Back to chapter

4.7:

Nonconscious Mimicry

JoVE Core
Social Psychology
This content is Free Access.
JoVE Core Social Psychology
Nonconscious Mimicry

Languages

Share

Like chameleons, people blend in with their social environments. Without intention, individuals, as well as other social species, can alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby. This phenomenon is known as nonconscious mimicry.

In this case, the imitations occurred automatically, without a direct personal connection or awareness. These “automatic” behaviors do not demand the same level of cognitive processing as mindful thinking does. Synchrony is a way to respond and fit into the social world, involuntarily.

Thankfully, not all behaviors are copied. In general, human imitation is selective and related to actions that are more relevant to the perceiver’s current state. For example, while running, the woman may more easily display the positive facial expressions and body postures of her confident running partner.

Such instances of empathic mimicry are why people’s moods may appear linked—simply by observing happy people, the delightful mood becomes contagious.

4.7:

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.

The concept of nonconscious mimicry is not a new one. How often do you find yourself mimicking someone’s behavior or speech, or even beginning to like the same things that they do? Such actions relate to forming affiliation and fitting in within social situations. Here, this phenomenon will be explored from various aspects to understand how nonconscious mimicry is utilized and impacts us on a daily basis.

Rapport and Liking

What makes nonconscious mimicry more likely to occur? One possibility is rapport and liking. For instance, rapport between two people has been directly linked to increases in mimicry behavior (Bavelas et al., 1986), while mimicry has also been linked to increasing rapport itself. Chartrand and Bargh (1999) were able to demonstrate this behavior: Participants expressed liking the person that they mimicked more. Thus, mimicry is more prominent in relationships where the individuals are looking to build rapport or have a high “like” for the individual.

Using Mimicry to Our Advantage

Now, can mimicry be used to our advantage to achieve certain goals? Goals activate behavioral strategies and actions to pursue such goals (Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2000). As a result, Lakin and Chartrand hypothesized that individuals will mimic another person more when they have a goal to affiliate than when they do not (Lakin & Chartrand, 2003). This Scientists-in Action video demonstrates their experiment.

Briefly, they demonstrated that having an affiliation goal increased nonconscious mimicry, like face-touching, compared to those in the no-goal condition. Such findings support the concept that fitting in and relating to individuals matter in social situations (Larkin & Chartrand, 2003). Thus, nonconscious mimicry can be used as a strategy to achieving a goal, even without awareness.

How Does Nonconscious Mimicry Apply to Everyday Activities?

Imagine you are going in for an interview. Immediately, you notice that your interviewer is very animated in both their facial expressions and mannerisms. You naturally start to increase their mannerisms to relate to the interviewer and build rapport.

Or, perhaps you come home after a long day of work. You are excited that it’s Friday, giving you the weekend to relax. Instantly, you notice that your roommate is in a bad mood and sulking about. Unconsciously, your mood begins to change and becomes more negative due to your roommate’s attitude. In this case, you are shifting your disposition to meet that of your roommate’s in order to feel more connected.

Either negatively or positively, nonconscious mimicry can occur to build rapport. Whether you’d like to relate to an interviewer to get a job or your mood dips to match a friend, such flexibility allows individuals to fit in to a variety of situations.

Suggested Reading

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53-63.

Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Lemery, C.R., & Mullet, J. (1986). “I show you how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50. 322-329.

Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.

Lakin, J., & Chartrand, T. (2003). Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport. Psychological Science, 14(4), 334-339. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40063804

Madsen, E.A., & Persson, T. (2013). Contagious yawning in domestic dog puppies (Canis lupus familiaris): the effect of ontogeny and emotional closeness on low-level imitation in dogs. Anim. Cogn. 16, 233–240. 

Romero, T., Konno, A., & Hasegawa, T. (2013). Familiarity bias and physiological responses in contagious yawning by dogs support link to empathy. PLoS ONE 8, e71365.