JoVE   
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Biology

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Neuroscience

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Immunology and Infection

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Clinical and Translational Medicine

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Bioengineering

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Applied Physics

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Chemistry

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Behavior

  
You do not have subscription access to articles in this section. Learn more about access.

  JoVE Environment

|   

JoVE Science Education

General Laboratory Techniques

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Basic Methods in Cellular and Molecular Biology

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms I

You do not have subscription access to videos in this collection. Learn more about access.

Model Organisms II

You have trial access to videos in this collection until May 31, 2014.

 JoVE Biology

Proboscis Extension Response (PER) Assay in Drosophila

1, 1

1Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University

Article
    Downloads Comments Metrics

    You must be subscribed to JoVE to access this content.

    This article is a part of   JoVE Biology. If you think this article would be useful for your research, please recommend JoVE to your institution's librarian.

    Recommend JoVE to Your Librarian

    Current Access Through Your IP Address

    You do not have access to any JoVE content through your current IP address.

    IP: 54.243.12.156, User IP: 54.243.12.156, User IP Hex: 921898140

    Current Access Through Your Registered Email Address

    You aren't signed into JoVE. If your institution subscribes to JoVE, please or create an account with your institutional email address to access this content.

     

    Summary

    Proboscis extension response or PER is a taste behavior assay that has been used in flies as well as in honeybees. When the proboscis makes contact with an attractive substance, the fly extends its proboscis to consume the substance. Solutions of various sugars are very attractive to the fly.

    Date Published: 4/29/2007, Issue 3; doi: 10.3791/193

    Cite this Article

    Shiraiwa, T., Carlson, J. R. Proboscis Extension Response (PER) Assay in Drosophila. J. Vis. Exp. (3), e193, doi:10.3791/193 (2007).

    Abstract

    Proboscis extension response (PER) is a taste behavior assay that has been used in flies as well as in honeybees.

    On the surface of the fly's mouth (labellum), there are hair-like structures called sensilla which houses taste neurons. When an attractive substance makes contact to the labellum, the fly extends its proboscis to consume the material. Proboscis Extension Response (PER) assay measures this taste behavior response, and it is a useful method to learn about food preferences in a single fly Solutions of various sugars, such as sucrose, glucose and fructose, are very attractive to the fly. The effect of aversive substances can also be tested as reduction of PER when mixed in a sweet solution.

    Despite the simplicity of the basic procedure, there are many things that can prevent it from working. One of the factors that requires attention is the fly's responsive state. The required starvation time to bring the fly to the proper responsive state varies drastically from 36 to 72 hours. We established a series of controls to evaluate the fly's state and which allows screening out of non-responsive or hyper-responsive individual animals. Another important factor is the impact level and the position of the contact to the labellum, which would be difficult to describe by words. This video presentation demonstrates all these together with several other improvements that would increase the reproducibility of this method.

    Protocol

    Starvation

    1. First, starve the fly.
    2. Put a small piece of Kim-wipe soaked with water in an empty vial.
    3. Transfer 20-30 well-fed flies to the empty vial.
    4. Check every 12 -24 hours to make sure the paper is moist.
    5. Starve the fly for 36-72 hours.

    Fix the fly

    1. Take one fly in an aspirator.
    2. Place a 200 µl yellow tip over the opening. Simultaneously flipping and blowing on it, you can squeeze the fly up into the yellow tip.
    3. Gently apply some air to push the fly up to a point where it cannot move.
    4. By using a razor, put a mark approximately at the fly's eye, then suck the fly back and cut off the tip.
    5. Gently blow the fly back to position, but just before reaching the very end, make a slant cut at the position where the proboscis is going to be located. You can do without this slant cut, but it would definitely make the following process easier.

    Prepare sucrose wicks

    1. Twist a 6 mm wide strip of Kimwipes® paper into a thread, and pull apart into small pieces of cone-like shaped wick (< 1 cm).
    2. These small wicks were dipped into sucrose solutions or water and presented to the proboscis by making contact.

    Prepare controls and experimental animals

    1. Before testing any tastants, give a 4% sucrose solution to the fly. This acts as a positive control. Discard any fly that did not respond.
    2. Next, test dH20 on the fly. This act as a negative control. Discard the fly if it did respond.
    3. Test these controls after testing your tastants.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Discussion

    In this presentation, we've gone through all the steps for Proboscis extension response assay. The method sounds pretty straightforward but as in many other behavior assays, many small things can prevent the assay from working. We have gone through many such steps that need careful attention. Here, I reemphasize some of the most important factors.

    One such factor is the shape of the wick. I have shown some of the very good examples, but of course, in reality everything would be a continuous spectrum between very good and very bad. In the beginning, you might be using things close to the very good side, but day-by-day your standard might start to shift bit by bit to the not-so-good range. Human perception of so called "good" can very easily shift unconsciously. One way to prevent this is to take a picture of the wick you used in your experiments, and compare all the pictures side by side. Or, at least take one picture of the wicks that worked very well, and stare at it for a while before testing PERs.

    Another important thing is the impact level of the contact. This is easier to deal with because the goal is to make the contact as gentle as possible. If you don't see the fly's head move at all, that is the best.

    The starvation condition is the toughest factor to control. In many taste or olfactory behavioral assays, a starvation time of 24 hours is used very often. 24 hours might be very convenient for people to do the experiment, but if you rear your flies in a very good condition, this is a rather short period. But even if you used a rich fly food, and control the density precisely, the window for testing PER can vary from 36 hours to 72 hours. So, as an experiment, I have to say it is very inconvenient for people. There is another factor that make it more difficult for experimenters. As a matter of fact, there would be many batches, where the window for the experiment might be very short, or might not even exist at all.

    So there are some major hurdles you have to go through, but the most important thing is the positive and negative control I mentioned. By keeping to those standard very strictly, you will be able to collect reliable data sets.

    Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.

    Disclosures

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Paul Graham for serving as a camera man in the video presentation.

    Materials

    Name Type Company Catalog Number Comments
    HDR-HC1 Camera Sony Corporation
    SMZ800 Microscope Nikon Instruments
    P-IBSS Camera Adapter Nikon Instruments
    1x DC10LN Camera Adapter Optem, Qioptiq Inc.
    257010 Camera Adapter Optem, Qioptiq Inc.
    TREKKER Mk2 Tripod BENBO
    Gorillapod SLR Tripod Joby
    iMac G5 Computer Apple
    Power Mac G5 Computer Apple
    iMovie Software Apple
    MPEG Streamclip Software SQUARED 5

    References

    1. Dethier, V. G. The Hungry Fly (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1976).

    Comments

    2 Comments

     Comments about the starvation protocol. I am currently performing research on fly appetitive learning and test fly sugar response as a control with an assay similar to the one described in Kim et al. (J Neurosci. ²007 Jul 18;²7(²9):7640-7.) In my experiments flies are starved for ²1h before conditioning at ²5°C. In my experience, the temperature during starvation is of huge importance: In preliminary experiments, I got similar sugar responses for flies starved for 7h at ²5° and ²4h at 18°. So information about the temperature during starvation is highly welcomed. The density of flies during starvation also appeared critical. Using bigger tubes, I did another quick experiment transferring 40 or 80 flies in my tubes for starvation. One day after, the majority of the flies were dead while kept in groups of 80, while no death was seen in the tubes of 40 flies. So maybe a difference from ²0 to 30 flies in the vials might have big influence.
    Reply

    Posted by: AnonymousNovember 10, 2008, 8:05 AM

    I am very interested in the drosophila probosics extension response assay, and want to know more about this assay methods. Thank you.
    Reply

    Posted by: AnonymousNovember 20, 2011, 12:46 PM

    Post a Question / Comment / Request

    You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

    Metrics

    Waiting
    simple hit counter