+from+mucins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Methods+Mol+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">MALDI-TOF MS/MS analysis of permethylated O-glycan alditols released from mucins.</a> Methods Mol Biol. 2763, 201-208 (2024).</li>
<li>Kameyama, A., Thet Tin, W. W., Toyoda, M., Sakaguchi, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+practical+method+of+liberating+O-linked+glycans+from+glycoproteins+using+hydroxylamine+and+an+organic+superbase%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Biochem+and+Biophys+Res+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">A practical method of liberating O-linked glycans from glycoproteins using hydroxylamine and an organic superbase.</a> Biochem and Biophys Res Commun. 513 (1), 186-192 (2019).</li>
<li>Vos, G. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Oxidative+release+of+O-glycans+under+neutral+conditions+for+analysis+of+glycoconjugates+having+base-sensitive+substituents%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Anal+Chem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Oxidative release of O-glycans under neutral conditions for analysis of glycoconjugates having base-sensitive substituents.</a> Anal Chem. 95 (23), 8825-8833 (2023).</li>
<li>Furuki, K., Toyo'oka, T., Ban, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Highly+sensitive+glycosylamine+labelling+of+O-glycans+using+non-reductive+%CE%B2-elimination%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Anal+Bioanal+Chem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Highly sensitive glycosylamine labelling of O-glycans using non-reductive β-elimination.</a> Anal Bioanal Chem. 409 (9), 2269-2283 (2017).</li>
<li>Miura, Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Glycoblotting-assisted+O-glycomics%3A+ammonium+carbamate+allows+for+highly+efficient+o-glycan+release+from+glycoproteins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Analy+Chemi%22%5BJournal%5D)">Glycoblotting-assisted O-glycomics: ammonium carbamate allows for highly efficient o-glycan release from glycoproteins.</a> Analy Chemi. 82 (24), 10021-10029 (2010).</li>
<li>Annesley, T. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Ion+suppression+in+mass+spectrometry%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Clin+Chemi%22%5BJournal%5D)">Ion suppression in mass spectrometry.</a> Clin Chemi. 49 (7), 1041-1044 (2003).</li>
<li>Harvey, D. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Derivatization+of+carbohydrates+for+analysis+by+chromatography%3B+electrophoresis+and+mass+spectrometry%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Chromatogr.+B%2C+Analyt+Technol+Biomed+Life+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Derivatization of carbohydrates for analysis by chromatography; electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.</a> J Chromatogr. B, Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 879 (17-18), 1196-1225 (2011).</li>
<li>Jang-Lee, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Glycomic+profiling+of+cells+and+tissues+by+mass+spectrometry%3A+fingerprinting+and+sequencing+methodologies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Glycobiology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Glycomic profiling of cells and tissues by mass spectrometry: fingerprinting and sequencing methodologies.</a> Glycobiology. 415, 59-86 (2006).</li>
<li>Zhou, S., Hu, Y., DeSantos-Garcia, J. L., Mechref, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Quantitation+of+permethylated+N-glycans+through+multiple-reaction+monitoring+%28MRM%29+LC-MS%2FMS%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Am+Soc+Mass+Spectrom%22%5BJournal%5D)">Quantitation of permethylated N-glycans through multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) LC-MS/MS.</a> J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 26 (4), 596-603 (2015).</li>
<li>Hu, Y., Borges, C. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+spin+column-free+approach+to+sodium+hydroxide-based+glycan+permethylation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Analyst%22%5BJournal%5D)">A spin column-free approach to sodium hydroxide-based glycan permethylation.</a> Analyst. 142 (15), 2748-2759 (2017).</li>
<li>Ceroni, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((GlycoWorkbench%3A+a+tool+for+the+computer-assisted+annotation+of+mass+spectra+of+glycans%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Proteome+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">GlycoWorkbench: a tool for the computer-assisted annotation of mass spectra of glycans.</a> J Proteome Res. 7 (4), 1650-1659 (2008).</li>
</ol>

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

To study glycans, researchers employ a variety of methodologies, ranging from the use of lectins to identify specific epitopes to more sophisticated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to obtain detailed characterization of glycan structures. The main advantages of MALDI-TOF MS over alternative approaches are the sensitivity and the high-throughput nature of the method13. However, as there is no capability to separate isobaric compounds, different glycan structures with the same m/z value produce a mix of fragments under MS/MS that is then difficult to deconvolute13. If determining the exact structure of mucin glycans is required, LC-MS should be the method of choice.
Here, we present a protocol for the analysis of mucin glycans by MALDI-TOF MS that includes all the critical steps in the process, from glycan release, desalting, and permethylation, to data acquisition and analysis. It is important to acknowledge that each of these steps can be carried out using different approaches, and they all come with associated benefits and limitations.
In this protocol, we used reductive &#946;-elimination to release the glycans. The reaction takes place under basic conditions. If the mucin samples are already in suspension and have not been previously purified, the pH must be checked using a pH indicator paper; if acidic, it needs to be increased to a pH of ~8-9. A limitation of this approach is that the basic conditions required for the release of the glycans also lead to the hydrolysis and, therefore, loss of O-acetyl groups often found on sialic acids, in a reaction known as saponification.
While other methods have been described in the literature for the release of glycans15,16,17,18, some of which can preserve the labile O-acetyl groups, reductive &#946;-elimination remains the gold standard in the field. This approach requires a high concentration of salts. Salts and other ion-suppression contaminants then need to be removed prior to MALDI-TOF analysis19, as they can affect the ionization efficiency and quantification of glycans. Here, cation exchange chromatography, followed by removal of borate by methanol evaporation was shown to be the most efficient approach for desalting the released glycans from mucin. In this case, the glycans do not interact with the resin and instead flow through it, while sodium ions are trapped onto the resin. However, the preparation of the ion exchange columns is laborious and makes this approach inefficient for large-scale experiments with numerous samples. In such cases, PGC desalting may be preferred, as this resin is also available in a 96-well plate format. However, as presented above, desalting by PGC extraction can lead to inefficient elution, particularly of larger glycans, and this should be considered when interpreting the results.
Although native glycans can also be analyzed by MALDI-TOF, permethylation is usually employed, as this reaction significantly increases the sensitivity of detection, since native glycans have a low ionization efficiency20. Furthermore, permethylation makes negatively charged glycans, such as sulfated or sialylated glycans, easier to detect in positive mode and preserves labile glycan epitopes, such as sialic acids or fucose20. Most commonly, permethylation is allowed to run for 5-10 min14,21, with some reports allowing the reaction to continue up to 40 min22. Here, we showed that, under the conditions tested, sialylated glycans were not efficiently detected after 5 min of permethylation, and a longer incubation was required.
In addition to the reaction time, another factor that can affect the permethylation efficiency is the content of water in the reaction. The presence of water can lead to undermethylation or partial methylation of the glycans, where not all hydroxyl groups have been converted to methyl groups23. This can easily be determined as if undermethylation has occurred, groups of peaks that differ by 14 Da (the mass difference between hydroxyl and methyl groups) can be observed in the mass spectra. This issue can be addressed by repeating the permethylation reaction and re-analyzing the data.
A limiting factor in glycan analysis is the interpretation of the spectra. Despite recent advances, this process is still largely manual and requires good knowledge and understanding of the glycan biosynthetic pathways to accurately annotate the spectra. Tools like Glycoworkbench24 can assist by providing possible annotations, glycan structures, and compositions, but due to the inherent heterogeneity of glycan mixtures, researchers still need to make the decision of which choice is the correct one. In the example presented above using PGM, Glycoworkbench offered two potential glycan compositions for the peak at mz 2,025.7620, and based on the fragmentation profile, we concluded that the fucosylated structure was present, rather than the sialylated one. However, if a fragmentation spectrum was not available (which is often the case for low abundant glycans), researchers can base the annotation on the knowledge that glycans with a composition of Hex3HexNAc1Neu5Ac3 are found on gangliosides, rather than mucins, and this option should therefore not be considered in the context of PGM. Thus, identified glycan structures or compositions should be cross-referenced to previous publications and should agree with the principles of O-glycan biosynthesis. Overall, this protocol serves as a valuable resource, especially for researchers who are&#160;new to the field of glycobiology and with an interest in the study of interactions occurring at the mucosal interface.

Mucins are large glycoproteins that make up most of the structural components in mucus. They are produced by specialized epithelial cells called goblet cells and undergo extensive O-glycosylation before being secreted at the mucosal surface. The glycosylation of mucins takes place in the Golgi apparatus, where a family of specialized glycosyltransferases, polypeptide-N-acetylgalactosamine transferases (ppGalNAc-T) initiates the process by attaching a GalNAc residue to a serine (Ser) or a threonine (Thr)1. Then, an arsenal of glycosyltransferases extends the glycan structures by adding galactose (Gal), N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), GalNAc, N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), and fucose (Fuc) residues, while other carbohydrate-modifying enzymes can carry out reactions such as sulfation of the glycans1. The glycans that decorate the mucin protein backbone are primarily found in clusters in protein regions rich in Ser and Thr residues, as the hydroxyl groups on the side chain of these residues serve as O-glycosylation sites. This dense glycosylation gives mucins the appearance of a &#34;bottle-brush&#34; and is responsible for their physical properties, such as the ability to retain large amounts of water, their gel-forming ability, and high viscoelasticity2,3. Due to these properties, mucins provide lubrication, protect the epithelium from dehydration and physical injury, and form a physical barrier between the epithelium and its microenvironment4,5. Mucin glycans can also serve as binding sites and a carbon source for commensal or pathogenic bacteria6,7,8. The organization and composition of mucus are instrumental in protecting the epithelium by&#160;keeping microbes nearby but away from the epithelium surface. Mucin glycans also participate in cell-cell communication and adhesion9.
Mucin glycans play a pivotal role in maintaining mucosal homeostasis, and aberrant mucin glycosylation profiles are associated with impaired barrier function, altered microbiota composition, increased tumor metastasis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and other diseases10,11,12. Therefore, the study of mucin glycosylation is important in understanding the role of mucus and mucins in human health and can lead to novel approaches to the management or treatment of diseases.
Mass spectrometry-based techniques are among the most popular options for studying mucin glycans. MALDI-TOF MS is a soft ionization technique that enables the analysis of large, nonvolatile biomolecules such as glycans and glycoproteins13. This approach offers high sensitivity and a wide mass range, allowing the detection and identification of low-abundant and diverse glycan mixtures. In addition, the fragmentation patterns obtained from tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments can provide valuable structural information about the glycan composition and sequence13.
Typically, the analysis of O-linked glycans from mucins by MALDI-TOF MS involves a multi-step workflow, where the O-glycans are first chemically released from the protein backbone using methods like reductive &#946;-elimination, then desalted to remove the salts from the chemical release and derivatized to enhance ionization and detection. The purified, derivatized glycans are then co-crystallized with a suitable MALDI matrix on a MALDI target plate and mass spectra are acquired that provide information on the masses of the intact glycan ions. Following this, the glycans are fragmented in MS/MS experiments to yield information on the structure of the glycans14. Here we provide a detailed protocol to release, desalt, and permethylate glycans and analyze them by MALDI-TOF MS.

<table><tbody><tr><td>150 mm glass pasteur pipettes</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>15202699</td><td>Consumables&lt;br/&gt; Reference in the text (if applicable): glass pipette</td></tr><tr><td>5 mL tubes</td><td>Eppendorf</td><td>30122305</td><td>Consumables</td></tr><tr><td>96-well HLB extraction plate</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>16553290</td><td>Consumables</td></tr><tr><td>acetic acid</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>A6283</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>acetonitrile</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>15624520</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>anhydrous DMSO</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>5.89569</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>anhydrous methanol</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>5.89596</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>Autoflex mass spectrometer</td><td>Bruker</td><td></td><td>Equipment</td></tr><tr><td>DOWEX 50w x8 resin, H+ form, 200-400 mesh</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>44519</td><td>Reagent&lt;br/&gt; Reference in the text (if applicable): cation exchange resin</td></tr><tr><td>dry block heater</td><td>Grant</td><td>QBD2</td><td>Equipment</td></tr><tr><td>Evaporator/Concentrator for Block Heaters</td><td>Cole-Palmer</td><td>WZ-36610-99</td><td>Equipment</td></tr><tr><td>flexAnalysis</td><td>Bruker</td><td></td><td>Software, proprietary&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>flexControl</td><td>Bruker</td><td></td><td>Software, proprietary&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Genevac EZ-2</td><td>Biopharma</td><td>EZ-2</td><td>Equipment&lt;br/&gt; Reference in the text (if applicable): centrifugal evaporator</td></tr><tr><td>glass vials with matching PTFE caps (4 mL)</td><td>Wheaton</td><td>DWKW224582-144EA</td><td>Consumables</td></tr><tr><td>glass vials with matching PTFE caps (8 mL)</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>11587413</td><td>Consumables</td></tr><tr><td>glass wool</td><td>Supelco</td><td>1.04086</td><td>Consumables</td></tr><tr><td>Glycoworkbench</td><td>NA</td><td></td><td>Software; downloadable from https://glycoworkbench.software.informer.com/</td></tr><tr><td>HLB SPE cartridges</td><td>Supelco</td><td>57493-U</td><td>Consumable, as an alternative to the 96-well HLB extraction plate</td></tr><tr><td>iodomethane</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>289566</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>MALDI target plate</td><td>Bruker</td><td></td><td>Equipment</td></tr><tr><td>ModulyoD freeze dryer</td><td>Thermo Fisher</td><td>ModulyoD-230</td><td>Equipment&lt;br/&gt; Reference in the text (if applicable): freeze dryer</td></tr><tr><td>NaBH4</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>452882</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>NaOH pellets</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>567530</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>NaOH solution 50%</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>415413</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>positive Pressure-96 Processor</td><td>Waters</td><td>186006961</td><td>Equipment</td></tr><tr><td>super DHB</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>50862</td><td>Reagent</td></tr><tr><td>trifluoroacetic acid</td><td>Sigma-Aldrich</td><td>T6508</td><td>Reagent</td></tr></tbody></table>

profiling of permethylated mucin o-glycans using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

Profiling of Permethylated Mucin O-glycans Using Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a powerful tool for the profiling of mucin glycans that offers high sensitivity and throughput. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for the analysis of O-linked glycans from mucins using MALDI-TOF MS, encompassing glycan release, desalting, permethylation, and data acquisition and analysis. This study shows that desalting based on ion exchange chromatography leads to improved recovery of larger glycans and better quality of the produced spectra compared to solid-phase extraction using porous graphitized carbon (PGC). Additionally, this work suggests that a longer permethylation reaction time than currently employed might be necessary for efficient modification of sialylated structures. We also demonstrate the importance and necessity of fragmentation data and prior knowledge of the O-glycan&#160;biosynthetic pathways for the accurate identification of glycan composition and structure and discuss the inherent benefits and limitations that MALDI-TOF presents in the analysis of mucin O-glycans.

In the following results, porcine gastric mucin (PGM) was used to optimize the desalting and permethylation steps. To compare two commonly used desalting approaches, after release of the glycans, the samples were desalted either by cation exchange (as described in the protocol above) and co-evaporation of borate with methanol or by solid phase extraction with porous graphitized carbon (PGC) cartridges. This requires preconditioning of the cartridge with 80% acetonitrile and 100% H2O, a wash step with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and elution of the glycans with 2 mL of 25% acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA, 2 mL of 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA, and 2 mL of 80% acetonitrile in 0.1% TFA.
The resulting spectra after permethylation were analyzed in the m/z 500 to m/z 2,500 range. A total of 33 glycan structures were identified in the sample desalted by ion exchange and borate removal whereas 32 structures were identified in the sample desalted by PGC extraction (Figure 2A). One glycan structure was not identified in the PGC desalted sample (marked with an asterisk in Figure 2A). This comparative analysis showed that recovery of larger glycans was not as efficient after PGC extraction, compared to ion exchange. This is also evidenced by the relative abundance of larger glycans, which accounts for 21% of total glycans after PGC extraction, as opposed to 31% for ion exchange. Furthermore, desalting by ion exchange and borate removal led to spectra with increased signal-to-noise ratios compared to those produced after desalting by solid phase extraction with PGC (Figure 2B).
To optimize the permethylation reaction time, aliquots of the same permethylation reaction were quenched by adding H2O at different time points, (i.e., 5 min, 30 min, or 90 min). The results showed that 33 glycan peaks could be identified in the m/z 500 to m/z 2,500 range, in the samples permethylated for 30 or 90 min, with the resulting spectra being similar. In contrast, only 31 glycan peaks could be identified when permethylation was carried out for 5 min (Figure 3). Interestingly, the two structures that were not identified in this shorter reaction time (marked with an asterisk in Figure 3) are the two sialylated structures, suggesting that the modification of sialic acids is not efficient in 5 min, under the conditions tested.
Fragmentation was used for each PGM glycan peak to confirm the glycan composition and determine the glycan structure. Two examples are presented here (Figure 4). In Figure 4A, the fragmentation spectrum of a peak at 983 m/z is presented. The glycan composition is assigned as HexNAc2Hex2. There are two potential structures for this glycan composition, either Gal-(Gal-GlcNAc-Gal-)-GalNAc (glycan 1) or Gal-GlcNAc-Gal-GalNAc (glycan 2). Fragmentation of this compound produced a mass spectrum with peaks that can be assigned to different fragments of the glycan. The peak at m/z 529 and the peak at m/z 708 are characteristic of structures 1 and 2, respectively, and we can conclude that both glycans 1 and 2 are present in the PGM glycan mix.
In Figure 4B, the fragmentation spectrum of a peak at m/z 2,026 is presented. Glycoworkbench computed two potential glycan compositions for this peak, Hex3HexNAc1Neu5Ac3 and Hex3HexNAc4dHex2. The sialylated composition has a lower accuracy (~160 ppm and 178 ppm, respectively), suggesting that the first one must be the correct choice. However, the fragmentation profile indicates the presence of Fuc, not Neu5Ac; therefore, the second composition is the correct one. Here, four putative glycan structures are presented, and the spectrum has been annotated with the computed fragments from each putative glycan structure. In the annotated spectrum, we can see that peaks characteristic only of glycans 4 and 6 are present, while no peaks characteristic of glycans 3 and 5 were identified. Based on these data, we can conclude that glycans 4 and 6 are present.
<img alt="Mass spectrometry analysis; ion exchange vs. PGC desalting; intensity and signal-to-noise plots." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig02.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1783396841000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2: Comparison of the glycan peaks according to the desalting and solid phase extraction. (A) Comparison of the PGM glycan profile after desalting by either cation exchange chromatography and borate removal or by PGC solid phase extraction. (B) Comparison of the two desalting approaches in the resulting signal-to-noise ratio for each identified glycan peak. The asterisk specifies the glycan that was only identified in the samples desalted by cation exchange and removal of borate. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Mass spectrometry spectra diagram showing reaction times for 5, 30, and 90-minute intervals." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig03.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1783396841000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3: Comparison of the PGM glycan profile after permethylation for 5, 30, or 90 min. The asterisks indicate the sialylated glycans that were only identified after 30 or 90 min of permethylation. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Mass spectrometry results, glycan analysis, m/z ratio vs intensity graph, structural identification." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig04.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1783396841000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 4: Examples of fragmentation spectra from PGM glycans. (A) Fragmentation of the glycan peak at m/z 983. (B) Fragmentation of the glycan peak at m/z 2026. The boxes indicate potential glycan structures. The numbers over the fragments indicate from which glycan structure they could be derived. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67751/67751fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

Here, we present a detailed protocol for the release of O-glycans&#160;from mucins, and the subsequent desalting, permethylation, and analysis using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a powerful tool for the profiling of mucin glycans that ...

We are studying the glycobiology of host microbe-interactions in the gastrointestinal tract with a focus on the role of the mucus layer covering the GI tract, and in particular, mucins and their glycans in health and disease. Mucin glycans are increasingly recognized as important factors in host-microbe interactions as they provide nutrients and binding sites for bacteria. An alteration in the glycosylation profile can lead to disturbance in the microbiotic composition and vice versa, phenotypes that are commonly observed in disease states.However, mucins are notoriously challenging to study as they're heavily glycosylated. Innovations in sampling techniques and follow-up bioinformatic analysis can take the field forward as well as new sample processing approaches to increase the throughput and reduce the time from sample collection to results. Other analytical techniques allow more detailed structural characterization of glycans, but require long running and analysis time.The technique described here using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has advantage of speed, which makes it high-throughput and suitable for screening and profiling. To begin, mix purified mucins with 250 microliters of the beta-elimination buffer in a four milliliter glass vial. Seal the vial tightly with a polytetrafluoroethylene-lined cap and incubate the reaction at 45 degrees Celsius for 16 hours.On ice, add one milliliter of the 5%acetic acid solution to the reaction mix in a drop-wise manner. For desalting the sample, plug a glass pipette with a small amount of glass wool. Add 1.5 milliliters of the resin suspension to the glass pipette from the top, then allow it to settle and drain.Now, wash the resin with two milliliters of 5%acetic acid and discard the flowthrough. Then, add the mucin sample to the desalting column and collect the flowthrough in a five milliliter tube. Wash the column two times with one milliliter of 5%acetic acid to collect the flowthrough.Then using a centrifugal evaporator, remove the acetic acid and concentrate the sample at five millibar and 30 degrees Celsius for two hours. Dissolve the sample in 0.5 milliliters of methanolic acetic acid, and dry it under a stream of nitrogen. Using a glass syringe, add four milliliters of DMSO to the vial containing sodium hydroxide and methanol mixture.After vortexing, centrifuge the solution at 2, 000 G for two minutes. Carefully decant the supernatant and remove the salts without disturbing the gel. After ensuring no more salts are formed, resuspend the gel in four milliliters of anhydrous DMSO to prepare the permethylation base suspension.Next, to the dried mucin sample, add anhydrous DMSO and permethylation base immediately followed by iodomethane. Incubate the permethylation reaction for 30 minutes at room temperature with vigorous shaking. Then, add 0.5 milliliters of water to terminate the reaction.After the sample turns cloudy, flush it with nitrogen until it turns clear. Load the sample onto a hydrophilic lipophilic balance 96-well extraction plate. Apply positive pressure to push the samples through the solid phase at a flow rate of approximately one milliliter per minute.After discarding the flowthrough, wash the wells two times with one milliliter of water. Elute the glycans from the plate two times with one milliliter of methanol. Apply pressure only until methanol starts exiting the plate, then allow gravity flow to maintain the required rate.Dry the sample using a centrifugal evaporator and dissolve it in 10 microliters of TA50. After mixing one microliter of sample and the matrix, load it onto a steel MALDI target plate and allow it to dry. For data analysis, load the exported ASCII file of the mass spectrum in GlycoWorkbench.After performing baseline correction, compute the peak centroids and in the pop-up window, select the appropriate mass range, minimum signal-to-noise ratio, and minimum mass spectrometry peak intensity. Then, use the Glyco-Peakfinder tool to identify the structure compositions that match the peak list. Choose perMe as the derivitization, redEnd as the reducing end, and set the minimum and maximum number of expected residues.For mucins, select Hexose, N-Acetyl-Hexosamine, Deoxy-Hexose, and N-Acetylneuraminic Acid. For sulfated glycans, use the Other residue option with a mass of 87.9. For MALDI-TOF data, set the maximum number of sodium ions and charges to one each, and set the accuracy to 0.5 Daltons.Select all correct annotations with the Control key and click on each of them. Right-click on the selected annotations and choose Add to the annotated peak list. To generate a report comparing multiple annotated spectra, go to Tools followed by Reporting and create a report comparing different profiles.Print the report as a PDF to save it. For fragmentation spectra analysis, load the spectra onto GlycoWorkbench and generate the peak list as demonstrated earlier. Draw putative glycan structures that correspond to the annotated glycan compositions.To generate fragments for each structure, right-click to select Copy fragments into canvas and choose Compute fragments under the Fragments tool. For further fragmentation analysis, click on a peak of interest in the spectrum viewer. Right-click and select Find all structures matching the peaks to query the master charge ratio of the selected peak against online databases.Select putative structures of interest and right-click to copy them to the canvas window with the appropriate option. To compute possible fragments from each glycan structure, select the structure in the canvas. Then, under tools and fragments, select compute fragments for the current structure.If fragments for more than one glycan structure have been computed, go to the Fragments table view under the Summary tab to view the comparison table. Select the fragments matching the peak list for each potential glycan structure. Right-click and choose Copy fragments to canvas from the dropdown menu.Finally, in the Tools tab, go to Profiler followed by Annotate peaks with all structures. Then select Tools, Reporting, and Create a report of the annotations. Desalting by ion exchange resulted in better recovery of larger glycans with these larger structures making up 31%of total glycans compared to 21%for PGC extraction.Among the glycan structures identified, one glycan was identified only through in the ion exchange desalted sample. Furthermore, desalting by ion exchange and borate removal led to spectra with increased signal-to-noise ratios compared to those produced after desalting by solid phase extraction with PGC. Permethylation reaction times of 30 and 90 minutes led to the identification of 33 glycan peaks, while a five-minute reaction identified only 31 peaks.

profiling-permethylated-mucin-o-glycans-using-matrix-assisted-laser

Research

JoVE Journal

Biochemistry

A rapid way is described to gain insights into the structure of polysaccharides in an extracellular matrix. The method takes advantage of the specificity of glycosylhydrolases and the sensitivity of mass spectrometry allowing minute amounts of materials to be analyzed. This technique is adaptable to be used directly on tissue itself.

OLIgo Mass Profiling (OLIMP) of Extracellular Polysaccharides

A specific and sensitive method to gain insight into the expression profile of glycosphingolipid antigens in immune organs and cells is described. The method takes advantage of the ion trap mass spectrometry allowing step-wise fragmentation of glycosphingolipid molecules for structural analysis in comparison to chemically synthesized standards.

Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Glycosphingolipid Antigens

In order to comprehensively explore the diversity of O-linked glycans, a new procedure for in-gel reductive β-elimination, combined with permethylation and a rapid phase-partition method, is applied to the analysis of O-linked glycans directly released from glycoproteins resolved by SDS-PAGE and amenable to subsequent glycomic analysis by mass spectrometry.

Improved In-gel Reductive &#946;-Elimination for Comprehensive O-linked and Sulfo-glycomics by Mass Spectrometry

This protocol describes the specific techniques used for the structural characterization of reducing end (RE) and internal region glycosyl sequence(s) of heteroxylans by tagging the RE with 2 aminobenzamide prior to enzymatic (endoxylanase) hydrolysis and then analysis of the resultant oligosaccharides using mass spectrometry (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

Sequencing of Plant Wall Heteroxylans Using Enzymic, Chemical (Methylation) and Physical (Mass Spectrometry, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) Techniques

This article presents an enhanced form of a novel bottom-up glycomics technique designed to analyze the pooled compositional profile of glycans in unfractionated biofluids through the chemical breakdown of glycans into their constituent linkage-specific monosaccharides for detection by GC-MS. Potential applications include early detection of cancer and other glycan-affective disorders.

Glycan Node Analysis: A Bottom-up Approach to Glycomics

A protocol for the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) characterization of synthetic polymers is described including the optimization of sample preparation, spectral acquisition, and data analysis.

Characterization of Synthetic Polymers via Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry

Protein Arginine (R)-methylation is a wide-spread post-translational modification regulating multiple biological pathways. Mass spectrometry is the best technology to globally profile the R-methyl-proteome, when coupled to biochemical approaches for modified peptide enrichment. The workflow designed for the high confidence identification of global R-methylation in human cells is described here.

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Approach for Global and High-Confidence Protein R-Methylation Analysis

Microarray polymer profiling (MAPP) is a high-throughput technique for compositional analysis of glycans in biological samples.

Microarray Polymer Profiling (MAPP) for High-Throughput Glycan Analysis

This protocol details the glycomics-guided glycoproteomics method, an integrated omics technology that offers comprehensive insights into the heterogeneous glycoproteome in complex tumor microenvironments required to better understand the glycobiology of cancers.

Glycomics-Guided Glycoproteomics Facilitates Comprehensive Profiling of the Glycoproteome in Complex Tumor Microenvironments

A protocol for metabolic profiling of biological samples by capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry using a sheathless porous tip interface design is presented.

Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis&#8211;Mass Spectrometry for Metabolic Profiling of Biological Samples

Learn MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for profiling permethylated mucin O-glycans using beta-elimination and bioinformatic analysis. This high-throughput method advances glycobiology research.

Profiling of Permethylated Mucin O-glycans Using Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometry

Explore More Videos